Potential role of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is mainly driven by genetic aberrations involved in the cell cycle pathway resulting in cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 activation. This supports the investigation of the activity of CDK4/6 inhibitors in this disease. We review the therapeutic potential of CDK4/6 inhibitors in SCCHN. RECENT FINDINGS: CDK4/6 inhibitors in monotherapy have demonstrated cytostatic activity in HPV-negative SCCHN. Combination with epidermal growth factor inhibitors, with phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin pathways inhibitors or with immunotherapy, have shown promising preclinical efficacy. No strong predictive biomarkers of response or resistance have been firmly identified.Phase I clinical trials have demonstrated that palbociclib or ribociclib in combination with cetuximab is well tolerated. A phase II single-arm trial combining palbociclib/cetuximab has shown promising results. SUMMARY: Inhibition of CDK4/6 represents a new potential treatment for HPV-negative SCCHN patients. Randomized clinical trials that investigate these compounds in an unbiased manner are needed to fully evaluate their efficacy. However, it is unlikely that all the patients will benefit from this new approach. To determine a molecular profile/phenotype that will predict CDK4/6 inhibitor activity, researchers will have to take into account simultaneously occurring events in the cyclin-D/CDK4/CDK6/retinoblastoma and associated pathways.

Preclinical Evaluation of the Association of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor, Ribociclib, and Cetuximab in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression is observed in 90% of human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN). Cell cycle pathway impairments resulting in cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 activation, are frequently observed in SCCHN. We investigated the efficacy of ribociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in combination with cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the EGFR, in HPV-negative SCCHN patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDTX) models. The combination of cetuximab and ribociclib was not significantly more active than cetuximab monotherapy in all models investigated. In addition, the combination of cetuximab and ribociclib was less active than ribociclib monotherapy in the cetuximab-resistant PDTX models. In these models, a significant downregulation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein was observed in cetuximab-treated mice. We also observed Rb downregulation in the SCCHN cell lines chronically exposed and resistant to cetuximab. In addition, Rb downregulation induced interleukin 6 (Il-6) secretion and the Janus kinase family member/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway activation that might be implicated in the cetuximab resistance of these cell lines. To conclude, cetuximab is not an appropriate partner for ribociclib in cetuximab-resistant SCCHN models. Our work has significant clinical implications since the combination of anti-EGFR therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors is currently being investigated in clinical trials.

Preclinical Activity of Ribociclib in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

Cell-cycle pathway impairments resulting in CDK4 and 6 activation are frequently observed in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We investigated the activity of ribociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in SCCHN models with the aim of identifying predictive biomarkers of response. HPV-negative or HPV-positive SCCHN cell lines (n = 8) and patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDTX) models (n = 6) were used. The models were classified according to their sensitivity to ribociclib to investigate potential predictive biomarkers. Ribociclib had a cytostatic effect in some HPV-negative SCCHN models but had no effect in HPV-positive models. In SCCHN cell lines and PDTXs, the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein expression level correlated with ribociclib activity. Rb knockdown was, however, not sufficient to block G0-G1 arrest induced by ribociclib in Detroit-562 where p107, p130, and Forkhead BOX M1 (FOXM1) were also implicated in ribociclib activity. Cell lines harboring epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) features were less sensitive to ribociclib than those with an epithelial phenotype. Rb downregulation induced EMT in our Rb-expressing SCCHN cell lines. However, ribociclib still had significant activity in one PDTX model with high Rb and vimentin expression, suggesting that the presence of vimentin alone is not enough to induce ribociclib resistance. These findings suggest that CDK4/6 inhibitors should be investigated in patients with HPV-negative SCCHN with high Rb expression and an epithelial phenotype. Although these biomarkers are not predictive in all cases, they may enrich the population that could benefit from CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Association of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor Ribociclib and Cetuximab in Recurrent/Metastatic p16-Negative Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

Background: The majority of human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) present upregulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and frequent alterations in the cyclin D1-cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 (CDK 4/6)-retinoblastoma protein (pRb) pathway, resulting in cell cycle progression and tumor proliferation. This study investigated the combination of ribociclib, an orally highly selective inhibitor of CDK 4/6, and cetuximab in recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) SCCHN. Methods: A phase I trial using a 3 + 3 design was performed to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ribociclib with standard dose of weekly cetuximab in HPV-negative patients with R/M SCCHN. Ribociclib was administered orally (3 weeks on/1 week off) at dose level 1 of 400 mg daily and dose level 2 of 600 mg daily. The MTD of ribocilib was then further evaluated in an expansion cohort. Results: 10 patients were enrolled in the escalation trial. No DLTs were observed at dose level 1 (n = 3); at dose level 2, one patient was replaced due to rapid disease progression, and one patient out of six evaluable patients experienced a DLT (grade 4 thrombocytopenia >7 days). Ribociclib 600 mg daily was thus determined to be the MTD. Eleven additional patients were enrolled in the expansion cohort. Diarrhea (52%), rash (52%), fatigue (43%), nausea (33%), and mucositis (28%) were the most frequent grade 1-2 adverse events (AE). Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3-4 AE (20%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (range 0.4-17.3 months) and median overall survival (OS) was 8.3 months (range 0.4-24.1 months). Among the 19 radiologically evaluable patients, two (10.5%) achieved a partial response and 11 (58%) had stable disease. Conclusions: The MTD of ribociclib is 600 mg daily when administered in combination with standard dose cetuximab for 3 weeks on and 1 week off. This combination was safe and showed efficacy. Further clinical trials should be conducted to evaluate the antitumor effects of this combination. Trial Information: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02429089; Eudract number 2014-005371-83.