RESUMEN
Our study examined parenting stress and its association with behavioral problems and disease severity in children with problematic severe asthma. Research participants were 93 children (mean age 13.4 ± 2.7 years) and their parents (86 mothers, 59 fathers). As compared to reference groups analyzed in previous research, scores on the Parenting Stress Index in mothers and fathers of the children with problematic severe asthma were low. Higher parenting stress was associated with higher levels of internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems in children (Child Behavior Checklist). Higher parenting stress in mothers was also associated with higher airway inflammation (FeNO). Thus, although parenting stress was suggested to be low in this group, higher parenting stress, especially in the mother, is associated with more airway inflammation and greater child behavioral problems. This indicates the importance of focusing care in this group on all possible sources of problems, i.e., disease exacerbations and behavioral problems in the child as well as parenting stress.
Asunto(s)
Asma/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/complicaciones , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Padres/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/psicología , Niño , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Responsabilidad Parental/psicología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , SuizaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary treatment at high altitude is a possible treatment option for problematic severe asthma (PSA) in children. This management can result in the tapering of inhaled corticosteroids. AIM: Our aim was to analyze the effect of multidisciplinary treatment at high altitude, notably the ability to taper corticosteroids. To get an insight into possible factors influencing tapering, we examined whether demographic variables, disease control and quality of life at treatment entrance could predict the tapering of corticosteroids. METHODS: This prospective open-phase cohort study analyzed the data of 43 children aged 8-17 years referred to a specialized high altitude treatment centre. Lung function (FEV1, FEV1/VC), inflammation (FeNO), medication level, asthma control (ACT) and quality of life [PAQLQ(S)] were evaluated on admission and at discharge. RESULTS: Thirty-two (74%) children fulfilled PSA criteria. Three (7%) children used daily oral steroids. After 72 ± 30 (mean ± SD) days of treatment, the mean dosage of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) could be significantly reduced from 1315 µg ± 666 budesonide equivalent to 1132 µg ± 514. Oral steroid maintenance therapy could be stopped in all patients. FeNO, asthma control and quality of life improved (p < 0.001) from admission to discharge; FEV1 was in the normal range on both occasions. Apart from ICS levels at entrance, multiple regression analyses did not show any associated factor predicting the reduction of ICS dosage during treatment. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that high altitude treatment may be a treatment option for children with PSA, but it is not possible to predict ICS tapering off from health status variables at treatment entrance.
Asunto(s)
Altitud , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Asma/psicología , Asma/terapia , Budesonida/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Budesonida/uso terapéutico , Niño , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Gravedad del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this prospective study was to examine the association between behavioural problems and medical and psychological outcomes in clinically treated children and adolescents with asthma. METHODS: Patients (n = 134) were recruited from two high-altitude asthma clinics in Switzerland and one asthma clinic in the Netherlands. Outcome measures were Asthma Control Test (ACT), Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ(S)), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1 ) and fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Parents completed the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) (predictor variable). Data were collected at the start and end of treatment. Multiple regression analysis was used while adjusting for demographic variables, clinic and length of stay. RESULTS: More severe internalizing behavioural problems were associated with less improvement of total quality of life (t = -2.26, p = 0.03) and the domains symptoms (t = -2.04, p = 0.04) and emotions (t = -2.3, p = 0.02) after clinical treatment. Behavioural problems were not associated with a change of lung function measurements (FEV1 and FeNO) and asthma control (ACT) during treatment. CONCLUSION: A focus of healthcare professionals on the treatment of internalizing behavioural problems may optimize the quality of life in clinically treated youth with asthma.
Asunto(s)
Asma/psicología , Adolescente , Altitud , Asma/terapia , Síntomas Conductuales , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to quantify behavioral problems in clinically treated children and adolescents with asthma and to examine the association of these problems and quality of life with difficult-to-treat asthma. METHODS: Clinical patients with difficult-to-treat asthma (n = 31) and patients with asthma who were not classified as difficult-to-treat asthma (n = 52) completed the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [PAQLQ(S)]. Their parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) to assess behavioral problems. Behavioral problem scores were compared to norms of population reference groups and both behavioral problems and quality of life were compared between children and adolescents with and without difficult-to-treat asthma. RESULTS: Especially internalizing behavioral problems such as being withdrawn/depressed and somatic complaints were more severe in the asthmatic groups compared to the healthy reference groups. The behavioral problems 'somatic complaints' and 'thought problems' as well as a lower quality of life were more severe in children and adolescents with difficult-to-treat asthma than in asthma patients who did not fulfill the criteria of difficult-to-treat asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral problems and a lower quality of life are suggested to be more pronounced in clinically treated children and adolescents with difficult-to-treat asthma than in asthma patients who are not classified as difficult-to-treat asthma. With respect to practical implications, our data suggest that health-care professionals should - especially in children and adolescents with difficult-to-treat asthma - assess and, if necessary, treat behavioral problems.
Asunto(s)
Conducta del Adolescente , Asma/psicología , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/complicaciones , Adolescente , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/fisiopatología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify challenges in the application of GRADE for diagnosis when assessing the certainty of evidence in the test-treatment strategy (diagnostic accuracy, test burden, management effectiveness, natural course, linked evidence) in an illustrative example and to propose solutions to these challenges. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A case study in applying GRADE for diagnosis that looked at the added value of IgE for diagnosing allergic rhinitis. RESULTS: Evaluation of the full test-treatment strategy showed a lack of (high-quality) evidence for all elements. In our example, we found a lack of evidence for test burden, natural course, and link between the test result and clinical management. Overall, systematically reviewing the evidence for all elements of a test-treatment strategy is more time-consuming than only considering test accuracy results and management effectiveness. For increasing efficiency, the guideline panel could determine critical elements of the test-treatment strategy that need a systematic review of the evidence. For less critical elements, a guideline panel can rely on gray literature and professional expertise. CONCLUSION: A lack of high-quality evidence and time investment if the full test-treatment strategy is assessed, creating challenges in applying GRADE for diagnosis. Discussion within guideline panels about critical elements that need to be reviewed might help.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Rinitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Because most children with asthma now use inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), the added benefit of immunotherapy in asthmatic children needs to be examined. We re-assessed the effectiveness of subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in childhood asthma treatment focusing on studies with patient-relevant outcome measures and children using ICS. METHODS: We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to systematically search and appraise the evidence using predefined critical patient-relevant outcomes (asthma symptoms, asthma control and exacerbations). We searched to retrieve systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials on immunotherapy for asthma in children (1960-2017). We assessed the quality of the body of evidence with GRADE criteria. RESULTS: The quality of the evidence for SCIT was very low due to a large risk of bias and indirectness (dated studies in children not using ICS). No effect of SCIT was found for asthma symptoms; no studies reported on asthma control. For asthma exacerbations, studies favoured SCIT. We have little confidence in this effect estimate, due to the very low quality of evidence. For SLIT, quality of the evidence was very low due to a large risk of bias, indirectness and imprecision. The outcome 'asthma symptoms' could not be calculated due to lack of standardisation and large clinical heterogeneity. Other predefined outcomes were not reported. CONCLUSION: The beneficial effects of immunotherapy in childhood asthma found in earlier reviews are no longer considered applicable, because of indirectness (studies performed in children not being treated according to current asthma guidelines with ICS). There was absence of evidence to properly determine the effectiveness or lack thereof of immunotherapy in asthma treatment in children with ICS.
Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Niño , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In children < 6 years characteristic asthma patterns are often lacking and the diagnosis cannot be objectified. For this reason 'episodic expiratory wheezing' is the preferred diagnosis. In children ≥ 6 years asthma is diagnosed on the basis of symptoms; if there is doubt spirometry may be helpful. The treatment goal is complete asthma control, i.e. daytime symptoms < 2/week, no nocturnal symptoms, no limitation of activities, rescue treatment ≤ 2/week, normal spirometry. Smoking by children or relatives is strongly discouraged. In children < 1 year, a monitored trial with short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) is recommended. Controller medication (inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)) is not recommended. In children aged 1 to 6 years, a SABA is recommended, with additional ICS if symptoms persist. Incompletely controlled asthma is an indication for referral. In children ≥ 6 years ICS are recommended in incomplete asthma control. If the normal daily dosage of ICS and adequate coping fail to achieve complete control of the asthma, then referral is recommended. Patients on ICS should be monitored regularly.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Médicos Generales/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Países Bajos , Neumología/normas , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Ruidos Respiratorios , Fumar/efectos adversos , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
A 15-year-old boy reported to the Accident and Emergency Department with excessive coughing, shortness of breath and pain in the area of his left shoulder blade. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was cultured from his sputum. The boy was otherwise healthy, and had no immune deficiency or underlying anatomic abnormality. He probably contracted the MRSA infection at the international school he attends.