Inter-screw index as a novel diagnostic indicator of tether breakage.

PURPOSE: Tether breakage is the most common complication of Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) occurring in up to 52% of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients and risks continued progression and revision. Radiographical diagnosis of tether breakage is commonly defined by a 5° increase in inter-screw angle and associates breakage with loss of correction. However, the sensitivity of this method was 56% only, suggesting that tethers can break without an increase in angulation, which was supported by other studies. To our knowledge, current literature lacks a method merely focusing on the diagnosis of tether breakage radiographically that does not associate the breakages with loss of correction. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of AIS patients who underwent VBT. The "inter-screw index" is defined as the percentage increase in inter-screw distance since post-op, with ≥ 13% increase defined as tether breakage as suggested by our mechanical tests. CTs were reviewed to identify the breakages and compared with inter-screw angle and inter-screw index. RESULTS: 94 segments from 13 CTs were reviewed, and 15 tether breakages were identified. Use of inter-screw index correctly identified 14 breakages (93%), whereas ≥ 5° increase in inter-screw angle only identified 12 breakages (80%). CONCLUSION: Use of inter-screw index is proven to be more sensitive than inter-screw angle in identifying tether breakages. Therefore, we propose the use of inter-screw index to diagnose tether breakages radiographically. Tether breakages were not necessarily accompanied by a loss of segmental correction leading to an increase in inter-screw angle, especially after skeletal maturity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Robotic arm-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty resulted in superior radiological accuracy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective surgical treatment for medial compartment arthritis of the knee, yet surgical outcomes are directly related to surgical execution. Robotic arm-assisted surgery aims to address these difficulties by allowing for detailed preoperative planning, real-time intraoperative assessment and haptic-controlled bone removal. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between conventional manual mobile bearing and robot arm-assisted fixed bearing medial UKA in our local population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study of 148 UKAs performed at an academic institution with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. 74 robotic arm-assisted UKAs were matched to 74 conventional UKAs via propensity score matching. Radiological outcomes included postoperative mechanical axis and individual component alignment. Clinical parameters included a range of motion, Knee Society knee score and functional assessment taken before, 6 and 12 months after the operation. RESULTS: Robot arm-assisted UKA produced a more neutral component coronal alignment in both femoral component (robotic -0.2 ± 2.8, manual 2.6 ± 2.3; P = 0.043) and tibial component (robotic -0.3 ± 4.0, manual 1.7 ± 5.3; P < 0.001). While the postoperative mechanical axis was comparable, robot arm-assisted UKA demonstrated a smaller posterior tibial slope (robotic 5.7 ± 2.7, manual 8.2 ± 3.3; P = 0.02). Clinical outcomes did not show any statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional UKA, robotic arm-assisted UKA demonstrated improved component alignment and comparable clinical outcomes. Improved radiological accuracy with robotic-arm assistance demonstrated promising early results.