Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
2.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1652021 04 26.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33914433

RESUMEN

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is increasingly used as a recreational drug, and is presumed relatively safe and innocent. The risks for neurological complications are often known, however the risks of serious thromboembolic events are not. We describe three cases of acute thromboembolic events resulting in serious cardiovascular complications after N2O abuse: one case of myocardial infarction that resulted in a reduced ejection fraction, one case of peripheral arterial occlusion that led to limb amputation and one case of pulmonary embolism that resulted in hemodynamic instability requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and surgical removal. All patients were young adults with a low cardiovascular risk profile. N2O inactivates vitamin B12, leading to vitamin B12 deficiency and subsequent to hyperhomocysteinemia, which is associated with the formation of fibrinolysis-resistant blood thrombi. In conclusion, we contest the safety and innocence of recreational N2O (ab)use. Our three cases illustrate that, next to previously described neurological complications, the use of nitrous oxide is associated with thromboembolic cardiovascular complications, presumably mediated by hyperhomocysteinemia.


Asunto(s)
Drogas Ilícitas/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/inducido químicamente , Óxido Nitroso/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia/inducido químicamente , Deficiencia de Vitamina B 12/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/terapia , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Medición de Riesgo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/etiología , Tromboembolia/terapia , Deficiencia de Vitamina B 12/etiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 28(9): 994-1001, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20825929

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Falls in older people are a common presenting complaint. Knowledge of modifiable risk factors may lead to a more tailored approach to prevent recurrent falls and/or fractures. We investigated prevalence of 8 modifiable risk factors for recurrent falling and/or a serious consequence of the fall among older patients visiting the emergency department after a fall with the Combined Amsterdam and Rotterdam Evaluation of Falls Triage Instrument (CTI), a self-administrated questionnaire that consists of questions concerning demographics, possible cause(s) of the fall, and questions relating to (modifiable) risk factors for falling. METHODS: After treatment for their injuries, 1077 consecutive patients 65 years or older visiting the accident and emergency department due to a fall were evaluated by the CTI. The following were assessed: impaired vision, mobility disorder, fear of falling, mood disorder, high risk of osteoporosis, orthostatic hypotension, incontinence, and polypharmacy. RESULTS: The percentage of respondents who returned the questionnaire was 59.3%. The mean (SD) age was 78.5 (7.5) years, and 57.8% experienced a fall with serious consequences. There were 60.9% of patients with a recurrent fall versus 51% with a first fall who experienced with a serious consequence (P = .025). Age and risk factors mobility disorder (odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.3), high risk of osteoporosis (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.2), incontinence (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.7), fear of falling (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.7), and orthostatic hypotension (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.2) were independently associated with a recurrent fall. Age and high risk of osteoporosis were the only risk factors predicting a serious consequence of a fall (OR, 4.6; 95% CI, 2.9-7.2). CONCLUSIONS: Age and 5 modifiable risk factors assessed with the CTI were independently associated with a recurrent fall. Only high risk of osteoporosis was associated with a serious consequence.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Intervalos de Confianza , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Fracturas Óseas/prevención & control , Humanos , Hipotensión Ortostática/complicaciones , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Trastornos del Humor/complicaciones , Oportunidad Relativa , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Polifarmacia , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Prevención Secundaria , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Incontinencia Urinaria/complicaciones , Baja Visión/complicaciones
4.
J Vasc Access ; 18(Suppl. 1): 114-117, 2017 Mar 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28297049

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Non-maturation is a frequent complication of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas (RCAVF). In an animal model, liposomal prednisolone improved maturation of experimental fistulas. The Liposomal Prednisolone to Improve Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation (LIPMAT) study investigates if liposomal prednisolone improves RCAVF maturation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The LIPMAT study is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial with 1:1 randomization to liposomal prednisolone or placebo. Eighty patients receiving an RCAVF will be included. The primary outcome is the cephalic vein diameter six weeks after surgery, measured by ultrasound. The LIPMAT study started in May 2016. Enrollment is expected to be completed by the end of 2017. CONCLUSIONS: The LIPMAT study is the first to evaluate the efficacy of liposomal prednisolone to enhance RCAVF maturation.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/métodos , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/prevención & control , Prednisolona/administración & dosificación , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Diálisis Renal , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Venas/cirugía , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Protocolos Clínicos , Método Doble Ciego , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/fisiopatología , Humanos , Liposomas , Países Bajos , Prednisolona/efectos adversos , Arteria Radial/fisiopatología , Proyectos de Investigación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas/fisiopatología
5.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 49(1-2): 24-9, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25977207

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Different factors contribute to infection after arterial reconstructive surgery. Prophylactic antibiotic use during surgery is widespread, however, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of prophylactic antibiotics with autologous vein grafting. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of single-dose prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing autologous vein grafting. METHODS: Patients undergoing arterial bypass reconstruction in the lower extremity between 2004 and 2012 were retrospectively screened for use of vein grafts. Patients receiving single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis (group 1) were compared with those not receiving prophylaxis (group 2). RESULTS: Primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI), and 142 patients were included. The SSI occurred in 22% of patients in group 1 and in 29% of patients in group 2 (P = .39; odds ratio: 1.46 confidence interval 95%: 0.61-3.47). CONCLUSIONS: Results showed no significant effect from single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis on lowering the incidence of SSI.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Injerto Vascular/métodos , Venas/trasplante , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cefuroxima/administración & dosificación , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Esquema de Medicación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Metronidazol/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Países Bajos , Oportunidad Relativa , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos
7.
Ann Surg ; 240(6): 955-60; discussion 960-1, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15570201

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of prophylactic antibiotics is effective in the prevention of postoperative wound infection after Lichtenstein open mesh inguinal hernia repair. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A recent Cochrane meta-analysis (2003) concluded that "antibiotic prophylaxis for elective inguinal hernia repair cannot be firmly recommended or discarded." METHODS: Patients with a primary inguinal hernia scheduled for Lichtenstein repair were randomized to a preoperative single dose of 1.5 g intravenous cephalosporin or a placebo. Patients with recurrent hernias, immunosuppressive diseases, or allergies for the given antibiotic were excluded. Infection was defined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. RESULTS: We included 1040 patients in the study between November 1998 and May 2003. According to the intention-to-treat principle, 1008 patients were analyzed. There were 8 infections (1.6%) in the antibiotic prophylaxis group and 9 (1.8%) in the placebo group (P = 0.82). There was 1 deep infection in the antibiotic prophylaxis group and 2 in the placebo group (P = 0.57). Statistical analysis showed an absolute risk reduction of 0.19% (95% confidence interval, -1.78%-1.40%) and a number needed to treat of 520 for the total number of infections. For deep infection, the absolute risk reduction is 0.20% (95% confidence interval, -0.87%-0.48%) with a number needed to treat of 508. CONCLUSIONS: A low percentage (1.7%) of wound infection after Lichtenstein open mesh inguinal (primary) hernia repair was found, and there was no difference between the antibiotic prophylaxis or placebo group. The results show that, in Lichtenstein inguinal primary hernia repair, antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated in low-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA