Myocardial protection with phosphocreatine in high-risk cardiac surgery patients: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that phosphocreatine (PCr), administered intravenously and as cardioplegia adjuvant in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with prolonged aortic cross clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, would decrease troponin I concentration after surgery. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study we included 120 patients undergoing double/triple valve repair/replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass in the cardiac surgery department of a tertiary hospital. The treatment group received: intravenous administration of 2 g of PCr after anesthesia induction; 2.5 g of PCr in every 1 L of cardioplegic solution (concentration = 10 mmol/L); intravenous administration of 2 g of PCr immediately after heart recovery following aorta declamping; 4 g of PCr at intensive care unit admission. The control group received an equivolume dose of normosaline. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was peak concentration of troponin I after surgery. Secondary endpoints included peak concentration of serum creatinine, need for, and dosage of inotropic support, number of defibrillations after aortic declamping, incidence of arrhythmias, duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, length of hospitalization. There was no difference in peak troponin I concentration after surgery (PCr, 10,508 pg/ml [IQR 6,838-19,034]; placebo, 11,328 pg/ml [IQR 7.660-22.894]; p = 0.24). There were also no differences in median peak serum creatinine (PCr, 100 µmol/L [IQR 85.0-117.0]; placebo, 99.5 µmol/L [IQR 90.0-117.0]; p = 0.87), the number of patients on vasopressor/inotropic agents (PCr, 49 [88%]; placebo, 57 [91%]; p = 0.60), the inotropic score on postoperative day 1 (PCr, 4.0 (0-7); placebo, 4.0 (0-10); p = 0.47), mean SOFA score on postoperative day 1 (PCr, 5.25 ± 2.33; placebo, 5,45 ± 2,65; p = 0.83), need for defibrillation after declamping of aorta (PCr, 22 [39%]; placebo, 25 [40%]; p = 0.9),, duration of ICU stay and length of hospitalization as well as 30-day mortality (PCr, 0 (0%); placebo,1 (4.3%); p = 0.4). CONCLUSION: PCr administration to patients undergoing double/triple valve surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass is safe but is not associated with a decrease in troponin I concentration. Phosphocreatine had no beneficial effect on clinical outcomes after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the Identifier: NCT02757443. First posted (published): 02/05/2016.

Edge-to-Edge Repair Versus Secondary Cord Cutting During Septal Myectomy in Patients With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: A Pilot Randomised Study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether the Alfieri technique improves clinical and haemodynamic results and compare it with transaortic mitral valve secondary cord cutting in patients scheduled for septal myectomy for severely symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Forty-eight (48) patients with moderate-to-severe systolic anterior motion (SAM)-mediated mitral regurgitation were randomly assigned to the Alfieri or Cutting groups in addition to septal myectomy. The primary endpoint was postoperative mean transmitral pressure gradient (TPG). The secondary endpoints were residual left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient after procedure, residual mitral regurgitation (MR), postoperative SAM, repeating bypass, and survival. RESULTS: There were no 30-day mortality and ventricular septal defects. The postoperative LVOT gradient was 15.4±7.6 mmHg and 11.1±4.9 mmHg (p=0.078) in the Alfieri and Cutting groups, respectively. The Alfieri technique was associated with higher peak (7.8±3.3 vs 4.7±2.8 mmHg; p=0.014) and mean (3.9±1.7 vs 2.1±1.6 mmHg; p=0.013) TPG. The Cutting group was associated with higher mild MR rate at discharge (six vs no patients; p=0.009). One (1) patient (4.2%) in the Alfieri group required pacemaker implantation owing to conduction disturbances (p=0.312). Two-year (2-year) freedom from late mortality and sudden cardiac death rates were 95.5%±4.4% and 100% for the Alfieri and Cutting groups, respectively (log rank, p=0.317). No patients had New York Heart Association functional class III or IV or moderate or severe MR. The maximum LVOT gradient was 20.4±15.2 mmHg and 16.7±10.4 mmHg, respectively (p=0.330). There were no reoperations during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques with septal myectomy effectively eliminated SAM-induced MR and LVOT obstructions in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients.

Single-Centre Experience of Surgical Myectomy for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Septal myectomy is the gold standard treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. This study aimed to evaluate the results from patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who had undergone septal myectomy. METHODS: Data were analysed that has been prospectively collected over 7 years from 345 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who underwent septal myectomy at Meshalkin National Medical Research Center. RESULTS: Six (6) patients (1.7%) died within 30 days of surgery. The mean (standard deviation, SD) resting left ventricular outflow tract gradients reduced from 83.4 (24.2) mmHg preoperatively to 16.2 (8.5) mmHg at discharge (p < 0.001). Of the 345 patients, 329 (95.4%) attended the most recent follow-up assessments, and of these, 254 (77.2%) were categorised as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I, 64 (19.5%) class II, and 11 (3.3%) class III. The mean overall long-term survival rate after septal myectomy was 95.7% (SD 1.7%) (95% CI, 90.0-97.9). This did not differ from the age-matched and gender-matched general population (log-rank, p = 0.109). At the last follow-up assessments, six of 67 patients who had undergone concomitant Cox-Maze IV procedures had late atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences. A preoperative short-axis view of left atrial diameter of 57.5 mm (hazard ratio, 1.30 (95% CI, 1.03-1.65), p < 0.001) predicted late atrial tachyarrhythmias (p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: At this hypertrophic cardiomyopathy centre, septal myectomy is associated with low operative and early mortality rates (<2%), a low risk of early adverse events, and acceptable intermediate-term clinical and haemodynamic results.

Transapical Approach to Septal Myectomy for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

A 63-year-old symptomatic female with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and diastolic disfunction was admitted to the hospital. What is the best way to manage this patient? This study is a literature review that was performed to answer this question. The following PubMed search strategy was used: 'Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy' [All Fields] OR 'apical myectomy' [All Fields], NOT 'animal [mh]' NOT 'human [mh]' NOT 'comment [All Fields]' OR 'editorial [All Fields]' OR 'meta-analysis [All Fields]' OR 'practice-guideline [All Fields]' OR 'review [All Fields]' OR 'pediatrics [mh]'. The natural history of the disease has a benign prognosis; however, a watchful strategy was associated with the risk of adverse cardiovacular events. Contrastingly, transapical myectomy was associated with low surgical risk and acceptable outcomes. In our case, the patient underwent transapical myectomy with an unconventional post-operative period. Control echocardiography showed marked left ventricular (LV) cavity enlargement: LV end-diastolic volume, 74 mL; LV ejection fraction, 65%; and LV stroke volume index increased to 27 mL/m2. The patient was discharged 7 days after myectomy. At 6 months post-operation, the patient was NYHA Class I, with a 6 min walk test score of 420 m. Therefore, transapical myectomy may be considered as a feasible procedure in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and progressive heart failure.

The David procedure through a right anterior minithoracotomy.

A right anterior minithoracotomy is the least-frequently utilized approach in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery; moreover, this access is rarely used for aortic root procedures. With careful patient selection, some technical considerations, e.g. institution of peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, and a sufficient learning curve, the right anterior minithoracotomy can become a convenient access for surgical interventions on the aortic root. We present the case of a 31-year-old female patient with Marfan syndrome and severe aortic regurgitation due to an aortic root aneurysm. We demonstrate a step-by-step guide through the David procedure via a right anterior minithoracotomy.

Redo aortic root surgery post-Ross procedure.

Background: Despite numerous advantages of the Ross procedure, it presents a risk of late autograft and right ventricular outflow tract conduit failure. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of autograft dysfunction reoperations using autograft-sparing and root replacement techniques. Methods: Between 2015 and 2023, 49 patients underwent redo root surgery in our institution. Autograft valve-sparing procedures (VSP) were performed in 20 cases and the Bentall procedure (BP) in 29 patients. The short and long-term clinical outcomes along with echocardiographic results of VSP and BP were investigated. Results: Overall early mortality rate was 2.0% with no significant difference between the groups. Severe autograft valve insufficiency at the time of redo (OR 4.07, P = 0.03) and patient age (OR 1.07, P = 0.04) were associated with a valve replacement procedure instead of VSP. The median follow-up duration was 34 months. No late deaths occurred in either group. Freedom from VSP failure and aortic prosthesis dysfunction were 93.8% and 94.1% in the VSP and BP groups, respectively. No reoperations were necessary in either group. Conclusion: Redo aortic root surgery can be safely performed in patients with autograft failure. Both root replacement and autograft valve-sparing procedures demonstrated acceptable results at mid-term follow-up. Early redo surgery pre-empting severe aortic insufficiency increases the likelihood of preservation of the dilated autograft valve.

Results of concomitant cryoablation for atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation during mitral valve (MV) surgery using radio frequency energy sources has been reported previously with excellent outcomes. However, data regarding the effectiveness of concomitant cryoablation remain limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of concomitant cryoablation in patients scheduled for MV surgery. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2020, 242 adult patients who underwent MV surgery and concomitant cryoablation were included. Data on rhythm, medication status and clinical events were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months, then annually thereafter. RESULTS: Early mortality was 0.4%. The mean follow-up period duration was 43.9 months. The survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 97.3%, 94.3% and 87.7%, respectively. The rates of freedom from atrial arrhythmia paroxysms at 1, 3 and 5 years were 79.0%, 64.0% and 60.5%, respectively. Atrial arrhythmia recurrence was associated with isolated left atrial lesion set (P = 0.038), large right atrial size (P = 0.002), lower surgeon experience (P = 0.003) and atrial fibrillation paroxysms in the early postoperative period (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant cryoablation during MV surgery is a safe and reproducible technique. The procedure provides acceptable freedom from atrial arrhythmias recurrences during long-term follow-up. The biatrial lesion set has advantages over the left atrium pattern in terms of atrial arrhythmias freedom. Surgeon experience significantly influences atrial fibrillation ablation success. Randomized trials are needed to compare radiofrequency and cryoablation.

Early post-septal myectomy outcomes for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate early outcomes of septal myectomy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data collected over a 9-year period from 583 patients who underwent septal myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at our institution. RESULTS: The mean age was 55.7 ± 13.1 years, and 338 (58%) patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. There were 11 (1.9%) early deaths, including 3 (0.5%) intraoperative deaths. Early mortality was lowest after isolated septal myectomy (0.8%) and highest after concomitant mitral valve replacement (6.1%). There were 4 (0.7%) and 9 (1.5%) patients with left ventricular wall rupture and ventricular septal defect, respectively, after myectomy. New pacemaker implantation caused by atrioventricular disturbances was required in 29 (5.0%) patients, and was associated with previous alcohol septal ablation (odds ratio 3.34, 95% confidence interval 1.02-11.0, P = 0.047). Left ventricular wall rupture, intraoperative residual (15.5% moderate, 0.3% severe) mitral regurgitation, and pre-discharge residual outflow tract gradient >30 mm Hg (4.6%) occurrences were surgeon-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: The early results are consistent with example targets reported in the 2020 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for septal reduction therapy outcomes. Septal myectomy safety and efficacy are surgeon-dependent. Previous alcohol septal ablation increases the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation due to postoperative complete atrioventricular block. Therefore, continuous education, mentoring, and learning by doing may play an important role in achieving reasonable septal myectomy safety and efficacy.

Myectomy versus alcohol septal ablation in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: There is very little evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of alcohol septal ablation versus septal myectomy for a septal reduction in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. This study aimed to compare the immediate and long-term outcomes of these procedures. METHODS: Following propensity score matching, we retrospectively analysed outcomes in 105 patients who underwent myectomy and 105 who underwent septal ablation between 2011 and 2017 at 2 reference centres. RESULTS: The mean age was 51.9 ± 14.3 and 52.2 ± 14.3 years in the myectomy and ablation groups, respectively (P = 0.855), and postoperative left ventricular outflow tract gradients were 13 (10-19) mmHg vs 16 (12-26) mmHg; P = 0.025. The 1-year prevalence of the New York Heart Association class III-IV was higher in the ablation group (none vs 6.4%; P = 0.041). The 5-year overall survival rate [96.8% (86.3-99.3) after myectomy and 93.5% (85.9-97.1) after ablation; P = 0.103] and cumulative incidence of sudden cardiac death [0% and 1.9% (0.5-7.5), respectively P = 0.797] did not differ between the groups. The cumulative reoperation rate within 5 years was lower after myectomy than after ablation [2.0% (0.5-7.6) vs 14.6% (8.6-24.1); P = 0.003]. Ablation was associated with a higher reoperation risk (subdistributional hazard ratio = 5.9; 95% confidence interval 1.3-26.3, P = 0.020). At follow-up, left ventricular outflow tract gradient [16 (11-20) vs 23 (15-59) mmHg; P < 0.001] and prevalence of 2+ mitral regurgitation (1.1% vs 10.6%; P = 0.016) were lower after myectomy than after ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures improved functional capacity; however, myectomy better-resolved classes III-IV of heart failure. Septal ablation was associated with higher reoperation rates. Myectomy demonstrated benefits in gradient relief and mitral regurgitation elimination. The results suggest that decreasing rates of myectomy procedures need to be investigated and reconsidered.