High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Polymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stent for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease Treatment.

PURPOSE: Clinical trials have demonstrated that high-dose drug-coated balloon (HD-DCB) and polymer-based drug-eluting stent (PB-DES) treatments for femoropopliteal (FP) artery disease have favorable outcomes. However, which one would be better remained unrevealed. METHODS: This study used the databases of 2 large-scale multicenter prospective drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stent (DES) registries. The study included 2470 patients with symptomatic FP lesion treated with IN.PACT Admiral DCB or Eluvia DES at 69 centers. A propensity-score-based paired analysis was conducted. Primary endpoint was 1-year restenosis rate. Secondary endpoints were 1-year reocclusion rate, target lesion revascularization (TLR), acute thrombosis, bypass conversion, major amputation, major adverse limb event (MALE), and all-cause death. RESULTS: A total of 1535 patients were treated with HD-DCB, and 935 patients were treated with PB-DES. The propensity-score matching extracted 678 pairs, with no remarkable intergroup difference in baseline characteristics. The 1-year restenosis rate was significantly lower in the PB-DES group than in the HD-DCB group (16.0% vs 22.0%, p=0.016). The other endpoints (reocclusion rate, TLR, acute thrombosis, bypass conversion, major amputation, MALE, and all-cause death) did not differ between the groups. No baseline characteristics had any significant interaction effect on the association of HD-DCB vs PB-DES with restenosis risk (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the 1-year TLR, reocclusion rate, and other endpoints did not differ between the PB-DES group and the HD-DCB group despite the lower restenosis in the PB-DES group. CLINICAL IMPACT: One-year restenosis rate was significantly lower in the polymer-based DES group than in the high-dose DCB group for foemoropopliteal disease. However, there is no difference in the other endpoints between two groups.

Comparison of the Pre-Established and Finally Selected Treatment Strategies for Endovascular Treatment in Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions.

This study aimed to compare lower limb events associated with preplanned and finally selected treatment strategies-the validity and usefulness of the physician-chosen strategy were verified.We examined the data of 1003 patients in the registry of multicenter endovascular treatment for superficial femoral and popliteal artery disease study and prospectively enrolled patients who underwent endovascular treatment (EVT) of the femoropopliteal (FP) artery between February 2017 and June 2018 from 67 Japanese institutes. The outcome measures were major adverse limb events (MALE) and target vessel revascularization.The EVT strategies were classified into balloon angioplasty-alone (37.3%), primary stenting (26.7%), and provisional stenting (36.0%) groups. In the initial strategy analysis for the balloon angioplasty-alone, primary stenting, and provisional stenting groups, two-year rates of freedom from MALE (95% confidence interval) were 0.680 (0.620-0.732), 0.754 (0.688-0.808), and 0.798 (0.746-0.840), respectively. Additionally, the rate of MALE was significantly higher among patients in the balloon angioplasty-alone group than among those in the primary or provisional stenting groups in the initial strategy analysis (P = 0.007). Changes in treatment strategy were more frequent in the primary stenting group than in the other groups. Furthermore, the rate of MALE did not significantly differ among the three groups in the final strategy analysis (P = 0.56).Limb outcomes for the final applied strategy did not differ among the three strategies. Additionally, the physician's selection bias was mostly appropriate in the EVT of the FP artery.

Independent Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events at 3 Years after Aortoiliac Stent Implantation.

PURPOSE: To identify the risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in real-world practice for symptomatic peripheral artery disease in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on Japanese patients (N = 880) from the Observational Prospective Multicenter Registry Study on Outcomes of Peripheral Arterial Disease Patients Treated by Angioplasty Therapy for Aortoiliac Artery who underwent de novo aortoiliac stent placement. The 3-year risk of incident MACEs was investigated. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 72.6 years (range, 34-97 years), and 83.1% of the patients were men. The patients had the following conditions: smoking (35.6%), hypertension (94.1%), dyslipidemia (81.7%), diabetes (48.0%), renal failure on dialysis (12.6%), myocardial infarction (12.7%), stroke (15.8%), and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (7.1%). Femoropopliteal lesions were present in 38.8% of the limbs with aortoiliac lesions. The 3-year rate of freedom from MACEs was 89.1%. Baseline characteristics, such as age, renal failure on dialysis, myocardial infarction, stroke, and femoropopliteal lesions, were independently associated with the risk of incident MACEs. When the study population was stratified according to these risk factors, the rate of MACEs was highest in patients with at least 3 risk factors (32.9% at 3 years). CONCLUSIONS: The 3-year rate of freedom from MACEs was reported. Baseline characteristics, such as age, renal failure on dialysis, myocardial infarction, stroke, and femoropopliteal lesions, are independent risk factors for MACEs after aortoiliac stent placement.

Impact of Dialysis Vintage and Renal Biomarkers on Mortality in Dialysis-Dependent Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Revascularization.

PURPOSE: Revascularization of both endovascular therapy (EVT) and surgical reconstruction improve clinical outcomes of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI); however, treatment of dialysis-dependent patients with CLI is still challenging. This study aimed to investigate the impact of dialysis-related parameters on the risk of mortality in dialysis-dependent patients undergoing revascularization for CLI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 274 dialysis-dependent patients with CLI (196 males; mean age 71 years), who underwent revascularization, from the clinical database of the surgical reconstruction vs peripheral intervention in patients with critical limb ischemia (SPINACH) study, which was a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Of these patients, 175 patients underwent EVT and 99 patients received surgical reconstruction. The current study evaluated the impact of dialysis vintage and renal biomarkers on the mortality rate of dialysis-dependent patients with CLI undergoing revascularization. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up period of 1.7 ± 1.1 years, 147 deaths were observed. The 3-year overall survival rate and its standard error were estimated to be 40.5% ± 8.1% using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that dialysis vintage ≥4 years, serum creatinine levels <4.7 mg/dL, serum urea nitrogen ≥88 mg/dL, and calcium-phosphate product ≥62.6 mg2/dL2 were independent risk factors for mortality after adjustment for the detailed mortality risk score developed in the SPINACH study. Adding these parameters to the original mortality risk score slightly, but not significantly, increased the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristics curve from 0.74 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.81) to 0.77 (0.71 to 0.84) (p=0.084), whereas continuous net reclassification improvement reached 0.75 (0.12 to 0.90) (p=0.027). CONCLUSION: We found that long dialysis vintage, low serum creatinine, high serum urea nitrogen, and high calcium-phosphate product were independently associated with the increased risk of mortality in dialysis-dependent patients with CLI undergoing revascularization.

Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging During Aortoiliac Stenting: No Impact on Outcomes at 1 Year.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging use on clinical outcomes after aortoiliac stenting in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects for this retrospective analysis were derived from the OMOTENASHI registry database, which contained 803 symptomatic PAD patients (Rutherford categories 2-4) who were treated with self-expanding stent implantation for aortoiliac atherosclerotic lesions at 61 centers in Japan between January 2014 and April 2016. Of the 803 patients, 545 (67.9%) patients (mean age 73±9 years; 453 men) underwent IVUS-supported stent implantation and were compared with the 258 patients (mean age 73±8 years; 217 men) treated without IVUS. A propensity score analysis of 138 matched pairs was conducted to compare treatment strategies and clinical outcomes between patients having IVUS-supported endovascular therapy and those treated without IVUS. RESULTS: Endovascular strategies and postoperative medications were not significantly different between the IVUS and no-IVUS groups. A procedure time under 1 hour was less frequent in the IVUS group, which had a longer fluoroscopy time. The 12-month restenosis rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups [10.2% (95% CI 6.9 to 14.9%) vs 10.3% (95% CI 5.4 to 18.6%), p=0.99]. There was no interaction between baseline characteristics and the association of IVUS use with restenosis risk. CONCLUSION: Propensity score matching analysis revealed that duration and fluoroscopy time during IVUS-supported procedures were significantly longer than in cases without IVUS use, whereas the 12-month restenosis rate was not significantly different between the groups. IVUS use in aortoiliac lesions may be unnecessary.

Independent predictors of loss of primary patency at 1 year after aortoiliac stent implantation.

To identify the risk factors for restenosis at 1 year after aortoiliac stenting for symptomatic peripheral artery disease in real-world practice. We performed subgroup analysis of a large-scale prospective multicenter registry study enrolling Japanese patients with peripheral arterial disease who underwent aortoiliac endovascular therapy from April 2014 to April 2016. The subgroup comprised 880 patients (1108 limbs) who received iliac stenting. The Rutherford class was 2, 3, and 4 in 42%, 51%, and 7% of the patients, respectively. TASC II class D disease was noted in 18% of the patients and 35% had chronic total occlusion. Mean total stent length was 82.1 ± 48.5 mm and minimum stent diameter was 9.0 ± 1.3 mm. Balloon-expandable stents were used in 8% of the limbs. Concomitant femoropopliteal lesions were present in 36% of the limbs with aortoiliac lesions. In the overall patient population, the risk of restenosis at 1 year after stenting was 11.4%. Femoropopliteal lesions and the minimum stent diameter were identified as independent risk factors for restenosis at 1 year. When the study population was stratified according to these two risk factors, the restenosis rate at 1 year was 27.1% in the patients with a minimum stent diameter < 8 mm and femoropopliteal lesions, whereas it was only 5.3% in those with a minimum stent diameter ≥ 10 mm and no femoropopliteal lesions. Femoropopliteal lesions and a smaller stent diameter were independent risk factors for restenosis at 1 year after aortoiliac stenting.

Comparison of 3-year clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy for aortoiliac artery occlusive disease between patients with and without hemodialysis: Subanalysis of the REAL-AI registry.

PURPOSE: The impact of hemodialysis (HD) on aortoiliac (AI) occlusive lesions remains unknown. Here, we report the 3-year clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) for AI occlusive lesions in propensity-matched populations of patients who did and did not undergo HD. METHODS: The cohort of this large-scale, multicenter, retrospective registry study included 574 consecutive patients with AI occlusive disease. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare AI occlusive lesions between patients who did and did not undergo HD. The endpoints were primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency as well as overall survival and major adverse limb events (MALEs). RESULTS: A total of 57 matched pairs of patients who did and did not undergo HD were analyzed after propensity score-matched analysis. No significant difference was observed in primary patency, assisted primary patency, secondary patency, and MALEs at 3 years. The survival rate was significantly lower in the HD group than in the without-HD group (68% vs. 93%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Although the survival rate of HD patients was poor, the results of EVT for AI occlusive lesions were reasonable in these patients.

Clinical Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance During Endovascular Treatment of Subclavian Artery Disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance during endovascular treatment (EVT) of subclavian artery disease. METHODS: The multicenter SCALLOP registry (SubClavian Artery disease treated with endovascuLar therapy; muLticenter retrOsPective registry) was interrogated to identify 542 patients who underwent successful EVT for SCAD between January 2003 and December 2012. Lesions were classified according to the use of IVUS guidance: 177 patients (mean age 68.9±8.6 years; 149 men) with and 373 patients (mean age 69.9±8.7 years; 275 men) without. The main outcome was the difference in primary patency; secondary outcomes were differences in assisted primary patency, secondary patency, overall survival, freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE; all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke], and freedom from major adverse events (MAE). Multivariate analysis of the IVUS+ group was performed to identify predictors of failure; results are presented as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: In total, 538 (97.8%) lesions were treated with stents and 12 lesions by balloon angioplasty alone. Periprocedural and in-hospital overall complication rates did not differ significantly between IVUS+ (10.2%) and IVUS- (8.8%, p=0.617). Long-term follow-up demonstrated no significant difference between IVUS+ and IVUS- groups in 5-year all-cause mortality (p=0.37), MI (p=0.07), stroke (p=0.31), or MACE (p=0.07). However, 5-year primary patency was significantly higher in the IVUS+ group (88.5% vs 77.7%, p=0.03). There were no group differences in 5-year assisted primary patency (90.4% vs 89.9%, p=0.81) or secondary patency (99.4% vs 97.1%, p=0.25). Multivariate analysis of the IVUS+ group identified in-hospital stroke (HR 16.92, 95% CI 3.60 to 79.42, p<0.01) and combined use of balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents (HR 5.59, 95% CI 1.22 to 25.65, p=0.02) as independent negative predictors of primary patency. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that IVUS guidance can significantly improve long-term primary patency following endovascular treatment of subclavian artery disease.

Penetration rate of the placement of a drug-eluting stent for the treatment of superficial femoral artery lesions in Japan.

Stent placement for treating superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions has been approved. The Zilver PTX stent, a drug-eluting stent (DES) for treating SFA lesions, has been available in Japan since 2012. However, the penetration rate of this DES has not yet been reported. This prospective multicenter registry study enrolled 314 patients (354 limbs) to be treated by stent placement in 2014 (UMIN000011551). The primary endpoint was the measurement of the penetration rate of the DES. The secondary endpoints were measuring the freedom from restenosis, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), freedom from major adverse limb event (MALE), and the survival rate at 12 months postoperatively. Female patients comprised 28% participants. The mean age was 73.1 ± 9.2 years. A total of 56% patients had diabetes mellitus (DM), 36% patients were receiving hemodialysis, and 30% used cilostazol at baseline. The mean lesion length was 156 ± 101 mm, and the percentage of TASC II C/D lesions was 58%. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) was observed in 32% limbs. The penetration rates of the Zilver PTX stent were only 8%. The primary patency rate was similar between DES and bare-metal stents (BMS) at 12 months postoperatively (77 vs. 84%, p = 0.52). In this study, the rates of freedom from restenosis, freedom from TLR, freedom from MALE, and the survival rate at 12 months postoperatively were 83, 86, 85, and 89%, respectively. The penetration rate of a first-generation DES placement for treating SFA lesions is low in Japan. On the other hand, BMS is well utilized and its primary patency is acceptable.

Efficacy of CilostAzol for Below-the-Knee Artery Disease after Balloon AnGioplasty in PatiEnts with Severe Limb Ischemia (CABBAGE Trial).

BACKGROUND: Optimal medical therapy after endovascular therapy in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated whether cilostazol reduce restenosis after balloon angioplasty for infrapopliteal lesions in CLI patients. METHODS: This study was performed as a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point study with independent angiographic core laboratory adjudication. Sixty patients were eligible and 53 patients were enrolled and allocated. The primary end point was 3-month angiographic restenosis. The main secondary end points included major adverse limb event (MALE defined as requirement of any reintervention or major amputation), perioperative complications, major amputation, all-cause death, and hemorrhagic events. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were randomized and all received their allocated intervention. Two patients in the cilostazol plus aspirin group and 1 in the aspirin group did not undergo any angioplasty for infrapopliteal stenotic lesions, and therefore were excluded from analysis. Finally, 38 vessels in 25 patients in the cilostazol plus aspirin group and as many cases in the aspirin group were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. The 3-month restenosis rate was 82% in the cilostazol + aspirin group and 81% in the aspirin group, with no significant difference (P = 0.91). The MALE rate was 11% in the cilostazol plus aspirin group and 8% in the aspirin group (P = 0.73). In addition, no significant difference was observed in any secondary points. CONCLUSIONS: Cilostazol did not reduce 3-month angiographic restenosis after balloon angioplasty for below-the-knee lesion in CLI patients.

Incidence and its characteristics of repetition of reintervention after drug-eluting stent implantation for femoropopliteal lesion.

OBJECTIVE: Although clinical trials demonstrated the superiority of the Zilver (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) paclitaxel-eluting stent (PTX), a recently developed drug-eluting stent (DES), to conventional therapy for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions, the incidence and risk factors of the repetition of reintervention after DES implantation in clinical practice remained unrevealed. METHODS: This was a subanalysis of the ZEPHYR (ZilvEr PTX for tHe Femoral ArterY and Proximal Popliteal ArteRy) study, enrolling FP lesions undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) with DES implantation. The current study analyzed the 2-year database including 583 FP lesions in 495 patients undergoing preoperative intravascular ultrasound imaging before DES implantation. The primary outcome measure was re-re-EVT, defined as undergoing additional EVT more than once during the 2-year follow-up after DES implantation. The secondary outcome measure was re-EVT, defined as undergoing at least one additional EVT during the follow-up. RESULTS: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) was present in 28% of the study population, 23% had a history of EVT, and 43% had chronic total occlusion. Mean lesion length was 16 ± 10 cm, and intravascular ultrasound imaging-evaluated external elastic membrane area was 28 ± 10 mm2. The cumulative incidence rate of re-re-EVT at 2 years was estimated to be 14%, whereas that of re-EVT was 31%. After multivariate analysis, CLI and smaller external elastic membrane area were independently associated with the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and risk factors of the repetition of reintervention after DES implantation for FP lesions were revealed. The current findings suggest that DES implantation might be a careful indication in CLI cases especially with a small vessel.

Outcomes of One straight-line flow with and without pedal arch in patients with critical limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of revascularization strategies for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) whereby single vessel run off to the foot was established with or without flow into a patent pedal arch. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 312 consecutive patients with CLI who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) between December 2009 and February 2011. Below-the-knee angiography identified one vessel run off in 137 patients (44%), and we aimed to compare the outcomes between those patients where revascularization resulted in one-straight-line flow into a patent pedal arch (76 limbs, Group A) versus those who attained one straight-line flow to the distal end of a tibial vessel without flow into a patent pedal arch (61 limbs, Group B). The study endpoints were amputation free survival rate, limb salvage rate and wound healing rate at 12 months after EVT. RESULTS: Amputation free survival rate differed significantly between groups (88.2% in group A vs. 65.6% in group B, P = 0.01). Limb salvage rate also differed between groups (98.4% vs.89.3%, P = 0.03). Wound healing rate showed a trend towards difference between the two groups (89.4% vs. 80.6% P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with CLI where only one vessel runoff can be established to the foot, direct flow into a patent pedal arch is essential to improve their clinical outcomes. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Propensity Score Analysis Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Eluting vs Bare Nitinol Stents in Femoropopliteal Lesions.

PURPOSE: To present a propensity score matching analysis comparing the 1-year outcomes of de novo femoropopliteal lesions treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) or bare nitinol stents (BNS). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 452 limbs in 389 patients (mean age 74±8 years; 284 men) treated with DES implantation and 1808 limbs in 1441 patients (mean age 72±9 years; 1023 men) implanted with BNS for de novo femoropopliteal lesions. One-year follow-up data were available on all patients. The primary endpoint was 12-month restenosis assessed by duplex ultrasonography or follow-up angiography within ±2 months. Secondary endpoint was major adverse limb events (MALE) including major amputation, any reintervention, and restenosis. RESULTS: The BNS group was more likely to have current smoking, chronic total occlusion, and poor below-the-knee runoff. The stratification analysis demonstrated that diabetes mellitus (DM) and reference vessel diameter (RVD) had a significant interaction on the association of DES vs BNS implantation with restenosis (interaction p<0.05). Thus, the population was stratified into 4 subgroups (1: -DM, RVD ≥5 mm, 2: +DM, RVD ≥5 mm, 3: -DM, RVD <5 mm, and 4: +DM, RVD <5 mm); the RVD threshold was empirically determined. There were no significant intergroup differences in baseline variables after matching. There was no significant difference in restenosis risk between DES and BNS in the RVD ≥5 mm subgroup regardless of the presence of DM. The DES group had a significantly higher restenosis risk in the RVD <5 mm subgroup regardless of the presence of DM. No significant difference was observed in the risk of major amputation, reintervention, or MALE in any subgroup. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a first-generation DES was not superior to a conventional BNS for femoropopliteal lesions.

Impact of Perioperative Complications After Endovascular Therapy in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia due to Isolated Infrapopliteal Lesions.

PURPOSE: To investigate the thus far poorly defined impact of perioperative complications (POCs) on clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy (EVT) of diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) due to isolated infrapopliteal lesions. METHODS: A multicenter registry of CLI patients was interrogated to identify 780 consecutive diabetic patients (mean age 71 ± 10 years; 553 men) who successfully underwent balloon angioplasty for isolated infrapopliteal lesions. More than half of the population (487 patients) was on dialysis. Independent predictors (logistic regression) and prognostic impact on outcomes (Cox proportional hazards model) of POC (ie, death, myocardial infarction, stroke, pseudoaneurysm, puncture site hemorrhage/hematoma, distal emboli, vascular rupture, transfusion, dialysis, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage) were investigated. Outcomes are presented as the odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR), respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: POCs occurred in 12.3% (96/780) of the population. Multivariate modeling identified body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m(2) (adjusted OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.89, p=0.047) and tissue loss (adjusted OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.14 to 5.15, p=0.021) as independent predictors of POCs. In a Cox regression model adjusted for baseline clinical characteristics, the occurrence of POCs was independently associated with major adverse limb events (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.13, p=0.016) but not with mortality or wound healing. In follow-up, freedom from major adverse limb events was higher in the group without POC (85.2%) than with POC (69.7%, p=0.006) at up to 3 years. CONCLUSION: POCs within 30 days after balloon angioplasty for infrapopliteal disease in diabetics with CLI were more likely to occur in patients with low BMI and tissue loss. POC occurrence was associated with major adverse limb events in follow-up but not with mortality or wound healing.

Influence of Repeat Intervention on the Risk of Major Amputation After Infrapopliteal Angioplasty for Critical Limb Ischemia.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of repeat intervention on the risk of major amputation after infrapopliteal angioplasty for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS: A multicenter database of Japanese CLI patients was interrogated to identify patients who underwent balloon angioplasty for isolated infrapopliteal lesions from April 2004 to December 2012. In that time frame, 1298 limbs of 1065 patients (mean age 72±10 years; 739 men) were eligible for this analysis. The prevalence of tissue loss was 76%, with 33% accompanied by infection. The association between repeat intervention and future risk for major amputation was evaluated using a mixed effects logistic regression model. A stratification analysis was also performed with baseline variables. A supplementary analysis compared baseline characteristics between the cases with and without repeat intervention. Hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 1.2 years (interquartile range 0.4-2.5), during which time 143 (11.0%) limbs had major amputations and 499 (38.4%) underwent repeat intervention. The mixed effects modeling revealed that repeat intervention was significantly associated with future risk for major amputation (unadjusted HR 3.01, 95% CI 2.05 to 4.41, p=0.001). From the stratification analysis, repeat intervention significantly increased future risk of major amputation in cases with regular dialysis (HR 3.35, 95% CI 2.14 to 5.26, p<0.001), whereas it did not in those without dialysis. The supplemental analysis showed that patients with repeat intervention within 1 year had a higher prevalence of nonambulatory status, regular dialysis, tissue loss, and infection at baseline compared to those without repeat intervention for 1 year. CONCLUSION: In the patients with CLI due to infrapopliteal lesions, the need for repeat intervention increased the risk of future major amputation. However, this correlation was not applicable to nondialysis patients.

Drug-Eluting Stent vs Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: Results From a Retrospective 1-Year Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: To compare drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: A comparison was performed of data from 112 ZEPHYR registry patients (mean age 74±9 years; 60 men) with 119 femoropopliteal ISR lesions treated with a drug-eluting stent (Zilver PTX) with historical data from 116 patients (mean age 72±8 years; 83 men) with 133 lesions treated with PTA. The patients were stratified for analysis by lesions with (101/252, 40%) and without (n=151) in-stent occlusion. The primary outcome measure was the 1-year incidence of recurrent restenosis; the secondary outcome was major adverse limb events (MALE). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to look for any independent association of DES implantation with 1-year recurrent restenosis in the respective subgroups; results are presented as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: In the subgroup without in-stent occlusion, there was no significant difference between DES and PTA in the 1-year incidence of recurrent restenosis (40.5% vs 45.7%, p=0.583, respectively) or MALE (27.8% vs 20.7%, p=0.322, respectively). However, in the subgroup with in-stent occlusion, DES implantation was associated with significantly lower incidences of recurrent restenosis (44.1% vs 90.3% for PTA, p<0.001) and MALE (25.5% vs 53.6% for PTA, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that DES implantation had a significant independent negative association with the risk of recurrent restenosis in the subgroup with occlusion (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.6, p=0.006). CONCLUSION: DES implantation may be more effective than PTA in the management of femoropopliteal ISR with occlusion, but equally effective to PTA in nonocclusive ISR lesions. These results require confirmation in prospective randomized studies.

Comparable 2-Year Restenosis Rates Following Subintimal and Intraluminal Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Femoropopliteal Chronic Total Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To report midterm outcomes after subintimal vs intraluminal drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for femoropopliteal (FP) chronic total occlusion (CTO). METHODS: This subanalysis of the prospective, multicenter ZEPHYR study (ZilvEr PTX for tHe Femoral ArterY and Proximal Popliteal ArteRy) included 176 patients (mean age 74±8 years; 130 men) with 192 de novo FP CTOs that were evaluated by intravascular ultrasound after successful guidewire crossing. The primary outcome was the 2-year restenosis rate after subintimal (n=73) or intraluminal (n=119) DES implantation. Propensity score matching extracted 61 matched pairs (mean age 75 years; 49 men) for patency analysis to minimize baseline intergroup differences. Restenosis rates are reported with the 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The 1-year restenosis rates in the groups with subintimal and intraluminal DES implantation were 45% (95% CI 32% to 59%) and 35% (95% CI 22% to 49%), respectively (p=0.352), whereas the corresponding rates at 2 years were not significantly different (p=0.648) at 56% (95% CI 41% to 71%) and 51% (95% CI 34% to 68%). Baseline characteristics had no significant interaction effect on the association of subintimal angioplasty with restenosis risk. CONCLUSION: In FP CTO, 2-year restenosis rates were comparable after subintimal or intraluminal DES implantation.

Three-year clinical outcome after infrapopliteal angioplasty for critical limb ischemia in hemodialysis patients with minor or major tissue loss.

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: Among hemodialysis (HD)-dependent patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI), Endovascular therapy (EVT) of isolated infrapopliteal lesions improves limb salvage. Accordingly, we sought to determine the outcomes of this group of patients based on the extent of tissue loss at baseline. METHODS: From 2004 to 2011, 449 consecutive HD patients with CLI had ischemic wounds and underwent EVT for isolated infrapopliteal lesions. The "minor tissue loss" (MI) group was confirmed by 340 HD patients with wounds located distal to the metatarsophalangeal joints, and the "major tissue loss" (MA) group included 109 HD patients with wounds that extended beyond this point. The two groups were compared for limb salvage and amputation free survival (AFS) rates by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the percentage of diabetic patients (MI: 76.5 vs. MA: 75.2%). The percentage with direct flow to the wound site was lower in the MA group than in the MI group (MI: 63.5 vs. MA: 45.9%, P < 0.01). After EVT the MI group had a significantly better limb salvage rate (MI: 83.7 vs. MA: 71.2% at 3 years, P < 0.01), and AFS rate (MI: 44.1 vs. MA: 29.1% at 3 years, P < 0.01) compared to the MA group. CONCLUSIONS: EVT is an efficient treatment for HD patients with minor tissue loss, achieving >80% limb salvage rates at 3 years. However, AFS rates in all HD patients with tissue loss are <50% at 3 years, making their prognosis poor.

Perioperative and Long-term Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Subclavian Artery Disease From a Large Multicenter Registry.

PURPOSE: To investigate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) for subclavian artery disease in a large-scale multicenter study. METHODS: The study analyzed the outcomes from a multicenter retrospective registry (SubClavian Artery disease treated with endovascuLar therapy; muLticenter retrOsPective registry: SCALLOP) of 718 consecutive patients with upper extremity artery disease who underwent EVT between January 2003 and December 2012 at 37 Japanese cardiovascular centers. Of the 718 patients enrolled in the registry, 162 patients were excluded, leaving 553 patients (mean 70±7 years, range 41-91; 405 men) who underwent primary EVT for de novo subclavian artery disease (560 arms). RESULTS: Procedure success was achieved in 96.8% (100% for stenoses, 91% for total occlusions). The perioperative complication rate was 9.2%. Stroke was found in 1.8%, with ipsilateral posterior infarction accounting for 0.9%. The 30-day mortality was 0.7%. The mean follow-up was 39±24 months. Primary patency estimates were 90.6%±1.3%, 83.4%±1.8%, and 80.5%±2.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. There was no significant difference in primary patency between stenotic and occlusive lesions. Secondary patency estimates were 99.2%±0.4%, 98.2%±0.6%, and 97.7%±0.8% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The respective overall survival rates were 94.6%±1.0%, 86.8%±1.7%, and 79.0%±2.4%. There were 86 deaths during follow-up, of which half were due to cardiovascular causes. On multivariate analysis, critical hand ischemia (hazard ratio [HR] 4.6, 95% CI 2.06 to 10.2, p<0.001), cerebrovascular disease (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.06, p=0.01), current smoking (HR 1.8, 95% 1.14 to 2.79, p=0.01), and lesion length (in 1-cm increments; HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.04, p=0.03) were negative independent predictors of primary patency, while IVUS use (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.96, p=0.04) was a positive predictor of primary patency. CONCLUSION: Primary angioplasty/stenting for subclavian artery disease afforded acceptable outcomes in terms of perioperative complications and long-term patency.

Bypass Surgery vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus-II (TASCII) C or D Femoropopliteal Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Bypass surgery (BSX) as first-line therapy for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus-II (TASCII) C/D femoropopliteal (FP) lesions is recommended. Recent reports have shown that a drug-eluting stent (DES) provides good durability up to the mid-term. We investigated clinical outcomes after BSX vs. DES for TASCII C/D FP lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: As treatment of de novo TASCII C/D FP lesions, 274 patients who underwent DES implantation and 201 patients who had BSX were identified and analyzed. Each group had at least 1 year of follow-up data. The primary endpoint was binary restenosis. Secondary endpoints were major amputation, reintervention, reocclusion and major adverse limb event (MALE; including major amputation or any reintervention and restenosis). Before matching, the binary restenosis rate was significantly higher in the DES group than in the BSX group (42% vs. 18%, P<0.001). After propensity matching, the 1-year restenosis rate was still higher in the DES group (44% vs. 18%, P<0.001). The DES group also had a significantly higher incidence of reintervention and MALE. Major amputation and reocclusion showed no significant difference. The subsequent stratification analysis reconfirmed no significant interaction effect of any background characteristics on the association of DES implantation vs. BSX with the 1-year restenosis risk. CONCLUSIONS: BSX is still a feasible and recommended treatment for TASCII C/D FP lesions in Japanese patients, based on good durability up to 1 year.