Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 104(9): 759-766, 2022 05 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35286282

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications and substantial loss of physical function are common after musculoskeletal trauma. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of conditionally essential amino acid (CEAA) supplementation on complications and skeletal muscle mass in adults after operative fixation of acute fractures. METHODS: Adults who sustained pelvic and extremity fractures that were indicated for operative fixation at a level-I trauma center were enrolled. The subjects were stratified based on injury characteristics (open fractures and/or polytrauma, fragility fractures, isolated injuries) and randomized to standard nutrition (control group) or oral CEAA supplementation twice daily for 2 weeks. Body composition (fat-free mass [FFM]) was measured at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Complications were prospectively collected. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. The relative risk (RR) of complications for the control group relative to the CEAA group was determined, and linear mixed-effects models were used to model the relationship between CEAA supplementation and changes in FFM. RESULTS: Four hundred subjects (control group: 200; CEAA group: 200) were enrolled. The CEAA group had significantly lower overall complications than the control group (30.5% vs. 43.8%; adjusted RR = 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55 to 0.92; p = 0.008). The FFM decreased significantly at 6 weeks in the control subjects (-0.9 kg, p = 0.0205), whereas the FFM was maintained at 6 weeks in the CEAA subjects (-0.33 kg, p = 0.3606). This difference in FFM was not seen at subsequent time points. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that CEAA supplementation has a protective effect against common complications and early skeletal muscle wasting after operative fixation of extremity and pelvic fractures. Given the potential benefits of this inexpensive, low-risk intervention, multicenter prospective studies in focused trauma populations are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fijación de Fractura , Fracturas Óseas , Adulto , Aminoácidos Esenciales , Suplementos Dietéticos , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Músculos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 35(7): e223-e227, 2021 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33208714

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine if inclusion of an olecranon osteotomy to the posterior paratricipital approach for operative fixation of distal humerus fractures significantly affects surgical complication rates (OTA/AO 13). DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred four patients underwent open reduction internal fixation of a distal humerus fracture between 2007 and 2017. Of those, 134 met inclusion criteria (≥15 years, OTA/AO fracture type 13A, B, or C, and posterior surgical approach) for the study (n = 64 with olecranon osteotomy; n = 70 without olecranon osteotomy). INTERVENTION: Open reduction internal fixation of distal humerus fractures performed using a posterior paratricipital approach with or without olecranon osteotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ulnar neuropathy (UN), fracture site bony nonunion, and surgical site infection (SSI). RESULTS: Thirty-one (33.3%) who underwent the paratricipital approach without olecranon osteotomy, and 15 patients (26.8%) who underwent olecranon osteotomy reported postoperative UN with no significant difference between approaches (P = 0.438). There was no significant difference in rates of SSI (P = 0.418) or fracture site nonunion (P = 0.263) when comparing the approaches. Subjects with Charlson comorbidity index ≥2 were more likely to not undergo an olecranon osteotomy (P = 0.01), whereas subjects with more complex fractures by OTA/AO classification were more likely to have an olecranon osteotomy approach (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of an olecranon osteotomy with the paratricipital approach for fixation of distal humerus fractures does not result in higher rates of UN, fracture site nonunion, or SSI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Articulación del Codo , Fracturas del Húmero , Olécranon , Estudios de Cohortes , Articulación del Codo/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Fracturas del Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Húmero , Olécranon/diagnóstico por imagen , Olécranon/cirugía , Osteotomía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA