Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Malays J Med Sci ; 31(1): 71-75, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38456112

RESUMEN

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare axial length (AL) and the refractive outcome after phacoemulsification surgery from 2014 to 2019 at Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah, Terengganu, Malaysia. Method: This was a retrospective record review of all cataract patients who met the inclusion criteria and underwent uneventful superior wound phacoemulsification with nontoric intraocular lens (IOL) by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2019. Using optical biometry or immersion technique, the preoperative AL determined solely via the Sanders, Retzlaff and Kraff 2 (SRK2) formula was selected. The postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) at 6 weeks-12 weeks was retrieved. Using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 24.0, the mean differences between targeted and actual postoperative SE were analysed based on the AL. Result: In this study, 490 eyes of 472 patients aged 25 years old-88 years old (mean age 65.72 years old [SD 8.83]) were involved. There were 162 eyes (33%) in Group A (< 23 mm), 189 eyes (39%) in Group B (23.01 mm-24.0 mm) and 139 eyes (28%) in Group C (> 24.0 mm). The mean AL was 23.63 mm (SD 1.19). The mean differences between the targeted and actual postoperative SE were: -0.09 D (SD 0.60) in Group A, -0.07 D (SD 0.53) in Group B and -0.16 D (SD 0.52) in Group C. No significant difference was found between these groups (P = 0.327). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the refractive outcome using the SRK2 formula in different ALs after phacoemulsification surgery. Hence, there is no reason to modify or adjust the targeted SE based on AL.

2.
Cureus ; 16(5): e60132, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38864048

RESUMEN

Purpose Our study aimed to describe the clinical profile of endogenous endophthalmitis, focusing on patient demographics, infection sources, microbial profiles, clinical outcomes, and factors affecting the final visual outcome. Methods A retrospective review was performed on data from 68 eyes of 60 patients diagnosed with endogenous endophthalmitis and hospitalized in two tertiary hospitals on the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia from January 2011 to December 2020. The analysis encompassed evaluating patient age, gender, laterality, risk factors, infection origins, presenting and final visual acuity, microbial results, treatment responses, and factors affecting final visual outcomes. Results The average age of the patient cohort was 54.9 ± 13.3 years. Females were more likely to have endogenous endophthalmitis than males (33, 55.0% vs. 27, 45.0%). Twenty-seven patients (45.0%) presented with endogenous endophthalmitis in the left eye, while 25 patients (41.7%) had it in the right eye, and eight patients (13.3%) had bilateral involvement. Most patients had underlying predisposing conditions, predominantly diabetes mellitus (53, 88.3%). Infection sources were identified in 42 patients (70.0%), out of which urinary tract infections account for the majority (11, 18.3%). Klebsiella species(14, 22.7%) were the leading pathogens and were significantly associated with liver abscess cases. In this series, the majority of patients had poor presenting and final visual acuity of worse than 3/60 (56, 82.4% and 53, 77.9%, respectively). Thirty-six eyes (52.9%) underwent vitrectomy, resulting in only four eyes (11.11%) achieving final visual acuity better than 6/12. Presenting visual acuity was identified as the factor contributing to the blind final visual outcome (r = 0.707, p < 0.001). Conclusion Females were found to be more commonly affected by endogenous endophthalmitis than males. Klebsiella species were the most commonly isolated microorganisms and were typically associated with liver abscesses. Urinary tract infection was the most common predisposing factor. A majority of the patients had poor presenting and final visual acuity, in which poor visual acuity is a significant indicator of blind visual outcomes.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA