Same but Different-ECMO in COVID-19 and ARDS of Other Etiologies. Comparison of Survival Outcomes and Management in Different ARDS Groups.

Background: COVID-19 has led to increased numbers of patients in need of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, but knowledge on management in comparison to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of other etiologies is still lacking. We analyzed venovenous ECMO management and survival outcomes in patients with COVID-19 in comparison to influenza ARDS and pulmonary ARDS of other origin. Results: Retrospective analysis of prospective venovenous ECMO registry-based data collection was performed. One hundred consecutive venovenous ECMO patients with severe ARDS were included (41 COVID-19, 24 influenza A, 35 ARDS of other etiologies). Patients with COVID-19 had higher BMI (body mass index), lower SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) and APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) scores, lower C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels and less vasoactive support at ECMO initiation. Significantly more patients were mechanically ventilated for more than 7 days prior to ECMO initiation in the COVID-19 group, however they were ventilated with lower tidal volumes and more often received additional rescue therapies prior to and on ECMO. COVID-19 patients had significantly more barotrauma and thrombotic events on ECMO. There were no differences in weaning of ECMO, however duration of ECMO runs and ICU length of stay was significantly longer in the COVID-19 group. The leading cause of death in the COVID-19 group was irreversible respiratory failure, while uncontrolled sepsis and multiorgan failure were leading causes in the other 2 groups. All patients who survived ICU treatment were discharged out of hospital, and there were no differences in survival among groups at 180 days. Conclusions: Survival outcomes of venovenous ECMO patients do not differ between COVID-19 and ARDS of other pulmonary etiologies. ARDS guidelines were in greater proportion adhered to in COVID-19 patients, with, however, longer time to ECMO initiation. COVID-19 ARDS seems specific as a more single-organ disease with longer ECMO duration and irreversible respiratory failure as a main cause of ICU mortality.

Nonlinear Heart Rate Variability in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Changes after 4-week Comprehensive Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

Cardiovascular disease is among the leading causes of mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Nonlinear heart rate variability (NHRV) measures are markers and predictors of cardiovascular disease, particularly arrhythmias. Our aim was to investigate NHRV in patients with COPD and changes after pulmonary rehabilitation. 20-minute ECGs were used to compare NHRV (a) in 45 healthy individuals and 31 patients with COPD and (b) in 16 patients who completed rehabilitation versus 13 age- and sex-matched control patients. We studied detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA1, DFA2), fractal dimension (low, high, average FD) and sample entropy. Compared to healthy individuals, patients with COPD had lower DFA1 (p=.038). During rehabilitation high FD decreased (p=.018) and DFA2 increased (p=.043). Cluster analysis displayed an increase of DFA1 in the rehabilitation cluster with DFA1 values below 1 (p=.032). NHRV reflects altered autonomic regulation in patients with COPD. Reduced DFA1 in patients with COPD implies a stronger pro-arrhythmic substrate and altered parasympathetic modulation.

The effect of 4-week rehabilitation on heart rate variability and QTc interval in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease negatively affects the autonomic nervous system and increases risks of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings were used to compare parameters of heart rate variability and QTc interval in patients with COPD and healthy individuals. The effects of a 4-week program of rehabilitation in patients with COPD were also evaluated by comparing pre- and post-rehabilitation ECGs with age- and sex-matched control COPD patients not participating in the program. Heart rate, average NN, SDNN, RMSSD, pNN50, TP, LF, HF, LF/HF, and QTc were analyzed. Rehabilitation effects were evaluated using the St. George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), the 6-min walk test (6MWT), and the incremental shuttle walking test (ISWT). In comparison with the healthy individuals, the patients with COPD had higher heart rate (p < 0.05) and reduced average NN, SDNN, RMSSD, pNN50, HF, LF, and TP (all p < 0.05) but similar QTc interval (p = 0.185). During rehabilitation, SDNN and TP (p < 0.05 for both) increased, as did the results for 6MWT, ISWT, and SGRQ (all p < 0.05). No significant change of QTc interval was observed within or between the two groups of patients with COPD. Change in SDNN correlated with a clinically relevant difference in SGRQ (r = 0.538, p = 0.021). It is concluded that patients with COPD demonstrate reduced parameters of heart rate variability and that these can be improved in a rehabilitation program, thus improving health-related quality of life.

[Chronic heart failure - new insights]. / Chronische Herzinsuffizienz ­ neue Erkenntnisse.

Chronic heart failure is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide with increasing prevalence and incidence. Due to high morbidity and mortality a standardized and evidence-based therapy is crucial. This review presents new pharmacological and interventional developments, as well as new insights due to common comorbidities of patients with chronic heart failure like anemia and hyperkalemia.

Renal denervation reduces office and ambulatory heart rate in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: 12-month outcomes from the global SYMPLICITY registry.

OBJECTIVES: Renal denervation (RDN) can reduce sympathetic activity and blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension. The effects on resting and ambulatory heart rate (HR), also regulated by the sympathetic nervous system, are not established. METHODS: Herein, we report 12-month outcomes from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry on office and ambulatory HR and BP in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (n = 846). RESULTS: HR declined in correlation with the HR at baseline and at 12 months, in particular, in patients in the upper tertile of HR (>74 bpm). BP reduction was similar in the tertiles of HR at baseline. Similar effects were observed when 24-h ambulatory HR and SBP were determined. Office HR was similarly decreased when patients were on a ß-blocker or not. Antihypertensive treatment remained unchanged during the 12-month period of the Global SYMPLICITY Registry. CONCLUSION: RDN reduces BP independent from HR. A HR reduction is dependent on baseline HR and unchanged by ß-blocker treatment. The effects of RDN on SBP and HR are durable up to 1 year. HR reduction might be a target for RDN in patients with high HR at baseline, which needs to be scrutinized in prospective trials.

The effect of renal denervation in moderate treatment-resistant hypertension with confirmed medication adherence.

OBJECTIVES: Data on the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect of renal denervation (RDN) in moderate treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH) are limited. Moreover, change of adherence to medication, as one potential confounder of BP response, has never been analyzed rigorously in this group of patients. We analyzed the effect of RDN on BP in patients with moderate TRH who were retrospectively found to be completely adherent to their antihypertensive medication. METHODS: Our study cohort comprised 40 patients with moderate TRH [office BP ≥ 140/90 but <160/100 mmHg and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) ≥130/80 mmHg] who underwent catheter-based RDN. Further major inclusion criterion was complete adherence to their medication (≥80% intake of their prescribed antihypertensive drugs) at baseline (assessed by retrospective toxicological analysis). RESULTS: Six months after RDN, office BP was reduced by -10/-6 mmHg (SBP: 149 ±â€Š6 vs. 139 ±â€Š15 mmHg; DBP: 81 ±â€Š12 vs. 75 ±â€Š10 mmHg; both P < 0.001) and 24-h ABPM by -7/-4 mmHg (SBP: 150 ±â€Š14 vs. 143 ±â€Š16 mmHg, P = 0.005; DBP: 82 ±â€Š10 vs. 78 ±â€Š9 mmHg, P = 0.009). Number of prescribed antihypertensive medication [6.0 (5.0-6.0) vs. 5.5 (5.0-6.0), P = 0.013] and adherence rate (95.2 ±â€Š7.6 vs. 91.7 ±â€Š13.9%, P = 0.065) was slightly reduced 6 months after RDN, both likely to underestimate the true BP reduction. CONCLUSION: Thus, our data indicate that even after given full respect to drug adherence as potential confounder of BP response after RDN, both office and 24-h ABPM were substantially reduced in patients with moderate TRH.