RESUMEN
This study aimed to investigate the association between preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) scores on the stage of ovarian cancer (OC), chemotherapeutic response, and overall survival (OS) in patients with OC.The data of the patients who operated due to OC between January 2015 and January 2020 in a tertiary referral hospital were recorded. The patients' basic characteristics, preoperative total cholesterol, albumin, lymphocyte count, tumor markers, disease stage, grade, chemotherapeutic response, OS, and progression-free survival were recorded. The PNI and the CONUT score were calculated.The mean PNI level was considerably higher in the early-stage group than the advanced-stage group (50.02 ± 6.8 vs. 46.3 ± 7.4, p = 0.005). The AUC was 63% for the cutoff point 45.98 of PNI, whereas the AUC was 42% for the cutoff point 1.5 of CONUT score in predicting early-stage disease. The PFS and OS were significantly higher in the high PNI group than the low PNI group (p = 0.01, p = 0.002, respectively).The patients with early-stage OC had significantly higher PNI levels and lower CONUT scores in our study population.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación Nutricional , Neoplasias Ováricas , Femenino , Humanos , Estado Nutricional , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background and objectives: Preoperative anxiety is an enormous feeling of fear that is seen in all patients undergoing surgery. The severity of anxiety may vary depending on the type of surgery and anesthesia to be performed. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of brachial plexus blocks and general anesthesia methods on preoperative anxiety levels in patients who will undergo orthopedic upper-extremity surgery and to determine the factors affecting anxiety. Materials and Methods: After randomization, the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Knowledge Scale (APAIS) questionnaire was applied to the patients to determine the preoperative anxiety level, and then anesthesia was applied according to the anesthesia type determined. Pain scores (1, 8, 16, and 24 h) and total opioid consumption of the patients were recorded postoperatively. Results: The APAIS score of the patients in the general anesthesia (GA) group was significantly higher (p = 0.021). VAS score medians at 1, 4, and 8 h postoperatively were found to be significantly higher in the GA group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.044, respectively). Conclusions: USG-guided BPB may cause less anxiety than GA in patients who will undergo elective upper-extremity surgery. However, these patients have moderate anxiety, although it is more associated with advanced age, female gender, and education level.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial , Analgésicos Opioides , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/métodos , Ansiedad/etiología , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Extremidad Superior/cirugíaRESUMEN
Hysterectomy is one of the most frequent gynaecological procedures performed for various uterine pathologies. There are several approaches for conducting hysterectomies, including abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic. Recently, natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has emerged as an alternative approach for conducting hysterectomies. In this study, we aimed to compare the results of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and vaginally assisted-NOTES (vNOTES) hysterectomy procedures for the treatment of benign gynaecological diseases. Ninety-nine patients, who underwent conventional TLH or vNOTES hysterectomies, were included in this study. The operation time, presence of per/postoperative complications, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at postoperative sixth and 24th hours, and the duration of hospital stays were all analysed. The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the vNOTES hysterectomy group (79.56 ± 32.54 min) compared to the TLH group (120.67 ± 38.35 min) (p: < .001). Also, postoperative hospital stays were significantly shorter in favour of the vNOTES hysterectomy group (44 ± 16.47 h) compared to the TLH group (57.86 ± 21.31 h) (p: .002). These results indicate that vNOTES hysterectomy can be a promising approach for treating a variety of different uterine pathologies and, furthermore, that it can be an alternative to TLH.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? A hysterectomy can be done in a variety of different ways, such as abdominal, laparoscopic, vaginal, and robotic. Even though the standard practice guidelines recommend that a vaginal hysterectomy (VH) should be the first choice of treatment, it can be challenging in cases of non-descendent and large uteruses. In such cases, NOTES hysterectomy can be an alternative option.What do the results of this study add? The study has shown that vNOTES is associated with a shorter operation and briefer postoperative hospitalisation time, in comparison to TLH.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study speculates that vNOTES is an approach which may offer better outcomes than a conventional laparoscopy. Further randomised controlled trials with larger sample sizes, however, should be conducted in order to establish the place of vNOTES in hysterectomy surgeries.
Asunto(s)
Histerectomía Vaginal/estadística & datos numéricos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/estadística & datos numéricos , Vagina/cirugía , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/métodos , Histerectomía Vaginal/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postdural puncture headache is a headache that occurs after a dura puncture, especially in caesarean sections, and afects patient comfort and mobilization. In this study, we compared the efects of pencil-tipped spinal needles and especially curved, bilateral atraumatic spinal needles in individuals undergoing elective caesarean sections. METHODS: A total of 886 patients, aged 20-50 years, who had cesarean sections with spinal anesthesia and had American Society of Anesthesiologists II and III scores, were included in the study. The patients were allocated into 3 groups using the closed envelope randomization technique: Group 1 (n=250) received spinal insertions using 25-gauge pencil-point needles; Group 2 (n=245) received spinal insertions using 26-gauge atraumatic needles; and Group 3 (n=250) received spinal insertions using 27-gauge pencil-point needles. Records were kept of the quantity of spinal needle referrals, the type of treatment, the length of hospital stays, and complications. RESULTS: In the study, 745 patients who had cesarean section operations under spinal anesthesia were further analyzed. The mean incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) was 3.2% (n=24). The incidence of PDPH was higher in group 2 than in group 3 and group 1 (Group 1: 2.8%; Group 2: 6.8%; Group 3: 0%) (P <0.05). Among other complications, low back, back, shoulder, and surgical complications were similar for all 3 groups. CONCLUSION: In caesarean section operations, pencil-point spinal needles were found to have a lower incidence of postdural puncture headache than Atraucan-cut needles, regardless of needle thickness.
RESUMEN
Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy is the most performed emergency surgical technique worldwide. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, which are easier to achieve with ultrasound, are frequently used in multimodal analgesia techniques for this surgery. Quadratus lumborum (QL) block has become a standard block, first used in gynecological and other abdominal surgeries. This study was planned to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided QL and TAP blocks for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic appendectomy. Materials and methods: A total of 136 patients aged 18-65 years who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy were randomized and divided into two groups. A volume of 40 ml of local anesthetic containing 0.375% bupivacaine was administered for block applications in group TAP (n = 68) and group QL (n = 68). In addition, a patient-controlled analgesia device was used to administer bolus tramadol hydrochloride at a dose of 10 mg to relieve pain in the postoperative period. Postoperative opioid consumption of patients was recorded as the primary outcome and pain scores (1, 6, 12, 18, 24 h) as the secondary outcome. Results: Both groups were statistically similar in demographic and surgical data. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups over 24 h in terms of intraoperative remifentanil consumption (p = 0.584), postoperative cumulative opioid consumption (p = 0.807), and pain scores. No complications were observed in either group related to the block. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided lateral approach QL block may provide adequate analgesia efficacy in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy, like TAP block, and may be included in multimodal analgesia in pain control.
RESUMEN
New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality, especially in older patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although many comorbidities are associated with NOAF, the effect of anemia on the onset of atrial fibrillation is still unknown. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that anemia is associated with an increased risk of developing NOAF in critically ill patients in intensive care. We performed a retrospective analysis of critically ill patients who underwent routine hemoglobin and electrocardiography monitoring in the ICU. Receiver operating characteristics analysis determined the hemoglobin (Hb) value that triggered NOAF formation. Bivariate correlation was used to determine the relationship between anemia and NOAF. The incidence of NOAF was 9.9% in the total population, and 12.8% in the patient group with anemia. Analysis of 1931 patients revealed a negative association between anemia and the development of NOAF in the ICU. The stimulatory Hb cut-off value for the formation of NOAF was determined as 9.64 g/dL. Anemia is associated with the development of NOAF in critically ill patients in intensive care.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is an analgesic method recommended in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and proven successful in thoracoscopic surgery. The study aimed to investigate whether the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) administered single-injection in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) can be an alternative to TPVB as an analgesic method. METHODS: In this study, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I-II-III patients aged between 18-70 years who underwent thoracoscopic wedge resection surgery were analyzed retrospectively; 136 patients in the ESPB group and 114 patients in the TPVB group were included in the study. Postoperative cumulative morphine consumption numerical rating scale (NRS) scores were compared at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery at rest and during coughing between the groups. Also, rescue analgesia requirements, postoperative nausea, vomiting and other complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean cumulative morphine consumption in the postoperative 24 hours was 20.06 mg in the ESPB group and 11.35 mg in the TPVB group. A statistically significant difference was observed between groups in terms of total morphine consumption in the postoperative 24 hours (P<0.001). NRS score was significantly lower in the TPVB group at postoperative 6th and 24th hours during coughing (P=0.003 and P=0.034, respectively) and at 24th hour at rest (P=0.008) than ESPB group. Median NRS scores at rest were low (<4) in both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of postoperative pulmonary complications as atelectasis and length of hospital stay (LOS) (P=0.643 and P=0.867 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound (US)-guided single-injection TPVB provided superior analgesia in patients undergoing single-port VATS than ESPB. In addition to this, TPVB showed more opioid sparing by reducing morphine consumption.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia , Bloqueo Nervioso , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/efectos adversos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background and Aims: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, health care workers are at a high risk of infection from aerosols. In this study, we compared the ease of using the aerosol box (AB) with the traditional method during internal jugular vein cannulation attempts (IJVCA). Methods: The study included 40 patients with COVID-19 who required central venous catheterisation during treatment in the ward. The patients were randomly allocated to one of the two protective equipment (PPE) groups and then randomly assigned to one of the five anaesthesiologists with at least 5 years of experience. Group P and A had both PPE and AB used, whereas Group P included patients where PPE was used alone. The physicians completed a survey after performing the procedure to evaluate the use of the AB. Results: The preparation for the procedure and procedure durations were observed to be statistically longer in Group P and A (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively). The first attempt in Group P and A was unsuccessful in six patients, whereas the first attempt in Group P was unsuccessful in only two patients (P = 0.235). Anaesthesiologists described difficulty with manipulation during the procedure, discomfort using the box, and resulting cognitive load increase in Group P and A. Conclusion: The IJVCA procedures were faster and easier and had greater satisfaction for physicians when the AB was not used. Also, the high complication rate, including carotid artery punctures and disruption of sterility and PPE, albeit not statistically significant, has clinical implications. Therefore, we do not recommend the use of ABs for IJVCA.