Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Chem Commun (Camb) ; 59(75): 11248-11251, 2023 Sep 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37661728

RESUMEN

A phosphorescence enhancement of pyridinium macrocycle/monomer phosphors is realized with up to 14.7-fold prolonging of the phosphorescence lifetimes and visible afterglow by doping into a poly(vinylalcohol) (PVA) matrix. The abundant hydrogen-bonding interactions and electrostatic interactions between the phosphors and the PVA suppressed the nonradiative decay processes, slowed down the radiative decay and nonradiative decay of triplet states, and therefore promoted the long-lived RTP.

2.
RSC Adv ; 13(43): 30269-30272, 2023 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37881211

RESUMEN

Reported here is the efficient macrocyclization facilitated by skeleton preorganization. A pyridylcarbazole macrocycle and a phenylpyridylcarbazole macrocycle was synthesized in yield up to 75%. Single-crystal structures and theoretic computation uncovered that the skeleton preorganization promoted the formation of cyclization-favorable conformation of noncyclic precursors via π⋯π interactions. This result provided a new approach for the efficient syntheses of macrocycles.

3.
EClinicalMedicine ; 58: 101919, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37007736

RESUMEN

Background: We aimed to investigate perineal nerve block versus periprostatic block in pain control for men undergoing a transperineal prostate biopsy. Methods: In this prospective, randomised, blinded and parallel-group trial, men in six Chinese hospitals with suspected prostate cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) at the point of local anaesthesia to receive a perineal nerve block or periprostatic block and followed by a transperineal prostate biopsy. Centres used their usual biopsy procedure. Operators who performed anaesthesia were trained in both techniques before the trial and were masked to the randomised allocation until the time of anaesthesia and were not involved in the subsequent biopsy procedure and any assessment or analysis. Other investigators and the patients were masked until trial completion. The primary outcome was the level of the worst pain experienced during the prostate biopsy procedure. Secondary outcomes included pain (post-biopsy at 1, 6 and 24 h), changes in blood pressure, heart rate and breathing rate during the biopsy procedure, external manifestations of pain during biopsy, anaesthesia satisfaction, the detection rate of PCa and clinically significant PCa. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04501055. Findings: Between August 13, 2020, and July 20, 2022, 192 men were randomly assigned to perineal nerve block or periprostatic block, 96 per study group. Perineal nerve block was superior for the relief of pain during the biopsy procedure (mean 2.80 for perineal nerve block and 3.98 for periprostatic block; adjusted difference in means -1.17, P < 0.001). Although the perineal nerve block had a lower mean pain score at 1 h post-biopsy compared with the periprostatic block (0.23 vs 0.43, P = 0.042), they were equivalent at 6 h (0.16 vs 0.25, P = 0.389) and 24 h (0.10 vs 0.26, P = 0.184) respectively. For the change in vital signs during biopsy procedure, perineal nerve block was significantly superior to periprostatic block in terms of maximum value of systolic blood pressure, maximum value of mean arterial pressure and maximum value of heart rate. There are no statistical differences in average value of systolic blood pressure, average value of mean, average value of heart rate, diastolic blood pressure and breathing rate. Perineal nerve block was also superior to periprostatic block in external manifestations of pain (1.88 vs 3.00, P < 0.001) and anaesthesia satisfaction (8.93 vs 11.90, P < 0.001). Equivalence was shown for the detection rate of PCa (31.25% for perineal nerve block and 29.17% for periprostatic block, P = 0.753) or csPCa (23.96% for perineal nerve block and 20.83% for periprostatic block, P = 0.604). 33 (34.8%) of 96 patients in the perineal nerve block group and 40 (41.67%) of 96 patients in the periprostatic block group had at least one complication. Interpretation: Perineal nerve block was superior to periprostatic block in pain control for men undergoing a transperineal prostate biopsy. Funding: Grant 2019YFC0119100 from the National Key Research and Development Program of China.

4.
RSC Adv ; 10(57): 34605-34611, 2020 Sep 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35514411

RESUMEN

A series of small-membered heterocycle probes, so-called azaheterocycle-containing diphenylmethanol chiral solvating agents (CSAs), have been developed for NMR enantiodiscrimination. These chiral sensors were readily synthesized were inexpensive and efficiently used for the chiral analysis of alpha-substituted carboxylic acids. The sensing method was operationally simple and the processing was straightforward. Notably, we propose (S)-aziridinyl diphenylmethanol as a promising CSA, which has excellent chiral discriminating properties and offers multiple detectable possibilities pertaining to the 1H NMR signals of diagnostic split protons (including 25 examples, up to 0.194 ppm, 77.6 Hz). Its ability to detect the molecular recognition of fluorinated carboxylic acids were further investigated, with a good level of discrimination via the 19F NMR spectroscopic analysis. In addition, an accurate enantiomeric excess (ee) analysis of the p-methoxyl-mandelic acid with different optical compositions have been calculated based on the integration of well-separated proton signals.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA