Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
1.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 30(12): 780-792, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30318343

RESUMEN

AIMS: Our purpose was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) carried out 3-6 months after (chemo)radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study we included 82 patients with advanced-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated between 2012 and 2015. Primary tumours and lymph nodes were assessed separately. DWI was analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. 18F-FDG-PET/CT was evaluated using the Hopkins criteria. Dichotomous qualitative analysis was carried out for both modalities. Cox regression analysis was used for univariate analysis of recurrence-free survival (RFS). Significant univariate parameters were included in multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In 12 patients, locoregional recurrence occurred. With all imaging strategies, either single-modality or multi-modality, a high negative predictive value (NPV) was achieved (94.3-100%). In response evaluation of the primary site, the preferred strategy is 18F-FDG-PET/CT only, which resulted in a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 86.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 37.5% and NPV of 98.5%. For response evaluation of the neck, the best results were obtained with a sequential approach only including the second modality in positive reads of the first modality. It did not matter which modality was assessed first. This strategy for lymph node assessment resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 83.3%, 95.6%, 62.5%, and 98.5%, respectively. After correction for received treatment and human papillomavirus status, primary tumour (P = 0.009) or lymph node (P < 0.001) Hopkins score ≥4 on 18F-FDG-PET/CT remained significant predictors of RFS. CONCLUSION: For response evaluation of the primary tumour 18F-FDG-PET/CT only is the preferred strategy, whereas for the neck a sequential approach including both DWI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT resulted in the best diagnostic accuracy for follow-up after (chemo)radiotherapy. Qualitative analysis of 18F-FDG-PET/CT is a stronger predictor of RFS than DWI analysis.


Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Pronóstico , Radiofármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA