Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of ciprofol for sedating patients in ICUs who required mechanical ventilation (MV). DESIGN: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized, noninferiority trial. SETTING: Twenty-one centers across China from December 2020 to June 2021. PATIENTS: A total of 135 ICU patients 18 to 80 years old with endotracheal intubation and undergoing MV, who were expected to require sedation for 6-24 hours. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred thirty-five ICU patients were randomly allocated into ciprofol ( n = 90) and propofol ( n = 45) groups in a 2:1 ratio. Ciprofol or propofol were IV infused at loading doses of 0.1 mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg, respectively, over 4 minutes ± 30 seconds depending on the physical condition of each patient. Ciprofol or propofol were then immediately administered at an initial maintenance dose of 0.3 mg/kg/hr or 1.5 mg/kg/hr, to achieve the target sedation range of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (+1 to -2). Besides, continuous IV remifentanil analgesia was administered (loading dose: 0.5-1 µg/kg, maintenance dose: 0.02-0.15 µg/kg/min). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 135 patients enrolled, 129 completed the study. The primary endpoint-sedation success rates of ciprofol and propofol groups were 97.7% versus 97.8% in the full analysis set (FAS) and were both 100% in per-protocol set (PPS). The noninferiority margin was set as 8% and confirmed with a lower limit of two-sided 95% CI for the inter-group difference of -5.98% and -4.32% in the FAS and PPS groups. Patients who received ciprofol had a longer recovery time ( p = 0.003), but there were no differences in the remaining secondary endpoints (all p > 0.05). The occurrence rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) or drug-related TEAEs were not significantly different between the groups (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ciprofol was well tolerated, with a noninferior sedation profile to propofol in Chinese ICU patients undergoing MV for a period of 6-24 hours.

Clinical significance of hemoglobin level and blood transfusion therapy in elderly sepsis patients: A retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical significance of hemoglobin level and blood transfusion therapy in elderly sepsis patients remains controversial. The study investigated the relationship between mortality, hemoglobin levels, and blood transfusion in elderly sepsis patients. METHODS: Elderly sepsis patients were included in the Marketplace for Medical Information in Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database. A multivariate regression model analyzed the relationship between the Hb level and the 28-day mortality risk. Logistic Multivariate analysis, Propensity Matching (PSM) analysis, an Inverse Probabilities Weighting (IPW) model and doubly robust estimation were applied to analyze the 28-day mortality risk between transfused and non-transfused patients in Hb at 7-8 g/dL, 8-9 g/dL, 9-10 g/dL, and 10-11 g/dL groups. RESULTS: 7473 elderly sepsis patients were enrolled in the study. The Hb level in the ICU and the 28-day mortality risk of patients with sepsis shared a non-linear relationship. The patients with Hb levels of <10 g/dL(p < 0.05) and > 15 g/dL(p < 0.05) within 24 h had a high mortality risk in multivariate analysis. In the Hb level 7-8 g/dL and 8-9 g/dL subgroup, the Multivariate analysis (p < 0.05), PSM (p < 0.05), IPW (p < 0.05) and doubly robust estimation (p < 0.05) suggested that blood transfusion could reduce the mortality risk. In the subgroup with a Hb level of 10-11 g/dL, IPW (p < 0.05) and doubly robust estimation (p < 0.05) suggested that blood transfusion could increase the mortality risk of elderly sepsis patients. CONCLUSION: A non-linear relationship between the Hb level and the 28-day mortality risk and Hb levels of <10 g/dL and > 15 g/dL may increase the mortality risk, and blood transfusion with a Hb level of <9 g/dL may minimize mortality risk in elderly sepsis patients.

Early administration of hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine in adult patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination therapy of hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine has been proposed as a potential treatment in patients with sepsis and septic shock. However, subsequent trials have reported conflicting results in relation to survival outcomes. Hence, we performed this randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early combination therapy among adult patients with septic shock. METHODS: This single-center, double-blind RCT enrolled adult patients with diagnosis of septic shock within 12 h from Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital between February 2019 and June 2021. Recruited patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intervention (hydrocortisone 200 mg daily, vitamin C 2 g every 6 h, and thiamine 200 mg every 12 h) or placebo (0.9% saline) for 5 days or until ICU discharge. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. The secondary endpoints included mortality at day 28, ICU discharge, and hospital discharge; shock reversal; 72-h Delta SOFA score; ICU-free days, vasopressor-free days, and ventilator support -free days up to day 28; ICU length of stay (LOS) and hospital LOS. RESULTS: Among 426 patients randomized, a total of 408 patients with septic shock were included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis, of which 203 were assigned to the intervention group and 205 to the placebo group. In the PP population, the primary outcome of 90-day mortality was 39.9% (81/203) and 39.0% (80/205) in the intervention and the placebo groups, respectively, and was not significantly different (P = 0.86). There was no significant difference between two groups in 28-day mortality (36.5% vs. 36.1%, P = 0.94) or the ICU mortality (31.5% vs. 28.8%, P = 0.55) and hospital mortality (34.5% vs. 33.2%, P = 0.78). No other secondary outcomes showed significant differences between two groups, including shock reversal, vasopressor-free days, and ICU LOS. Intention-to-treat analysis included all the 426 patients and confirmed these results (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among adult patients with septic shock, early use of hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine combination therapy compared with placebo did not confer survival benefits. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03872011 , registration date: March 12, 2019.

Atorvastatin treatment ameliorates cardiac function and remodeling induced by isoproterenol attack through mitigation of ferroptosis.

Ferroptosis has been identified as an important role in damaged heart. Meanwhile, statin therapy has been reported to be beneficial for the treatment of heart failure(HF) under different conditions. However, the beneficial effects of statin treatment on regulation of ferroptosis in failing heart is unveiled. The aim of this study is to explore the protective efficacy of atorvastatin against the ferroptosis related signaling pathway in isoproterenol(ISO)-induced HF. We found that ATV and ferrostatin-1(Fer-1,as a positive control) significantly improved ISO-decreased cell viability and cell survival by reducing oxidative stress and Fe2+-dependent lipid peroxidation in H9C2 cells. Additionally, ISO triggered marked ferritinophagy accompanied by up-regulating protein levels of LC3BII,NCOA4 and Beclin1 and down-regulating protein levels of P62 and FTH1 in damaged cells, which nevertheless was significantly blocked by administration of ATV and these results were in parallel with the results obtained after 3-methyadenine(3-MA) treatment. Consistently, C57BL/6J mice were used in used in this study and administered 5 mg/kg/day ISO for 2 weeks to simulate cardiac injury. 20 mg/kg/day ATV treatment for 2 weeks simultaneously markedly improved cardiac dysfunction and remodeling induced by ISO attack. ATV showed significantly protective effects through suppressing the activation of ferroptosis related signaling, as evidenced by decreasing the mRNA levels of PTGS2(a marker of ferroptosis), contents of malonaldehyde and protein levels of NOX4 and increasing the contents of glutathione(GSH), the ratio of GSH/GSSG and protein levels of GPX4 and SLC7A11. Moreover, ISO evidently triggered degradation of FTH1 in failing heart. However, ATV significantly prevented these changes in damaged heart. Overall, these results reveal atorvastatin suppresses ferroptosis and exhibits protective effect on failing myocardium of mice after ISO insult though inhibiting ferritinophagy-mediated ferroptosis, which might be a potential therapeutic strategy in the prevention of ISO-associated cardiomyopathy.

The value of urine cell cycle arrest biomarkers to predict persistent acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The urinary biomarker tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) combined with insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7 (IGFBP7) has recently been used in the early prediction of persistent acute kidney injury (AKI). However, there is no consensus on the use of urinary TIMP-2 combined with IGFBP7 in predicting persistent AKI. Hence, the present meta-analysis was performed to assess the totality of the current evidence regarding the utilization of urinary TIMP-2 combined with IGFBP7 in predicting persistent AKI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant studies for this meta-analysis were obtained from the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 2020. The data on specificity and sensitivity were extracted, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were constructed. RESULTS: Four studies involving 382 patients were included in this research. The specificity of [TIMP-2] * [IGFBP7] on admission in predicting persistent AKI was 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.50 - 0.82), and the sensitivity was 0.61 (95% CI = 0.46 - 0.75). The area under the curve estimated by SROC was 0.69 (95% CI = 0.65 - 0.73). CONCLUSION: Based on the latest evidence, the present meta-analysis established that urinary TIMP-2 combined with IGFBP7 on admission is a poor predictor of persistent AKI.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in perioperative period of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in perioperative period of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search using Pubmed, Embase, and the Chinese SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang and VIP databases was performed to find comparative studies on the efficacy of different antibiotic prophylaxis strategies in PCNL for preventing postoperative sepsis. The last search was conducted on 21 April 2019. All selected articles were reviewed independently by two, and in case of discordance, three reviewers. Summarized unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the efficacy of different antibiotic prophylaxis strategies. RESULTS: Thirteen independent studies comprising up to 1549 individuals were included. Compared with single dose before anesthesia, preoperative prophylactic antibiotics significantly reduced postoperative sepsis (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.20-0.50; P < 0.00001) and fever (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.48; P < 0.0001). But no remarkable difference in sepsis risk between patients with and without postoperative prophylactic antibiotics was detected (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.72-1.97; P = 0.49). And patients receiving postoperative prophylactic antibiotics were at a significantly high risk of fever (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.01-3.05; P = 0.05). Compared with single dose before anesthesia, preoperative prophylactic antibiotics significantly reduced positive pelvic urine (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.54; P = 0.0009) and stone cultures (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.25-0.64; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The conclusion is drawn that preoperative prophylactic antibiotics indeed lowered the risk of postoperative sepsis and fever, whereas its postoperative use seems unnecessary. Besides, preoperative prophylactic antibiotics reduced positive pelvic urine and stone cultures significantly, which are a risk factor for sepsis. In our meta-analysis, the efficacy of different types of antibiotics and different courses of preoperative antibiotics could not be assessed. To verify the correctness of these conclusions, randomized controlled trials with a larger sample size and more rigorous study design are required.

Effect of Low-Dose Hydrocortisone Therapy in Adult Patients With Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of low-dose hydrocortisone therapy in the management of septic shock remains controversial in critical care for many years. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate its effect on clinical outcome among adult patients with septic shock. METHODS: We identified relevant RCTs published from inception to March 7, 2018 comparing low-dose hydrocortisone with placebo or no intervention in adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for septic shock. Meta-analyses were performed for the primary and secondary outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's instrument. Trial sequential analysis was used to pool the results from the included studies for the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were retrieved by our literature search strategy. There were no significant differences in 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.81-1.00; P = .05) and hospital mortality (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.82-1.02; P = .09) between the 2 groups, which were confirmed by TSA. However, there was a significant improvement in shock reversal in the hydrocortisone group (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.02-1.72; P = .03). Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed that hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone statistically reduced the rate of 28-day mortality (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64-0.97; P = .03), ICU mortality (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63-0.95; P = .02), and hospital mortality (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63-0.95; P = .01) in comparison with the placebo, the results were also confirmed by TSA. CONCLUSION: Among adult patients with septic shock, the use of low-dose hydrocortisone compared with control did not confer overall survival benefits, albeit improving shock reversal rate. The benefit of reducing 28-day mortality, ICU mortality, and hospital mortality was observed in combination use of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone.

Effect of levosimendan on prognosis in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Small trials suggest that levosimendan is associated with a favorable outcome in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, recently published larger-scale trials did not provide evidence for a similar benefit from levosimendan. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the survival benefits of levosimendan in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and to investigate its effects in subgroups of patients with preoperative low-ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: We identified randomized clinical trials through 20 April 2017 that investigated levosimendan therapy versus control in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Individual patient data from each study were compiled. Meta-analyses were performed for primary outcomes, secondary outcomes and serious adverse events, and subgroup analyses according to the preoperative EF of enrolled patients were also conducted. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. RESULTS: Seventeen studies involving a total of 2756 patients were included. Levosimendan therapy was associated with a significant reduction in 30-day mortality (RR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.93; p = 0.02) and reduced the risk of death in single-center trials (RR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.79; p = 0.004) and in subgroup trials of inferior quality (RR 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.92; p = 0.02); however, in multicenter and in high-quality subgroup-analysis trials, no significant difference in mortality was observed between patients who received levosimendan therapy and controls (p > 0.05). However, in high-quality subgroup trials, levosimendan therapy was associated with reduced mortality in patients in a preoperative low-EF subgroup (RR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.88; p = 0.01). Similarly, only patients in the preoperative low-EF subgroup benefited in terms of reduced risk of renal replacement therapy (RR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.85; p = 0.007). Furthermore, levosimendan therapy was associated with a significant reduction in intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (MDR -17.19; 95% CI, -34.43 to -2.94; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the benefit of levosimendan in terms of survival was not shown in multicenter or in high-quality trials; however, levosimendan therapy was associated with reduced mortality in patients with preoperative ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Global end-diastolic volume index vs CVP goal-directed fluid resuscitation for COPD patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the clinical effects of early goal-directed therapy according to the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDI) on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with septic shock. METHODS: A total of 71 COPD patients with septic shock were randomly assigned to 2 groups. In the control group (n = 37), fluid resuscitation was performed based on the central venous pressure. In the study group (n = 34), fluid resuscitation was performed until GEDI reached 800 mL/m2. The following indices were observed for the 2 groups: 6- and 24-hour fluid volumes, norepinephrine dosage, 24-hour blood lactate clearance rate, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, ICU mortality, and 90-day survival rate. RESULTS: At both 6- and 24-hour measurements, the fluid volume was lower and norepinephrine dosage was higher in the control group than in the study group (P < .05). The blood lactate clearance rate was lower, the duration of mechanical ventilation was longer, and the length of stay in the ICU was longer in the control group than in the study group (P < .05). No significant difference in mortality or 90-day survival rate was found between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The GEDI goal-directed fluid resuscitation shows better clinical effects than that shown by central venous pressure for COPD patients with septic shock; however, it cannot reduce the mortality rate.

Early initiation of low-dose hydrocortisone treatment for septic shock in adults: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Physiologic dose hydrocortisone is part of the suggested adjuvant therapies for patients with septic shock. However, the association between the corticosteroid therapy and mortality in patients with septic shock is still not clear. Some authors considered that the mortality is related to the time frame between development of septic shock and start of low dose hydrocortisone. Thus we designed a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial to assess the importance of early initiation of low dose hydrocortisone for the final outcome. METHODS: A total of 118 patients with septic shock were recruited in the study. All eligible patients were randomized to receive hydrocortisone (n=58) or normal saline (n=60). The study medication (hydrocortisone and normal saline) was initiated simultaneously with vasopressors. The primary end-point was 28-day mortality. The secondary end-points were the reversal of shock, in-hospital mortality and the duration of ICU and hospital stay. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with reversal of shock was similar in the two groups (P=0.602); There were no significant differences in 28-day or hospital all-cause mortality; length of stay in the ICU or hospital between patients treated with hydrocortisone or normal saline. CONCLUSION: The early initiation of low-dose of hydrocortisone did not decrease the risk of mortality, and the length of stay in the ICU or hospital in adults with septic shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.govNCT02580240.

Improved sepsis bundles in the treatment of septic shock: a prospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis bundles can decrease mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. However, current methods of measuring pressure, such as central venous pressure, are inadequate. This study investigated the effect of improved sepsis bundles informed by pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output. METHODS: We compared the outcome of treatment with sepsis bundles informed by either conventional pressure measurements or pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output. Patients in 2 groups received fluid resuscitation, standard antibiotics, and oxygen therapy. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients with septic shock were randomly divided into 2 groups: the conventional sepsis bundle group (n = 52) or the improved sepsis bundle group (ISBG, n =53). The ISBG significantly reduced the mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment scores. Significantly fewer ISBG-treated patients received vasoactive drugs compared to conventional sepsis bundle group-treated patients. In addition, patients in the ISBG exhibited a significantly increased arterial blood lactate clearance rate and required less total fluid resuscitation and a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output-directed sepsis bundles can reduce the severity of septic shock, provide more accurate fluid resuscitation, and reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit.

[Research progress on the relationship between the gut microbiota dysbiosis and sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy].

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by the host's dysfunctional response to infection. Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SICM), as a serious complication of sepsis, is an acute reversible cardiac dysfunction syndrome unrelated to myocardial ischemia, which affects the outcome and prognosis of sepsis. As a complex microbial system, gut microbiota has been confirmed to be involved in the development of coronary heart disease, hypertension, heart failure and other cardiovascular diseases, and is also related to the occurrence and development of sepsis. However, there are few studies on the relationship between gut microbiota and SICM. This paper reviews the current research progress on gut microbiota and SICM, aiming at provide a new idea for clinical treatment of SICM.

[Research progress in the mechanism of intestinal environmental disturbance on the occurrence and development of sepsis-associated liver injury].

Sepsis-associated liver injury (SALI) is a common complication of sepsis, which is characterized by systemic immune disorders induced by sepsis leading to liver damage. Currently, there are no effective treatments for SALI, which is related to its complex pathophysiological mechanisms. In recent years, the disorder of intestinal environment after sepsis has been considered as an important factor for SALI, but the specific molecular mechanism of the above process is still unclear. This article will review the pathological role and molecular mechanisms between intestinal environmental disturbance and SALI, aiming to analyze the potential research direction of SALI and identify potential therapeutic targets for its treatment.

Post-translational modifications in sepsis-induced organ dysfunction: mechanisms and implications.

As a grave and highly lethal clinical challenge, sepsis, along with its consequent multiorgan dysfunction, affects millions of people worldwide. Sepsis is a complex syndrome caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, leading to fatal organ dysfunction. An increasing body of evidence suggests that the pathogenesis of sepsis is both intricate and rapid and involves various cellular responses and signal transductions mediated by post-translational modifications (PTMs). Hence, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms and functions of PTMs within regulatory networks is imperative for understanding the pathological processes, diagnosis, progression, and treatment of sepsis. In this review, we provide an exhaustive and comprehensive summary of the relationship between PTMs and sepsis-induced organ dysfunction. Furthermore, we explored the potential applications of PTMs in the treatment of sepsis, offering a forward-looking perspective on the understanding of infectious diseases.

The influence of gender on the epidemiology of and outcome from sepsis associated acute kidney injury in ICU: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.

PURPOSES: The influence of gender on the epidemiology of and outcome from SA-AKI in ICU has not been fully clarified. Our aim is to elucidate these differences. METHODS: This study included adult patients with sepsis in MIMIC IV (V 2.2), and propensity matching analysis, cox regression and logistic regression were used to analyze gender differences in incidence, mortality and organ support rate. RESULTS: Of the 24,467 patients included in the cohort, 18,128 were retained after propensity score matching. In the matched cohort, the incidence of SA-AKI in males is higher than that in females (58.6% vs. 56.2%; P = 0.001).males were associated with a higher risk of SA-AKI (OR:1.07(1.01-1.14), P = 0.026;adjusted OR:1.07(1.01-1.14), P < 0.033).In SA-AKI patients, males were associated with a lower risk of ICU mortality(HR:0.803(0.721-0.893), P < 0.001;adjusted HR:0.836(0.746-0.937), P = 0.002) and in-hospital mortality(HR: 0.820(0.748-0.899), P < 0.001;adjusted HR:0.853(0.775-0.938), P = 0.003).there were no statistically significant differences between male and female patients in 1-year all-cause mortality (36.9% vs. 35.8%, P = 0.12), kidney replacement therapy rate (7.8% vs.7.4%, P = 0.547), mechanical ventilation rate 64.8% vs.63.9%, P = 0.369), and usage of vasoactive drugs (55.4% vs. 54.6%, P = 0.418). CONCLUSIONS: Gender may affect the incidence and outcomes of SA-AKI, further research is needed to fully understand the impact of gender on SA-AKI patients.

Prolonged vs shorter awake prone positioning for COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure: a multicenter, randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Awake prone positioning has been reported to reduce endotracheal intubation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). However, it is still unclear whether using the awake prone positioning for longer periods can further improve outcomes. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label clinical trial conducted at 12 hospitals in China, non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related AHRF were randomly assigned to prolonged awake prone positioning (target > 12 h daily for 7 days) or standard care with a shorter period of awake prone positioning. The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation within 28 days after randomization. The key secondary outcomes included mortality and adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 409 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to prolonged awake prone positioning (n = 205) or standard care (n = 204). In the first 7 days after randomization, the median duration of prone positioning was 12 h/d (interquartile range [IQR] 12-14 h/d) in the prolonged awake prone positioning group vs. 5 h/d (IQR 2-8 h/d) in the standard care group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, intubation occurred in 35 (17%) patients assigned to prolonged awake prone positioning and in 56 (27%) patients assigned to standard care (relative risk 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.9]). The hazard ratio (HR) for intubation was 0.56 (0.37-0.86), and for mortality was 0.63 (0.42-0.96) for prolonged awake prone positioning versus standard care, within 28 days. The incidence of pre-specified adverse events was low and similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Prolonged awake prone positioning of patients with COVID-19-related AHRF reduces the intubation rate without significant harm. These results support prolonged awake prone positioning of patients with COVID-19-related AHRF.

Predictability performance of urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 and renal resistive index for persistent sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in ICU patients.

OBJECTIVES: The performance of renal resistance index (RRI) in predicting persistent sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (S-AKI) remains debatable, and the value of urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) in predicting persistent S-AKI has not been validated yet. Therefore, we aimed to determine the applicability of a urinary biomarker CCL14 for the early detection of persistent S-AKI. Furthermore, the use of RRI obtained from renal Doppler ultrasonography was applied to differentiate transient from persistent S-AKI. Finally, we aimed to evaluate the use of these techniques in predicting different subtypes of S-AKI. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted at the internal medicine intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital. The RRI was determined within 12 h of ICU admission and the urinary CCL14 was evaluated at T0, T6, T12, and T24. The reversibility of renal dysfunction was assessed within 48 h. The receiver operating characteristic curves were then plotted to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the RRI and urinary CCL14 in predicting persistent S-AKI. RESULTS: Out of 48 patients, 23 developed persistent S-AKI upon admission. The RRI was higher in the persistent S-AKI group (P = 0.02) and the RRI ≥ 0.679 could predict persistent S-AKI with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.93), a sensitivity of 91.30% (95% CI 70-98%), and a specificity of 65.20% (95% CI 43-83%). Urinary CCL14 was not significantly different between the two groups at the tested period, showing poor diagnostic performance at T0, T6, T12, and T24, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.56 (95% CI 0.38-0.73), 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.79), 0.52 (95% CI 0.35-0.68), and 0.60 (95% CI 0.43-0.77), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The RRI obtained from renal Doppler ultrasound is extremely effective in predicting persistent S-AKI in critically ill patients, and urinary CCL14 could not distinguish between transient and persistent S-AKIs.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality of elderly patients with persistent sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in intensive care units: a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV database.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the clinical risk factors that influence in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with persistent sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (S-AKI) and to establish and validate a nomogram to predict in-hospital mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Data from critically ill patients at a US centre between 2008 and 2021 were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database (V.1.0). PARTICIPANTS: Data from 1519 patients with persistent S-AKI were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database. PRIMARY OUTCOME: All-cause in-hospital death from persistent S-AKI. RESULTS: Multiple logistic regression revealed that gender (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.88), cancer (2.5, 1.69-3.71), respiratory rate (1.06, 1.01-1.12), AKI stage (2.01, 1.24-3.24), blood urea nitrogen (1.01, 1.01-1.02), Glasgow Coma Scale score (0.75, 0.70-0.81), mechanical ventilation (1.57, 1.01-2.46) and continuous renal replacement therapy within 48 hours (9.97, 3.39-33.9) were independent risk factors for mortality from persistent S-AKI. The consistency indices of the prediction and the validation cohorts were 0.780 (95% CI: 0.75-0.82) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85), respectively. The model's calibration plot suggested excellent consistency between the predicted and actual probabilities. CONCLUSIONS: This study's prediction model demonstrated good discrimination and calibration abilities to predict in-hospital mortality of elderly patients with persistent S-AKI, although it warrants further external validation to verify its accuracy and applicability.

Effects of awake prone position vs. usual care on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Previous studies have shown that an awake prone position may be beneficial for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) in patients with COVID-19, but the results are not consistent, especially in terms of oxygenation outcomes and intubation rate. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of the awake prone position on AHRF in patients with COVID-19 with all randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: An extensive search of online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 December 2019 to 30 October 2022, with no language restrictions was performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis are based on the PRISMA statement. We only included RCTs and used the Cochrane risk assessment tool for quality assessment. Results: Fourteen RCTs fulfilled the selection criteria, and 3,290 patients were included. A meta-analysis found that patients in the awake prone position group had more significant improvement in the SpO2/FiO2 ratio [mean difference (MD): 29.76; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.39-48.13; P = 0.001] compared with the usual care. The prone position also reduced the need for intubation [odd ratio (OR): 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.84; P < 0.0001; I 2 = 0%]. There was no significant difference in mortality, hospital length of stay, incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and adverse events between the two groups. Conclusion: The awake prone position was a promising intervention method, which is beneficial to improve the oxygenation of patients with ARDS or AHRF caused by COVID-19 and reduce the need for intubation. However, the awake prone position showed no obvious advantage in mortality, hospital length of stay, incidence of ICU admission, and adverse events. Systematic review registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identifier: CRD42022367885.

[A nonlinear relationship between the hemoglobin level and prognosis of elderly patients with sepsis: an analysis based on MIMIC-IV].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation of hemoglobin (Hb) level with prognosis of elderly patients diagnosed as sepsis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Information on the cases of elderly patients with sepsis in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV), including basic information, blood pressure, routine blood test results [the Hb level of a patient was defined as his/her maximum Hb level from 6 hours before admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and 24 hours after admission to ICU], blood biochemical indexes, coagulation function, vital signs, severity score and outcome indicators were extracted. The curves of Hb level vs. 28-day mortality risk were developed by using the restricted cubic spline model based on the Cox regression analysis. The patients were divided into four groups (Hb < 100 g/L, 100 g/L ≤ Hb < 130 g/L, 130 g/L ≤ Hb < 150 g/L, Hb ≥ 150 g/L groups) based on these curves. The outcome indicators of patients in each group were analyzed, and the 28-day Kaplan-Meier survival curve was drawn. Logistic regression model and Cox regression model were used to analyze the relationship between Hb level and 28-day mortality risk in different groups. RESULTS: A total of 7 473 elderly patients with sepsis were included. There was a "U" curve relationship between Hb levels within 24 hours after ICU admission and the risk of 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. The patients with 100 g/L ≤ Hb < 130 g/L had a lower risk of 28-day mortality. When Hb level was less than 100 g/L, the risk of death decreased gradually with the increase of Hb level. When Hb level was ≥ 130 g/L, the risk of death gradually increased with the increase of Hb level. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that the mortality risks of patients with Hb < 100 g/L [odds ratio (OR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.23-1.70, P < 0.001] and Hb ≥ 150 g/L (OR = 1.77, 95%CI was 1.26-2.49, P = 0.001) increased significantly in the model involving all confounding factors; the mortality risks of patients with 130 g/L ≤ Hb < 150 g/L increased, while the difference was not statistically significant (OR = 1.21, 95%CI was 0.99-1.48, P = 0.057). The multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that the mortality risks of patients with Hb < 100 g/L [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95%CI was 1.12-1.44, P < 0.001] and Hb ≥ 150 g/L (HR = 1.49, 95%CI was 1.16-1.93, P = 0.002) increased significantly in the model involving all confounding factors; the mortality risks of patients with 130 g/L ≤ Hb < 150 g/L increased, while the difference was not statistically significant (HR = 1.17, 95%CI was 0.99-1.37, P = 0.053). Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the 28-day survival rate of elderly septic patients in 100 g/L ≤ Hb < 130 g/L group was significantly higher than that in Hb < 100 g/L, 130 g/L ≤ Hb < 150 g/L and Hb ≥ 150 g/L groups (85.26% vs. 77.33%, 79.81%, 74.33%; Log-Rank test: χ2 = 71.850, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with sepsis exhibited low mortality risk if their 100 g/L ≤ Hb < 130 g/L within 24 hours after admission to ICU, and both higher and lower Hb levels led to increased mortality risks.