RESUMEN
Osteoporosis is a common metabolic bone disease with a rapidly increasing prevalence, characterized by massive bone loss because of excessive osteoclast formation. Gallic acid (GA), a phenolic acid isolated from Cornus officinalis, has anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects, but its effect on osteoclast formation has not been confirmed. In our study, we demonstrated that GA significantly inhibited RANKL-induced osteoclast formation and function of osteoclast in bone marrow monocytes (BMMs) and RAW264.7 cells in a dose-dependent manner without cytotoxicity. For molecular mechanisms, GA repressed osteoclastogenesis by blocking Akt, ERK, and JNK pathways, and suppressed osteoclastogenesis-related marker expression, including nuclear factor of the activated T-cell cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1), c-Fos, and cathepsin K (CTSK). In addition, we further assessed the effect of GA in an ovariectomized mouse model, which indicated that GA has a notable effect on preventing bone loss. In conclusion, GA exerts notable effects in inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and preventing ovariectomy-induced bone loss, suggesting that GA is a potential agent in osteoporosis treatment.
Asunto(s)
Osteogénesis , Osteoporosis , Ratones , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Ácido Gálico/farmacología , Ácido Gálico/uso terapéutico , Factores de Transcripción NFATC/metabolismo , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/etiología , Osteoporosis/prevención & control , Ovariectomía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Objective: To investigate the safety of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) bioactive support in bone grafting and fusion for elderly patients with lumbar tuberculosis, and to analyze its effectiveness and advantages by comparing with autologous iliac bone grafting. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 48 elderly patients with lumbar tuberculosis who met the selection criteria between January 2017 and January 2020. The patients all underwent one-stage posterior pedicle screw internal fixation combined with anterior lesion removal and bone grafting and fusion, of which 23 cases applied n-HA/PA66 bioactive support+allogeneic bone graft (n-HA/PA66 group) and 25 cases applied autologous iliac bone graft (autologous iliac bone group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, bone density, disease duration, lesion segment, and preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Cobb angle ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications, as well as the VAS score, JOA score, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) spinal cord injury grading, Cobb angle, and bone fusion were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: The operations were completed successfully in both groups. n-HA/PA66 group had significantly less operation time and intraoperative blood loss than the autologous iliac bone group ( P<0.05). All patients were followed up 12-24 months, with an average of 15.7 months. And the difference in follow-up time between the two groups was not significant ( P>0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 cases (13%) in the n-HA/PA66 group and 10 cases (40%) in the autologous iliac group, and the difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups was significant ( χ 2=4.408, P=0.036). The postoperative VAS scores and JOA scores significantly improved when compared with the preoperative scores in both groups ( P<0.05), and the difference was significant ( P<0.05) between 2 weeks after operation and the last follow-up. The difference in VAS score at 2 weeks after operation was significant between the two groups ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference ( P>0.05) at the other time points. At last follow-up, according to the ASIA grading, the effective improvement rate was 86% (18/21) in the n-HA/PA66 group and 90% (18/20) in the autologous iliac group, with no significant difference ( χ 2=0.176, P=0.675). Imaging review showed that grade â bony fusion was obtained in both groups, and the fusion time of bone graft in the n-HA/PA66 group was significantly longer than that in the autologous iliac bone group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the Cobb angle at each time point between the two groups ( P>0.05). No recurrence of tuberculosis, loosening or fracture of the internal fixator, or displacement of the bone graft was observed during follow-up. Conclusion: In elderly patients with lumbar spine tuberculosis, the n-HA/PA66 bioactive support combined with allogeneic bone graft can effectively restore and maintain the fusion segment height and physiological curvature of the lumbar spine, and the fusion rate of bone graft is similar to that of autologous iliac bone, which can achieve better effectiveness.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Fusión Vertebral , Tuberculosis de la Columna Vertebral , Anciano , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Durapatita , Humanos , Nylons , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tuberculosis de la Columna Vertebral/cirugíaRESUMEN
Purpose: This study is aimed at comparing the clinical efficacy of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation and pedicle screw (PS) fixation of the affected vertebrae in lumbar tuberculosis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes in 52 patients (27 cases in the CBT group, 25 cases in the PS group) with lumbar TB who underwent posterior affected-vertebra fixation combined with anterior debridement and bone grafting. The intraoperative blood loss, operative time, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for incision pain and leg pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, bone grafting fusion, and complications were recorded. Results: All patients were followed up for 35-52 months and achieved good clinical outcomes. There were no differences between the two groups in the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, JOA score, bone grafting fusion, and complications. However, there was a significant difference between the two groups in VAS scores for incision pain on the 1st day and 3rd day after surgery. At the last follow-up, JOA scores were significantly improved in both groups compared to the preoperation. Conclusion: This retrospective study confirmed that both the affected-vertebra CBT screw fixation and PS fixation for lumbar TB via posterior and anterior approaches could achieve satisfactory outcomes, while the former resulted in better improvement for postoperative VAS scores.