MRIO: the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition and Analysis Ontology.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain is a useful tool in both the clinic and research settings, aiding in the diagnosis and treatments of neurological disease and expanding our knowledge of the brain. However, there are many challenges inherent in managing and analyzing MRI data, due in large part to the heterogeneity of data acquisition. To address this, we have developed MRIO, the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition and Analysis Ontology. MRIO provides well-reasoned classes and logical axioms for the acquisition of several MRI acquisition types and well-known, peer-reviewed analysis software, facilitating the use of MRI data. These classes provide a common language for the neuroimaging research process and help standardize the organization and analysis of MRI data for reproducible datasets. We also provide queries for automated assignment of analyses for given MRI types. MRIO aids researchers in managing neuroimaging studies by helping organize and annotate MRI data and integrating with existing standards such as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine and the Brain Imaging Data Structure, enhancing reproducibility and interoperability. MRIO was constructed according to Open Biomedical Ontologies Foundry principles and has contributed several classes to the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations to help bridge neuroimaging data to other domains. MRIO addresses the need for a "common language" for MRI that can help manage the neuroimaging research, by enabling researchers to identify appropriate analyses for sets of scans and facilitating data organization and reporting.

MRIO: The Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition and Analysis Ontology.

Objective: Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain is a useful tool in both the clinic and research settings, aiding in the diagnosis and treatments of neurological disease and expanding our knowledge of the brain. However, there are many challenges inherent in managing and analyzing MRI data, due in large part to the heterogeneity of data acquisition. Materials and Methods: To address this, we have developed MRIO, the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition and Analysis Ontology. Results: MRIO provides well-reasoned classes and logical axioms for the acquisition of several MRI acquisition types and well-known, peer-reviewed analysis software, facilitating the use of MRI data. These classes provide a common language for the neuroimaging research process and help standardize the organization and analysis of MRI data for reproducible datasets. We also provide queries for automated assignment of analyses for given MRI types. Discussion: MRIO aids researchers in managing neuroimaging studies by helping organize and annotate MRI data and integrating with existing standards such as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine and the Brain Imaging Data Structure, enhancing reproducibility and interoperability. MRIO was constructed according to Open Biomedical Ontologies Foundry principals and has contributed several terms to the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations to help bridge neuroimaging data to other domains. Conclusion: MRIO addresses the need for a "common language" for MRI that can help manage the neuroimaging research, by enabling researchers to identify appropriate analyses for sets of scans and facilitating data organization and reporting.

Foundations for a Realism-Based Ontology of Protein Aggregates.

The objective of this paper is to propose formal definitions for the terms 'protein aggregate' and 'protein-containing complex' such that the descriptions and usages of these terms in biomedical literature are unified and that those portions of reality are correctly represented. To this end, we surveyed the literature to assess the need for a distinction between these entities, then compared the features of usages and definitions found in the literature to the definitions for those terms found in Bioportal ontologies. Based on the results of this comparison, we propose updated definitions for the terms 'protein aggregate' and 'protein-containing complex'. Thus far, we propose the following distinguishing factors: first, that one important difference lies in whether an entity is disposed to change type in response to certain structural alterations, such as dissociation of a continuant part, and second that an important difference lies in the ability of the entity to realize its function after such an event occurs. These distinctions are reflected in the proposed definitions.