GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar: Pharmacokinetic similarity to its reference product and comparison of its autoinjector device with prefilled syringes.

AIMS: To assess pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar, in two studies: comparison with etanercept originator (ETN, bioequivalence study) and comparison of GP2015 administered via an autoinjector (AI) or prefilled syringes (PFS, delivery study). METHODS: Both studies were randomized, two-sequence, two-period, crossover studies conducted in healthy male subjects. In the bioequivalence study, subjects were randomized to receive a single 50 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of GP2015 or ETN. In the delivery study, subjects were randomized to receive a single 50 mg s.c. injection of GP2015 via AI or PFS. Following a wash-out period of 35 days, subjects in the bioequivalence study received single 50 mg s.c. injection of GP2015 or ETN, and subjects in the delivery study received single 50 mg s.c. injection of GP2015 via AI or PFS. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of GP2015/ETN for Cmax (1.11 [1.05-1.17]), AUC0-tlast (0.98 [0.94-1.02]) and AUC0-inf (0.96 [0.93-1.00]) were within the predefined bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of AI/PFS for Cmax (1.01 [0.94-1.08]), AUC0-tlast (1.01 [0.95-1.07]) and AUC0-inf (1.01 [0.96-1.07]) were also within the range 0.80-1.25. No new safety issues were reported. Three subjects had low titres of non-neutralising anti-drug antibodies during a follow-up visit in the bioequivalence study. CONCLUSIONS: The PK of GP2015 was similar to ETN, demonstrating bioequivalence. The safety profile of GP2015 was consistent with previous reports for ETN. The GP2015 AI provided equivalent dosing and tolerability to the GP2015 PFS.

Pimasertib, a selective oral MEK1/2 inhibitor: absolute bioavailability, mass balance, elimination route, and metabolite profile in cancer patients.

AIM: This trial (NCT: 01713036) investigated the absolute bioavailability, mass balance and metabolite profile of pimasertib in a new design combining these investigations in a single group of patients. METHODS: Six male patients with pathologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >1. In Part A of the trial, patients received a 60 mg oral dose of unlabelled pimasertib followed by an intravenous (i.v.) tracer dose of [14 C]pimasertib 2 µg (equalling 9 kBq) as a bolus injection, one hour after the oral dose, on Day 1. On Day 8, all patients received 60 mg pimasertib capsules spiked with 2.6 MBq of [14 C]pimasertib. Patients received 60 mg oral unlabelled pimasertib twice daily from Day 3 to Day 21 of Part A and in subsequent 21-day cycles in Part B. RESULTS: Following i.v. administration, [14 C]pimasertib exhibited a geometric mean total body clearance of 45.7 l h-1 (geometric coefficient of variation [geometric CV]: 47.2%) and a volume of distribution of 229 l (geometric CV: 42.0%). Absolute bioavailability was 73%. The majority of the oral [14 C] dose (85.1%) was recovered in excreta. Total radioactivity was mainly excreted into urine (52.8%) and faeces (30.7%) with 78.9% of the [14 C] dose recovered as metabolites. Two major circulating metabolites were identified in plasma: a carboxylic acid (M445) and a phosphoethanolamine conjugate (M554). The safety profile was in line with the published pimasertib trials. CONCLUSION: Pimasertib showed a favourable pharmacokinetic profile with high absolute bioavailability and a unique metabolic pathway (conjugation with phosphoethanolamine).

'Totality of Evidence' Approach in the Development of GP2017, an Approved Adalimumab Biosimilar.

INTRODUCTION: Hyrimoz®, (GP2017 [SDZ-ADL]), is a biosimilar to Humira® (REF-ADL). SDZ-ADL was approved in 2018 by both the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the indications of REF-ADL not protected by orphan exclusivity. In 2023, the US FDA and EMA also approved a citrate-free high-concentration formulation (HCF) of SDZ-ADL. TOTALITY OF EVIDENCE-THE APPROACH: Approval of SDZ-ADL was based on data gathered using the US FDA, EMA and World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended step-wise Totality of Evidence approach. This approach is a robust dataset confirming high confidence in analytical, functional, pharmacokinetic (PK) and clinical biosimilarity between the biosimilar and reference medicine determined through analytical and clinical investigation. EVIDENCE OF BIOSIMILARITY: Evidence supporting the biosimilarity of SDZ-ADL and REF-ADL was reported at each stage of investigation. Comprehensive comparative analytical and functional assessments demonstrated that SDZ-ADL was analytically indistinguishable from REF-ADL in required critical quality attributes, including receptor binding. Phase I clinical data showed PK similarity of SDZ-ADL and REF-ADL in healthy volunteers, with similar safety, tolerability and immunogenicity profiles. Phase III confirmatory efficacy and safety studies, ADACCESS (included in US/EU dossiers) and ADMYRA (separate to US/EU dossiers), both confirmed that SDZ-ADL's efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity matched REF-ADL in all patient groups with no clinically meaningful differences. More recently, this data package was the basis for a citrate-free HCF of SDZ-ADL to be developed, and its PK, safety and immunogenicity were confirmed against the initially approved formulation of SDZ-ADL. CONCLUSION: Overall, the Totality of Evidence provided for biosimilar adalimumab, SDZ-ADL, confirmed the analytical, functional and clinical similarity of SDZ-ADL to REF-ADL, supporting its regulatory approval and providing a data bridge with which to evaluate and support the approval of citrate-free HCF SDZ-ADL for clinical use.

A biosimilar is a type of medicine that is designed to match the structure and function of a 'reference' biologic medicine. Hyrimoz^® (SDZ-ADL) is a biosimilar of the adalimumab reference medicine, Humira^® ([REF-ADL]). SDZ-ADL was approved in the US and Europe in 2018. For SDZ-ADL to be approved, a collection of evidence needed to be created, called the 'Totality of Evidence.' The purpose of this collection of data is to show there is a high confidence that the new biosimilar medicine matches the reference medicine, from the structure of the medicine to the effect of the medicine on the human body. For SDZ-ADL, this investigation started with comparing the physical structure and other functional properties of SDZ-ADL versus REF-ADL and ended with clinical studies in both healthy volunteers and in patients with diseases treated with adalimumab. This Totality of Evidence gathered for biosimilar adalimumab, SDZ-ADL, confirmed the similarity of SDZ-ADL to REF-ADL and therefore supported the approval of SDZ-ADL. In 2018, a citrate-free high-concentration version (high concentration formulation [HCF]) of REF-ADL was launched that matched REF-ADL. HCF REF-ADL has since become the primary formulation of REF-ADL used in practice. In 2023, a HCF version of SDZ-ADL was also approved in the US and EU based on evidence confirming that HCF SDZ-ADL matched SDZ-ADL. As SDZ-ADL had been previously confirmed to match the reference medicine, this meant that HCF SDZ-ADL could be directly compared against SDZ-ADL to confirm biosimilarity and support its approval.

First-in-Human, Single- and Multiple-Ascending-Dose, Food-Effect, and Absolute Bioavailability Trials to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Pritelivir, a Nonnucleoside Helicase-Primase Inhibitor Against Herpes Simplex Virus in Healthy Subjects.

The pharmacokinetics and safety of the novel herpes simplex virus helicase-primase inhibitor pritelivir were evaluated in 5 phase 1 trials: a single-ascending-dose trial, 2 multiple-ascending-dose trials, a food-effect trial, and an absolute bioavailability trial in healthy male subjects. One cohort of healthy female subjects was included in the single-ascending-dose trial. Pritelivir pharmacokinetics were linear up to 480 mg following single and up to 400 mg following multiple once-daily doses. The half-life ranged from 52 to 83 hours, and steady state was reached between 8 and 13 days. Maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration were 1.5- and 1.1-fold higher in female compared to male subjects. Absolute bioavailability was 72% under fasted conditions. Following a fatty diet, pritelivir time to maximum concentration was 1.5 hour delayed and maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration were 33% and 16% higher, respectively. Pritelivir was safe and well tolerated up to 600 mg following single and up to 200 mg following multiple once-daily doses. Considering a therapeutic dose of 100 mg once-daily, pritelivir demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile in healthy subjects to support further development.

GP2017-HCF, a high concentration formulation, demonstrates similar pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and safety to GP2017, an approved adalimumab biosimilar.

BACKGROUND: GP2017 is an adalimumab biosimilar. The objective of this study is to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of GP2017 in its approved formulation and GP2017-high concentration formulation (HCF) in a randomized, double-blind, two-arm PK bridging study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthy male subjects received a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of either GP2017-HCF (n = 162) or GP2017 (n = 168). PK, safety, and immunogenicity were assessed over 72 days post-injection. RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals [CIs] of geometric mean ratios between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 for Cmax, AUC0-inf, AUC0-360 and AUC0-last were within the pre-defined margin of 0.80 to 1.25; thus, PK comparability between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 was demonstrated. Subgroup analysis of PK comparability by anti-drug antibody (ADA) subpopulation showed that the 90% CIs of geometric mean ratios between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 for Cmax, AUC0-inf, AUC0-360 and AUC0-last were within the margin of 0.80 to 1.25 in ADA-positive and ADA-negative subjects. The proportions of subjects with positive ADA responses and with neutralizing antibodies were comparable between the GP2017-HCF and GP2017 groups. GP2017-HCF and GP2017 were well tolerated, and there were no reports of deaths or other serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Results show PK comparability between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 and comparable safety and tolerability.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of biosimilar natalizumab (PB006) to its reference medicine: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: PB006 (Polpharma Biologics S.A; marketed as Tyruko®, Sandoz) is an approved biosimilar to natalizumab (Tysabri®; Biogen [ref-NTZ]). This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, single-dose study was conducted to demonstrate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) similarity between PB006 and ref-NTZ. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthy participants (N = 453) were randomized to receive 3 mg/kg infusion of PB006, US-licensed, or EU-approved ref-NTZ before an 85-day follow-up. Primary PK endpoint was total natalizumab serum concentration over time; secondary PK endpoints explored concentration changes. Primary PD endpoints compared CD19+ cell counts and percentage α4-integrin receptor saturation, per natalizumab's mechanism of action. Secondary PD endpoints explored serum changes in sVCAM-1 and sMAdCAM-1, CD34+, and CD19+ cells. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were assessed. RESULTS: The primary PK endpoint was met, with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean for serum test/reference ratios contained within a prespecified margin (0.8-1.25). All primary PD endpoints were met, with 90% and 95% CIs within this similarity margin for baseline-adjusted CD19+ cell counts and percentage α4-integrin receptor saturation. All secondary endpoints were similarly contained, except sVCAM. No notable differences in safety, tolerability, or immunogenicity were observed. CONCLUSION: Similarity was confirmed, with PB006 demonstrating PK/PD behavior consistent with that of ref-NTZ. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2019-003874-15.

PB006 (developed by Polpharma Biologics S.A; and marketed as Tyruko® by Sandoz) is an approved biosimilar to the reference medicine, natalizumab (Tysabri®, Biogen [ref-NTZ]) used to treat relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Approved biosimilar medicines have been shown to be as safe and effective as their reference medicines via different types of comparisons to the reference medicine, confirming that physicians and patients can expect the same clinical outcome.This study was conducted to confirm that PB006 acts the same way in the body as ref-NTZ. Healthy participants received one dose of either PB006, ref-NTZ from the US or ref-NTZ from Europe. During the study, blood samples were tested to confirm how much of each medicine was present in participants' blood, as well as to assess changes in immune cells or proteins related to how natalizumab works. The study also measured whether any treatment caused unwanted side effects or caused any changes in the immune system that may stop the medicine working.The results showed that PB006 behaved in the same way as ref-NTZ in the blood. All reported side effects were similar between groups and were as expected for this medicine, and neither PB006 nor ref-NTZ caused any important or unexpected changes to the immune system. This study showed that biosimilar natalizumab, PB006, behaves in the same way as ref-NTZ, and the same treatment outcomes can be expected.

Clinical evidence of herbal drugs as perpetrators of pharmacokinetic drug interactions.

The use of herbal/botanical products, also referred to as complementary and alternative medicines (CAM), worldwide enjoys increasing popularity. It appears in particular highly prevalent in patient populations already exposed to complex treatment algorithms and polypharmacotherapy, frequently involving narrow therapeutic index drugs. Accordingly, the potential clinical dimension and relevance of herb-drug interactions has received considerable attention over the last years. However, review of pertinent literature indicates that the available clinical evidence in this regard is still limited and sometimes inconclusive. Also, communication of herb-drug interaction data in the biopharmaceutical/medical literature is often complex and confusing, not always unbiased, and in many cases appears not to strive for clear-cut and useful guidance in terms of the clinical relevance of such findings.This systematic review summarizes and interprets the published evidence on clinical herb-drug interaction studies which examined the potential of six popular herbal drugs (Echinacea, garlic, gingko, ginseng, goldenseal, and milk thistle) as perpetrators of pharmacokinetic (PK) drug interactions. Reported effect sizes were systematically categorized according to FDA drug interaction guideline criteria. A total of 66 clinical PK interaction studies, meeting the scope of the present review, were identified. The clinical evidence was found to be most robust and informative for Gingko biloba (GB; 21 studies) and milk thistle/silymarin (MT; 13), and appears still limited for ginseng (9), goldenseal/berberine (GS; 8), garlic (8), and Echinacea (7). Collectively, the available evidence indicates that, at commonly recommended doses, none of these herbs act as potent or moderate inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes or P-glycoprotein (ABCB1). Weak effects in terms of either induction or inhibition were found for GB (presystemic/hepatic CYP3A4 induction/inhibition, CYP2C19 induction at high doses), milk thistle/silymarin (CYP2C9 inhibition), GS/berberine (CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 inhibition), Echinacea (presystemic/hepatic CYP3A4 inhibition/induction, CYP1A2 and CYP2C9 inhibition at high doses). Information was found not always complete for the major drug metabolizing CYP enzymes in the less well-studied herbs and is largely limited to P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) when effects on drug transporters have been investigated.

Long-term Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of the Infliximab (IFX) Biosimilar, PF-06438179/GP1111, in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis After Switching from Reference IFX or Continuing Biosimilar Therapy: Week 54-78 Data From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the infliximab biosimilar, PF-06438179/GP1111 (PF-SZ-IFX), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who continued biosimilar treatment throughout 78 weeks or who switched from reference infliximab (Remicade®) sourced from the EU (IFX-EU) at week 30 or week 54 in the REFLECTIONS B537-02 study. METHODS: In this phase III, double-blind, active-controlled study, patients with moderate-to-severe active RA were initially randomized to PF-SZ-IFX or IFX-EU, each with methotrexate (treatment period [TP] 1; N = 650). At week 30, patients receiving PF-SZ-IFX continued PF-SZ-IFX; patients receiving IFX-EU were re-randomized to continue IFX-EU or switch to PF-SZ-IFX (TP2; n = 566). From weeks 54 to 78, all patients received open-label treatment with PF-SZ-IFX (TP3; n = 505). Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity data were analyzed during TP3. RESULTS: Efficacy was sustained and comparable across groups at week 78, with American College of Rheumatology criteria for ≥ 20% clinical improvement response rates of 75.9% (biosimilar group), 77.8% (week 30 switch group), and 68.3% (week 54 switch group). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 28.9%, 29.4%, and 30.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients who were antidrug antibody (ADA) positive and neutralizing antibody positive (as a percentage of ADA-positive patients) was stable and comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results to week 78 continue to support the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of PF-SZ-IFX in patients with moderate-to-severe active RA. There were no clinically meaningful differences between groups, independent of a single treatment transition from IFX-EU to PF-SZ-IFX at week 30 or week 54. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02222493.

Effects of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide in healthy subjects.

AIMS: To evaluate the effect of co-administration of rifampicin, an inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4, on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide. Roflumilast is an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, being developed for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Roflumilast is metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP1A2, with further involvement of CYP2C19 and extrahepatic CYP1A1. In vivo, roflumilast N-oxide contributes >90% to the total PDE4 inhibitory activity. METHODS: Sixteen healthy male subjects were enrolled in an open-label, three-period, fixed-sequence study. They received a single oral dose of roflumilast 500 microg on days 1 and 12 and repeated oral doses of rifampicin 600 mg once daily on days 5-15. Plasma concentrations of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide were measured for up to 96 h. Test/Reference ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of geometric means for AUC and C(max) of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide and for oral apparent clearance (CL/F) of roflumilast were estimated. RESULTS: During the steady-state of rifampicin, the AUC(0-infinity) of roflumilast decreased by 80% (point estimate 0.21; 90% CI 0.16, 0.27); C(max) by 68% (0.32; CI 0.26, 0.39); for roflumilast N-oxide, the AUC(0-infinity) decreased by 56% (0.44; CI 0.36, 0.55); C(max) increased by 30% (1.30; 1.15, 1.48); total PDE4 inhibitory activity decreased by 58% (0.42; 0.38, 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of rifampicin and roflumilast led to a reduction in total PDE4 inhibitory activity of roflumilast by about 58%. The use of potent cytochrome P450 inducers may reduce the therapeutic effect of roflumilast.

A novel screening strategy to identify ABCB1 substrates and inhibitors.

We tested the hypothesis whether data on ABCB1 ATPase activity and passive permeability can be used in combination to identify ABCB1 substrates and inhibitors. We determined passive permeability using an artificial membrane permeability assay (HDM-PAMPA) and ABCB1 function, i.e., vanadate-sensitive ATPase activity for a training set (40 INN drugs) and a validation set (26 development compounds). In parallel experiments, we determined ABCB1 function, i.e., vectorial transport in a Caco-2 cell monolayer, and ABCB1 inhibition, i.e., calcein AM extrusion out of K562-MDR cells, to cross-validate the results with cellular assays. We found that compounds that did not modulate ABCB1-ATPase did also not affect calcein AM extrusion and were not actively transported by ABCB1 in Caco-2 cell monolayers. The results corroborated the effect of passive permeability as an important covariate of active transport: active transport in Caco-2 monolayer was only apparent for compounds showing low passive permeability (<5.0 cmx10(-6)/s) in the HDM-PAMPA assay whereas compounds with high passive permeability (>50 cmx10(-6)/s) were shown to inhibit calcein AM efflux with IC50 values close to their respective Km value obtained for ABCB1-ATPase. The use of HDM-PAMPA in combination with ABCB1-ATPase offers a simple, inexpensive experimental approach capable of identifying ABCB1 inhibitors as well as transported substrates.

Population pharmacokinetics of PF-06438179/GP1111 (an infliximab biosimilar) and reference infliximab in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis.

Background: PF-06438179/GP1111 (PF-SZ-IFX) is an infliximab (IFX) biosimilar. Pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of PF-SZ-IFX and reference IFX authorized in the European Union (ref-IFX-EU) and in the US (ref-IFX-US) was demonstrated in healthy subjects. Safety and efficacy of PF-SZ-IFX were investigated in a multinational, double-blind, randomized study in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. This work aims to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) of ref-IFX-EU and PF-SZ-IFX in RA patients. Research design and methods: Patients with moderately to severely active RA (N = 650) were randomized 1:1 to PF-SZ-IFX or ref-IFX-EU. PopPK modeling with data collected from the study was performed using a nonlinear mixed-effects approach (NONMEM 7.2.0). Results: The PK of ref-IFX-EU and PF-SZ-IFX were adequately described using a two-compartment model with linear elimination. Clearance (CL) estimates were 0.014 L/h and 0.015 L/h for PF-SZ-IFX and ref-IFX-EU, with inter-individual variability (IIV) on CL of 43.1% and 40.1%, respectively. Volumes of distribution in the central compartment (V1) were 3.38 L and 3.57 L, with IIV on V1 of 28.1% and 23.7%, respectively. The same covariates of sex and antidrug antibody titers on CL, and body weight on V1, influenced the PK variability of ref-IFX-EU and PF-SZ-IFX. Conclusions: PopPK analysis revealed no appreciable differences between the PK of ref-IFX-EU and PF-SZ-IFX in RA patients. Trial registration: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT02222493).

Differences in immunogenicity associated with non-product related variability: insights from two pharmacokinetic studies using GP2017, an adalimumab biosimilar.

Introduction: Antidrug antibody (ADA) development is known to occur with adalimumab treatment and impacts adalimumab exposure. Here, we compare the impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetics (PK) across two randomized PK studies of GP2017, an approved biosimilar adalimumab, in healthy subjects. Methods: Healthy male subjects (N= 107 in study GP17-104; N= 90 in study GP17-103) received a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of the same GP2017 drug product batch. Cross-study PK comparison was performed for log-transformed Cmax, AUC0-360h, AUC0-last, and AUC0-inf, using an ANCOVA model. Results: The proportion of ADA-positive subjects was higher in GP17-103 (in total 71.1%) vs. GP17-104 (57.9%). Comparison of GP2017 PK between studies showed that the exposure was lower in GP17-103 vs GP17-104, with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios of AUC0-last and AUC0-inf being outside the range of 0.80-1.25. A subgroup analysis showed that in ADA-negative subjects 90% CIs for all PK parameters were within range, with geometric mean ratios close to 1.00. Conclusion: The differences in GP2017 PK between the two groups are not considered to be product-related, but may be due to currently unknown factors related to differences between the two study populations.

GP2017, an adalimumab biosimilar: pharmacokinetic similarity to its reference medicine and pharmacokinetics comparison of different administration methods.

Background: To compare the pharmacokinetics of Sandoz biosimilar adalimumab (GP2017) with reference adalimumab (Humira) in healthy volunteers (PK similarity study) and to compare the pharmacokinetics of GP2017 administered by autoinjector (AI) or prefilled syringe (PFS; delivery study). Methods: Healthy male subjects were randomized to receive a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of GP2017, US-licensed or EU-authorized reference adalimumab (US/EU-Humira; PK similarity study) or a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of GP2017 via AI or PFS (delivery study). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity were assessed over 72 days post-injection. Results: The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for Cmax and AUC0-inf were 1.05 (0.99-1.11) and 1.04 (0.96-1.13) for GP2017/EU-Humira and 1.00 (0.94-1.06) and 1.08 (1.00-1.18) for GP2017/US-Humira, all within the prespecified margin of 0.80-1.25 (PK similarity study). Pharmacokinetic parameters of GP2017 matched between AI and PFS (delivery study). Safety and immunogenicity were similar across groups in both studies. Conclusion: PK similarity between GP2017, EU- and US-Humira was demonstrated. The safety profile of GP2017 was consistent with previous reports for Humira. These results contribute to the 'totality-of-the-evidence' supporting biosimilarity of GP2017 to Humira. PK and tolerability were equivalent for GP2017 dosed by AI or PFS. Trial registration: PK similarity study EudraCT no. 2015-000579-28; Delivery study: EudraCT no. 2014-002879-29.

Randomised, double-blind, phase III study comparing the infliximab biosimilar, PF-06438179/GP1111, with reference infliximab: efficacy, safety and immunogenicity from week 30 to week 54.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of PF-06438179/GP1111 (PF-SZ-IFX) compared with European reference infliximab (Remicade®; ref-IFX) in patients with moderate-to-severe, active rheumatoid arthritis after continued long-term use of PF-SZ-IFX, and in patients who were switched from ref-IFX to PF-SZ-IFX. Methods: REFLECTIONS B537-02 was a double-blind, active-controlled, multinational study in which patients (N=650) were initially randomised to PF-SZ-IFX or ref-IFX for 30 weeks (treatment period [TP] 1). During weeks 30-54 (TP2), the PF-SZ-IFX group (n=280) continued treatment with PF-SZ-IFX (PF-SZ-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX) and patients in the ref-IFX group (n=286) were rerandomised (1:1) to continue ref-IFX (ref-IFX/ref-IFX) (n=143) or switch to PF-SZ-IFX (ref-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX) (n=143) for a further 24 weeks. Efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics were evaluated. Results: During TP2, patients in all three treatment groups continued to maintain comparable treatment response. At week 54, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response rates were 71.1% (PF-SZ-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX), 64.3% (ref-IFX/ref-IFX) and 70.6% (ref-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX). Observations for other endpoints, including ACR50/70, Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints Based on High-Sensitivity C Reactive Protein(DAS28-CRP) remission, and mean change in DAS28-CRP and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, were also comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 36.8% (PF-SZ-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX), 33.6% (ref-IFX/ref-IFX) and 37.8% (ref-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX) of patients; there were no clinically meaningful differences in the safety profiles between groups. The percentage of patients who were antidrug antibody-positive was generally stable through the treatment period and comparable overall between the PF-SZ-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX (52.1%; neutralising: 80.8%), ref-IFX/ref-IFX (60.1%; neutralising: 84.9%) and ref-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX (58.0%; neutralising 78.3%) groups. Conclusions: The similar efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of PF-SZ-IFX compared with ref-IFX were maintained for up to 54 weeks and were not affected by blinded treatment switch from ref-IFX to PF-SZ-IFX at week 30. Trial registration number: NCT02222493.

Effect of single and repeated doses of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide.

Effects of single and multiple doses of oral ketoconazole on roflumilast and its active metabolite, roflumilast N-oxide, were investigated in healthy subjects. In study 1, subjects (n = 26) received oral roflumilast 500 microg once daily for 11 days and a concomitant 200-mg single dose of ketoconazole on day 11. In study 2, subjects (n = 16) received oral roflumilast 500 microg on days 1 and 11 and a repeated dose of ketoconazole 200 mg twice daily from days 8 to 20. Coadministration of single-dose ketoconazole with steady-state roflumilast increased the AUC of roflumilast by 34%; C(max) was unchanged. For roflumilast N-oxide, AUC and C(max) decreased by 12% and 20%, respectively. Repeated doses of ketoconazole increased the AUC and C(max) of roflumilast by 99% and 23%, respectively; for roflumilast N-oxide, AUC was unchanged, and C(max) decreased by 38%. No clinically relevant adverse events were observed. Coadministration of ketoconazole and roflumilast does not require dose adjustment of roflumilast.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Letermovir Coadministered With Cyclosporine A or Tacrolimus in Healthy Subjects.

Letermovir is being developed for human cytomegalovirus infection treatment and prophylaxis. In patients receiving transplants, antivirals are coadministered with cyclosporine A (CsA) or tacrolimus (TAC) immunosuppressants. Therefore, we investigated the potential for letermovir-immunosuppressant interactions. In 2 phase 1 clinical trials either CsA 50 mg or TAC 5 mg was administered to healthy males. Following washout, letermovir 80 mg was dosed twice daily for 7 and 11 days in the CsA and TAC trials, respectively, with a second dose of immunosuppressant coadministered with letermovir at steady state. In addition, letermovir 40 mg twice daily was administered for 14 days, and either CsA 50 or 200 mg administered on days 7 and 14. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability were assessed. Letermovir increased CsA and TAC Cmax by 37% and 70%, respectively, and exposure by 70% and 78%, respectively, compared with immunosuppressant alone; t½ was also increased from 10.7 to 17.9 hours for CsA. CsA (50/200 mg) increased letermovir Cmax,ss (109%/167%) and AUCss,τ (126%/237%) and decreased t½ (4.33 to 3.68/3.04 hours) versus letermovir alone. TAC did not significantly affect letermovir pharmacokinetics. All treatments were well tolerated. Concomitant letermovir increased TAC and CsA exposure. CsA altered letermovir pharmacokinetics, whereas TAC did not.

A Novel PBPK Modeling Approach to Assess Cytochrome P450 Mediated Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of the Cytotoxic Prodrug Evofosfamide.

Evofosfamide is a cytotoxic small-molecule prodrug preferentially activated under hypoxic conditions. The cytotoxicity of evofosfamide impacted the generation of in vitro drug-drug interaction (DDI) data, especially in vitro induction results. Therefore, a novel physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approach was used, which involved available in vitro and clinical data of evofosfamide and combined it with induction data from the prototypical cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A inducer rifampicin. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratios of midazolam were above 0.80, indicating that induction of CYP3A by evofosfamide administered weekly is unlikely to occur in humans. Moreover, static and PBPK modeling showed no clinically relevant inhibition via CYP2B6, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4. In conclusion, PBPK models were used to supplement in vitro information of a cytotoxic compound. This approach may set a precedent for future studies of cytotoxic drugs, potentially reducing the need for clinical DDI studies and providing more confidence in the clinical use of approved cytotoxic compounds for which DDI information is sparse.

Effect of fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of steady-state dosing of fluvoxamine, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and CYP2C19, on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast, an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor and its pharmacodynamically active metabolite roflumilast N-oxide. METHODS: In an open-label, non-randomised, one-sequence, two-period, two-treatment crossover study, 14 healthy subjects received a single oral dose of roflumilast 500 microg on study day 1. After a 6-day washout period, repeated doses of fluvoxamine 50 mg once daily were given from days 8 to 21. On day 15, roflumilast 500 microg and fluvoxamine 50 mg were taken concomitantly. Percentage ratios of test/reference (reference: roflumilast alone; test: roflumilast plus steady-state fluvoxamine) of geometric means and their 90% confidence intervals for area under the plasma concentration-time curve, maximum plasma concentration (roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide) and plasma clearance of roflumilast were calculated. RESULTS: Upon co-administration with steady-state fluvoxamine, the exposure to roflumilast as well as roflumilast N-oxide increased by a factor of 2.6 and 1.5, respectively. Roflumilast plasma clearance decreased by a factor of 2.6, from 9.06 L/h (reference) to 3.53 L/h (test). The combined effect of fluvoxamine co-administration on roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide exposures resulted in a moderate (i.e. 59%) increase in total PDE4 inhibitory activity. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of roflumilast and fluvoxamine affects the disposition of roflumilast and its active metabolite roflumilast N-oxide most likely via a potent dual pathway inhibition of CYP1A2 and CYP2C19 by fluvoxamine. The exposure increases observed for roflumilast N-oxide are suggested to be attributable to CYP2C19 co-inhibition by fluvoxamine and thus, are not to be expected to occur when roflumilast is co-administered with more selective CYP1A2 inhibitors.

Identification and characterization of CYP3A4*20, a novel rare CYP3A4 allele without functional activity.

BACKGROUND: The major drug-metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 is genetically conserved. One outlier of Brazilian descent was found in a clinical pharmacokinetic trial exhibiting a 6-fold higher exposure than expected to an investigational drug, shown to be a CYP3A4 substrate. We aimed to investigate the genetic background of this finding. METHODS: The allelic variant of the CYP3A4 gene present in the outlier was sequenced, and the corresponding complementary deoxyribonucleic acid was expressed in yeast and human embryonic kidney cells. The outlier was phenotyped by use of intravenous administration of 1 mg midazolam. Analysis of phenotype and genotype correlation was carried out. The prevalence of the new allele was screened for in a white population. RESULTS: We identified a subject who heterozygously carried a novel CYP3A4 allele, named CYP3A4*20, with a premature stop codon yielding a truncated protein. Heterologous expression revealed that the CYP3A4.20 enzyme does not incorporate heme and thus is devoid of catalytic activity. CYP3A phenotyping in vivo showed that CYP3A4*20 exhibits a clear genotype-phenotype correlation, demonstrated by the subject's low systemic midazolam clearance (2.99 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1)). Genotyping of a white German population (n = 428) and relatives of the subject, as well as a review of published CYP3A4 sequencing data, suggests that CYP3A4*20 is a rare variant allele (<0.06% in white subjects). CONCLUSIONS: CYP3A4*20 represents the first CYP3A4 allele to be identified that has been shown to be devoid of functional activity. It causes an intermediate CYP3A4 metabolizer phenotype in a heterozygous carrier. Subjects of this genotype might be susceptible to side effects during drug therapy with substrates or inhibitors of CYP3A4.

Metabolism and disposition of the αv-integrin ß3/ß5 receptor antagonist cilengitide, a cyclic polypeptide, in humans.

Cilengitide (EMD 121974, manufactured by Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) is an αv-integrin receptor antagonist showing high affinity for αvß3 and αvß5.This study determined the mass balance of cilengitide in healthy volunteers receiving a single intravenous infusion of 2.1 MBq (14) C-cilengitide spiked into 250 mL of 2000 mg of cilengitide. Blood, urine, and feces were collected up to day 15 or until excretion of radioactivity was below 1% of the administered dose. Total radioactivity derived from the administration of (14) C-cilengitide and unlabeled cilengitide levels were determined and used for calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters.(14) C-cilengitide-related radioactivity was completely recovered (94.5%; 87.4%-100.6%) and was mainly excreted into urine (mean, 79.0%; range, 70.3%-88.2%) and to a lesser extent into feces (mean, 15.5%; range, 9.3%-20.3%). Of the administered dose, 77.5% was recovered as unchanged cilengitide in urine. The concentration profiles of cilengitide and total radioactivity in plasma were comparable. No circulating metabolites were identified in plasma and urine. Two metabolites,M606-1 and M606-2, were identified in feces considered to be formed by intestinal peptidases or by peptidases from fecal bacteria. In conclusion, the data show that following intravenous administration, (14) C-cilengitide was completely recovered, was excreted mainly via renal elimination, and was not metabolized systemically.