RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The global nursing shortages exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a drastic reorganization in nursing practices. Work routines, the composition of teams and subsequently mundane nursing practices were all altered to sustain the accessibility and quality of care. These dramatic changes demanded a reshaping of the nurses' work environment. The aim of this study was to explore how nurses reshaped their work environment in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A descriptive study comprising 26 semi-structured interviews conducted in a large Dutch teaching hospital between June and September 2020. Participants were nurses (including intensive care unit nurses), outpatient clinic assistants, nurse managers, and management (including one member of the Nurse Practice Council). The interviews were analysed with open, axial, and selective coding. RESULTS: We identified five themes: 1) the Nursing Staff Deployment Plan created new micro-teams with complementary roles to meet the care needs of COVID-19 infected patients; 2) nurse-led adaptations effectively managed the increased workload, thereby ensuring the quality of care; 3) continuous professional development ensured adequate competence levels for all roles; 4) interprofessional collaboration resulted in experienced solidarity, a positive atmosphere, and increased autonomy for nurses; and, 5) supportive managers reduced nurses' stress and improved work conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that nurses positively reshaped their work environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. They contributed to innovative solutions in an environment of equal interprofessional collaboration, which led to greater respect for their knowledge and competencies, enhanced their autonomy and improved management support.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is known that interprofessional collaboration is crucial for integrated care delivery, yet we are still unclear about the underlying mechanisms explaining effectiveness of integrated care delivery to older patients. In addition, we lack research comparing integrated care delivery between hospitals. Therefore, this study aims to (i) provide insight into the underlying components 'relational coordination' and 'situational awareness' of integrated care delivery and the role of team and organizational context in integrated care delivery; and (ii) compare situational awareness, relational coordination, and integrated care delivery of different hospitals in the Netherlands. METHODS: This cross-sectional study took place in 2012 among professionals from three different hospitals involved in the delivery of care to older patients. A total of 215 professionals filled in the questionnaire (42% response rate).Descriptive statistics and paired-sample t-tests were used to investigate the level of situational awareness, relational coordination, and integrated care delivery in the three different hospitals. Correlation and multilevel analyses were used to investigate the relationship between background characteristics, team context, organizational context, situational awareness, relational coordination and integrated care delivery. RESULTS: No differences in background characteristics, team context, organizational context, situational awareness, relational coordination and integrated care delivery were found among the three hospitals. Correlational analysis revealed that situational awareness (r = 0.30; p < 0.01), relational coordination (r = 0.17; p < 0.05), team climate (r = 0.29; p < 0.01), formal internal communication (r = 0.46; p < 0.01), and informal internal communication (r = 0.36; p < 0.01) were positively associated with integrated care delivery. Stepwise multilevel analyses showed that formal internal communication (p < 0.001) and situational awareness (p < 0.01) were associated with integrated care delivery. Team climate was not significantly associated with integrated care delivery when situational awareness and relational coordination were included in the equation. Thus situational awareness acted as mediator between team climate and integrated care delivery among professionals delivering care to older hospitalized patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show the importance of formal internal communication and situational awareness for quality of care delivery to hospitalized older patients.
Asunto(s)
Concienciación , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/métodos , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Personal de Salud , Hospitales , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Atención a la Salud/normas , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Femenino , Personal de Salud/normas , Hospitales/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Prevention and Reactivation Care Program (PReCaP) entails an innovative multidisciplinary, integrated and goal oriented approach aimed at reducing hospital related functional decline among elderly patients. Despite calls for process evaluation as an essential component of clinical trials in the geriatric care field, studies assessing fidelity lag behind the number of effect studies. The threefold purpose of this study was (1) to systematically assess intervention fidelity of the hospital phase of the PReCaP in the first year of the intervention delivery; (2) to improve our understanding of the moderating factors and modifications affecting intervention fidelity; and (3) to explore the feasibility of the PReCaP fidelity assessment in view of the modifications. METHODS: Based on the PReCaP description we developed a fidelity instrument incorporating nineteen (n=19) intervention components. A combination of data collection methods was utilized, i.e. data collection from patient records and individual Goal Attainment Scaling care plans, in-depth interviews with stakeholders, and non-participant observations. Descriptive analysis was performed to obtain levels of fidelity of each of the nineteen PReCaP components. Moderating factors were identified by using the Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity. RESULTS: Ten of the nineteen intervention components were always or often delivered to the group of twenty elderly patients. Moderating factors, such as facilitating strategies and context were useful in explaining the non- or low-adherence of particular intervention components. CONCLUSIONS: Fidelity assessment was carried out to evaluate the adherence to the PReCaP in the Vlietland Ziekenhuis in the Netherlands. Given that the fidelity was assessed in the first year of PReCaP implementation it was commendable that ten of the nineteen intervention components were performed always or often. The adequate delivery of the intervention components strongly depended on various moderating factors. Since the intervention is still developing and undergoing continuous modifications, it has been concluded that the fidelity criteria should evolve with the modified intervention. Furthermore, repeated intervention fidelity assessments will be necessary to ensure a valid and reliable fidelity assessment of the PReCaP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR2317.
Asunto(s)
Anciano Frágil , Enfermería Geriátrica/normas , Hospitalización , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Masculino , Auditoría Médica , Países Bajos , Competencia Profesional , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hospital related functional decline in older patients is an underestimated problem. Thirty-five procent of 70-year old patients experience functional decline during hospital admission in comparison with pre-illness baseline. This percentage increases considerably with age. METHODS/DESIGN: To address this issue, the Vlietland Ziekenhuis in The Netherlands has implemented an innovative program (PReCaP), aimed at reducing hospital related functional decline among elderly patients by offering interventions that are multidisciplinary, integrated and goal-oriented at the physical, social, and psychological domains of functional decline. DISCUSSION: This paper presents a detailed description of the intervention, which incorporates five distinctive elements: (1) Early identification of elderly patients with a high risk of functional decline, and if necessary followed by the start of the reactivation treatment within 48 h after hospital admission; (2) Intensive follow-up treatment for a selected patient group at the Prevention and Reactivation Centre (PRC); (3) Availability of multidisciplinary geriatric expertise; (4) Provision of support and consultation of relevant professionals to informal caregivers; (5) Intensive follow-up throughout the entire chain of care by a casemanager with geriatric expertise. Outcome and process evaluations are ongoing and results will be published in a series of future papers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR2317.
Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Hospitalización , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Recuperación de la Función/fisiología , Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Proyectos Piloto , Medicina Preventiva/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nurses and nursing students experienced an emotional burden while working during the COVID-19 outbreak. During the COVID-19 outbreak three questions for nurses working under these extreme circumstances were formulated: 1. What today's events do you remember? 2. How do you feel (physically and mentally)? 3. Do you have enough support? The purpose of this study was to obtain insight into whether nurses and nursing students perceive that the use of the three-questions-method contributes to effective coping with the emotional burden during the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: Focus group interviews were held with hospital nurses (n = 11) and nursing students with internships in mental health care (n = 2), hospital (n = 9), and homecare/nursing home care (n = 3) in September 2020 followed by twenty semi-structured interviews one year later. RESULTS: Almost all nurses and nursing students named factors that contributed to the emotional burden: fear, powerlessness, frustration, lack of knowledge about COVID-19, and pressure to pass the internship. Participants indicated that using the three-questions-method can help to effectively cope with the emotional burden during and after the COVID-19 outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: Using the three-questions-method offers added value in coping with emotional burden and can be used in education as well as in practice.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Adaptación Psicológica , COVID-19/epidemiología , Emociones , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To provide insight into professionals' perceptions of and experiences with shared decision-making (SDM) in the treatment of symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS: A semistructured interview study was performed in the heart centres of academic and large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands between June and December 2020. Cardiothoracic surgeons, interventional cardiologists, nurse practitioners and physician assistants (n=21) involved in the decision-making process for treatment of severe AS were interviewed. An inductive thematic analysis was used to identify, analyse and report patterns in the data. RESULTS: Four primary themes were generated: (1) the concept of SDM, (2) knowledge, (3) communication and interaction, and (4) implementation of SDM. Not all respondents considered patient participation as an element of SDM. They experienced a discrepancy between patients' wishes and treatment options. Respondents explained that not knowing patient preferences for health improvement hinders SDM and complicating patient characteristics for patient participation were perceived. A shared responsibility for improving SDM was suggested for patients and all professionals involved in the decision-making process for severe AS. CONCLUSIONS: Professionals struggle to make highly complex treatment decisions part of SDM and to embed patients' expectations of treatment and patients' preferences. Additionally, organisational constraints complicate the SDM process. To ensure sustainable high-quality care, professionals should increase their awareness of patient participation in SDM, and collaboration in the pathway for decision-making in severe AS is required to support the documentation and availability of information according to the principles of SDM.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Comunicación , Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Participación del Paciente , Prioridad del PacienteRESUMEN
This review provides an overview of the status of shared decision making (SDM) in older patients regarding treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (SSAS). The databases Embase, Medline Ovid, Cinahl and Cochrane Dare were searched for relevant studies from January 2002 to May 2018 regarding perspectives of professionals, patients and caregivers; aspects of decision making; type of decision making; application of the six domains of SDM; barriers to and facilitators of SDM. The systematic search yielded 1842 articles, 15 studies were included. Experiences of professionals and informal caregivers with SDM were scarcely found. Patient refusal was a frequently reported result of decision making, but often no insight was given into the decision process. Most studies investigated the 'decision' and 'option' domains of SDM, yet no study took all six domains into account. Problem analysis, personalised treatment aims, use of decision aids and integrating patient goals in decisions lacked in all studies. Barriers to and facilitators of SDM were 'individualised formal and informal information support' and 'patients' opportunity to use their own knowledge about their health condition and preferences for SDM'. In conclusion, SDM is not yet common practice in the decision making process of older patients with SSAS. Moreover, the six domains of SDM are not often applied in this process. More knowledge is needed about the implementation of SDM in the context of SSAS treatment and how to involve patients, professionals and informal caregivers.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Humanos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bushfire smoke contains a range of air toxics. To prevent inhalation of these toxics, fire fighters use respiratory equipment. Yet, little is known about the effectiveness of the equipment on the fire ground. Experimental trials in a smoke chamber demonstrated that, the particulate/organic vapor/formaldehyde (POVF) filter performed best under simulated conditions. This article reports on the field validation trials during prescribed burns in Western Australia. METHODS: Sixty-seven career fire fighters from the Fire and Emergency Services Authority of Western Australia were allocated one of the three types of filters. Spirometry, oximetry, self-reported symptom, and personal air sampling data were collected before, during and after exposure to bushfire smoke from prescribed burns. RESULTS: Declines in FEV(1) and SaO(2) were demonstrated after 60 and 120 min exposure. A significant higher number of participants in the P filter group reported increases in respiratory symptoms after the exposure. Air sampling inside the respirators demonstrated formaldehyde levels significantly higher in the P filter group compared to the POV and the POVF filter group. CONCLUSIONS: The field validation trials during prescribed burns supported the findings from the controlled exposure trials in the smoke chamber. Testing the effectiveness of three types of different filters under bushfire smoke conditions in the field for up to 2 hr demonstrated that the P filter is ineffective in filtering out respiratory irritants. The performance of the POV and the POVF filter appears to be equally effective after 2 hr bushfire smoke exposure in the field.
Asunto(s)
Incendios , Ocupaciones , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Tos/epidemiología , Método Doble Ciego , Disnea/epidemiología , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Formaldehído/análisis , Cefalea/epidemiología , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Exposición por Inhalación/prevención & control , Masculino , Salud Laboral , Oximetría , Oxígeno/sangre , Ruidos Respiratorios , Espirometría , SedRESUMEN
Bushfire smoke contains an array of organic and inorganic compounds, including respirable and inspirable particles, aldehydes, and carbon monoxide. These compounds have been found to be a health hazard for firefighters in the United States. Despite the high frequency of bushfires in Australia, analyses of bushfire smoke components are scarce. As part of an occupational health study investigating the respiratory health effects of bushfire smoke in firefighters, air toxics sampling was undertaken in a smoke chamber and during prescribed burns. Levels of formaldehyde and acrolein were demonstrated at respectively 60% and 80% of the Short Term Exposure Limit in the smoke chamber. Carbon monoxide levels exceeded the peak limit of 400 ppm significantly. Although concentrations were lower during the prescribed burns, the study shows that Australian bushfire smoke contains air toxics of concern and provides justification for further research into the levels of air toxics measured at bushfires and the associated health impacts.
Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Incendios , Irritantes/análisis , Humo/análisis , Acroleína/análisis , Formaldehído/análisis , Compuestos Orgánicos/análisis , Material Particulado/análisisRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether changes in 24-hour average background ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO) and particulates < 10 µm (PM10) increase the risk of hospital emergency department (ED) presentations for asthma among children. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A time-stratified case-crossover method was used to analyse data of 603 children and young adults aged 0-19 years who were resident in a south-west metropolitan area of Perth, Western Australia, and who had presented with asthma at any public ED within Perth between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2006. Effect sizes were assessed in relation to age group, sex and season of exposure. City-wide background air pollution was estimated from air monitoring network data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ED presentation with asthma. RESULTS: Patients 0-4 years with 1-day lagged exposure to NO2 and CO showed the most significant risk of ED presentation for asthma. An interquartile range (IQR) increase in NO2 resulted in an odds ratio (OR) of 1.70 (95% CI, 1.08-2.69). An IQR increase in CO resulted in an OR of 1.40 (95% CI, 1.06-1.84). CONCLUSIONS: The effect sizes observed in this study were higher than those of past studies, and indicated that children aged 0-4 years were the most vulnerable to the effects of air pollution. The period of exposure most clinically relevant is the day before ED presentation.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Asma/epidemiología , Emisiones de Vehículos/toxicidad , Adolescente , Australia/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Cruzados , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/toxicidad , Material Particulado , Población Urbana , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bushfire fighters are potentially subject to risks from bushfire smoke. Although many different protective masks and filters are available, it is not clear which is the most effective from a health and safety perspective. The effect of protective filters on the respiratory health of Western Australian urban career fire fighters under controlled simulated conditions is investigated. METHODS: Sixty-four healthy Fire and Emergency Services Authority of Western Australia (FESA) urban career fire fighters were subjected to controlled simulated bushfire smoke in an open smoke chamber for 15 min. The fire fighters were allocated one of the three types of protective filters: particulate only (P), particulate/organic vapor (POV), and a particulate/organic vapor/formaldehyde (POVF) filter using a double-blind randomized procedure. Personal air sampling inside the fire fighters' masks, spirometry, oximetry, and self-reported symptom data were collected at baseline and at two time intervals after the smoke exposure. RESULTS: A significant decline in oxygen saturation was seen immediately after exposure, however, the decline was small and no significant relationships could be established between this and the type of filter used. A significantly higher number of participants in the P and POV filter groups self-reported an increase in coughing, wheezing, and shortness of breath compared to the POVF group. Air sampling demonstrated a significantly higher level of formaldehyde and acrolein inside the masks fitted with P filters compared to POV and POVF filters. CONCLUSIONS: Testing the effectiveness of P, POV, and POVF filters under controlled conditions has demonstrated that the POVF filter provides statistically significant better protection for the fire fighters' airways in a simulated bushfire exposure chamber.