Evaluation of MRI Signal Changes of the Distal Biceps Tendon in Asymptomatic Patients.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used widely for complete ruptures of the distal biceps tendon. The validity of this investigation for bicipital bursitis and tendinosis is unknown. The purpose of present study was to assess the prevalence of incidental (asymptomatic) signal changes in the distal biceps tendon in patients who underwent MRI including the elbow. Our null hypothesis was that signal changes of the distal biceps tendon do not occur in asymptomatic patients. This would empower MRI as a diagnostic tool for bicipital bursitis and tendinosis as well as complete and partial distal biceps tendon ruptures. METHODS: We evaluated 1,191 elbow MRI scans including the distal biceps tendon insertion. The prevalence of incidental findings was calculated and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false positive probability, and false negative probability were calculated. RESULTS: Signal changes of the distal biceps tendon or bursitis were identified in 8 of 1,191 asymptomatic patients (prevalence 0.6%). The sensitivity of MRI for distal biceps pathology was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93%-99%), specificity 99% (95% CI, 98%-99%), positive predictive value 94% (95% CI, 89%-97%), negative predictive value 99% (95% CI, 99%-99%), false positive probability 6% (95% CI, 3%-10%), and false negative probability 0.3% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.9%). There was no correlation between explanatory variables, including age, sex, race, occupation, and inflammatory disease and incidental distal biceps tendon signal changes. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of distal biceps tendon signal changes on MRI in asymptomatic patients is very low. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The negative predictive value of 99% shows that patients without signal changes on MRI may be assumed to have no distal biceps tendon pathology. MRI investigation of distal biceps tendon is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of tendinosis and bicipital bursitis.

Arthroscopic lateral collateral ligament imbrication of the elbow: short-term clinical results.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of the elbow results from an insufficient lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex. Arthroscopic LCL imbrication may prove a minimally invasive alternative to open lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction with a quicker rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to analyze the validity of a modified arthroscopic imbrication technique. We hypothesized that arthroscopic LUCL imbrication would yield stable elbows in patients with grade 1 or 2 chronic PLRI at a minimum of 2 year of follow-up. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed data of all PLRI patients who underwent arthroscopic LUCL imbrication from 2010 to 2013 (n = 20). Stage 3 PLRIs (frank ulnohumeral dislocations) were excluded from this treatment. After confirmation of PLRI during standard elbow arthroscopy, a doubled absorbable suture is shuttled through as much LCL tissue as possible (from the lateral ulnar border to the area proximal to the lateral epicondyle) and the sutures are tied. This results in a plication of the entire LCL complex. Objective elbow stability was assessed using a combination of the pivot shift, table top, and posterior drawer tests. RESULT: Of 20 included patients, 18 were stable subjectively and objectively at a minimum of 2 year of follow-up. Mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 48 preoperatively to 88.9 at final follow-up (P < .001). Mean Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved from 53 preoperatively to 10.3 at final follow-up (P < .001). One patient developed elbow stiffness. Two patients reported tenderness of the subcutaneous PDS knots. CONCLUSION: As a less invasive alternative to open LCL reconstruction using a graft, arthroscopic LCL imbrication has demonstrated acceptable rates of perceived elbow stability among patients with stage 1 or 2 PLRI.

Evaluation of clinical tests for partial distal biceps tendon ruptures and tendinitis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical diagnosis of partial distal biceps tendon ruptures or tendinosis can be challenging. Three clinical tests have been described to aid in an accurate and timely diagnosis: biceps provocation test, tilt sign, and resisted hook test. However, not much is known about the sensitivity, specificity, and inter-rater reliability as the available evaluations are based on small groups or are case based. Furthermore, these tests have not been compared together in the same patient group. METHODS: Two dedicated elbow surgeons each included 20 consecutive patients in whom distal biceps tendon pathology was suspected. Patients with a complete distal biceps tendon tear were excluded. As a control, the same number of consecutive patients with various elbow pathologies other than distal biceps tendon problems was included. All 3 tests were performed both in control patients and in patients with suspected biceps tendon pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the flexion-abduction-supination view and/or surgical exploration was performed in both groups. The findings of the clinical tests were determined before the results of MRI and other technical investigations were analyzed. The values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. RESULTS: The combined sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values for the biceps provocation test were 95%, 97%, and 96%, respectively. For the resisted hook test, the combined values were 78%, 76%, and 77%, respectively. The combined values for the tilt sign were 58%, 55%, and 56%, respectively. When the biceps provocation test and the resisted hook test were combined in a parallel testing setup, the sensitivity increased to 98% whereas the specificity was 73%. The sensitivity and specificity of the biceps provocation test and the tilt sign in a parallel testing setup were 97% and 53%, respectively. Finally, the sensitivity and specificity of the tilt sign and the resisted hook test in a parallel testing setup were 90% and 41%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The biceps provocation test yielded higher accuracy than the resisted hook test and the tilt sign. When the biceps provocation test and the resisted hook test were combined, the sensitivity increased to 98%. We advise integration of these tests in daily practice to minimize delays in the diagnosis of partial distal biceps tendon ruptures, distal biceps tendon bursitis, or tendinosis. MRI in the flexion-abduction-supination view is still advised to distinguish between a partial biceps tendon rupture and tendinosis or bursitis at the distal biceps tendon insertion as this may influence further treatment.

Radial tuberosity anatomy in intramedullar repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures. A radiological study.

The aim of this study was to measure cortex thickness and medullar canal width of the bicipital tuberosity, to evaluate the accessibility of a intramedullar fixation device and the resistance to pullout strengths of the anterior cortex. The final objective was to determine the length of tendon ingrowth size that will be expected when using this surgical technique. A total of 144 computer tomography images of the proximal radius were used. Bone thickness of the anterior and posterior cortex and medullar canal size were measured. The possible ingrowth of the tendon was measured both for an anatomical and non- anatomical reinsertion. Statistical and concordance analyses of results were performed. The average width of the medullar canal was 8,7mm proximal, 7,9mm distal and 7,7mm at the tuberosity. The average posterior and anterior cortex measured respectively 2,5mm and 2,9mm proximal, 3,2mm and 3,2mm distal and 2,8mm and 1,9mm at the radial tuberosity. The possible non-anatomical ingrowth was 7,6 mm on average and the possible anatomical ingrowth was 7,6mm on average. The radial tuberosity anatomy can accommodate the new distal biceps fixation device. The anterior cortex on which the new device relies for support has a similar thickness as the posterior cortex used in bicortical fixation devices which may suggest similar resistance to pull-out strengths. The availability for intra-osseous fixation of the tendon stump may avoids tendon gapping. The intra-osseous length for the tendon stump surpassed reported tendon slippage during mobilization and active contraction of the distal biceps tendon.

Distal Biceps Provocation Test.

PURPOSE: To describe and study a test for distal biceps tendon pathology other than complete tears. METHODS: In this prospective study, the biceps provocation test (BPT) was performed in a cohort of 30 patients with suspected distal biceps tendon pathology and 30 patients with another elbow pathology. Patients with a complete tear were excluded. Diagnosis was confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging or from surgical findings. The BPT is a 2-part test. The elbow is flexed to 70° with the forearm supinated. The examiner's hands are placed on the patient's forearm and the patient is asked to flex the elbow against resistance (BPTs). The forearm is then pronated and the test is repeated (BPTp). Pain is documented for both supination and pronation using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10. The test is positive when the patient indicates an increase in pain with BPTp compared with BPTs. RESULTS: The BPT was positive in all patients with distal biceps tendon pathology. The average visual analog scale score in this group was 1 (range, 0-7) for the supinated part of the test (BPTs) and 7 (range, 4-10) with the forearm in pronation (BPTp), with an average increase of 5 points (range, 2-8). This difference was significant. No significant difference was found in the control group. Among the controls, BPTp and BPTs were rated as equally painful by 27 patients, and BPTp was less painful than BPTs in 3. Sensitivity and specificity were both 100% in this small group of 60 patients, with a high prevalence of distal biceps tendon pathology. CONCLUSIONS: The BPT appears to be highly sensitive and specific for distal biceps partial injury or tendinitis. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.

In vivo evaluation of a new intramedullary distal biceps tendon fixation device.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary fixation in distal biceps tendon repair may be a solution to address specific shortcomings of current fixation techniques. Most investigations are limited to biomechanical evaluation. The purpose of this study was to report the short-term outcomes of an intramedullary fixation device. METHODS: We evaluated functional and radiographic outcomes at up to 6 months of follow-up. Patients with an acute distal biceps tendon rupture eligible for surgical repair were invited to take part in the study. Ten patients were included in the final analysis. All patients were evaluated both clinically and radiographically at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Outcomes were recorded using a visual analog scale score for pain, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. Radiographic evaluation comprised radiographic and computed tomography evaluation. RESULTS: There were no failures of fixation in the patient group examined. Elbow mobility was symmetrical for all patients from 3 months onward. Supination strength was 86% of the uninjured side at final follow-up. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score at final follow-up were 0 and 100, respectively. Computed tomography images showed no signs of button migration, cortical thinning due to button pressure, or button breakout. The tendon could be followed to the button in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The intramedullary fixation button technique to repair the distal biceps tendon has excellent functional outcomes at 6 months. No adverse reactions of the button on the bone were seen. As this technique minimizes the risk of posterior interosseous nerve injury and has a sufficient bone tunnel to avoid gap formation, this may be a promising new technique for distal biceps tendon rupture refixation.

Is the flexion-abduction-supination magnetic resonance imaging view more accurate than standard magnetic resonance imaging in detecting distal biceps pathology?

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Partial biceps tendon pathology is difficult to diagnose. The flexion-abduction-supination (FABS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) view has been advocated to improve the accuracy of MRI investigation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the FABS view MRI in the diagnosis of distal biceps tendon pathology. METHODS: The study included 50 patients with surgically confirmed distal biceps tendon pathology and 50 patients with other elbow disorders. In both groups, standard elbow MRI (retrospective review of previously obtained MRI data) was performed in half of the patients whereas FABS views MRI were obtained in the other half. These were evaluated by 2 independent musculoskeletal radiologists. The sensitivity and specificity of both MRI views were determined. Tendinosis and grade of rupture were reported from MRI and then compared with surgical findings. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in sensitivity and specificity in detecting partial distal biceps injuries when the FABS view MRI (sensitivity, 84%; specificity, 86%) and standard MRI (sensitivity, 76%; specificity, 98%) were compared. The interobserver reliability was 92% for the FABS view MRI with biceps pathology and 68% for standard MRI. In the control group, the interobserver reliability was 88% for the FABS view MRI and 96% for standard MRI. FABS MRI was significantly better regarding grade of injury. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in sensitivity and specificity were found between the FABS view and standard elbow MRI in the diagnosis of partial distal biceps tendon injuries, with high sensitivity and specificity for both views. Inter-rater reliability was better for FABS views, and FABS views were significantly more accurate than surgical findings in grading the extent of pathology.

A new intramedullary fixation method for distal biceps tendon ruptures: a biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Various techniques have been described for distal biceps tendon reinsertion. Although high success rates have been reported, all current techniques have specific shortcomings, with complications such as heterotopic ossification, nerve damage, and gap formation. The purpose of the present study was to biomechanically evaluate a new intramedullary fixation device that might reduce the risk of posterior interosseous nerve lesions. We therefore compared the fixation strength of this new intramedullary button with an extramedullary placed classic extracortical button. METHODS: A standard bicortical button was compared to the new intramedullary fixation device using fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens. The fixation strengths were tested both cyclically and statically. Load to failure and method of failure were also recorded. RESULTS: There were no failures during the cyclic load testing. The mean tendon-bone displacement was 0.87 ± 0.13 mm for the bicortical group and 0.83 ± 0.13 mm for the new button. During static loading, the mean load to failure for the bicortical group was 296 ± 97 N, whereas the new button group showed a higher mean load to failure of 356 ± 37 N. Breakout through the anterior cortex was recorded in 2 of 6 bicortically placed buttons and 1 of 6 in the new device. CONCLUSIONS: The new intramedullary fixation device yields comparable loads to failure compared with currently used techniques in a biomechanical setup. These findings together with the theoretical advantages suggest that this technique may be a valuable solution for the repair of distal biceps tendon rupture.

Accuracy and safety of the endoscopic repair of the distal biceps : a cadaveric study.

Clinical results of endoscopic distal biceps tendon repair have been shown to be comparable to open techniques in small series. This study evaluates safety and accuracy of the endoscopic technique. Sixteen fresh-frozen paired cadaveric upper extremities were used. The distal biceps tendons were cut and then repaired with the classic single incision bone button technique. Eight were done through an open technique, and eight were repaired endoscopically. Safety and accuracy were assessed by comparing the distance of the repair to neurovascular structures as well as the distance of the bone tunnel to the native biceps insertion. Paired t-tests were used to compare measurements. Significance level was set at p=0.05. There were no significant differences between the open and endoscopic groups, for any of the anatomic measurements. The ulnar artery was the closest neurovascular structure to the tunnel, with an average of 1 mm. The radial and recurrent radial arteries were located at 3 and 19 mm respectively. The median nerve was an average 10 mm from the tunnel, and both the SBRN and PIN at 12 mm. The distance between the PIN and the endobutton at the posterior side of the radius was an average 6 mm. There were no significant differences in variance between both groups related to the placement of the tunnel relative to the native biceps insertion. The single incision endoscopic-assisted technique of distal biceps repair can be performed consistently and with no added risk to neurovascular structures when compared to the classic open technique.

Radiocapitellar arthroplasty: a consecutive case series with 2 to 6 years' follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze indications, outcomes, and complications in patients treated with radiocapitellar arthroplasty. METHODS: This prospective analysis of clinical and radiographic results included 16 elbows in 15 patients. RESULTS: This study included 4 men and 11 women (mean age, 51.9 years; age range, 32-65 years). The mean follow-up period was 3.4 years (range, 2-6 years). The indications were post-traumatic (n = 10) and primary radiohumeral osteoarthritis (n = 6). A mean of 2 surgical procedures (range, 0-4) had been performed before radiocapitellar arthroplasty. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score significantly improved from 46 points to 85 points (P < .01). The arc of motion improved from 106° to 117° (P = .27). Radiographic ulnohumeral degeneration progressed in 40% of cases but was not symptomatic in any. Subsequent surgery was required in 5 elbows (31%). Revision of the radial head component was necessary in 4 patients (25%). In 3 patients this was a result of loosening of the stem. The radial component was subsequently removed because of persistent pain in 1. Radiographic loosening not requiring revision was found in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: The overall Mayo Elbow Performance Score was good to excellent after radiocapitellar arthroplasty. Both the revision and reoperation rates were high, and one should consider this before performing this procedure. Loosening of the radial head component was a problem. An improved fixation technique or an adaptation of the design is needed before this type of surgery can be recommended as a standard procedure.

Outcomes after revision total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although revision arthroplasty surgery is a frequently used treatment for failed total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), published results are conflicting. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the outcomes of revision TEA surgery. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in major databases to find articles relating to outcomes after revision of TEA. Two reviewers independently screened the articles for inclusion, and a third reviewer screened them before final inclusion. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles containing 532 cases were included. The mean age at revision was 61 years. The mean interval between primary and revision arthroplasty was 77 months, and the average follow-up period was 65 months. Different types of prostheses were included, with 69% of the revision prostheses having linked designs and 31% having unlinked designs. The visual analog scale score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Oxford Elbow Score, and range of motion improved significantly after revision surgery. Complications were reported in 232 of 532 cases (44%), leading to reoperations in 22%. After revision with linked prostheses, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, range of flexion-extension, and pronation improved significantly more than with unlinked designs. CONCLUSION: Improved functional outcomes can be expected after revision TEA, but the complication rate remains high. Revision TEA should still be considered a salvage procedure for failed TEA. Linked designs for revision TEA result in better outcomes than unlinked designs in the midterm follow-up.

Joint contact areas after radial head arthroplasty: a comparative study of 3 prostheses.

BACKGROUND: Contact stresses of radial head prostheses remain a concern, potentially leading to early capitellar cartilage wear and erosion. In particular, point contact or edge loading could have a detrimental effect. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 different types of radial head prostheses in terms of joint contact areas with each other and with the native situation. The hypothesis was that the joint contact areas would be lower after monopolar arthroplasty. METHODS: Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric upper limbs were used. Radiocapitellar contact areas of a monopolar design, a straight-neck bipolar design, and an angled-neck bipolar design were compared with each other and with the native joint. After standardized preparation, polysiloxane was injected into the loaded radiocapitellar joint to create a cast from which the joint contact area was measured. Measurements were performed at 3 angles of elbow flexion and in 3 different forearm positions. RESULTS: In the native elbow, contact areas were highest in supination. Elbow flexion had no significant effect on native and prosthetic joint contact areas. Contact areas were decreased for all types of arthroplasties compared with the native joint (from 11% to 53%). No significant contact area difference was found between the 3 designs. However, bipolar prostheses showed lateral subluxation in neutral forearm rotation, resulting in a significant decrease in the contact areas from pronation to the neutral position. CONCLUSIONS: All types of radial head prostheses tested showed a significant decrease in radiocapitellar contact area compared with the native joint. Bipolar designs led to subluxation of the radial head, further decreasing radiocapitellar contact.

Plate Osteosynthesis of Proximal Ulna Fractures-A Biomechanical Micromotion Analysis.

PURPOSE: Double plating has been promoted, in recent years, as an alternative treatment method for proximal ulna fractures. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical properties of double-plate osteosynthesis with posterior plate fixation using a novel investigational design utilizing a 3-dimensional camera system to analyze fracture micromotion. METHODS: Fourteen fresh-frozen specimens were available for this study. Mayo type IIA fractures of the olecranon were created and internal fixation was performed with either an angular stable posterior plate or angular stable double plates. Fracture micromotion was evaluated by means of digital image correlation with a 3-dimensional camera system before and after dynamic cyclic loading from 15° to 90° of elbow flexion with a pulling force of 25 N to 80 N. RESULTS: Micromotion of fragments was less pronounced in double-plate osteosynthesis when compared with single plates before and after cyclic loading. However, overall results were similar. Two of the single plates failed during cyclic loading but there were no failures in the double plates. CONCLUSIONS: This biomechanical analysis shows that single and double plating results in comparable stability of fixation. Although the double-plating technique tends to provide more stable fixation, relevant differences were not observed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Double plating potentially represents an efficient option for fixation of proximal ulna fractures. It could decrease the risk of soft tissue complications owing to their low profile and the superior soft tissue coverage.

Intra-articular capacity of the elbow joint.

The intra-articular capacity of the elbow joint is reported to be 23 ± 4 ml on cadaveric elbows. During years, this value was the standard. The aim of this observational study was to reanalyze the volume of the elbow joint on live patients. Measurement of the intra-articular capacity and pressure of the elbow joint was performed on 30 patients (mean age: 43.8 years) undergoing elbow arthroscopy. Intra-articular capacity was recorded when the elbow moved to the maximum lose packed position and/or when there was a sudden drop in pressure, indicating a capsular rupture (maximum capacity). Indications for arthroscopy were loose bodies, osteoarthritis, synovitis, radial head resection, and lateral collateral ligament repair. Mean intra-articular capacity and pressure were 35.8 ml and 557.5 mm Hg, respectively. Mean maximal capacity was 40.5 ml. We conclude that the intra-articular capacity of the elbow joint is substantially greater than reported in previous studies. Clin. Anat. 30:795-798, 2017. © 2017Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The Unstable Elbow: Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Elbow instability is common and may occur after a variety of injuries, including falls or direct blows. Instability can be classified as either acute or chronic. Acute instability is classified as simple (without fracture) or complex (with associated fracture). Chronic instability is classified as a chronically dislocated or recurrently unstable elbow. Recurrent instability commonly presents as isolated medial or lateral collateral ligament insufficiency. A chronically dislocated elbow is often more complex, involving both osseous and ligamentous injuries. The treatment of simple dislocations typically involves closed reduction and nonsurgical management. Chronic recurrent lateral and medial collateral ligament insufficiencies have very different clinical characteristics, but definitive treatment frequently involves ligament reconstruction. Complex instability usually requires surgery, which includes open reduction and internal fixation of coronoid and olecranon fractures, repair or replacement of radial head fractures, and lateral collateral ligament repair. Medial collateral ligament repair and/or external fixation are rarely required to restore stability. It is important for surgeons to understand current concepts in the diagnosis and management of acute and chronic elbow instability as well as the preferred surgical treatments and techniques for the management of these injuries.

Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the elbow.

Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease and a major cause of disability. Distinct biological processes are considered crucial for the development of osteoarthritis and are assumed to act in concert with additional risk factors to induce expression of the disease. In the classical weightbearing joints, one such risk factor is an unfavourable biomechanical environment about the joint. While the elbow has long been considered a non-weightbearing joint, it is now assumed that the tissues of the upper extremity may be stressed to similar levels as those of the lower limb, and that forces across the elbow are in fact very high when the joint is extended from a flexed position. This review examined the available basic science, preclinical and clinical evidence regarding the role of several unfavourable biomechanical conditions about the elbow on the development of osteoarthritis: post-traumatic changes, osteochondritis dissecans, instability or laxity and malalignment. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis following fractures is well recognized, however, the role of overload or repetitive microtrauma as risk factors for post-traumatic osteoarthritis is unclear. The natural course of untreated cartilage defects in general, and osteochondritis dissecans at the elbow in particular, remains incompletely understood to date. However, larger lesions and older age seem to be associated with more symptoms and radiographic changes in the long term. Instability seems to play a role, although the association between instability and osteoarthritis is not yet clearly defined. No data are available on the association of malalignment and osteoarthritis, but based on force estimations across the elbow joint, it seems reasonable to assume an association.

Radiological and Clinical Evaluation of the Transosseous Cortical Button Technique in Distal Biceps Tendon Repair.

PURPOSE: One of the options to repair a ruptured distal biceps tendon to the radial tuberosity is by means of a transosseous cortical button. Although excellent functional outcomes have been reported, no studies have been performed to quantify the effect of the transosseous fixation technique on the radius. Our study evaluated the clinical outcome and radiological outcome of this technique. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the radiographic evolution of the bone tunnel in the radius. METHODS: Patients with an acute distal biceps tendon rupture treated with a transosseous cortical button were invited to take part in the study. Fourteen patients were included in the final analysis. All patients were evaluated both clinically and by computed tomography scanning of the proximal radius after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Outcomes were recorded using the visual analog scale score for pain, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Bone tunnel volume was measured with semiautomated computed tomography segmentation using image-processing software. RESULTS: There were no failures of fixation in the patient group examined. Elbow mobility, arm, and forearm circumference were symmetric for all patients. Average visual analog scale for pain was less than 2. Mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were 2.3 and 97.6, respectively. Computed tomography images showed an average closure of the radial bony tunnel of 64% of the initial volume. CONCLUSIONS: Biceps tendon repair with cortical button fixation only shows partial tunnel closure. This could reduce the risk of potential complications due to osteolysis, such as radius fracture or hardware failure. Functional results were excellent and comparable to other fixation methods. The role of interference screws in transosseous cortical button techniques to strengthen the repair and to avoid osteolysis may therefore be questioned. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Update in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum.

Osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum is debilitating and is a potentially sports career-ending injury in a young and athletic population. Osteochondritis dissecans typically occurs in patients between the ages of 10 and 24 years, and boys are more commonly affected than girls. Conventional radiographs have low diagnostic accuracy, and magnetic resonance imaging (with or without contrast) or computed tomography may aid in accurate diagnosis. The primary indication for non-operative treatment is the presence of an intact cartilage cap on magnetic resonance imaging, indicating a "stable lesion." However, if operative treatment is necessary, various surgical procedures are available when operative treatment for an osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum is considered, including open or arthroscopic removal of loose bodies, with or without microfracturing, fragment fixation, osteochondral autograft transplantation, and osteochondral allograft transplantation. The decision-making process for selecting the appropriate treatment considers factors such as the patient's characteristics, functional limitations, and lesion morphology.

Management of fractures of the proximal ulna.

Proximal ulna fractures can be difficult to manage because of the elbow's complex anatomy. Advances in understanding elbow anatomy and biomechanics, however, have led to new insights. Careful preoperative evaluation is critical because failure to restore normal anatomy of the proximal ulna could have a detrimental effect on postoperative elbow function. Management options include anatomic plates, intramedullary devices, and strong tension band materials. Determining the most appropriate option for an individual fracture is based on analysis of radiographs and CT scans, including three-dimensional reconstruction. Coronoid fractures, olecranon fractures, and associated elbow instability influence the indications for any given fixation device. Appreciating the subtleties of proximal ulna anatomy and biomechanics can lead to improved clinical outcomes. Recent concepts affecting fracture management include proximal ulna dorsal angulation, the importance of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid, and intermediate fragments of the olecranon.

Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis or deformities of the elbow: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To report the short-term results for posttraumatic total elbow arthroplasty. METHODS: We included patients presenting to our hospital with symptomatic chronic posttraumatic arthritis or deformities of the elbow, aged 55 to 90 years. All patients had reconstruction with a Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis. We performed clinical follow-up after 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, consisting of physical examination, standard radiographs, and calculation of the Mayo elbow performance index. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were enrolled in this study and had a mean follow-up of 32 months. Mean preoperative flexion arc was 67° and 105° postoperatively. The mean preoperative Mayo elbow performance index score was 54 (range, 30-80) and improved to a postoperative score of 93 (range, 60-100). We encountered 6 complications in 5 patients. Four complications required surgical intervention and 2 minor complications were treated noninvasively. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term functional outcomes after total elbow arthroplasty in this prospective cohort of patients with posttraumatic arthritis or deformities of the elbow were good according to mean postoperative measurements.