RESUMEN
Medical clowns (MCs) are trained professionals who aim to change the hospital environment through humor. Previous studies focused on their positive impact and began identifying their various skills in specific situations. When placed in pediatrics, MCs face various challenges, including approaching frustrated adolescents who are unwilling to cooperate with their care, dealing with their anxious parents, and communicating in a team in the presence of other health professionals. Research that systematically describes MCs' skills and therapeutic goals in meeting these challenges is limited. This article describes a qualitative, immersion/crystallization study, triangulating between 26 video-recorded simulations and 12 in-depth-semi-structured interviews with MCs. Through an iterative consensus-building process we identified 40 different skills, not limited to humor and entertainment. Four main therapeutic goals emerged: building a relationship, dealing with emotions, enhancing a sense of control, caring, and encouragement, and motivating treatment adherence. Mapping MCs' skills and goals enhances the understanding of MCs' role and actions to illustrate their unique caring practices. This clarification may help other healthcare professionals to recognize their practices and the benefits in involving them in care. Furthermore, other health professionals may apply some of the identified skills when faced with these challenges themselves.
Asunto(s)
Emociones , Objetivos , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa , Personal de Salud , ComunicaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Physicians play a crucial frontline role in the COVID-19 pandemic, which may involve high levels of anxiety. We aimed to investigate the association between pandemic-related stress factors (PRSF) and anxiety and to evaluate the potential effect of resilience on anxiety among physicians. METHODS: A self-report digital survey was completed by 1106 Israeli physicians (564 males and 542 females) during the COVID-19 outbreak. Anxiety was measured by the 8-item version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Resilience was evaluated by the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Stress was assessed using a PRSF inventory. RESULTS: Physicians reported high levels of anxiety with a mean score of 59.20 ± 7.95. We found an inverse association between resilience and anxiety. Four salient PRSF (mental exhaustion, anxiety about being infected, anxiety infecting family members, and sleep difficulties) positively associated with anxiety scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified specific PRSF including workload burden and fear of infection that are associated with increased anxiety and resilience that is associated with reduced anxiety among physicians.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Médicos , Neumonía Viral , Resiliencia Psicológica , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Depresión , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Competency Based Medical Education (CBME) is an educational approach that occupies a central place in medical education. Medical education is accountable for the graduates' professional level, ensuring they are skilled and competent in all key areas of their profession. Adopting CBME underscores the importance of simulation-based training. Experiential training provides, among other things: standardization of training, controlled exposure to extreme events and soft skills, such as patient-caregiver communication and teamwork training. Unlike the traditional apprentice approach, accountability reinforces the choice of a preliminary encounter with simulated patients prior to real-life care, as a complimentary tool for improving patient safety. Incorporating a practical exam is self-evident in CBME because of the need to ensure that the examinees are competent to provide unsupervised safe and quality care. Implementation of a national CBME program, likewise, incorporating simulation into national training programs, requires involvement and supervision on health system regulators. In this paper, we describe simulation-based national training programs that to date integrate competency-based training in the various medical sectors. As national programs, they are implemented under the guidance and in cooperation with the regulators. On the one hand, CBME is a new approach and its implementation will require time and the cooperation of many stakeholders. On the other hand, simulation is an existing, well-established training and assessment tool that can be used as an anchor around which you can start building the competency-based training programs.
Asunto(s)
Educación Basada en Competencias , Educación Médica , HumanosRESUMEN
In Israeli emergency departments, pediatric residents are allowed to independently perform procedural sedation after training. Preparing the residents to practice unsupervised sedations requires participation in a simulation-based training in patient safety during sedation (STPSDS). The study objective was to evaluate participants' perception of knowledge and confidence from the STPSDS. We performed a retrospective analysis of participants' self-reported perception of knowledge acquisition. At the end of each course, participants were requested to rate, anonymously and independently, the training contribution to their knowledge and confidence using a four-point Likert scale. Between January 2010 and December 2017, 321 pediatric residents participated in 67 STPSDS courses; 315 completed the self-assessments. Participants' median responses of the training contribution were 4 (IQR 3-4) for overall knowledge, 4 (IQR 4-4) for understanding potential complications during sedation, 3 (IQR 3-4) for knowledge in managing adverse events, and 3 (IQR 2-4) for knowledge in practicing safe sedation. Median response for contribution to participants' confidence in performing sedation was 3 (IQR 3-4).Conclusion: We found that the STPSDS improved perception of knowledge and confidence among pediatric residents. Our findings suggest that this training has a valuable role in preparing pediatric residents to practice unsupervised sedations in the ED. What is Known: ⢠In Israel, sedation-trained pediatric residents performed sedations in the Emergency Department ⢠Successful completion of a simulation-based training in patient safety during sedation (STPSDS) is a mandatory requirement to perform unsupervised sedation. What is New: ⢠The STPSDS improved perception of knowledge and confidence among pediatric residents. ⢠This training may be valuable in preparing pediatric residents to practice unsupervised sedations.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Pediatría/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Adulto , Sedación Consciente/efectos adversos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Seguridad del Paciente , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Hence, identifying and monitoring ADEs is of utmost importance. The Trigger Tool introduced by the Institute of Healthcare Improvement in the United States has been used in various countries worldwide, but has yet to be validated in Israel. OBJECTIVES: To validate the international Trigger Tool in Israel and to compare the results with those generated in various countries. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive correlative analysis surveying four general hospitals in Israel from different geographical regions was conducted. Patient medical charts (n=960) were screened for 17 established triggers and confirmed for the presence of an ADE. Trigger incidence was compared to the actual ADE rate. Further comparison among countries was conducted using published literature describing Trigger Tool validation in various countries. RESULTS: A total of 421 triggers in 279 hospitalizations were identified, of which 75 ADEs in 72 hospitalizations (7.5%) were confirmed. In addition, two ADEs were identified by chart review only. Mean positive predictive value was 17.81% and overall sensitivity was 97%. We found 1.54 ADEs for every 100 hospitalization days, 7.8 ADEs per 100 admissions, and 1.81 ADEs for every 1000 doses of medication. Of the 77 ADEs identified, 22.7% were defined as preventable. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the Trigger Tool validity in Israel as a standardized method. Further studies should evaluate between hospital and region differences in ADE rate, in particular for the preventable events.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hospitales Generales , Humanos , Incidencia , Israel , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multiple Mini-Interviews (MMI) is an admissions tool being used for more than a decade by medical schools worldwide to assess non-cognitive skills. In Israel, in addition to the MMI tool, two questionnaires are given to the candidates. It has been necessary to find a relevant criterion to examine the predictive validity of the MMI test. The measure developed in this study was a peer assessment tool which was filled out during clerkship. AIMS: The study aims at evaluating the predictive validity of the MMI and two questionnaires when compared with the peer assessment tool. METHOD: Ninety nine fourth-year medical students were included in this study. All of them went through the MMI test before the beginning of their studies. The students participated in two clinical rotations and were divided into 10 groups, each consisting of 9-12 students. This study is based on assessments given to 99 students. Every member of a group evaluated his fellow members on a number of attribute. The questionnaire included 10 statements, related to a particular attributes. In addition two concluding questions were included. Pearson correlations were used to test the relationships between pre-admission variables (MMI and two questionnaires) and the peer assessments. RESULTS: Statistically significant, moderate correlations between the general MOR and MIRKAM scores and the sum of the questionnaire assessments were 0.39 and 0.37, respectively (P-value <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study provides important evidence for the validity of the MMI. Additional studies are required to reevaluate the predicted validity of the MMI.
Asunto(s)
Prácticas Clínicas/métodos , Prueba de Admisión Académica/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , Grupo Paritario , Prácticas Clínicas/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto/normas , Israel , Masculino , Criterios de Admisión Escolar , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Human dignity has a pivotal role within the health care system. There is little experience using simulation-based medical education (SBME) programs that focus on human dignity issues in doctor-patient relationships. OBJECTIVES: To describe and assess a SBME program aimed at improving physicians' competence in a dignifying approach when encountering adolescents and their parents. METHODS: A total of 97 physicians participated in 8 one-day SMBE workshops that included 7 scenarios of typical adolescent health care dilemmas. These issues could be resolved if the physician used an appropriate dignifying approach toward the patient and the parents. Debriefing discussions were based on video recordings of the scenarios. The effect of the workshops on participants' approach to adolescent health care was assessed by a feedback questionnaire and on 5-point Likert score questionnaires administered before the workshop and 3 months after. RESULTS: All participants completed both the pre-workshop and the feedback questionnaires and 41 (42%) completed the post-workshop questionnaire 3 months later. Practice and competence topics received significantly higher scores in post-workshop questionnaires (P < 0.001). A score of high to very high was given by 90% of physicians to the contribution of the workshop to participants understanding the dignifying approach, and by 70% to its influence on their communicative skills. CONCLUSIONS: A one-day simulation-based workshop may improve physicians' communication skills and sense of competence in addressing adolescents' health care issues which require a dignifying approach toward both the adolescent patients and their parents. This dignity-focused methodology may be expanded to improve communication skills of physicians from various disciplines.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Adolescente , Educación Médica/métodos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Simulación de Paciente , Personeidad , Médicos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Encuestas y CuestionariosAsunto(s)
Curriculum/tendencias , Educación a Distancia , Educación Médica , Enseñanza , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Educación a Distancia/métodos , Educación a Distancia/organización & administración , Educación Médica/organización & administración , Educación Médica/tendencias , Humanos , Israel , Psicología Educacional , SARS-CoV-2 , Enseñanza/psicología , Enseñanza/normas , Telemedicina/métodosRESUMEN
Health care organizations have installed electronic systems to increase efficiency in health care. Empirically assessing the cost-effectiveness of technologies to the health care system is a challenging and complex task. This study examined cost-effectiveness of additional clinical information supplied via an EHR system by simulating a case of abdominal aortic aneurysm devised and acted professionally by the Israel Center of Medical Simulation. We conducted a simulation-based study on physicians who were asked to treat a simulated patient for the prevalent medical scenario of hip and leg pain that actually corresponded to an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Half of the participating physicians from the Department of Emergency Medicine at Tel-Hashomer Hospital - Israel's largest - had access to an EHR system that integrates medical data from multiple health providers (community and hospitals) in addition to the local health record, and half did not. To model medical decision making, the results of the simulation were combined with a Markov Model within a decision tree. Cost-effectiveness was analyzed by comparing the effects of the admission/discharge decision in units of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) to the estimated costs. The results showed that using EHR in the ED increases the QALY of the patient and improves medical decision-making. The expenditure per patient for one QALY unit as a result of using the EHR was $1229, which is very cost-effective according to many accepted threshold values (less than all these values). Thus, using the EHR contributes to making a cost-effective decision in this specific but prevalent case.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Israel , Cadenas de MarkovRESUMEN
It is widely believed that Electronic Health Records (EHR) improve medical decision-making by enabling medical staff to access medical information stored in the system. It remains unclear, however, whether EHR indeed fulfills this claim under the severe time constraints of Emergency Departments (EDs). We assessed whether accessing EHR in an ED actually improves decision-making by clinicians. A simulated ED environment was created at the Israel Center for Medical Simulation (MSR). Four different actors were trained to simulate four specific complaints and behavior and 'consulted' 26 volunteer ED physicians. Each physician treated half of the cases (randomly) with access to EHR, and their medical decisions were compared to those where the physicians had no access to EHR. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy with and without access showed that accessing the EHR led to an increase in the quality of the clinical decisions. Physicians accessing EHR were more highly informed and thus made more accurate decisions. The percentage of correct diagnoses was higher and these physicians were more confident in their diagnoses and made their decisions faster.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & control , Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Teóricos , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Simulación por Computador , Femenino , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In recent years the city of Eilat has come under threat of rocket attacks. This emphasized the need for an upgrade of the city's medical center capabilities in trauma care. Medical simulation has been used for many years in training and for the improvement of trauma care both at the field Level and in hospitals. Although there was significant improvement in the technological aspects of simulations, the use of simulators was restricted mainly to simulation centers and its effectiveness in training and assessment of trauma teams in situ in emergency departments was still not examined. OBJECTIVES: To train the personnel engaged in trauma care in a small rural medical center in the fastest and most comprehensive manner, using a mobile and highly sophisticated medical simulator. METHODS: A team of simulation specialists from MSR, Israel Center for Medical Simulation, held a one week long course including all the staff members involved in trauma care, 38 doctors and nurses in total. All drills were recorded and then reviewed in the debriefing. Four staff members were trained in video debriefing at MSR. The participants were requested to complete questionnaires before and after training. RESULTS: Subjective feelings of competence in the team's ability to treat trauma patients were found to improve after training. Airway management rating of very good improved from 21.05% prior to training to 50% after the course. Chest trauma management and hemorrhage control scores of very good rose from 10.53% and 26.32% before to 42.11% and 55.26% respectively after the course. The highest improvement was measured in teamwork performance, which was ranked as very good: 10.53% before training and elevated to 47.37% after training. A total of 74% of the responders stated that this training program contributed very significantly to their trauma care capabilities. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mobile medical simulations combined with instructors from within the hospital enabled the training and assessment of the trauma care in situ and in a short time.
Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Simulación de Paciente , Desarrollo de Personal , Heridas y Lesiones , Competencia Clínica , Evaluación Educacional , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/normas , Femenino , Hospitales Rurales , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/normas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Médicos/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Desarrollo de Personal/métodos , Desarrollo de Personal/organización & administración , Heridas y Lesiones/clasificación , Heridas y Lesiones/terapiaRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the impact of three-dimensional (3D) imaging system on the performance of basic laparoscopic tasks in a test model by novice and experienced surgeons. DESIGN: Three tasks were performed in a test model by 30 surgeons, 15 experienced surgeons, and 15 with minimal laparoscopic experience. The tasks were performed using 2D and 3D vision systems. DESIGN CLASSIFICATION: Canadian Task Force II-1. SUBJECTS: Fifteen experienced laparoscopic surgeons and fifteen novices with minimal laparoscopic experience. MEASUREMENTS: Performance times were recorded using both two-dimensional and 3D imaging system for each task. MAIN RESULTS: Performance time for all skills was significantly (P < 0.02) shorter when using 3D imaging system. Performance times were reduced by 18-31% using 3D imaging for all participants. Experienced surgeons performed the tasks faster and showed similar improvement while using 3D imaging system. CONCLUSION: 3D vision systems allow for significant improvement in performance times of basic laparoscopic tasks in a test model for both inexperienced and advanced laparoscopic surgeons. Experienced surgeons benefit as much as novices from 3D imaging system. This benefit should be weighed against the disadvantages of the 3D vision systems, mainly cost, decreased light, eye strain, headaches, and shorter focal lengths.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Educación Médica/métodos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Laparoscopía/educación , Cirujanos/normas , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Physicians are often insufficiently trained in bedside teaching and mentoring skills. OBJECTIVES: To develop, implement and assess a simulation-based training program designed to improve clinical teaching among physicians. METHODS: We developed a one-day tutor training program based on six simulated scenarios with video-based debriefing. The program's efficacy was assessed using questionnaires completed by the participating physicians and their students. Main outcome measures were self-perceived teaching skills at baseline, after participation in the program, and following completion of the tutor role. Secondary outcome measures were the students' perceptions regarding their tutor skills. RESULTS: Thirty-two physicians (mean age 35.5 years, 56% females) participated in the program. Self-assessment questionnaires indicated statistically significant improvement following the program in 13 of 20 measures of teaching skills. Additional improvement was observed upon completion of the tutor role, leading to significant improvement in 19 of the .20 measures. Questionnaires completed by their students indicated higher scores in all parameters as compared to a matched control group of tutors who did not participate in the program, though not statistically significant. Most participants stated that the program enhanced their teaching skills (88%), they implement program-acquired skills when teaching students (79%), and they would recommend it to their peers (100%). Satisfaction was similar among participants with and without previous teaching experience. CONCLUSIONS: A novel one-day simulation-based tutor training program was developed and implemented with encouraging results regarding its potential to improve clinical teaching and mentoring skills.
Asunto(s)
Docentes Médicos/normas , Mentores , Médicos/normas , Competencia Profesional , Estudiantes de Medicina , Adulto , Simulación por Computador , Evaluación Educacional , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Enseñanza/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prescription errors are common in hospitalized patients and result in significant morbidity, mortality and costs. Electronic prescriptions with computerized physician order entry systems (CPOE) and integrated computerized decision support systems (CDSS providing online alerts) reduce prescription errors by approximately 50%. However, the introduction of CDSS is often met by opposition due to the flood of alerts, and most prescribers eventually ignore even crucial alerts ("alert fatigue"). OBJECTIVES: To describe the implementation and customization of a commercial CDSS (SafeRx) for electronic prescribing in Internal Medicine departments at a tertiary care center, with the purpose of improving comprehensibility and substantially reducing the number of alerts to minimize alert fatigue. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert committee was authorized by the hospital administration to customize the CDSS according to the needs of six internal medicine departments at Sheba Medical Center. We assessed volume of prescriptions and alert types during the period February-August 2012 using the statistical functions provided by the CDSS. RESULTS: A mean of 339 +/- 13 patients per month per department received 11.2 +/- 0.5 prescriptions per patient, 30.1% of which triggered one or more CDSS alerts, most commonly drug-drug interactions (43.2%) and dosing alerts (38.3%). The review committee silenced or modified 3981 alerts, enhancing comprehensibility, and providing dosing instructions adjusted to the patient's renal function and recommendations for follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The large volume of drug prescriptions in internal medicine departments is associated with a significant rate of potential prescription errors. To ensure its effectiveness and minimize alert fatigue, continuous customization of the CDSS to the specific needs of particular departments is required.
Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia Asistida por Computador , Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas , Errores de Medicación , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Quimioterapia Asistida por Computador/instrumentación , Quimioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Prescripción Electrónica/normas , Prescripción Electrónica/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Israel , Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas/normas , Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
This editorial is in response to Bar-Sela, Bentur, Schultz and Corn's article entitled "Spiritual care in hospitals and other healthcare settings in Israel--a profession in the making", published in Harefuah in May 2014. The integration of spiritual support into hospitals marks an interesting trend in light of the current emphases in the Israeli medical system on technological advancement, financial feasibility and quantifiable quality measures. This step is evidence of the importance still attached by policy and decisionmakers to those human aspects of illness and disease, which are difficult to define and measure. "Spiritual Support" is an ancient profession based on the principle, whereby support of the spirit is considered a basic human right, in recognition of the spirit as a source of strength during times of crisis and distress. This service was introduced into the Chaim Sheba Medical Center six years ago for patients with untreatable illnesses, and through identification of commonality between their coping features and those of rehabilitation patients. It was later expanded into the orthopedic and neurological rehabilitation departments. The service is provided on an individual level for the patients and in a group formal for their caregivers. Spiritual support as an integral part of the multi-disciplinary care further ratifies the holistic approach in medical practice, as an everlasting value transcending periodical trends. The conclusion drawn is that technological advancement, the scientific approach, physical-medical treatment, emotional therapy and spiritual support can and should exist side by side to improve the welfare and coping abilities of patients dealing with adverse medical conditions.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Terapias Espirituales/métodos , Espiritualidad , Adaptación Psicológica , Cuidadores/psicología , Hospitales , Humanos , Israel , Atención al Paciente/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The decision to allocate hospitals for the initial reception of hostages abducted on the October 7th Hamas attack introduced an array of unprecedented challenges. These challenges stemmed from a paucity of existing literature and protocols, lack of information regarding captivity conditions, and variability in hostage characteristics and circumstances. OBJECTIVE: To describe the rapid development, implementation and evaluation of the Hostage-ReSPOND protocol, a comprehensive trauma-informed procedure for the care of hostages, including young children, their caregivers and families, immediately following their release from prolonged captivity. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert focus group conducted a comprehensive literature review to develop the ReSPOND protocol, consisting of: Readiness of teams via multifaceted trainings, utilizing live simulations and video debriefings; Specialized professional teams experienced in providing holistic trauma-informed care; Personalized care tailored to individualized and developmentally-informed needs; Optimal safety rooted in creating a secure environment and trauma-informed response to young children, adolescents, caregivers and families; and Navigating Discharge, through coordination with community-based care systems. RESULTS: A designated facility at the Children's hospital was carefully prepared for receiving 29 hostages, aged 3.9-80 years, 28% under the age of 18. Implementation of the ReSPOND protocol, which prioritized holistic psychosocial interventions above urgent medical care, proved feasible and effective in managing the diverse and complex needs of returnees as per provider report. Finally, systemic assessment of returnee's immediate and long-term mental health needs proved highly challenging. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no literature addressing the response to released hostages, especially those involving infants, young children and families within a children's hospital facility. This study has the potential to fill a crucial gap in knowledge by introducing a novel protocol which could offer valuable insights for public health organizations tasked with providing acute care to diverse individuals and families experiencing extreme, multi-layered mass traumatization.
RESUMEN
The recent technological advance of digital high resolution imaging has allowed the field of pathology and medical laboratory science to undergo a dramatic transformation with the incorporation of virtual microscopy as a simulation-based educational and diagnostic tool. This transformation has correlated with an overall increase in the use of simulation in medicine in an effort to address dwindling clinical resource availability and patient safety issues currently facing the modern healthcare system. Virtual microscopy represents one such simulation-based technology that has the potential to enhance student learning and readiness to practice while revolutionising the ability to clinically diagnose pathology collaboratively across the world. While understanding that a substantial amount of literature already exists on virtual microscopy, much more research is still required to elucidate the full capabilities of this technology. This review explores the use of virtual microscopy in medical education and disease diagnosis with a unique focus on key requirements needed to take this technology to the next level in its use in medical education and clinical practice.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Communication skills are an important component of the neurosurgery residency training program. We developed a simulation-based training module for neurosurgery residents in which medical, communication and ethical dilemmas are presented by role-playing actors. OBJECTIVES: To assess the first national simulation-based communication skills training for neurosurgical residents. METHODS: Eight scenarios covering different aspects of neurosurgery were developed by our team: (1) obtaining informed consent for an elective surgery, (2) discharge of a patient following elective surgery, (3) dealing with an unsatisfied patient, (4) delivering news of intraoperative complications, (5) delivering news of a brain tumor to parents of a 5 year old boy, (6) delivering news of brain death to a family member, (7) obtaining informed consent for urgent surgery from the grandfather of a 7 year old boy with an epidural hematoma, and (8) dealing with a case of child abuse. Fifteen neurosurgery residents from all major medical centers in Israel participated in the training. The session was recorded on video and was followed by videotaped debriefing by a senior neurosurgeon and communication expert and by feedback questionnaires. RESULTS: All trainees participated in two scenarios and observed another two. Participants largely agreed that the actors simulating patients represented real patients and family members and that the videotaped debriefing contributed to the teaching of professional skills. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based communication skill training is effective, and together with thorough debriefing is an excellent learning and practical method for imparting communication skills to neurosurgery residents. Such simulation-based training will ultimately be part of the national residency program.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Comunicación , Ética Médica/educación , Internado y Residencia/normas , Neurocirugia/educación , Humanos , Israel , Simulación de Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Grabación de Cinta de VideoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although effective communication with families of critically ill patients is a vital component of quality care, training in this field is neglected. AIMS: The article aims to validate communication skills training program for anesthesiology residents in the intensive care set up. METHODS: Ten anesthesia residents, following 3 months of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) rotation, had 4 hours of lectures and one day simulation-based communication skills training with families of critically ill patients. Participants completed an attitude questionnaire over 3 time periods--before training [t1], immediately following training (t2) and three months following training (t3). The participants' communication skills were assessed by two blinded independent observers using the SEGUE framework while performing a simulation-based scenario at t1 and t3. RESULTS: Seven participants finished the study protocol. Participants ndicated communication importance as 3.68 +/- 0.58 (t1), 4.05 +/- 0.59 (t2), 4.13 +/- 0.64 (t3); their communication ability as 3.09 +/- 0.90 (t1), 3.70 +/- 0.80 (t2), 3.57 +/- 0.64 (t3); the contribution of lecture to communication 3.04 +/- 0.43 (t1), 3.83 +/- 0.39 (t2), 3.87 +/- 0.51 (t3), and contribution of simulation training to communication 3.00 +/- 0.71 (t1), 4.04 +/- 0.52 (t2), 3.84 +/- 0.31 (t3). The differences did not reach statistical significance. Objective assessment of the communication skills using the SEGUE framework indicated that 6/7 participants improved their communication skills, with communication ability before training at 2.66 +/- 0.83 and 1 month following training it was 3.38 +/- 0.78 (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study demonstrates the value of communication skills training in the intensive care environment.
Asunto(s)
Anestesiología/educación , Competencia Clínica , Comunicación , Internado y Residencia/normas , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Enfermedad Crítica , Familia , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Simulación de Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest in the parturient is often fatal, but appropriate resuscitation in this special situation may save the lives of the mother and/or unborn baby. Concern has arisen as to application of recommended techniques for resuscitation in the obstetric patient. The Israel Board of Anesthesiology has incorporated simulation assessment into accreditation examinations. The candidates represent a unique national cohort in which we were able to assess competence in the simulated scenario of cardiorespiratory arrest in the parturient. METHODS A simulated scenario of preeclampsia with magnesium toxicity leading to cardiac arrest in a pregnant patient was performed by 25 senior anesthesiology residents. A unique two-stage simulation examination consisting of high fidelity simulation followed immediately by oral debriefing was conducted. The assessment was scored using a predetermined checklist of key actions and answers to clarifying questions. Simulation performance was compared to debriefing performance. RESULTS During the board examination, resuscitation not specific to the pregnant patient was performed well (commencing chest compressions, bag-mask ventilation, cardiac defibrillation); however actions specific to the parturient were performed poorly. Left uterine displacement, cricoid pressure during bag-mask ventilation, and instructing preparations to be made for perimortem cesarean delivery within 5 minutes were performed by 68%, 48%, and 40% of candidates respectively (lower 99% confidence limit 42%, 25%, and 19%, respectively). Cricoid pressure during bag-mask ventilation was performed by 48% (25%) but described in debriefing by 80% of candidates (53%) (P = 0.08), and time setting for perimortem cesarean delivery was performed by 40% (29%) but described by 80% (53%) (P = 0.05) of examinees. CONCLUSIONS Senior anesthesiology residents have poor knowledge of resuscitation of the pregnant patient. The results suggest 2-stage simulation including an oral component may reveal disparities in knowledge not assessed by simulation alone, but definitive conclusions require further study.