Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Physiol Rep ; 12(16): e70005, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39161065

RESUMEN

Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients exhibit compromised immune responses, leading to lower immunogenicity to the COVID-19 vaccine than the general population. The metabolomic factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine response in MHD patients remain elusive. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 MHD patients, divided into three vaccine regimen groups (N= 10 per group): homologous CoronaVac® (SV-SV), homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZ-AZ), and heterologous prime-boost (SV-AZ). Plasma samples were collected at baseline and at 28 days after the final dose to analyze 92 metabolomic levels using targeted metabolomics. The study included 30 MHD patients (mean age 56.67 ± 10.79 years) with similar neutralizing antibody (nAb) levels across vaccine regimens. The most significant differences in metabolomics were found between AZ-AZ and SV-SV, followed by SV-AZ versus SV-SV, and AZ-AZ versus SV-AZ. Overall, the metabolomic changes involved amino acids like glutamate and phenylalanine, and phospholipids. Prevaccination metabolomic profiles, including PG (38:1), lysoPE (20:2), lysoPC (18:2), lysoPI (18:1), and PC (34:2), exhibited negative correlations with postvaccination nAb levels. Different COVID-19 vaccine regimens had unique interactions with the immune response in MHD patients. Amino acid and phospholipid metabolisms play crucial roles in nAb formation, with the phospholipid metabolism being a potentially predictive marker of vaccine immunogenicity among MHD patients.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Metaboloma , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/prevención & control , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre
3.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(4)2023 Mar 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37112627

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vaccines that prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection are considered the most promising approach to modulating the pandemic. There is scarce evidence on the efficacy and safety of different vaccine prime-boost combinations in MHD patients since most clinical trials have used homologous mRNA vaccine regimens. METHODS: This prospective observational study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of homologous CoronaVac® (SV-SV), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) (AZ-AZ), and the heterologous prime-boost of SV-AZ, among MHD patients. RESULTS: A total of 130 MHD participants were recruited. On day 28, after the second dose, seroconversion results of the surrogate virus neutralization test were not different between vaccine regimens. The magnitude of the receptor-binding domain-specific IgG was highest among the SV-AZ. Different vaccine regimens had a distinct impact on seroconversion, for which the heterologous vaccine regimen demonstrated a higher probability of seroconversion (OR 10.12; p = 0.020, and OR 1.81; p = 0.437 for SV-AZ vs. SV-SV, and SV-AZ vs. AZ-AZ, respectively). There were no serious adverse events reported in any of the vaccine groups. CONCLUSIONS: Immunization with SV-SV, AZ-AZ, and SV-AZ could generate humoral immunity without any serious adverse events among MHD patients. Using the heterologous vaccine prime-boost seemed to be more efficacious in terms of inducing immunogenicity.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA