The Role of a Silver Releasing Lipido-colloid Contact Layer in Venous Leg Ulcers Presenting Inflammatory Signs Suggesting Heavy Bacterial Colonization: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.

UNLABELLED: Objective. Clinical interest of silver in the management of chronic wounds is not fully established. The main objective of this clinical study was to assess the ability of a new silver releasing lipido-colloid contact layer to promote the healing process of venous leg ulcers (VLU) presenting inflammatory signs suggesting a heavy bacteria colonization and then a delayed healing, in comparison to the same wound dressing not impregnated with silver salts. METHODS: This was an open-labeled, randomized, controlled trial. VLU presenting at least 3 out of 5 clinical signs suggesting heavy bacterial colonization were recruited. Patients were treated with contact layer silver dressing ([CLS], Restore® Contact Layer, Silver* (Hollister Wound Care, Libertyville, Ill) or contact layer dressing ([CL] Restore® Contact Layer**, Hollister Wound Care, Libertyville, Ill) for 4 weeks, then all treated ulcers were treated with CL for the 4 additional weeks. Wound evaluation and area measurements were conducted weekly during the first 4 weeks and then at week 6 and 8. Main efficacy criterion was absolute wound area decrease (AD) at week 4 and week 8. RESULTS: Patients (N = 102) were randomized and treated. Ulcers were present for nearly 11 months on average; 65% were recurrent and mean area was 20.0 ± 17.8 cm2. Almost 80% of the treated VLU were stagnating/aggravating with their previous treatment. By week 4, mean surface area decreased by 6.5 ± 13.4 cm2 (median: 4.2 cm2) and 1.3 ± 9.0 cm2 (median: 1.1 cm2) in CLS and CL groups, respectively (P = 0.023). At week 8, median decrease was 5.9 cm2 versus 0.8 cm2 (P = 0.002) with a wound percentage decrease of 47.9% and 5.6% (P = 0.036). Median closure rate was 0.145 versus 0.044 cm2/day (P = 0.009) at week 4 and remained higher in the CLS group up to week 8 even after switching to CL dressing in these patients (P = 0.001). Odds ratio (multinomial logistic regression) of the chance to reach a ≥ 40% wound area reduction was 2.7 (95% CI: 1.1 to 6.7; P = 0.038) for silver treated ulcers. Dressing tolerance was good in both groups. CONCLUSION: A 4-week treatment with silver releasing lipido-colloid contact layer promotes a sustained increase of closure rate of venous leg ulcers presenting inflammatory signs suggesting a high bacterial load. Also marketed as *Urgotul® Silver and **Urgotul®, Laboratoires Urgo, (France)..

Dressings for acute and chronic wounds: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To critically review the literature on the efficacy of modern dressings in healing chronic and acute wounds by secondary intention. DATA SOURCES: Search of 3 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register) from January 1990 to June 2006, completed by manual research, for articles in English and in French. STUDY SELECTION: The end points for selecting studies were the rate of complete healing, time to complete healing, rate of change in wound area, and general performance criteria (eg, pain, ease of use, avoidance of wound trauma on dressing removal, ability to absorb and contain exudates). Studies were selected by a single reviewer. Overall, 99 studies met the selection criteria (89 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 3 meta-analyses [1 of which came from 1 of the selected systematic reviews], 7 systematic reviews, and 1 cost-effectiveness study). DATA EXTRACTION: The RCTs, meta-analyses, and cost-effectiveness studies were critically appraised by 2 reviewers to assess the clinical evidence level according to a modification of Sackett's 1989 criteria. Ninety-three articles were finally graded. DATA SYNTHESIS: We found no level A studies, 14 level B studies (11 RCTs and 3 meta-analyses), and 79 level C studies. Hydrocolloid dressings proved superior to saline gauze or paraffin gauze dressings for the complete healing of chronic wounds, and alginates were better than other modern dressings for debriding necrotic wounds. Hydrofiber and foam dressings, when compared with other traditional dressings or a silver-coated dressing, respectively, reduced time to healing of acute wounds. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review provided only weak levels of evidence on the clinical efficacy of modern dressings compared with saline or paraffin gauze in terms of healing, with the exception of hydrocolloids. There was no evidence that any of the modern dressings was better than another, or better than saline or paraffin gauze, in terms of general performance criteria. More wound care research providing level A evidence is needed.

[Dermatoses, multiple conditions with various causes]. / Les dermatoses, des affections multiples aux causes diverses.

Frequent or rare, minor or serious, numerous skin conditions exist. Allergic, inflammatory, infectious or bullous, dermatoses may also reveal underlying pathologies.

[The main types of skin allergies]. / Les principales allergies cutanées.

Incidence of skin allergies is increasing today. Often provoked by environmental factors, to which skin is highly-sensitive, as an interface, they may also express internal processes that are inherent to an individual. We will focus here on three of them: eczema, atopic dermatitis and urticaria.