A liquid biopsy signature of circulating extracellular vesicles-derived RNAs predicts response to first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most threatening tumors in the world, and chemotherapy remains dominant in the treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients. The purpose of this study was to develop a biomarker panel to predict the response of the first line chemotherapy in mCRC patients. METHODS: Totally 190 mCRC patients treated with FOLFOX or XEOLX chemotherapy in 3 different institutions were included. We extracted the plasma extracellular vesicle (EV) RNA, performed RNA sequencing, constructed a model and generated a signature through shrinking the number of variables by the random forest algorithm and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm in the training cohort (n = 80). We validated it in an internal validation cohort (n = 62) and a prospective external validation cohort (n = 48). RESULTS: We established a signature consisted of 22 EV RNAs which could identify responders, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values was 0.986, 0.821, and 0.816 in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohort respectively. The signature could also identify the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Besides, we constructed a 7-gene signature which could predict tumor response to first-line oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy and simultaneously resistance to second-line irinotecan-containing chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The study was first to develop a signature of EV-derived RNAs to predict the response of the first line chemotherapy in mCRC with high accuracy using a non-invasive approach, indicating that the signature could help to select the optimal regimen for mCRC patients.

STUB1 is targeted by the SUMO-interacting motif of EBNA1 to maintain Epstein-Barr Virus latency.

Latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is strongly associated with several malignancies, including B-cell lymphomas and epithelial tumors. EBNA1 is a key antigen expressed in all EBV-associated tumors during latency that is required for maintenance of the EBV episome DNA and the regulation of viral gene transcription. However, the mechanism utilized by EBV to maintain latent infection at the levels of posttranslational regulation remains largely unclear. Here, we report that EBNA1 contains two SUMO-interacting motifs (SIM2 and SIM3), and mutation of SIM2, but not SIM3, dramatically disrupts the EBNA1 dimerization, while SIM3 contributes to the polySUMO2 modification of EBNA1 at lysine 477 in vitro. Proteomic and immunoprecipitation analyses further reveal that the SIM3 motif is required for the EBNA1-mediated inhibitory effects on SUMO2-modified STUB1, SUMO2-mediated degradation of USP7, and SUMO1-modified KAP1. Deletion of the EBNASIM motif leads to functional loss of both EBNA1-mediated viral episome maintenance and lytic gene silencing. Importantly, hypoxic stress induces the SUMO2 modification of EBNA1, and in turn the dissociation of EBNA1 with STUB1, KAP1 and USP7 to increase the SUMO1 modification of both STUB1 and KAP1 for reactivation of lytic replication. Therefore, the EBNA1SIM motif plays an essential role in EBV latency and is a potential therapeutic target against EBV-associated cancers.

A prospective phase II single-arm study and predictive factor analysis of irinotecan as third-line treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Background: Currently, there is no recommended standard third-line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer. Objectives: In this study, we aimed to evaluate irinotecan's efficacy and safety in treating metastatic gastric cancer after the failure of first- and second-line chemotherapy. Design: Prospective single-arm, two-center, phase II trial. Methods: Patients were aged 18-70 years, with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, progressed during or within 3 months following the last administration of second-line chemotherapy and had no other severe hematologic, cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal functional abnormalities or immunodeficiency diseases. Eligible patients received 28-day cycles of irinotecan (180 mg/m2 intravenously, days 1 and 15) and were assessed according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria every two cycles. Patients who discontinued treatment for any reason were followed up every 2 months until death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity. Results: A total of 98 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. In the intention-to-treat population, the median OS was 7.17 months, the median PFS was 3.47 months, and the ORR and DCR were 4.08% and 47.96%, respectively. In the per-protocol population, the median OS was 7.77 months, the median PFS was 3.47 months, and the ORR and DCR were 4.82% and 50.60%, respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities was 19.4%, and none of the patients died owing to adverse events. Cox regression analysis revealed neutropenia and baseline thrombocyte levels were independently correlated with PFS and OS. Conclusion: Irinotecan monotherapy is an efficient, well-tolerated, and economical third-line treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer as a third-line treatment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02662959.

The ubiquitin-like protein UBTD1 promotes colorectal cancer progression by stabilizing c-Myc to upregulate glycolysis.

Dysfunction of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is involved in the pathogenesis of various malignancies including colorectal cancer (CRC). Ubiquitin domain containing 1 (UBTD1), a ubiquitin-like protein, regulates UPS-mediated protein degradation and tumor progression in some cancer types. However, the biological function and mechanism of UBTD1 are far from being well elucidated, and its role in CRC has not been explored yet. In our study, we analyzed CRC patients' clinical information and UBTD1 expression data, and found that the expression of UBTD1 in cancer tissue was significantly higher than that in adjacent normal tissue. Higher UBTD1 expression was significantly associated with poorer survival and more lymph node metastasis. Overexpression of UBTD1 could facilitate, while knockdown could inhibit CRC cell proliferation and migration, respectively. RNA-seq and proteomics indicated that c-Myc is an important downstream target of UBTD1. Metabolomics showed the products of the glycolysis pathway were significantly increased in UBTD1 overexpression cells. In vitro, we verified UBTD1 upregulating c-Myc protein and promoting CRC cell proliferation and migration via regulating c-Myc. UBTD1 promoted CRC cells' glycolysis, evidenced by the increased lactate production and glucose uptake following UBTD1 overexpression. Mechanistically, UBTD1 prolonged the half-life of the c-Myc protein by binding to E3 ligase ß-transducin repeat-containing protein (ß-TrCP), thereby upregulated the expression of glycolysis rate-limiting enzyme hexokinase II (HK2), and enhanced glycolysis and promoted CRC progression. In conclusion, our study revealed that UBTD1 promotes CRC progression by upregulating glycolysis via the ß-TrCP/c-Myc/HK2 pathway, suggesting its potential as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in CRC.

LncRNA LINC01094 Promotes Cells Proliferation and Metastasis through the PTEN/AKT Pathway by Targeting AZGP1 in Gastric Cancer.

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) were recently reported to play an essential role in multiple cancer types. Herein, through next-generation sequencing, we screened metastasis-driving molecules by using tissues from early-stage gastric cancer (GC) patients with lymph node metastasis, and we identified a lncRNA LINC01094, which was associated with the metastasis of GC. According to the clinical data from the TCGA, GSE15459, and GSE62254 cohorts, the high expression of LINC01094 was associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Moreover, 106 clinical GC and paired normal samples were collected, and the qRT-PCR results showed that the high expression of LINC01094 was associated with high T and N stages and a poor prognosis. We found that LINC01094 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of GC in vitro and in vivo. AZGP1 was found as the protein-binding partner of LINC01094 by using RNA pulldown and RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays. LINC01094 antagonizes the function of AZGP1, downregulates the expression of PTEN, and further upregulates the AKT pathway. Collectively, our results suggested that LINC01094 might predict the prognosis of GC patients and become the therapy target for GC.

Integrated DNA and RNA sequencing reveals early drivers involved in metastasis of gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer (GC) is the second cause of cancer-related death and metastasis is an important cause of death. Considering difficulties in searching for metastatic driver mutations, we tried a novel strategy here. We conducted an integrative genomic analysis on GC and identified early drivers lead to metastasis. Whole-exome sequencing (WES), transcriptomes sequencing and targeted-exome sequencing (TES) were performed on tumors and matched normal tissues from 432 Chinese GC patients, especially the comparative analysis between higher metastatic-potential (HMP) group with T1 stage and lymph-node metastasis, and lower metastatic-potential (LMP) group without lymph-nodes or distant metastasis. HMP group presented higher mutation load and heterogeneity, enrichment in immunosuppressive signaling, more immune cell infiltration than LMP group. An integrated mRNA-lncRNA signature based on differentially expressed genes was constructed and its prognostic value was better than traditional TNM stage. We identified 176 candidate prometastatic mutations by WES and selected 8 genes for following TES. Mutated TP53 and MADCAM1 were significantly associated with poor metastasis-free survival. We further demonstrated that mutated MADCAM1 could not only directly promote cancer cells migration, but also could trigger tumor metastasis by establishing immunosuppressive microenvironment, including promoting PD-L1-mediated immune escape and reprogramming tumor-associated macrophages by regulating CCL2 through Akt/mTOR axis. In conclusion, GCs with different metastatic-potential are distinguishable at the genetic level and we revealed a number of potential metastatic driver mutations. Driver mutations in early-onset metastatic GC could promote metastasis by establishing an immunosuppressive microenvironment. This study provided possibility for future target therapy of GC.

Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Primary Tumor Resection Did Not Bring Survival Benefits in Colon Cancer Patients With Asymptomatic Primary Lesion and Synchronous Unresectable Metastases.

BACKGROUND: It is still controversial whether primary tumor resection (PTR) improves survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with unresectable metastases. METHODS: Colon cancer patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to with or without PTR after induction chemotherapy with XELOX or mFOLFOX6, and those with chemotherapy failure were excluded. The primary endpoint was TTF (time to strategy failure) on an intent-to-treat basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02291744. RESULTS: Between April 2015 and July 2020, 140 patients were enrolled, and 54 patients were excluded due to colon obstruction (16), perforation (1), disease progression (22), death (1), radical resection (3), or other reasons (11). After induction chemotherapy, 86 patients were randomized into group A (the resection group, n = 42) or group B (chemotherapy-alone group, n = 44). The median TTF was 143 days (95% CI: 104.9-181.1) in group A and 196 days (95% CI: 96.5-295.5) in group B (HR: 0.930 95% CI: 0.589-1.468, p = 0.755), and there was no significant difference in PFS, OS, and incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events between two groups. The primary lesion-related events after PTR in group A were significantly fewer than those in group B. Patients with a tumor regression grade (TRG) score of 2 had longer TTF and PFS than those with score of 3. CONCLUSION: PTR after induction chemotherapy could not bring survival benefits for colon cancer patients with unresectable metastases, and it is not recommended routinely. However, it also requires individualized treatment as colon obstruction or perforation occurred in some patients and PTR could reduce primary tumor-related events, and the TRG score might help for selection of beneficial patients.