Benchmarks in colorectal surgery: multinational study to define quality thresholds in high and low anterior resection.

BACKGROUND: Benchmark comparisons in surgery allow identification of gaps in the quality of care provided. The aim of this study was to determine quality thresholds for high (HAR) and low (LAR) anterior resections in colorectal cancer surgery by applying the concept of benchmarking. METHODS: This 5-year multinational retrospective study included patients who underwent anterior resection for cancer in 19 high-volume centres on five continents. Benchmarks were defined for 11 relevant postoperative variables at discharge, 3 months, and 6 months (for LAR). Benchmarks were calculated for two separate cohorts: patients without (ideal) and those with (non-ideal) outcome-relevant co-morbidities. Benchmark cut-offs were defined as the 75th percentile of each centre's median value. RESULTS: A total of 3903 patients who underwent HAR and 3726 who had LAR for cancer were analysed. After 3 months' follow-up, the mortality benchmark in HAR for ideal and non-ideal patients was 0.0 versus 3.0 per cent, and in LAR it was 0.0 versus 2.2 per cent. Benchmark results for anastomotic leakage were 5.0 versus 6.9 per cent for HAR, and 13.6 versus 11.8 per cent for LAR. The overall morbidity benchmark in HAR was a Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) score of 8.6 versus 14.7, and that for LAR was CCI® score 11.9 versus 18.3. CONCLUSION: Regular comparison of individual-surgeon or -unit outcome data against benchmark thresholds may identify gaps in care quality that can improve patient outcome.

Hand-assisted versus straight laparoscopy for colorectal surgery - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is an alternative to straight laparoscopy (LAP) in colorectal surgery. Many studies have compared the two in terms of efficacy, complications, and outcomes. This meta-analysis aims to uncover if there are any significant differences in conversion rates, operative times, body mass index (BMI), incision lengths, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of stay. METHODS: Comprehensive searches were performed on databases from their respective inceptions to 16 December 2021, with a manual search performed through Scopus. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case series involving more than 10 patients were included. RESULTS: A total of 47 studies were found fitting the inclusion criteria, with 5 RCTs, 41 cohort studies, and 1 case series. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery was associated with lower conversion rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.41, 95%CI 0.28-0.60, p < 0.00001), shorter operative times (Mean Difference [MD] - 8.32 min, 95%CI - 14.05- - 2.59, p = 0.004), and higher BMI (MD 0.79, 95%CI 0.46-1.13, p < 0.00001), but it was also associated with longer incision lengths (MD 2.19 cm, 95%CI 1.66-2.73 cm, p < 0.00001), and higher postoperative complication rates (OR 1.15, 95%CI 1.06-1.24, p = 0.0004). Length of stay was not different in HALS as compared to Lap (MD 0.16 days, 95%CI - 0.06-0.38 days, p = 0.16, and intraoperative complications were the same between both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-assisted laparoscopy is a suitable alternative to straight laparoscopy with benefits and risks. While there are many cohort studies comparing HALS and LAP, more RCTs would be needed for a better quality of evidence.

Peristomal Necrosis Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Peristomal necrosis is a rare but challenging condition requiring multidisciplinary management involving surgical debridement and intensive WOC nurse management. CASE: Mr T was a 56-year-old man who underwent cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy for a high-grade appendiceal neoplasm. As part of the procedure, an Abcarian stoma (end-ileostomy with a distal lumen from the transverse colon brought out flush with skin beside the proximal stoma) was created. Postoperatively there was leakage of effluent under the subcutaneous skin resulting in full-thickness necrosis of the peristomal area requiring surgical debridement. Consequently, a large peristomal skin defect occurred, resulting in difficulty achieving a good seal of the ostomy pouching system. To overcome these challenges, a multidisciplinary approach with WOC nurses, colorectal surgeons, and plastic surgeons was implemented. Initially, the defect was managed with a negative pressure wound therapy system, followed by a primary closure of the peristomal skin by the plastic surgeons. Mr T was discharged to home 58 days after his initial surgery; by that time, the peristomal skin was healed and he was able to manage ostomy pouching changes independently. Eight months later his ileostomy was successfully reversed. CONCLUSIONS: Large peristomal defects are challenging but can be managed successfully via a multidisciplinary approach including WOC nurses, colorectal surgeons, and plastic surgeons.

Can MRI pelvimetry predict the technical difficulty of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery?

PURPOSE: Selection of an open or minimally invasive approach to total mesorectal excision (TME) is generally based on surgeon preference and an intuitive assessment of patient characteristics but there consensus on criteria to predict surgical difficulty. Pelvimetry has been used to predict the difficult surgical pelvis, typically using only bony landmarks. This study aimed to assess the relationship between pelvic soft tissue measurements on preoperative MRI and surgical difficulty. METHODS: Preoperative MRIs for patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection in the Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial (ALaCaRT) were retrospectively reviewed by two blinded surgeons and pelvimetric variables measured. Pelvimetric variables were analyzed for predictors of successful resection of the rectal cancer, defined by clear circumferential and distal resection margins and completeness of TME. RESULTS: There was no association between successful surgery and any measurement of distance, area, or ratio. However, the was a strong association between the primary outcome and the estimated total pelvic volume on adjusted logistic regression analysis (OR = 0.99, P = 0.01). For each cubic centimeter increase in the pelvic volume, there was a 1% decrease in the odds of successful laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Intuitive prediction of unsuccessful surgery was correct in 43% of cases, and correlation between surgeons was poor (ICC = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: A surgeon's intuitive assessment of the difficult pelvis, based on visible MRI assessment, is not a reliable predictor of successful laparoscopic surgery. Further assessment of pelvic volume may provide an objective method of defining the difficult surgical pelvis.

Pelvic exenteration combined with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for advanced primary or recurrent colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases.

AIM: The aim was to report early outcomes of six patients who underwent combined pelvic exenteration (PE), cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer with colorectal peritoneal metastases at a single centre. The literature contains limited data on the safety and oncological outcomes of patients who undergo this combined procedure. METHODS: Six patients who underwent combined PE, CRS and HIPEC at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, between January 2017 and February 2020 were identified and included. Data were extracted from prospectively maintained databases. RESULTS: Three patients underwent surgery for advanced primary rectal cancer, while two patients had recurrent sigmoid cancer and one had recurrent rectal cancer. All patients had synchronous peritoneal metastases. Two patients required total PE and two patients had a central (bladder-sparing) PE. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index was 6 (range 3-12) and all patients underwent a complete cytoreduction. The median operating time was 702 min (range 485-900) and the median blood loss was 1650 ml (range 700-12,000). The median length of intensive care unit and hospital stay was 4.5 and 25 days, respectively. There was no inpatient, 30-day or 90-day mortality. Three patients (50%) experienced a major (Clavien-Dindo III/IV) complication. At a median follow-up of 11.5 months (range 2-18 months), two patients died with recurrent disease, one patient was alive with recurrence, while three patients remain alive and disease-free. Of the three patients who developed recurrent disease, one had isolated pelvic recurrence, one had pelvic and peritoneal recurrences and one had bone metastases. CONCLUSION: Early results from this initial experience with simultaneous PE, CRS and HIPEC suggest that this combined procedure is safe and feasible; however, the long-term oncological and quality of life outcomes require further investigation.

Management of obstetric anal sphincter injury: Colorectal surgeons' perspectives in Australia and New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) are a significant complication of vaginal delivery, and a leading cause of anal incontinence in women. AIMS: The aims were to explore the management of OASIs in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) by colorectal surgeons and how this compares with current recommendations and international experience, and to identify the deterrents to the provision of best-practice care among colorectal surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred colorectal surgeons of the Colorectal Surgical Society of ANZ were mailed questionnaires. Areas of interest included: surgeon demographics; exposure to OASIs; understanding of current recommendations; and opinions regarding the importance of symptoms and assessment tools in OASIs. RESULTS: There were 94 completed questionnaires (response rate 31.3%). Fifty-seven surgeons (60.6%) reported low exposure to OASIs during their fellowship training. Greater than 90% believed patients with grade three tears and above should have anal sphincter assessment. Sixty-six (70.2%) reported that they routinely review women who have had OASIs. However, 56.4% were unaware if their obstetrics department followed a standard protocol for OASIs. Surgeons practising in metropolitan centres reported higher rates of their obstetrics department following a protocol (P = 0.013), and greater access to investigative tools (P < 0.001), when compared to rural-based surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Most ANZ colorectal surgeons have had minimal training in OASI management. Colorectal surgeons are more commonly involved with OASI patients in the non-acute setting. Management protocols involving a multidisciplinary team of both colorectal surgeons and obstetricians should be clearly defined, and the gap between metropolitan and rural centres needs to be reviewed.

Quality of Life After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Early Results from a Prospective Cohort Study of 115 Patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe short- and medium-term longitudinal quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC were recruited. The primary outcome was QoL, measured using the short-form 36 questionnaire and expressed as a physical component score (PCS) and a mental component score (MCS), with higher scores representing better QoL. Data were collected prospectively at baseline and before discharge, then 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Trajectories of the PCS and MCS were described for the study period and grouped according to a peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) (≤ 12 vs. ≥ 13) and a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (CC0 vs. CC1-CC3). RESULTS: Overall, 117 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC and 115 (98.3%) of the 117 patients participated in the study. The main primary pathology was colorectal in 52 (45%) of the 115 patients and appendiceal in 27 (23.5%) of the 115 patients. The median baseline PCS [48.16; interquartile range (IQR), 38.6-54.9] had decreased at pre-discharge (35.34; IQR, 28.7-41.8), then increased slightly at 3 months (42.54; IQR, 37.6-51.6), before returning to baseline within 6 months (48.35; IQR, 39.1-52.5) and remaining unchanged 12 months after surgery (48.55; IQR, 40.8-55.5). The MCS remained unchanged during the study period. The patients with a PCI of 13 or higher had worse PCS and MCS during the postoperative period than the patients with a PCI of 12 or lower. CONCLUSIONS: The CRS and HIPEC procedures impaired PCS, with scores returning to baseline within 6 months after surgery, whereas MCS remained unchanged. The patients with a lower PCI had better postoperative QoL outcomes. For patients with peritoneal malignancy, CRS and HIPEC can be performed with acceptable short- to medium-term QoL outcomes.

Parastomal hernia repair with onlay mesh remains a safe and effective approach.

BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernia (PSH) management poses difficulties due to significant rates of recurrence and morbidity after repair. This study aims to describe a practical approach for PSH, particularly with onlay mesh repair using a lateral peristomal incision. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent PSH repair between 2001 and 2018. RESULTS: Seventy-six consecutive PSH with a mean follow-up of 93.1 months were reviewed. Repair was carried out for end colostomy (40%), end ileostomy (25%), ileal conduit (21%), loop colostomy (6.5%) end-loop colostomy (5%) and loop ileostomy (2.5%). The repair was performed either with a lateral peristomal incision (59%) or a midline incision (41%). Polypropylene mesh (86%), biologic mesh (8%) and composite mesh (6%) were used. Stoma relocation was done in 9 patients (12%). Eight patients (11%) developed postoperative wound complications. Recurrence occurred in 16 patients (21%) with a mean time to recurrence at 29.4 months. No significant difference in wound complication and recurrence was observed based on the type of stoma, incision used, type of mesh used, and whether or not the stoma was repaired on the same site or relocated. CONCLUSION: Onlay mesh repair of PSH remains a practical and safe approach and could be an advantageous technique for high-risk patients. It can be performed using a lateral peristomal incision with low morbidity and an acceptable recurrence rate. However, for patients with significant adhesions and very large PSH, a midline approach with stoma relocation may also be considered.

Patterns of internet and social media use in colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons use the Internet and social media to provide health information, promote their clinical practice, network with clinicians and researchers, and engage with journal clubs and online campaigns. While surgical patients are increasingly Internet-literate, the prevalence and purpose of searching for online health information vary among patient populations. We aimed to characterise patient and colorectal surgeon (CRS) use of the Internet and social media to seek health information. METHODS: Members of the Colorectal Society of Australia and New Zealand and patients under the care of CRS at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, were surveyed. Questions pertained to the types of information sought from the Internet, the platforms used to seek it, and the perceived utility of this information. RESULTS: Most CRS spent 2-6 h per week using the Internet for clinical purposes and an additional 2-6 h per week for research. 79% preferred literature databases as an information source. CRS most commonly directed patients to professional healthcare body websites. 59% of CRS use social media, mainly for socialising or networking. Nine percent of surgeons spent > 1 h per week on social media for clinical or research purposes. 72% of surgeons have a surgical practice website. 43% of patients searched the Internet for information on their doctor, and 75% of patients sought information on their symptoms or condition. However, 25% used health-specific websites, and 14% used professional healthcare body websites. Around 84% of patients found the information helpful, and 8% found it difficult to find information on the Internet. 12% of patients used social media to seek health information. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal surgery patients commonly find health information on the Internet but social media is not a prominent source of health information for patients or CRS.

Metastatic Melanoma to the Colon, Rectum, and Anus: A 50-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma metastatic to the large bowel (colon, rectum, and anus) is rarely diagnosed, with more than 95% of large bowel metastases identified post-mortem. The incidence, natural history, and survival rates of patients with large bowel melanoma metastases are poorly documented in the literature. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the incidence, clinical characteristics, and survival of patients with large bowel melanoma metastases. METHODS: A review was undertaken of all patients with melanoma treated over a 50-year period (1964-2014) at a tertiary referral center. Cases selected for study were those diagnosed with melanoma metastases in the colon, rectum, and anus. Primary colorectal and anal melanomas were excluded. Data were retrieved relating to patient demographics, clinical features, and survival. RESULTS: Of 38,279 patients with primary melanoma, 106 patients (0.3%, mean age 51.0 years [standard deviation 16.3], 64 males) developed large bowel metastases. The median interval between diagnosis of primary melanoma and large bowel metastasis was 62.8 months (range 1-476). The most common symptom was rectal bleeding (29.2%), and the large bowel was the sole site of metastasis in 47.2% of patients. Median survival from diagnosis of large bowel metastasis was 31.7 months (range 1-315), and overall survival at 1, 2, and 5 years was 68.1, 45.9, and 26.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study provides insights into melanoma metastatic to the colon, rectum, and anus, which had an incidence of 0.3%. There are potentially long intervals between diagnosis of primary melanoma and large bowel metastasis. The most common symptom was rectal bleeding, although some patients were asymptomatic.

Complications Arising From Perioperative Anticoagulant/Antiplatelet Therapy in Major Colorectal and Abdominal Wall Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative hemorrhage and thromboembolism are recognized complications following colorectal and abdominal wall surgery, but accurate documentation of their incidence, trends, and outcomes is scant. This is relevant given the increasing number of surgical patients with cardiovascular comorbidity on anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize trends in the use of anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy among patients undergoing major colorectal and abdominal wall surgery within the past decade, and to assess rates of, outcomes following, and risk factors for hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications. DESIGN AND SETTING: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at a single quaternary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent major colorectal and abdominal wall surgery during three 12-month intervals (2005, 2010, and 2015) were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured was the rate of complications relating to postoperative hemorrhage or thromboembolism. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred twenty-six patients underwent major colorectal and abdominal wall surgery (mean age, 61.4 years (SD 16.3); 575 (51.1%) male). Overall, 229 (21.7%) patients were on anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents; there was an increase in the proportion of patients on clopidogrel, dual antiplatelet therapy, and novel oral anticoagulants over the decade. One hundred seven (9.5%) cases were complicated by hemorrhage/thromboembolism. Aspirin (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.38-3.57), warfarin/enoxaparin (OR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.67-5.77), and dual antiplatelet therapy (OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.37-6.53) were most implicated with complications on univariate analysis. Patients with atrial fibrillation (adjusted OR 2.67; 95% CI, 1.47-4.85), ischemic heart disease (adjusted OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.04-4.40), and mechanical valves (adjusted OR, 7.40; 95% CI 1.11-49.29) were at increased risk of complications on multivariate analysis. The severity of these events was mainly limited to Clavien-Dindo 1 (n = 37) and 2 (n = 46) complications. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study with incomplete documentation of blood loss and operative time in the early study period. CONCLUSIONS: One in ten patients incurs hemorrhagic/thromboembolic complications following colorectal and abdominal wall surgery. "High-risk" patients are identifiable, and individualized management of these patients concerning multidisciplinary discussion and critical-care monitoring may help improve outcomes. Prospective studies are required to formalize protocols in these "high-risk" patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A747.

Major Abdominal and Perianal Surgery in Crohn's Disease: Long-term Follow-up of Australian Patients With Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with Crohn's disease still require surgery despite significant advances in medical therapy, surveillance, and management strategies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess surgical strategies and outcomes in Crohn's disease, including surgical recurrence and emergency surgery. DESIGN: This was a multicenter, retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. SETTINGS: A specialist-referred cohort of patients with Crohn's disease between 1970 and 2009 was studied. PATIENTS: Included were 972 patients with Crohn's disease who were referred to the Sydney Inflammatory Bowel Disease cohort database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcomes of interest were the rates of major abdominal and perianal surgery between decades (1970-1979, 1980-1989, 1990-1999, and 2000-2009), indications for surgery, types of procedure performed, rate of elective and emergency surgery, risk of surgical recurrence, and predictive factors for surgery. RESULTS: Between 1970 and 2009, the overall risks of surgery within 5, 10, and 15 years of diagnosis were 31.7%, 43.3%, and 48.4%. The median time to first surgery from time of diagnosis was 2 years (range, 0-31 years). A total of 6.7% of patients required emergency surgery within 5 years of diagnosis. In total, 8.8% of patients required emergency surgery within 15 years. The overall risk of surgical recurrence was 35.9%. The risk of major abdominal surgery significantly decreased between 2000 and 2009 when compared with the 1970 to 1979 period (OR = 0.49 (95% CI, 0.34-0.70). However, the rate of perianal surgery significantly increased (OR = 5.76 (95% CI, 2.54-13.06)). The main indications for surgery were enteric stricture or obstruction, perianal disease, and intra-abdominal fistulas/abscess. Of the 972 patients over 4 decades, only 11 patients (1.1%) were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. LIMITATIONS: This was a specialist-referred cohort, not a population-based study. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of major abdominal surgery has decreased, with surgery reserved for more severe and complicated disease. The natural history of patients with more complicated Crohn's disease and severe phenotypes puts them at higher risk of surgical recurrence and emergency surgery. There has been no reduction in emergency surgery rates and there has been an increase in surgical recurrence despite the reduction in surgical rate morbidity. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A483.

Discrimination, Bullying and Harassment in Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the public media in Australia reported a series of life stories of victims who had been subjected to inappropriate behaviors in their surgical careers, bringing the profession into disrepute. Currently, limited data are available in the medical literature on discrimination, bullying and harassment (DBH) in surgery. This significant information gap prompted a systematic review to compile relevant information about DBH in surgical practice and training, in particular, its prevalence and impact. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases (May 1929-October 2017). Studies identified were appraised with standard selection criteria. Data points were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. RESULTS: Eight studies, comprising 5934 participants, were examined. Discrimination occurred in a pooled estimate of 22.4% [95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 14.0-33.9%]. One of the papers reported the prevalence of bullying using two methods including Revised Negative Acts Questionnaire and a definition by Einarsen. Pooled estimate of incidence rate was thus 37.7% (95% CI = 34.0-41.5%) and 40.3% (95% CI = 34.7-46.2%), respectively. In terms of harassment, pooled prevalence was 31.2% (95% CI = 10.0-65.0%). CONCLUSIONS: DBH is a significant issue in surgery. The true incidence of these issues may remain underestimated. Actions are being taken by professional bodies to create a positive culture in surgery. The effectiveness of these strategies is yet to be determined. More studies are warranted to investigate the magnitude of these issues given their psychological impact, and more importantly to monitor the effectiveness of current measures.

Coaching Experts: Applications to Surgeons and Continuing Professional Development.

Surgery is a science and an art, which is mastered through years of training and refined by the accumulation of individual experience and preference. Continuing professional development (CPD) is a concept that emphasizes a self-directed approach to education. Coaching is a process that leads to increased utilization of a person's current skills and resources without counselling or advising. Coaching in surgery could be used to facilitate and optimize feedback and reflection, thus enhancing performance and outcomes through elite performance of an operative procedure. Therefore, it can be applied under the umbrella of CPD. Ultimately also emphasizing that better quality surgery is not necessarily purely based on technical outcomes, it is a combination of both technical and nontechnical practice. Coaching of surgeons is a conceptually formidable tool in the successful implementation of effective CPD programs. CPD currently provides an opportunity for surgeons to gain access to constantly evolving medical knowledge and technique; however, there is no accountability to its understanding or implementation. Coaches have the potential to provide confidential appraisal and feedback in a constructive approach with the aim to eliminate any barriers to the transfer of technique and knowledge.

Heuristics and bias in rectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Deciding to defunction after anterior resection can be difficult, requiring cognitive tools or heuristics. From our previous work, increasing age and risk-taking propensity were identified as heuristic biases for surgeons in Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ), and inversely proportional to the likelihood of creating defunctioning stomas. We aimed to assess these factors for colorectal surgeons in the British Isles, and identify other potential biases. METHODS: The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) was invited to complete an online survey. Questions included demographics, risk-taking propensity, sensitivity to professional criticism, self-perception of anastomotic leak rate and propensity for creating defunctioning stomas. Chi-squared testing was used to assess differences between ACPGBI and CSSANZ respondents. Multiple regression analysis identified independent surgeon predictors of stoma formation. RESULTS: One hundred fifty (19.2%) eligible members of the ACPGBI replied. Demographics between ACPGBI and CSSANZ groups were well-matched. Significantly more ACPGBI surgeons admitted to anastomotic leak in the last year (p < 0.001). ACPGBI surgeon age over 50 (p = 0.02), higher risk-taking propensity across several domains (p = 0.044), self-belief in a lower-than-average anastomotic leak rate (p = 0.02) and belief that the average risk of leak after anterior resection is 8% or lower (p = 0.007) were all independent predictors of less frequent stoma formation. Sensitivity to criticism from colleagues was not a predictor of stoma formation. CONCLUSIONS: Unrecognised surgeon factors including age, everyday risk-taking, self-belief in surgical ability and lower probability bias of anastomotic leak appear to exert an effect on decision-making in rectal surgery.

Pudendal nerve testing does not contribute to surgical decision making following anorectal testing in patients with faecal incontinence.

PURPOSE: Faecal incontinence (FI) is a debilitating condition, which affects approximately 2-17 % of the population. Clinical assessment, physiological testing and imaging are usually used to evaluate the pathophysiology and guide management of FI. By analysing patient characteristics, symptoms and investigative findings, the aim of this study was to identify which patient characteristics and investigations influence patient management. METHODS: Data was prospectively collected for all patients with FI presenting to a single surgeon at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, between March 2002 and September 2013. Continuous data was analysed using the independent T-test. Categorical data was analysed using chi-square tests and logistic regression. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-eight patients were reviewed; 96 % were female and the mean age was 57 years. Surgical intervention was recommended for 185 patients (47 %) should biofeedback fail. Independent predictors for surgical recommendation were prolapse (p < 0.001, adjusted OR = 4.9 [CI 2.9-8.2]), a functional sphincter length <1 cm (p = 0.032, OR = 1.7 [CI 1.1-2.8]), an external anal sphincter defect (p = 0.028, OR = 1.8 [CI 1.1-3.1]) and a Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score ≥10 (p = 0.029, OR = 1.7 [CI 1.1-2.6]). CONCLUSION: Independent predictors of surgical recommendation included the presence of prolapse, a functional sphincter length <1 cm, an external anal sphincter defect and a Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score ≥ 10. Pudendal neuropathy was not a predictor of surgical intervention, leading us to question the utility of this investigation.

Workplace Bullying in Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the extent and nature of workplace bullying among General Surgery trainees and consultants in Australia. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: An online questionnaire survey of General Surgery trainees and consultant surgeons in Australia was conducted between March and May 2012. Prevalence of bullying was measured using both a definition of workplace bullying and the revised Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ-R). Sources of bullying were also examined, as well as the barriers and outcomes of formal reporting of bullying. RESULTS: The response rate was 34 % (370/1084) with 41 % (n = 152) of respondents being trainees. Overall, 47 % (n = 173) of respondents reported having been bullied to some degree and 68 % (n = 250) reported having witnessed bullying of surgical colleagues in the last 12 months. The prevalence of bullying was significantly higher in trainees and females, with 64 % of trainees and 57 % of females experiencing some degree of bullying. The majority of respondents (83 %) had experienced at least one negative behavior in the last 12 months, but 38 % experienced at least one negative behavior on a weekly or daily basis. The persistent negative behaviors that represent work-related bullying most commonly experienced were 'having opinions ignored' and 'being exposed to an unmanageable workload.' Consultant surgeons were the most common source of bullying for both trainees and consultants, with administration the next common source. Of those who reported being bullied, only 18 % (n = 32) made a formal complaint. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased awareness and interventions, workplace bullying remains a significant problem within General Surgery in Australia. The findings in this study serve as a baseline for future questionnaires to monitor the effectiveness of implemented anti-bullying interventions.

Improving Quality of Life for People with Incurable Large-Bowel Obstruction: Randomized Control Trial of Colonic Stent Insertion.

BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the dominant treatment for large-bowel obstruction, with emerging data on self-expanding metallic stents. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether stent insertion improves quality of life and survival in comparison with surgical decompression. DESIGN: This study reports on a randomized control trial (registry number ACTRN012606000199516). SETTING: This study was conducted at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, and Western Hospital, Melbourne. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Patients with malignant incurable large-bowel obstruction were randomly assigned to surgical decompression or stent insertion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was differences in EuroQOL EQ-5D quality of life. Secondary end points included overall survival, 30-day mortality, stoma rates, postoperative recovery, complications, and readmissions. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients of 58 needed to reach the calculated sample size were evaluated. Stent insertion was successful in 19 of 26 (73%) patients. The remaining 7 patients required a stoma compared with 24 of 26 (92%) surgery group patients (p < 0.001). There were no stent-related perforations or deaths. The surgery group had significantly reduced quality of life compared with the stent group from baseline to 1 and 2 weeks (p = 0.001 and p = 0.012), and from baseline to 12 months (p = 0.01) in favor of the stent group, whereas both reported reduced quality of life. The stent group had an 8% 30-day mortality compared with 15% for the surgery group (p = 0.668). Median survival was 5.2 and 5.5 months for the groups (p = 0.613). The stent group had significantly reduced procedure time (p = 0.014), postprocedure stay (p = 0.027), days nothing by mouth (p = 0.002), and days before free access to solids (p = 0.022). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the lack of an EQ-5D Australian-based population set. CONCLUSIONS: Stent use in patients with incurable large-bowel obstruction has a number of advantages with faster return to diet, decreased stoma rates, reduced postprocedure stay, and some quality-of-life benefits.