Molecular correlates of response to capmatinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: clinical and biomarker results from a phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of receptor tyrosine kinase MET by various mechanisms occurs in 3%-4% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is associated with unfavorable prognosis. While MET is a validated drug target in lung cancer, the best biomarker strategy for the enrichment of a susceptible patient population still remains to be defined. Towards this end we analyze here primary data from a phase I dose expansion study of the MET inhibitor capmatinib in patients with advanced MET-dysregulated NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients [≥18 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2] with MET-dysregulated advanced NSCLC, defined as either (i) MET status by immunohistochemistry (MET IHC) 2+ or 3+ or H-score ≥150, or MET/centromere ratio ≥2.0 or gene copy number (GCN) ≥5, or (ii) epidermal growth factor receptor wild-type (EGFRwt) and centrally assessed MET IHC 3+, received capmatinib at the recommended dose of 400 mg (tablets) or 600 mg (capsules) b.i.d. The primary objective was to determine safety and tolerability; the key secondary objective was to explore antitumor activity. The exploratory end point was the correlation of clinical activity with different biomarker formats. RESULTS: Of 55 patients with advanced MET-dysregulated NSCLC, 40/55 (73%) had received two or more prior systemic therapies. All patients discontinued treatment, primarily due to disease progression (69.1%). The median treatment duration was 10.4 weeks. The overall response rate per RECIST was 20% (95% confidence interval, 10.4-33.0). In patients with MET GCN ≥6 (n = 15), the overall response rate by both the investigator and central assessments was 47%. The median progression-free survival per investigator for patients with MET GCN ≥6 was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval, 3.8-11.9). Tumor responses were observed in all four patients with METex14. The most common toxicities were nausea (42%), peripheral edema (33%), and vomiting (31%). CONCLUSIONS: MET GCN ≥6 and/or METex14 are suited to predict clinical activity of capmatinib in patients with NSCLC (NCT01324479).

Salvage therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a combination of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin.

A total of 30 consecutive patients with refractory or relapsing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were treated with a combination of dexamethasone, etoposide (VP-16), ifosfamide, and cisplatin (DVIP). In all, 9 subjects (30%) showed a partial response and 10 (33%) achieved a complete response (CR) lasting from 2.5 to 24+ months. Aggressive histology, no prior therapy with VP-16, a CR to previous chemotherapy, and a treatment-free interval of greater than 6 months prior to the present study were associated with the high CR rate. DVIP caused pronounced myelosuppression (median granulocyte nadir and median platelet nadir, 380/mm3 and 73.000/mm3, respectively), but no drug-related death occurred. We conclude that DVIP is an effective salvage combination, especially in aggressive NHL, that produces acceptable toxicity.

Heparanase procoagulant activity is elevated and predicts survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Heparanase is implicated in angiogenesis and tumor progression. We had earlier demonstrated that heparanase may also affect the hemostatic system in a non-enzymatic manner. It forms a complex and enhances the activity of the blood coagulation initiator- tissue factor (TF). Although increased heparanase antigen level in the plasma and biopsies of cancer patients was previously demonstrated, in the present study we evaluated, for the first time, the heparanase procoagulant activity in the plasma of patients with lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty five patients with non-small cell lung cancer at presentation and twenty controls were recruited. Plasma was studied for TF / heparanase procoagulant activity, TF activity and heparanase procoagulant activity using chromogenic assay and heparanase antigen levels by ELISA. RESULTS: Heparanase antigen levels were higher in the study group compared to control (P=0.05). TF / heparanase activity, and even more apparent, heparanase procoagulant activity were significantly higher in the study group compared to controls (P=0.008, P<0.0001, respectively). No significant difference was observed in the TF activity between the groups. Survival of patients with heparanase procoagulant activity higher than 31 ng/ml predicted a mean survival of 9 ± 1.3 months while heparanase procoagulant activity of 31 ng/ml or lower predicted a mean survival of 24 ± 4 months (P=0.001). Heparanase procoagulant activity was higher than 31 ng/ml in the four cases of thrombosis detected during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated heparanase procoagulant activity in patients with lung cancer reveals a new mechanism of coagulation system activation in malignancy. Heparanase procoagulant activity can potentially be used as a predictor for survival.

[Motivation for in-patient psychotherapy among patients of a psychosomatic pain clinic]. / Motivation zur stationären Psychotherapie bei Patienten einer Psychosomatischen Schmerzsprechstunde.

OBJECTIVE: For a number of pain patients inpatient psychotherapy is an adequate treatment. Many of these patients are lacking in motivation, though. The present study aimed at identifying factors associated with acceptance or rejection of inpatient psychotherapy. METHODS: 63 patients of a psychosomatic pain clinic underwent a multimodal assessment based on a psychosomatic interview as well as a set of psychodiagnostic questionnaires regarding sociodemographic factors, symptomatology (pain intensity, BSS, SCL-90-R, BDI), state of chronification, psychological defense mechanisms (DSQ) and biographic traumatisation (risk index). RESULTS: 71% of the patients were recommended in-patient psychotherapy. Among those, 63% accepted the recommendation, 27% rejected it. Among the patients who accepted in-patient psychotherapy, the extent of total psychological impairment as well as severity of depression and anxiety were more severe and the state of chronification tended to be less marked than in the rejecting group. Referring to sociodemographic variables, pain intensity,physical impairment and severity of biographic traumatisation,no significant difference between the groups could be shown. CONCLUSIONS: In our highly selected population the extent of psychiatric comorbidity and the state of chronification determined motivation for in-patient psychotherapy. Further studies should focus on unselected pain patients and on differences in motivation between various forms of psychotherapy.