Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Can J Surg ; 59(1): 6-8, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26574705

RESUMEN

SUMMARY: Point of care ultrasonography (POCUS) is revolutionizing care of critically ill patients. However, training in POCUS is extremely variable, with no accepted curriculum or certification process. We aimed to delineate the training experience and use of POCUS among trauma providers across Canada via a secure e-questionnaire sent to members of the Trauma Association of Canada. This commentary discusses our survey results and argues for the standardization of POCUS training and certification in Canada.


Asunto(s)
Educación Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ultrasonografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Canadá , Educación Médica/normas , Humanos , Centros Traumatológicos/normas , Ultrasonografía/normas
2.
Am J Surg ; 211(5): 894-902.e1, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27020901

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Remote-telementored ultrasound involves novice examiners being remotely guided by experts using informatic-technologies. However, requiring a novice to perform ultrasound is a cognitively demanding task exacerbated by unfamiliarity with ultrasound-machine controls. We incorporated a randomized evaluation of using remote control of the ultrasound functionality (knobology) within a study in which the images generated by distant naive examiners were viewed on an ultrasound graphic user interface (GUI) display viewed on laptop computers by mentors in different cities. METHODS: Fire-fighters in Edmonton (101) were remotely mentored from Calgary (n = 65), Nanaimo (n = 19), and Memphis (n = 17) to examine an ultrasound phantom randomized to contain free fluid or not. Remote mentors (2 surgeons, 1 internist, and 1 ED physician) were randomly assigned to use GUI knobology control during mentoring (GUIK+/GUIK-). RESULTS: Remote-telementored ultrasound was feasible in all cases. Overall accuracy for fluid detection was 97% (confidence interval = 91 to 99%) with 3 false negatives (FNs). Positive/negative likelihood ratios were infinity/0.0625. One FN occurred with the GUIK+ and 2 without (GUIK-). There were no statistical test performance differences in either group (GUIK+ and GUIK-). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-naive 1st responders can be remotely mentored with high accuracy, although providing basic remote control of the knobology did not affect outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Líquidos Corporales/diagnóstico por imagen , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Bomberos/educación , Telemedicina/métodos , Ultrasonografía/instrumentación , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Intervalos de Confianza , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Maniquíes , Estudios Prospectivos , Consulta Remota/métodos , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA