A critical analysis of trans-visibility through online medical crowdfunding.

In contexts where many people face barriers to accessing gender-affirming care through public systems, some turn to online crowdfunding to fundraise for private care pathways. Crowdfunding platforms invite people to share personal information, stories, and photos publicly, in order to elicit donations. In this article we draw on empirical data from a multimethodological three-year study of medical crowdfunding in Aotearoa New Zealand, with a focus on people crowdfunding for medical transition services. We apply a lens of 'visibility' to analysis of focus groups, interviews, case studies, and campaign pages, presenting findings on who was present and absent (with a focus on binary gender, and whiteness), and who was the assumed or expected audience (with a focus on cis publics). We describe how campaigns were defined by efforts to make trans bodies legible, and campaign requests competitive, through reference to narrow and medicalised frames of dysphoria, suffering, and transformation via medical intervention. We contribute to more comparative work in the literature on crowdfunding by highlighting how these globalised digital technologies are situated in the particular (demographic, cultural, and structural) contexts of Aotearoa New Zealand. We call attention to crowdfunding as a relational practice, in which the public marketisation of the self can have both individual consequences related to privacy and outing, and social consequences, in the reinforcing of trans-normativities. Overall we argue that although crowdfunding represents an adaptive strategy for trans people trying meet their own needs, it ultimately contributes to a type of trans-visibility which is both risky and limiting.

PATHA's vision for transgender healthcare under the current health reforms.

AIM: The Aotearoa New Zealand healthcare system does not adequately meet the needs of transgender people. Due to healthcare reforms and increases in funding and awareness of transgender health, the Ministry of Health has met with the Professional Association for Transgender Health Aotearoa (PATHA) to discuss ways to improve the healthcare system. We developed a vision for a transgender healthcare document to enable a process for our members to collaborate and to increase transparency about what advice PATHA has provided to the Ministry. METHOD: Feedback from PATHA's committees was incorporated into a draft document, which was then sent to all PATHA members for further feedback and collaboration. RESULTS: PATHA proposes improvements to transgender healthcare that are centred around a new transgender health resourcing hub, which should operate according to a Te Tiriti o Waitangi framework, provide national coordination of a distributed model of care, provide resourcing (including education) for primary care and actively work to increase provision and equity of gender-affirming surgeries. In order to be effective, the new resourcing hub would utilise peer health navigators, provide education and professional development, promote healing-focussed care and incorporate transgender community leadership and accountability. CONCLUSIONS: These improvements would allow for the best practices from existing regional programmes to be implemented throughout the healthcare system. The proposed changes align with the goals of the healthcare reforms to make healthcare for transgender people more equitable, accessible and cohesive.

Perspectives on expertise in teaching about transgender healthcare: A focus group study with health professional programme teaching staff and transgender community members.

Background: It is well established that transgender people experience considerable health inequities, which are sustained in part by limited teaching about transgender healthcare for trainee health professionals. Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of both teaching staff from health professional education programmes and transgender community members on the best ways to teach about transgender healthcare, with a focus on ways of: 1) overcoming barriers to this teaching; and 2) involving community members in this teaching. Methods: A research advisory committee was convened to guide the project and included transgender community members, teaching staff from health professional programmes, and trainee health professionals in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Three preliminary focus groups were held with 10 transgender community members. These community members were then invited to act as transgender community 'ambassadors' in focus groups with teaching staff based on suggestions from the advisory committee. Six focus groups were conducted with 22 teaching staff from a range of health professional education programmes along with at least two transgender community ambassadors. Results: Teaching staff positioned themselves as lacking the expertise to teach about transgender healthcare but also as expert teachers when applying methods such as small group teaching. Transgender participants also positioned themselves as having expertise arising primarily from their own experiences and acknowledged that effective teaching about transgender healthcare would need to cover a diversity of transgender identities and healthcare outside their own experiences. Teaching staff and transgender community members were keen to pool expertise and thus overcome the shared sense of lacking the expertise to teach about transgender healthcare. Discussion: These findings provide insights into the current barriers to teaching about transgender healthcare and provide future directions for staff development on teaching about transgender healthcare and ways of safely involving transgender community members in teaching.

Teeth are for chewing: a critical review of the conceptualisation and ethics of a controversial intraoral weight-loss device.

We are a diverse collective of researchers who are committed to improving the health and wellbeing of marginalised individuals. This article is a response to, and critique of, the DentalSlim Diet Control research. This device revises a controversial 1970s weight-loss technology connected to poor health outcomes, which is indicative of a culture that consistently promotes harm to fat and other marginalised communities.We address the historical context in which unruly bodies, particularly fat, and Indigenous bodies have been the site of unethical investigation conducted under the auspices of medical research. Existence outside the normative white, male, cis physical ideal demands regulation, and disciplinary measures. We demonstrate how Brunton et al.'s research is underpinned by anti-fat attitudes and assumptions which impose this punitive physical intervention onto healthy people in a way that should not be acceptable in medical research.Further, we address a range of harms, giving attention to Maori and to individuals with eating disorders, along with issues of research integrity. We argue that no ethics committee should have approved this research, no academic journal should have published it, and no member of the dental and medical community should promote or prescribe this device.