Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 62: 382-386, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31449944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study analyzes the outcome of lymphatic complications after a standard vascular procedure. METHODS: This is a retrospective study including patients who had a lymphatic complication after endarterectomy and patch of the common femoral artery in our clinic between March 2007 and June 2018. Therapy of choice was selected according to wound situation and amount of lymphatic liquid. If signs of a wound infection occurred, a surgical therapy was performed; in all other cases a nonsurgical treatment (conservative treatment, radiotherapy) was chosen. RESULTS: We performed 977 index operations, a lymphatic complication occurred in 112 cases (11.5%). In 69 cases the lymphatic complication presented as lymphatic fistula (Group 1), in 43 cases as lymphorrhea from the wound (Group 2). Nonsurgical treatment was done in 66 cases (Group 1: 76.8% vs. Group 2: 30.2%; P < 0.000), and a surgical treatment was necessary in 46 cases (Group 1: 23.2% vs. Group 2: 69.8%; P < 0.000). Indication for surgery was Szilagyi 1 infection in 25 cases, Szilagyi 2 infection in 11 cases, and Szilagyi 3 infection in 10 cases. Patients with Szilagyi 1 infections received negative wound pressure therapy (NWPT). A muscle flap in combination with an NWPT was performed in patients with Szilagyi 2 infections. In Szilagyi 3 infections, the patch was replaced; additionally, a muscle flap and an NWPT were performed. The median hospital stay was 13 days in the nonsurgical group and 22.5 days in the surgical group. We had no bleeding complications and no reinfection during follow-up. The median observation period was 23.0 months. Age ≥80 years was associated with an increased risk for lymphatic complications. CONCLUSIONS: The therapy of lymphatic complications should be done in accordance with clinical symptoms. A nonsurgical treatment is often sufficient. However, in cases of a wound infection different surgical treatments are necessary.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Endarterectomía/efectos adversos , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Fístula/terapia , Enfermedades Linfáticas/terapia , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tratamiento Conservador/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Conservador/mortalidad , Endarterectomía/mortalidad , Femenino , Fístula/diagnóstico , Fístula/etiología , Fístula/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Enfermedades Linfáticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Linfáticas/etiología , Enfermedades Linfáticas/mortalidad , Linfocele/etiología , Linfocele/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/efectos adversos , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/mortalidad , Radioterapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Europace ; 16(2): 258-64, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23813451

RESUMEN

AIMS: To evaluate passive-fixation lead failure rates and long-term patient survival in subjects implanted with Sprint Fidelis electrodes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 748 subjects who received a Sprint Fidelis (n = 429; Medtronic models 6948: 94.8%, 6949: 2.6%, 6930: 1.9%, 6931: 0.7%) or a Sprint 'non-Fidelis' implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead (n = 319, Medtronic models 6944: 68.6%, 6947: 17.9%, 6942: 7.8%, 6943: 3.4%, 6945: 2.2%) at our centre between 1998 and 2008. Kaplan-Meier patient survival was lower in the Fidelis group than in the Control cohort (68.4 vs. 77.0% at 5 years, P = 0.0061), but multivariate analyses revealed no significant association between mortality and implanted lead type. Passive-fixation lead failure rate at 5 years was 14.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) [9.2, 19.3]) in the Fidelis (n = 414) group and 1.8% (95% CI [0.0-3.8]) in the Control (n = 241) cohort (P < 0.001 upon multivariate comparison). CONCLUSION: Failure rates of passive-fixation Sprint Fidelis leads are increased and similar to those previously reported for active-fixation Fidelis electrodes. Despite the elevated risk for lead failure and its potential sequelae, the Sprint Fidelis has no obvious impact on long-term mortality.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Falla de Prótesis , Anciano , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Alemania , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Scand J Surg ; 110(3): 400-406, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32098583

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Arteriosclerotic disease of the common femoral artery can be treated by surgical or endovascular intervention. Elderly patients are said to have a worse outcome if treated by surgical means; however, data to support this theory are missing. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent common femoral artery endarterectomy between March 2007 and July 2018 in our clinic. Group 1 included all patients <80 years and Group 2 included all patients ⩾80 years. Endpoints were patency rates, limb salvage, and overall survival. RESULTS: During this time period, 977 common femoral artery endarterectomies were performed. Indication was claudication in 61.5% and critical limb ischemia in 38.5%. Group 1 included 805 cases (82.4%) and Group 2 included 172 cases (17.6%). Thirty-day mortality was 2.7% (Group 1 = 1.6% versus Group 2 = 7.6%; p < 0.001) and 30-day major amputation was 1.1% (Group 1 = 0.7% versus Group 2 = 2.9%; p = .043). Primary patency and secondary patency were 84.2% and 96.8%, respectively, after 7 years. Limb salvage (93.7%, Group 1 = 94.1% versus Group 2 = 91.8%; p = .088) and overall survival (52.0%, Group 1 = 59.1% versus Group 2 = 15.7%; p = .006) were significantly different after the same time period. Multivariable analysis showed female gender to be a risk factor for loss of primary patency. Age ⩾ 80 years and ulcer or gangrene were risk factors for death. Statin use was beneficial to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Common femoral artery endarterectomy is a safe procedure with excellent long-term results. Octogenarians have an increased risk for perioperative mortality and major amputation.


Asunto(s)
Octogenarios , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Endarterectomía , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Humanos , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA