Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
N C Med J ; 83(6): 431-434, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36344097

RESUMEN

To build a resilient, high-performing primary care infrastructure for North Carolina, primary care networks and policymakers should align efforts to create pathways for students, trainees, and new physicians to thrive in primary care. We describe the shifting primary care landscape, current workforce initiatives, and policy options for achieving this goal.


Asunto(s)
Médicos , Humanos , Recursos Humanos , North Carolina , Atención Primaria de Salud
2.
N C Med J ; 81(5): 293-299, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32900887

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND Mailed at-home stool testing offers a promising strategy for overcoming barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in vulnerable populations. This paper evaluates the facilitators and barriers of successful implementation of a mailed fecal testing program among Medicaid populations within a health department setting.METHOD Interviews were conducted with key informants involved in intervention start-up and implementation tasks. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to design the interview guide and structure the analysis. Axial coding was used to connect the themes to each other under the major categories of facilitators and barriers.RESULTS Overall, the process evaluation suggests that with strong partnerships, effective champions, and existing infrastructure, a large county health department can successfully implement a mailed fecal testing program targeted at Medicaid beneficiaries. The identified facilitators and challenges to implementation provide important information for similar emerging programs.LIMITATIONS The sample size of this evaluation is small. Additionally, we are unable to discern whether participating stakeholders' responses represent the feelings of non-interviewed staff, program implementers, or participants. We were not able to collect data on patient perspectives of the intervention. The nursing staff and interns were not able to be included in the process evaluation. Lastly, the information taken from this process evaluation may not be applicable to organizations and systems with different attributes.CONCLUSION The process evaluation suggests strong partnerships, effective champions, and elegant program designs were key contributors to successful implementation of a CRC screening program targeted at Medicaid beneficiaries in a large county health department.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Heces , Humanos , Medicaid , Servicios Postales , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estados Unidos
3.
Cancer ; 124(16): 3346-3354, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30004577

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective but underused. Screening rates are lower among Medicaid beneficiaries versus other insured populations. No studies have examined mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based outreach programs for Medicaid beneficiaries. METHODS: In a patient-level randomized controlled trial, a mailed CRC screening reminder plus FIT, sent from an urban health department to Medicaid beneficiaries, was compared with the same reminder without FIT. The reminder group could request FIT. Completed FIT kits were processed by the health department laboratory. Respondents were notified of normal results by mail. Abnormal results were given via phone by a patient navigator who provided counselling and assistance with follow-up care. The primary outcome was FIT return. RESULTS: In all, 2144 beneficiaries at average CRC risk were identified, and there was no evidence of screening with Medicaid claims data. To the reminder+FIT group, 1071 were randomized, and 1073 were randomized to the reminder group; 307 (28.7%) in the reminder+FIT group and 347 (32.3%) in the reminder group were unreachable or ineligible (previous screening). The FIT return rate was significantly higher in the reminder+FIT group than the reminder group (21.1% vs 12.3%; difference, 8.8%; 95% confidence interval, 3.7%-13.9%; P < .01). Eighteen individuals (7.2%) who completed FIT tests had abnormal results, and 15 were eligible for follow-up colonoscopy; 66.7% (n = 10) completed follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: A health department-based, mailed FIT program targeting Medicaid beneficiaries was feasible. Including a FIT kit resulted in greater screening completion than a reminder letter alone. Further research is needed to understand the comparative cost-effectiveness of these interventions.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Heces , Anciano , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoquímica/métodos , Masculino , Medicaid , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicios Postales , Estados Unidos
5.
N C Med J ; 72(3): 207-8, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21901917

RESUMEN

This commentary describes a pilot program wherein a community health center is partnering with Community Care of North Carolina to create a system of integrated care management and "treatment-in-place" visits for aged residents and disabled residents of adult care homes, with the goal of improving the quality of care and reducing unnecessary visits to emergency departments.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Vida Asistida/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Personas con Discapacidad , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Adulto , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Medicaid , North Carolina , Proyectos Piloto , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA