RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Difficulties with social functioning are common among survivors of pediatric brain tumors. Social participation is an understudied measure of social functioning that is associated with emotional health across the lifespan. This paper uses a diary method to assess the social participation of survivors of pediatric brain tumors in middle childhood. PROCEDURE: Survivors of pediatric brain tumors (N = 47; age 10.6 ± 1.4 years; 51.1% male, 89.4% White) who were 5.3 (SD = 2.4, range: 2-9.9) years post therapy completed a daily diary assessment of social interaction (5-7 days) and an objective measure of facial affect recognition. The participant's caregiver completed the NIH Toolbox Emotion Measures and a background information questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, frequency and quality of reported social interactions were low for survivors, with a large subset of survivors (n = 16, 34%) endorsing fewer than 10 social interactions over the course of a typical school week, and almost half of parents (48.9%) reporting that their child participates in zero social activities outside of school during a typical week. Participants engaged in more positive social participation exhibited stronger social skills (facial affect recognition (F(2,44) = 4.85, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: School-aged survivors of pediatric brain tumors seemed to be infrequently engaged in social participation and quality interaction with peers. More specifically, the interactions most commonly reported on the diary assessment are not indicative of friendship development and maintenance. Survivors of pediatric brain tumors would likely benefit from interventions designed to increase quality time spent with peers.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Participación Social , Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Femenino , Neoplasias Encefálicas/psicología , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Ajuste Social , Instituciones AcadémicasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Infancy/toddlerhood is a period of rapid development. All infants/toddlers (0-36 months-of-age) undergoing cancer-directed treatment at one hospital are offered developmental assessments and related services. Yet, literature comparing development of infants/toddlers with brain tumors to those with non-CNS solid tumors is sparse. DESIGN AND METHODS: Developmental assessment data were abstracted from electronic health records of infants/toddlers undergoing treatment for a brain tumor (n = 36; mean age = 21.83 ± 9.96 months) or a solid tumor (n = 40; mean age = 17.35 ± 8.50). Z-scores compared obtained data with age expectations. Chi-square analyses assessed whether a greater proportion of participants scored within the clinical range than normative expectations. Multivariate analysis of variance and chi-square analyses compared developmental outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Compared with age expectations, the overall group demonstrated significantly less well-developed skills. Infants/toddlers with solid tumors demonstrated clinical deficits at rates higher than expected for most domains; the rate of impairment for the solid tumor group did not differ significantly from that of the brain tumor group across most subtests. CONCLUSIONS: Like young patients with brain tumors, the developmental functioning of infants/toddlers with solid tumors should be studied across time to determine the trajectory of functioning for these young patients and to inform future developmental intervention studies. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Infants/toddlers with a malignant solid tumor may be at increased risk for delayed development. These very young patients would likely benefit from developmental assessment, early intervention services during and after treatment, and ongoing monitoring of development across time.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Humanos , Lactante , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Recién Nacido , Desarrollo Infantil , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/etiología , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome (OMAS) is a rare autoimmune disorder of the nervous system presenting with abnormal eye and limb movements, altered gait, and increased irritability. Two to four percent of children diagnosed with neuroblastoma have neuroblastoma-associated OMAS (NA-OMAS). These children typically present with non-high-risk neuroblastoma that is cured with surgery, with or without chemotherapy. Despite excellent overall survival, patients with NA-OMAS can have significant persistent neurological and developmental issues. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe long-term neurocognitive and adaptive functioning of patients with NA-OMAS treated with multimodal therapy, including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) on Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocol ANBL00P3. METHODS: Of 53 children enrolled on ANBL00P3, 25 submitted evaluable neurocognitive data at diagnosis and at least one additional time point within 2 years and were included in the analyses. Adaptive development was assessed via the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, and validated, age-appropriate measures of intellectual function were also administered. RESULTS: Twenty-one of the 25 patients in this cohort ultimately received IVIG. Descriptive spaghetti plots suggest that this cohort demonstrated stable long-term cognitive functioning and adaptive development over time. This cohort also demonstrated decreased OMAS scores over time consistent with improved OMAS symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: While statistical significance is limited by small sample size and loss to follow-up over 10 years, findings suggest stable long-term cognitive and adaptive functioning over time in this treated cohort.
Asunto(s)
Neuroblastoma , Síndrome de Opsoclonía-Mioclonía , Humanos , Síndrome de Opsoclonía-Mioclonía/terapia , Síndrome de Opsoclonía-Mioclonía/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Neuroblastoma/complicaciones , Neuroblastoma/terapia , Neuroblastoma/mortalidad , Preescolar , Niño , Lactante , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adolescente , Terapia Combinada , Pronóstico , Adaptación Psicológica , Cognición , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Survivors of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors are at risk for neurocognitive and social difficulties throughout childhood. This study characterized social cognition (perception and reasoning from social cues) and adjustment in adulthood. METHODS: A total of 81 adult survivors of pediatric CNS tumors (51% female; mean [SD] age, 28.0 [5.8] years), were recruited across four groups: (1) no radiation therapy (RT) [n = 21], (2) infratentorial (IT) tumors + focal RT [n = 20], (3) IT tumors + craniospinal irradiation [n = 20], and (4) supratentorial tumors + focal RT [n = 20]. Prevalence of social cognitive and adjustment impairments was compared to test norms. Multivariable models examined clinical and neurocognitive predictors of social cognition and its impact on functional outcomes. RESULTS: Survivors demonstrated elevated risk of severe social cognitive impairments (social perception Morbidity Ratio [95% CI] 5.70 [3.46-9.20]), but self-reported few social adjustment problems. Survivors of IT tumors treated with craniospinal irradiation performed nearly 1 SD worse than survivors treated without RT on multiple measures of social cognition (e.g., social perception: ß = -0.89, p = .004). Impaired executive functioning and nonverbal reasoning were associated with worse social cognitive performance (e.g., social perception: ß = -0.75, p < .001; ß = -0.84, p < .001, respectively). Better social perception was associated with higher odds of attaining full-time employment (odds ratio, 1.52 [1.17-1.97]) and at least some college education (odds ratio, 1.39 [1.11-1.74]). CONCLUSIONS: Adult survivors of CNS tumors are at elevated risk of severely impaired social cognition, but do not perceive social adjustment difficulties. Better understanding of potential mechanisms underlying social cognitive deficits may inform intervention targets to promote better functional outcomes for at-risk survivors.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central , Trastornos del Conocimiento , Niño , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Cognición Social , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/radioterapia , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/epidemiología , Sobrevivientes , Ajuste Social , Trastornos del Conocimiento/epidemiología , Cognición/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is limited understanding of associations between a combination of health behaviors (physical activity, sedentary/screen-time, diet) and cardiometabolic health risk factors, physical performance, and emotional health among young (<18) childhood cancer survivors (CCS). The aims of this research were to address this gap by 1) deriving health behavior adherence profiles among CCS, and 2) examining associations among demographic, diagnosis and/or treatment exposures, cardiometabolic, physical performance, and emotional functioning with health behavior profile membership. METHODS: Participants included 397 CCS (≥5 years post-diagnosis; 10-17 years old) enrolled in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study who completed physical health evaluations and questionnaires assessing health behaviors and psychological functioning. Latent profile analysis was used to derive profiles of health behavior adherence. Logistic regression and t-tests were used to examine mean-level differences and associations between profile membership with demographic, diagnosis, treatment exposures, cardiometabolic health, psychological functioning, and physical performance. RESULTS: Two profiles emerged: inactive-unhealthy-diet ("IU") and active-sedentary-unhealthy-diet ("ASU") to guidelines. More participants in IU demonstrated higher resting heart rate (mean [M], 76.54; SD = 12.00) and lower motor proficiency scores (M = 34.73; SD = 29.15) compared to ASU (resting heart rate, M = 71.95, SD = 10.74; motor proficiency, M = 50.40, SD = 31.02). CONCLUSIONS: CCS exhibited low adherence to multiple health behavior guidelines, with adherence patterns differentially associated with cardiometabolic health (i.e., resting heart rate) and physical performance. However, robust protection against all health variables was not observed. Findings suggest interventions designed to improve health outcomes should target multiple health behaviors simultaneously. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Pediatric cancer survivors are at-risk for detrimental health outcomes associated with cancer and treatment. Engagement in healthy lifestyle behaviors serves to reduce health vulnerabilities among adult survivors but less is known about associations with lifestyle behaviors on young survivors. This study documents patterns of lifestyle behaviors among survivors of pediatric cancer, factors that increase susceptibility to nonadherence, and associations among lifestyle behaviors and health indicators.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/psicología , Sobrevivientes , Conductas Relacionadas con la SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Retinoblastoma is the most common intraocular childhood cancer and is typically diagnosed in young children. With increasing number of survivors and improved medical outcomes, long-term psychosocial impacts need to be explored. Thus, the current study sought to assess functioning in school-aged survivors of retinoblastoma. PROCEDURE: Sixty-nine survivors of retinoblastoma underwent a one-time evaluation of psychosocial functioning. Survivors (Mage = 10.89 years, SD = 1.07 years; 49.3% male; 56.5% unilateral disease) and parents completed measures of quality of life (QoL; PedsQL) and emotional, behavioral, and social functioning (PROMIS [patient-reported outcome measurement information system] Pediatric Profile, BASC-2 parent report). Demographic and medical variables were also obtained. RESULTS: On the whole, both survivors and caregivers indicated QoL and behavioral and emotional health within the typical range of functioning. Survivors reported better physical QoL compared to both parent report and a national healthy comparison sample, whereas caregivers reported that survivors experienced lower social, school, and physical QoL than a healthy comparison. Regarding behavioral and emotional health, survivors indicated more anxiety than a nationally representative sample. Parents of female survivors endorsed lower adaptive scores than parents of male survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated that survivors of retinoblastoma reported QoL and behavioral and emotional health within normal limits, although parents appear to perceive greater impairment across several assessed domains. Understanding both survivor and parent reports remains important for this population. Future research should explore psychosocial functioning of these survivors as they transition to adolescence and early adulthood, given the increased independence and behavioral and emotional concerns during these developmental periods.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Retina , Retinoblastoma , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Femenino , Preescolar , Adulto , Retinoblastoma/terapia , Retinoblastoma/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Estado de Salud , Neoplasias de la Retina/psicología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Cancer disrupts the social lives of adolescents and young adults (AYA). Social media may be a resource to engage with social networks, seek entertainment, and receive social support. However, some aspects of social media engagement may be emotionally burdensome and sensitive for AYA to navigate. The aim of this qualitative study was to contextualize the impact of cancer on AYA social media interaction. METHODS: Eight AYA ages 15-21 years and recently diagnosed with cancer participated in a semi-structured interview. AYA were asked about their social media interactions, engagement habits, and online cancer-related disclosure. Interviews averaged 36 min in length and were de-identified and transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four salient themes emerged from the data: (1) AYA engage in active and passive social media use depending on the platform, (2) AYA social media habits change due to treatment experiences, (3) AYA evaluate and protect their self-image, privacy, and time, and (4) AYA access social support online and interpret its meaning in different ways. AYA reported using social media, but many altered their frequency and type of interaction after diagnosis. Some were comfortable sharing about cancer and continued to interact actively online; others felt protective and vulnerable, transitioning to media consumption, or withdrawing from use. While social media provided space to receive direct and indirect social support, AYA interpreted the meaning of support in complex ways. CONCLUSIONS: Social media may serve a variety of socio-emotional needs, but not all AYA will benefit from the same types of social media interaction. This study highlights the importance of talking to AYA with cancer about their social media interactions during treatment to better support their coping and adjustment.
RESUMEN
Socialization with peers is essential for development yet reduced when children and adolescents are undergoing cancer treatment. Providing opportunity for social experiences is a key role for providers working in the pediatric oncology setting. Traditional in-person socialization activities were significantly impacted by coronavirus disease-2019 restrictions, and psychosocial providers were forced to adapt their practice. This case series illustrates four unique scenarios that highlight virtual social interactions as both feasible and beneficial. While virtual socialization groups were intended to be temporary, the experiences described suggest that ongoing video-based options for some socialization activities are likely prudent for some pediatric populations.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Socialización , Pandemias , Grupo Paritario , Neoplasias/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Psychosocial late effects among survivors of pediatric brain tumors are common. For school-aged survivors, social skills deficits and isolation present a particular challenge. Social problem-solving is a social skill that is an important determinant of social outcomes and may yield a potential target for intervention. METHODS: School-aged youth (N = 65) 8-12 years of age (10.59 ± 1.36 years; 55.4% female, 86.2% white) who were 5.23 (SD = 2.44, range 2-10.9) years post-treatment for a brain tumor completed the Attributions and Coping Questionnaire, a measure of social problem-solving that uses vignettes to assess attribution of intent, subsequent emotional response, and imagined behavioral response to an interpersonal problem. Youth also completed self-reports of social functioning (PROMIS Peer Relationships, Self-Perception Profile). A caregiver completed additional measures of child social functioning (NIH Toolbox-Emotion Measures). RESULTS: Survivors attributed unpleasant situations to accidental causes (neutral attribution) and responded in ways that prioritized the friendship (appeasement) or relied on adult intervention. Self-reported social functioning was higher among those who were less likely to avoid challenging social problem-solving situations. CONCLUSIONS: Findings identified characteristic social problem-solving approaches among survivors, including a tendency to attribute ambiguous situations to accidental causes and to request adult assistance and/or maintain social relationships. This may indicate a possible avenue for intervention, with a focus on increasing survivors' understanding of the causes of potentially negative peer interactions and reducing their reliance on adults.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Sobrevivientes , Adaptación Psicológica , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/psicología , Cuidadores/psicología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Solución de Problemas , Sobrevivientes/psicologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To characterize academic and adaptive skill outcomes in survivors of high-risk B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR B-ALL). METHODS: Participants were 178 patients enrolled on a nontherapeutic clinical trial that aimed to characterize neurocognitive and functional outcomes (ie, academic achievement and adaptive skills) following treatment for childhood HR B-ALL. Eligible patients were treated on Children's Oncology Group AALL0232 clinical trial that included two treatment randomizations: methotrexate delivery (high or escalating dose) and corticosteroid (dexamethasone or prednisone). Academic achievement and adaptive skills were evaluated at one time point, 8-24 months after completing treatment. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression showed no significant association between treatment variables and outcomes after accounting for age at diagnosis, sex, and insurance status. In multivariable analyses accounting for sex and insurance status, survivors <10 years old at diagnosis had significantly lower scores in Math (P = .02). In multivariable analyses accounting for sex and age at diagnosis, scores for children with US public health insurance were significantly lower than those with US private or military insurance across all academic and adaptive skills (all P-values ≤.04). Results from univariate analyses showed that boys had significantly lower scores than girls across all adaptive skill domains (all P-values ≤.04). CONCLUSION: Regardless of treatment randomization, survivors of HR B-ALL <10 years at diagnosis are at risk for deficits in Math and overall adaptive functioning; overall adaptive skills for boys were significantly poorer. Screening and early intervention for patients at highest risk, particularly young patients and lower resourced families, should be prioritized.
Asunto(s)
Éxito Académico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Adaptación Psicológica , Adolescente , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/epidemiología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/psicología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: One of the peak incidences of childhood cancer is during the early childhood years. This is also an important time for psychosocial and personality development, and it is well known that early childhood temperament influences later psychosocial functioning. However, this association has not been examined in young children with cancer. METHODS: Parents of children with cancer (N = 39) and healthy comparisons (N = 35) completed an indicator of temperament (Children's Behavior Questionnaire) when children were young (Mage=4.99 ± 1.05 years). Five years later, parents and youth completed measures of psychosocial functioning (Mage=10.15 ± 1.10 years; Behavior Assessment Scale for Children, 2nd edition and Social Emotional Assets and Resilience Scale). RESULTS: Parents of healthy comparisons reported that their children demonstrated greater surgency than youth with cancer; there were no differences in negative affect or effortful control. Children with cancer and healthy comparisons were rated similarly on measures of psychosocial functioning. Health status was not a significant predictor of later functioning, but socioeconomic status and temperament were. The influence of temperament was stronger for strengths-based functioning (e.g., social competence, adaptive functioning) versus distress (internalizing and externalizing problems). CONCLUSIONS: Early childhood temperament is a strong predictor of later psychosocial functioning, regardless of health status. Findings highlight the need to consider temperament in the clinical assessment of psychosocial functioning in children with cancer. Additional research is needed to specifically assess how a diagnosis of cancer in early childhood influences temperament over time.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Temperamento , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Emociones , Humanos , Padres , Ajuste SocialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The preschool years (ages 4-6) are essential for the development of social-emotional skills, such as problem solving, emotion regulation, and conflict resolution. For children with cancer treated during this period, especially those with brain tumors, there are questions regarding the consequences of missed normative social experiences. The objective of this pilot study was to explore the social-emotional functioning of young children with brain tumors, as compared to those with non-CNS solid tumors, who have recently completed treatment. METHODS: Children with brain (n = 23) or solid tumors (n = 20) 4-6 years of age (5.42 ± 0.73 years; 60.5% male, 65.1% white) who were 8.21 (SD = 2.42) months post-treatment completed objective measures (Challenging Situations Task, NEPSY-II) of social functioning while a caregiver completed questionnaires (e.g., BASC-3, NIH Toolbox Emotion Measures). RESULTS: A large portion of the sample (brain tumor: 65.2%, solid tumor: 44.4%) fell in the clinical range on parent-report measures of peer interaction. There were no statistically significant differences between patient groups across measures, but effect sizes suggest youth with brain tumors potentially experienced more difficulties on some indices. All children were more likely to choose prosocial responses when presented with a challenging social situation where they were physically provoked (e.g., hit) versus socially provoked (e.g., left out). CONCLUSIONS: Preschool-aged children with cancer may experience weaknesses in social functioning shortly after treatment, with youth with brain tumors potentially demonstrating greater concerns. Emphasizing social interaction is critical to ensure young children have the opportunity to develop critical social-emotional skills.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Emociones , Adolescente , Encéfalo , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Ajuste SocialRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There is a growing population of childhood cancer survivors at risk for adverse outcomes, including sexual dysfunction. AIM: To estimate the prevalence of and risk factors for sexual dysfunction among adult female survivors of childhood cancer and evaluate associations between dysfunction and psychological symptoms/quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Female survivors (N = 936, mean 7.8 ± 5.6 years at diagnosis; 31 ± 7.8 years at evaluation) and noncancer controls (N = 122) participating in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study completed clinical evaluations, Sexual Functioning Questionnaires (SFQ), and Medical Outcomes Survey Short Forms 36 (SF-36). Linear models compared SFQ scores between sexually active survivors (N = 712) and controls; survivors with scores <10th percentile of controls were classified with sexual dysfunction. Logistic regression evaluated associations between survivor characteristics and sexual dysfunction, and between sexual dysfunction and QOL. OUTCOMES: Sexual dysfunction was defined by scores <10th percentile of noncancer controls on the SFQ overall, as well as the domains of arousal, interest, orgasm, and physical problems, while QOL was measured by scores on the SF-36 with both physical and mental summary scales. RESULTS: Sexual dysfunction was prevalent among 19.9% (95% CI 17.1, 23.1) of survivors. Those diagnosed with germ cell tumors (OR = 8.82, 95% CI 3.17, 24.50), renal tumors (OR = 4.49, 95% CI 1.89, 10.67), or leukemia (OR = 3.09, 95% CI 1.50, 6.38) were at greater risk compared to controls. Age at follow-up (45-54 vs 18-24 years; OR = 5.72, 95% CI 1.87, 17.49), pelvic surgery (OR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.18, 3.50), and depression (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.10, 3.51) were associated with sexual dysfunction. Hypogonadism receiving hormone replacement (vs nonmenopausal/nonhypogonadal; OR = 3.31, 95% CI 1.53, 7.15) represented an additional risk factor in the physical problems (eg, vaginal pain and dryness) subscale. Survivors with sexual dysfunction, compared to those without sexual dysfunction, were more likely to score <40 on the physical (21.1% vs 12.7%, P = .01) and mental health (36.5% vs 18.2%, P < .01) summary scales of the SF-36. Only 2.9% of survivors with sexual dysfunction reported receiving intervention. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Health care providers should be aware of the increased risk of sexual dysfunction in this growing population, inquire about symptomology, and refer for appropriate intervention. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths of this study include the use of a validated tool for evaluating sexual function in a large population of clinically assessed female childhood cancer survivors. Limitations include potential for selection bias, and lack of clinically confirmed dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Sexual dysfunction is prevalent among female childhood cancer survivors and few survivors receive intervention; further research is needed to determine if those with sexual dysfunction would benefit from targeted interventions. Bjornard KL, Howell CR, Klosky JL, et al. Psychosexual Functioning of Female Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Report From the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. J Sex Med 2020;17:1981-1994.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas , Adulto , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/etiología , SobrevivientesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Social interaction and peer relationships are critical for development, especially for adolescents and young adults (AYA). Cancer treatment may disrupt social functioning and impact quality of life. Prior research into AYA social functioning has primarily been qualitative in nature or assessed via broad measures of functioning. Given the multi-dimensional nature of social functioning, and its importance for AYA, a person-centered approach to analyses is needed. METHODS: AYA survivors of childhood cancer, ages 13 to 23 (n = 192, 51% male) and at least 1 year post-treatment (M = 7.35 ± 4.18 years post), completed measures to assess perceived social functioning, social support, and positive and negative affect. Caregivers also completed a measure of social functioning. Latent profile analysis was used to empirically derive profiles of perceived social functioning using the self-perception profile for adolescents (SPPA). RESULTS: A 3-class solution provided the best fit to the data: 58.9% average, 33.7% high, and 7.5% low functioning. The average group reported mean scores that were similar to normative values available in the SPPA manual. Demographic and medical factors were unrelated to class membership. Social support and positive/negative affect differed significantly by class; caregiver-report of social functioning did not. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the majority of AYA survivors of childhood cancer are doing well socially, with perceived adequate social functioning associated with both high levels of social support as well as greater perceptions of positive affect. Future work is needed to elucidate longitudinal trajectories of social functioning, as well as to identify and intervene with those survivors who are struggling.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Ajuste Social , Interacción Social , Adaptación Psicológica , Adolescente , Cuidadores/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/psicología , Apoyo Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this research was to examine patterns of parent-child relationship functioning among pediatric cancer survivors and their caregivers across a variety of relationship indicators (ie, Involvement, Attachment, Communication, Parenting Confidence, and Relational Frustration), and evaluate how these factors relate to psychosocial outcomes in survivors. METHODS: Young survivors aged 10 to 18 and their caregivers (N = 165) completed measures related to posttraumatic stress and general distress. Caregivers also completed assessments of parent-child relationship functioning, and survivors completed assessments of social functioning. Latent profile analysis was performed to identify patterns of relationship functioning. Medical, demographic, and parent functioning variables were examined as predictors, and youth's psychological and social functioning were examined as outcomes. RESULTS: A three-class solution was the best fit to the data. The struggling parent-child relationship profile (15%) evidenced below average levels of parent-child relationship functioning across several domains. The normative parent-child relationship (60%), was characterized by average levels of parent-child relationship functioning across all domains. Finally, the high-involved parent-child relationship profile (25%) demonstrated above average levels of parent-child relationship functioning in involved activities, communication, and attachment and normative levels of functioning across all other domains. Medical and parent functioning factors predicted profile membership. In turn, profile membership was associated with survivor psychological and social outcomes. CONCLUSION: Findings document the importance of extending existing research to examine patterns of parent-child relationship functioning, which may serve as a clinically relevant target to improve psychological and social outcomes in young survivors of childhood cancer.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Cuidadores/psicología , Neoplasias/psicología , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Responsabilidad Parental/psicología , Resiliencia Psicológica , Adaptación Psicológica , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Comunicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Padres/psicología , Ajuste Social , Estrés Psicológico/psicologíaRESUMEN
Many children with cancer are diagnosed during infancy and toddlerhood (< 3 years of age), potentially resulting in disrupted and/or missed developmental opportunities. Our objective was to describe the functioning of infants and toddlers with cancer who were clinically referred for evaluation at a hospital-based psychology clinic. Data from 29 very young children with cancer (Mage = 23.62 ± 6.6 months; 55.2% male) who completed clinically referred assessments from 2010 to 2015 were abstracted. Children were 11.3 months post-diagnosis (SD = 7.77, range 1-29 months) with just over half off-therapy at the time of assessment (55.2%). Overall, developmental functioning was significantly below expectations [t(22) = - 8.99, p < .001]. Adaptive functioning [t(25) = - 6.41, p < .001] was also significantly below expectations. Infants and toddlers with cancer appear to be at significant risk for weaknesses in early cognitive and adaptive functioning. The margin of deficits found in this study warrant the need for further investigation and consideration of this young population to ensure optimal functional development.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento/complicaciones , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/complicaciones , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Preescolar , Cognición , Trastornos del Conocimiento/psicología , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Neoplasias/psicología , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The most commonly occurring childhood cancers are diagnosed during the preschool years; yet limited psycho-oncology research has focused on this developmental time period. The primary objective was to examine rates of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in young children with cancer and compare these findings with those of children without a history of serious illness (comparisons). The secondary aim was to examine risk and modifiable factors associated with PTSS. METHOD: Ninety-seven caregivers of patients (n = 50) and comparisons (n = 47) aged three to six years completed diagnostic interviews for the assessment of PTSD. They also completed a survey measure of PTSS adapted from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL-PTSD), along with measures of their child's temperament and their own current psychological functioning. RESULTS: On the CBCL-PTSD, no differences in PTSS were observed between children with cancer and comparisons, although many in both groups appeared at risk, with approximately 34% of children with cancer and 27% of comparisons meeting threshold scores for probable PTSD. However, using a "gold-standard" clinical-interview assessment, only three children in the patient group and no children in the comparison group met diagnostic criteria for PTSD. Parental distress and child temperament were significantly associated with PTSS scores. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate PTSD is relatively infrequent in children with cancer, and survey measures may overestimate rates of PTSD in young children. However, other emotional or behavioral issues may be present. Ultimately, screening for potential emotional/behavioral concerns in young children with cancer is indicated, and interventions should continue to target caregiver distress.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/psicología , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Psicología Infantil , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tennessee/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Children with brain tumors (BT) are at risk for difficulties with social functioning. Research to date has focused on deficits, with no studies identifying areas of strength or resilience. Our objective was to assess the potential influence of connectedness on social functioning in youth with BT as compared with children with other cancers. METHODS: Children with cancer (20 with BT, 33 with other diagnoses) were enrolled on a longitudinal study of psychosocial functioning. The current study included measures from time 2 (+1 year after enrollment; Mage = 13.11 ± 2.31, Mtimesincediagnosis = 4.95 ± 3.74 years) and time 3 (+3 years after enrollment; Mage = 14.98 ± 2.36, Mtimesincediagnosis = 6.82 ± 3.81 years). Youth completed the Hemingway Measure of Adolescent Connectedness (HMAC) at time 2. Two years later, social functioning was assessed by the self- and proxy-report versions of the Social-Emotional Assets and Resilience Scale (SEARS). RESULTS: Youth with BT perceived that they were less connected to friends (t(50) = -2.13, P = 0.04), but similarly connected to peers as youth with other cancers. Youth with BT also demonstrated lower social functioning by self- and parent report. Connectedness to friends significantly mediated the relationship between diagnostic category and self-reported social functioning, such that youth with BT who reported being more connected to friends also indicated greater social functioning. Analyses using connectedness to peers and/or parent-reported social functioning were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Perceiving a connection to a friend may be a protective factor that could mitigate deficits in social functioning in youth with BT. Additional research is needed to further assess the potential benefits of this construct.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/psicología , Emociones/fisiología , Autoinforme , Identificación Social , Apoyo Social , Adolescente , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Grupo Paritario , Pronóstico , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Youth with brain tumors are at risk for late effects. Families report that survivors' difficulties with peer relationships are among the most distressing and impactful on quality of life. As such, interventions have been designed to improve social functioning. The objective was to review the nine published social skills intervention studies for survivors of brain tumors with regard to study design, participation rates, skills targeted, assessment measures, and outcomes. Results of this review were used to discuss future directions, with a focus on alternative approaches to inclusion criteria (including developmental considerations and screening for weaknesses), intervention timing and modality.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Conductista/métodos , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Ajuste Social , Habilidades Sociales , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
Young children (<3 years) with cancer are at risk for delays in development due to their disease and its required treatments and restrictions. In the United States, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act describes a system of early intervention (EI) services for young children with delays or the potential for delays in development. Children with cancer may be eligible for EI but are rarely referred. Our objectives are to describe the critical impact of early childhood development on long-term outcomes, review current considerations for EI, and advocate for the referral to EI for young children with cancer.