Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 53(3): 265-70, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23346873

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of occipito-posterior position in the second stage of labour on operative delivery. METHODS: Double-blinded prospective cohort study of ultrasound determined occiput-posterior position during the second stage of labour compared with occiput-anterior position. The primary outcome was operative (caesarean section, forceps or vacuum) delivery. RESULTS: A total of 68% (13/19) women in the occiput-posterior group, and 27% (39/141) in the occiput-anterior group had an operative delivery (unadjusted: P < 0.001). Caesarean section was performed in 37% and 5%, respectively (P < 0.001). The occiput-posterior group had a longer second stage (mean 2 h 59 minutes vs 1 h 54 minutes; P = 0.001) and larger infants (mean 3723 g vs 3480 g, P = 0.024). In the logistic regression, occiput-posterior position, nulliparity, abnormal second stage cardiotocograph and epidural analgesia were independent predictors for operative delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Occiput-posterior position early in the second stage of labour is strongly associated with operative delivery. There is potential to explore interventions such as manual rotation.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Extracción Obstétrica , Presentación en Trabajo de Parto , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Forceps Obstétrico , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Extracción Obstétrica por Aspiración
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA