Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Biol Chem ; 287(32): 26854-66, 2012 Aug 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22700977

RESUMEN

DNA polymerase α-primase (Pol-prim) plays an essential role in eukaryotic DNA replication, initiating synthesis of the leading strand and of each Okazaki fragment on the lagging strand. Pol-prim is composed of a primase heterodimer that synthesizes an RNA primer, a DNA polymerase subunit that extends the primer, and a regulatory B-subunit (p68) without apparent enzymatic activity. Pol-prim is thought to interact with eukaryotic replicative helicases, forming a dynamic multiprotein assembly that displays primosome activity. At least three subunits of Pol-prim interact physically with the hexameric replicative helicase SV40 large T antigen, constituting a simple primosome that is active in vitro. However, structural understanding of these interactions and their role in viral chromatin replication in vivo remains incomplete. Here, we report the detailed large T antigen-p68 interface, as revealed in a co-crystal structure and validated by site-directed mutagenesis, and we demonstrate its functional importance in activating the SV40 primosome in cell-free reactions with purified Pol-prim, as well as in monkey cells in vivo.


Asunto(s)
ADN Polimerasa I/metabolismo , ADN Primasa/metabolismo , Secuencia de Bases , Southern Blotting , ADN Polimerasa I/química , ADN Primasa/química , Cartilla de ADN , Replicación del ADN , Humanos , Modelos Moleculares , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Virus 40 de los Simios/genética
2.
J Breast Imaging ; 5(5): 575-584, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37744722

RESUMEN

Objective: To compare flat epithelial atypia (FEA) upgrade rates after excision versus surveillance and to identify variables associated with upgrade. Methods: This single-institution retrospective study identified isolated FEA cases determined by percutaneous biopsy from April 2005 through July 2022 with excision or ≥2 years surveillance. All cases were recommended for excision or surveillance based on multidisciplinary discussion of clinical, imaging, and pathologic variables with emphasis on sampling adequacy and significant atypia. Truth was determined by pathology at excision or the absence of cancer on surveillance. Upgrade was defined as cancer occurring ≤2 cm from the biopsy site. Demographic, imaging, and biopsy variables were compared between those that did and did not upgrade. Results: Among 112 cases of isolated FEA, imaging findings included calcifications in 81.3% (91/112), MRI lesions in 11.6% (13/112), and distortions or masses in 7.1% (8/112). Excision was recommended in 12.5% (14/112) and surveillance in 87.5% (98/112) of cases. Among those recommended for excision, 28.6% (4/14) of cases were upgraded, all to ductal carcinoma in situ. In those recommended for surveillance, 1.0% (1/98) were upgraded to invasive cancer. Overall, FEA had a 4.5% (5/112) upgrade rate, and 2.7% (3/112) also developed cancer >2 cm from the FEA. There were no significant differences in demographic, imaging, and biopsy variables between those that did and did not upgrade to cancer. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary management of isolated FEA distinguishes those at higher risk of upgrade to cancer (28.6%) in whom surgery is warranted from those at low risk of upgrade (1.0%) who can be managed non-operatively.

3.
J Radiol Case Rep ; 13(10): 1-5, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32184920

RESUMEN

Emanuel syndrome is a rare inherited chromosomal abnormality caused by an unbalanced translocation of chromosomes 11 and 22. Clinically, Emanuel syndrome is characterized by a wide spectrum of congenital anomalies, dysmorphisms, and developmental disability often confused with other similar syndromes. Outside of genetic testing, diagnosis remains challenging and current literature on typical radiologic findings is limited. We present classic neuroimaging findings of Emanuel syndrome consistent with prior literature including microcephaly, microretrognathia, external auditory canal stenosis, and cleft palate; and also introduce the additional maxillofacial anomaly of dysplastic middle ear ossicles, to our knowledge not previously described in the literature. Recognition of findings leading to earlier diagnosis of Emanuel syndrome may improve outcomes and quality of life for patients and their families.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de los Cromosomas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fisura del Paladar/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Discapacidad Intelectual/diagnóstico por imagen , Microcefalia/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipotonía Muscular/diagnóstico por imagen , Constricción Patológica/diagnóstico por imagen , Conducto Auditivo Externo/anomalías , Conducto Auditivo Externo/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Hidrocefalia/diagnóstico por imagen , Yunque/anomalías , Yunque/diagnóstico por imagen , Lactante , Masculino , Neuroimagen , Retrognatismo/diagnóstico por imagen , Espacio Subaracnoideo/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA