Development of the motivational thought frequency scale for alcohol abstinence (MTF-A).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: For most treatment-seeking patients with severe Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), abstinence is the clinically indicated goal. Existing AUD motivation scales are non-specific about treatment consumption goals, which limit their effectiveness. Desires and mental imagery are relevant in the motivation for AUD treatment engagement. The Motivational Thought Frequency Scale for an abstinence goal (MTF-A) was adapted from the MTF for controlled drinking (MTF-CD). This study psychometrically evaluated the MTF-A in an alcohol-dependent sample engaged in treatment with a goal of abstinence. To enhance the clinical utility of the scale, a secondary aim was to evaluate a psychometrically equivalent short version of the MTF-A. METHOD: A sample N of 329 treatment-seeking patients with AUD (mean age of 44.44 years, SD = 11.89 years, 72% male) who were undertaking a cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) program for abstinence completed the Motivational Thought Frequency Scale for Abstinence (MTF-A) and the Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire (SADQ). The MTF-A measured motivation for abstinence through four factors: intensity, self-efficacy imagery, incentives imagery, and availability. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were conducted to examine factor structure and model fit. Cronbach's alpha assessed internal consistency. Predictive validity was determined by logistic regression predicting first-session treatment non-attendance and alcohol consumption between baseline assessment and commencement of treatment, controlling for potential confounds. RESULTS: A four-factor structure provided the best fit for the MTF-A, compared with one- and three-factor models. A shortened 9-item MTF-A scale (S-MTF-A) provided better fit than the 13-item MTF-A scale. Both MTF-A and S-MTF-A displayed good internal consistency. Although both MTF-A and S-MTF-A successfully predicted first-session treatment non-attendance, neither predicted alcohol consumption between the baseline assessment and commencement of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The model fit of the four-factor, 9-item S-MTF-A was superior to the original 13-item MTF-A. Both scales were predictive of participation of AUD treatment. Desires and mental imagery play an important role in AUD treatment motivation.

Measuring alcohol craving: development of the Alcohol Craving Experience questionnaire.

AIMS: To develop a measure of craving based on the Elaborated Intrusion (EI) theory of desire and to examine the construct, concurrent and discriminant validity of the instrument. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients from a hospital alcohol and drug out-patient service (n = 230), participants in a randomized controlled trial (n = 219) and students in a university-based study of alcohol craving (n = 202) were recruited. MEASUREMENTS: The Alcohol Craving Experience questionnaire (ACE) was developed to measure sensory aspects of craving (imagining taste, smell or sensations of drinking and intrusive cognitions associated with craving) when craving was maximal during the previous week (ACE-S: strength), and to assess frequency of desire-related thoughts in the past week (ACE-F: frequency). All participants completed the ACE and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). The Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) and the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) were completed by hospital patients and randomized control trial participants. FINDINGS: Exploratory factor analysis on the ACE-S and ACE-F resulted in a three-factor structure representing imagery, intensity and intrusion. An attempt to confirm this factor structure required a reduction in items (two from ACE-S, five from ACE-F) before a good fit to the three-factor model was obtained. Concurrent validity with the OCDS, with severity of alcohol dependence and with depression, anxiety and stress, was demonstrated. The ACE discriminated between clinical and non-clinical populations and between those at higher risk of alcohol dependence and those at lower risk. CONCLUSIONS: A new scale, the Alcohol Craving Experience questionnaire, based on the Elaborated Intrusion theory of desire appears to capture key constructs of the theory and correlate with indices of alcohol dependence.

Alcohol dependence: the impact of cognitive behaviour therapy with or without naltrexone on subjective health status.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the health-related quality of life of alcohol-dependent patients across a 12-week cognitive behaviour treatment (CBT) program and identify whether the patient selection of the anticraving medication naltrexone further enhanced these outcomes. METHOD: One hundred and thirty-six consecutive alcohol-dependent subjects voluntarily participated and were offered naltrexone, of which 73 (54%) participants declined medication. A matched design was used. Of the 136 subjects, 86 (43 naltrexone and CBT; 43 CBT only) could be individually matched (blind to outcome measures) for gender, age, prior alcohol detoxification and dependence severity. Measures of health status and mental health wellbeing included the Rand Corporation Medical Outcomes Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). RESULTS: Pre-treatment, all had SF-36 and GHQ-28 scores markedly below national norms. Post-treatment, significant improvement in seven of the eight SF-36 subscales and all of the GHQ-28 subscales occurred, approximating national normative levels. Patients in the CBT + naltrexone group were significantly more likely to have increased days abstinent (p=0.002) and to complete the program abstinent (p=0.051). The adjunctive use of naltrexone did not provide additional benefit as reflected in SF-36 and GHQ-28 scores, beyond CBT alone. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who completed the CBT-based treatment program reported significant improvements in self-reported health status (SF-36) and wellbeing (GHQ-28). The adjunctive use of naltrexone demonstrated no additional improvement in these measures.

Cognitive behavioural therapy combined with the relapse-prevention medication acamprosate: are short-term treatment outcomes for alcohol dependence improved?

OBJECTIVE: The relapse prevention medication acamprosate has been recently introduced to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) for the treatment of alcohol dependence. Overseas clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of using acamprosate as an adjunct to existing psychotherapeutic approaches. Research has not examined treatment outcomes using a standardized clinical approach. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of adding acamprosate to an established abstinence-based outpatient alcohol rehabilitation programme in an Australian population. METHODS: Fifty patients participated in an established 12-week, outpatient, "contract" based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) alcohol abstinence programme and received acamprosate (CBT + acamprosate). Patients weighing > or = 60 kg were prescribed acamprosate calcium 333 mg tablets, two tablets three times daily (1998 mg/day) and those weighing < 60 kg received four tablets (1332 mg/day) daily. Outcomes were compared with 50 historical, matched controls, all of whom participated in the same program without a relapse prevention medication (CBT alone). All patients met DSM-IV criteria for alcohol dependence and the majority were socially disadvantaged. RESULTS: Programme attendance across the eight treatment sessions was similar in both the CBT + acamprosate and the CBT alone conditions (P = 0.268). Relapse to alcohol use occurred sooner and more frequently in the CBT alone group (P = < 0.0005). Rehabilitation programme completion at 12 weeks was 42% (CBT + acamprosate) compared with 32% for (CBT alone) (P = < 0.204). Alcohol abstinence at 12 weeks was 38% (CBT + acamprosate) compared with 14% (CBT alone) (P = < 0.006). CONCLUSION: Even within an alcohol dependent population characterized by poor prognostic indices, the addition of acamprosate to an established CBT outpatient programme significantly improved abstinence rates over a 12-week period. The use of acamprosate as an adjunctive treatment for alcohol dependence should be encouraged in Australia.