Beliefs about medications when treating hypertension in primary health care: results from "PERson-centredness in hypertension management using information Technology (PERHIT)".

PURPOSE: Hypertension is a major global health concern. Despite of efficient antihypertensive medications a low percentage of patients reach a blood pressure (BP) of <140/90. Nonadherence is a great concern in hypertension treatment and patients' beliefs about medications has been shown to have a strong impact on adherence. The objective of this study is to examine beliefs about medications and its impact on BP treatment in a group of Swedish primary healthcare patients treated for hypertension with or without an E-health platform. MATERIALS AND METHOD: In a randomised unblinded controlled trial, 949 patients with hypertension from Swedish primary health care centres were included. The intervention group used a web-based system to support self-management of hypertension for eight weeks. Beliefs about medication questionnaire (BMQ) were administered to all patients at inclusion, 8-week follow up and 1-year follow up. RESULTS: Data were collected from the 862 patients who completed the trial. No statistically significant difference was found in BMQ-scores between the intervention and the control group. An association between lower scores in the BMQ subsection 'General-Harm' and achieving target BP of <140/90 mmHg were noted (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: This study shows a significant association between beliefs about medication and BP levels, on hypertensive patients in the Swedish primary care setting, in only one out of four subsections of the BMQ. The intervention did not have a significant effect on changing patients' beliefs about medication. Further emphasis on patients' beliefs about medications could be useful in the clinical setting.

What is the context? Insufficient treatment effect of high blood pressure is a major global health concern, even though there are several different effective medications. Patients not taking their medications, as they have been prescribed, is a well-known contributing factor. There are associations between underlying beliefs about medications and how strict patients adhere to their prescriptions.What is new? In this study data was collected from 862 patients with high blood pressure. The participants were randomised into two groups, one group got treatment as usual and the other group used a web-based interactive information technology system for 8 weeks, in addition to their medications. All participants answered questionnaires about their beliefs about medications. It was shown that the beliefs about medications had limited significant associations to blood pressure levels. Furthermore, the intervention seemed to have no effect upon patients' beliefs about medications.What is the impact? This study provides further evidence that patients' beliefs about medications might be a possible factor to take into consideration when aiming to treat high blood pressure. The intervention used in this study had no impact on patients' beliefs about medications.

Impact of therapeutic education on the evolution of social representations of medication in patients with Parkinson's disease: A quantitative and qualitative study (ETPARK REMED).

BACKGROUND: Among the workshops of our therapeutic patient education (TPE) program, the medication workshop (TPEM workshop) is very frequently proposed to patients in view of the difficulties they encounter related to the complexity of managing antiparkinsonian treatment. Patients' appropriation of their medications could depend on their social representations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of our TPEM workshop on the social representations PD patients have of their medications and to compare it with that of another therapeutic intervention such as a talking group defined as the control group. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-group study investigated the social representations of medication through a questionnaire on knowledge about antiparkinsonian medications, a questionnaire on beliefs about medication (BMQ), and a word association task. RESULTS: In the TPEM group (n=16), the workshop induced significant effects over time on the knowledge questionnaire (P=0.01), BMQ specific necessity and concerns scores (P=0.04 and 0.01, respectively), necessity-concerns differential (P=0.04), and BMQ general harm (P=0.04). No significant difference was found in the talking group (n=6). Comparison of the two groups showed a significant difference of the BMQ general harm with a decrease in belief in the harmfulness of the medications in the workshop group (P=0.03). The results of the verbal association task showed a modification in the content and structure of the social representations of medication in the TPEM group. DISCUSSION: The TPEM workshop helped reduce initial negative aspects of medication representations. Improved knowledge of their medication allowed patients to feel more competent and legitimate in communicating with caregivers, modifying their beliefs about medications. Indeed, the medication was perceived as less restrictive, care becoming central as shown by the emergence of the medical team in the social representations of the medication. CONCLUSION: All the results show a specific beneficial effect of the TPEM workshop through an evolution of the social representations of medications, which became more positive in our PD patients.

Beliefs About Medicines Predict Side-Effects of Placebo Modafinil.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving placebo in clinical trials often report side-effects (nocebo effects), but contributing factors are still poorly understood. PURPOSE: Using a sham trial of the cognition-enhancing "smart pill" Modafinil we tested whether medication beliefs and other psychological factors predicted detection and attribution of symptoms as side-effects to placebo. METHODS: Healthy students (n = 201) completed measures assessing beliefs about medication, perceived sensitivity to medicines, negative affectivity, somatization, and body awareness; 66 were then randomized to receive Deceptive Placebo (told Modafinil-given placebo, 67 to Open Placebo (told placebo-given placebo, and 68 to No Placebo. Memory and attention tasks assessed cognitive enhancement. Nocebo effects were assessed by symptom checklist. RESULTS: More symptoms were reported in the Deceptive Placebo condition (M = 2.65; SD = 2.27) than Open Placebo (M = 1.92; SD = 2.24; Mann-Whitney U = 1,654, z = 2.30, p = .022) or No Placebo (M = 1.68; SD = 1.75, Mann-Whitney U = 1,640, z = 2.74, p = .006). Participants were more likely to attribute symptoms to Modafinil side-effects if they believed pharmaceuticals to be generally harmful (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.70, p = .019), had higher perceived sensitivity to medicines (IRR = 1.68, p = .011), stronger concerns about Modafinil (IRR = 2.10, p < .001), and higher negative affectivity (IRR = 2.37, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Beliefs about medication are potentially modifiable predictors of the nocebo effect. These findings provide insight into side-effect reports to placebo and, potentially, active treatment.

Validation of the Swedish version of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, based on people with epilepsy.

TITLE: Validation of the Swedish version of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, based on people with epilepsy. PURPOSE: The aims of the study were to explore the latent structure of the Swedish Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), to investigate its reliability and to identify the extent to which individual factors among people with epilepsy (PWE), as well as their general beliefs about medication, predict their beliefs about their specific anti-seizure drugs (ASDs). METHODS: One-hundred and fifty six included study participants diagnosed with epilepsy and with a well-established neurological follow-up completed an array of rating scales. Included were the Swedish BMQ, which captures beliefs about medicines, scales for symptoms of anxiety and depression and sense of self-efficacy, as well as a general questionnaire regarding their social situation in general. Statistical analysis included Principal Component Analyses (PCA) and hierarchical multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The PCA revealed a two-factor structure for each of the BMQ-subscales with acceptable (BMQ-G) to high (BMQ-S) internal consistency. The only individual factor that predicted variance in beliefs about medication was patient gender, where levels of both anxiety and depression were elevated in women. CONCLUSION: The Swedish BMQ exhibits psychometric features indicating its reliable use in adult PWE. Our results suggest that the BMQ provides information about the patients' view of their medication regardless of their general mood and that women hold stronger beliefs of concern beyond influence from their levels of depression and anxiety.

Beliefs About Medicines in Patients with Psoriasis Treated with Methotrexate or Biologics: A Cross-sectional Survey Study.

Methotrexate (MTX) and biologics are frequently used treatments for psoriasis. Exploring patients' beliefs about their treatment may help to elucidate patients' attitudes towards these therapies. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire-Specific (BMQ-Specific) in patients treated with methotrexate or biologics. BMQ-Specific scores (Necessity and Concerns scales) were calculated and patients were classified as "accepting", "indifferent", "ambivalent" or "sceptical" towards their treat-ment. Biologics users scored higher on the Necessity scale than did methotrexate users. Both groups had lower Concerns scores than Necessity scores. A high Necessity scale was associated with a low Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score in both groups and long treatment duration in the methotrexate group. Although this study cannot make a direct comparison, it was observed that most patients on biologics could be classified as "accepting" (59%), and most patients on MTX could be classified as "indifferent" (47%). In conclusion, the BMQ-Specific is useful to identify patients with a sceptical, ambivalent or indifferent profile. These profiles may negatively influence patient's attitude towards their medication.

Knowledge of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance among Norwegian pharmacy customers - a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is a global health threat. Public knowledge is considered a prerequisite for appropriate use of antibiotics and limited spread of antibiotic resistance. Our aim was to examine the level of knowledge of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance among Norwegian pharmacy customers, and to assess to which degree beliefs, attitudes and sociodemographic factors are associated with this knowledge. METHODS: A questionnaire based, cross-sectional study was conducted among pharmacy customers in three Norwegian cities. The questionnaire covered 1) knowledge of antibiotics (13 statements) and antibiotic resistance (10 statements), 2) the general beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ general) (three subdomains, four statements each), 3) attitudes toward antibiotic use (four statements), and 4) sociodemographic factors, life style and health. High knowledge level was defined as > 66% of maximum score. Factors associated with knowledge of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance were investigated through univariate and multiple linear regression. Hierarchical model regression was used to estimate a population average knowledge score weighted for age, gender and level of education. RESULTS: Among 877 participants, 57% had high knowledge of antibiotics in general and 71% had high knowledge of antibiotic resistance. More than 90% knew that bacteria can become resistant against antibiotics and that unnecessary use of antibiotics can make them less effective. Simultaneously, more than 30% erroneously stated that antibiotics are effective against viruses, colds or influenza. Factors positively associated with antibiotic knowledge were health professional background, high education level, and a positive view on the value of medications in general. Male gender, a less restrictive attitude toward antibiotic use, and young age were negatively associated with antibiotic knowledge. The mean overall antibiotic knowledge score was relatively high (15.6 out of maximum 23 with estimated weighted population score at 14.8). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high level of knowledge of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance among Norwegian pharmacy customers, there are obvious knowledge gaps. We suggest that action is taken to increase the knowledge level, and particularly target people in vocational, male dominated occupations outside the health service, and primary/secondary school curricula.

Predictors of nonadherence in children and adolescents with epilepsy: A multimethod assessment approach.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of a standardized tool for adherence measurement in patients with epilepsy. Studies in children with epilepsy have reported adherence in 50-96.5%. The primary objective of this study was to identify predictors of nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) using two different methods in Jordanian children and adolescents with epilepsy. METHODS: Participants included 63 children and adolescents with epilepsy and their primary caregivers. Adherence measures included a subjective approach (using parent and child self-reports via Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS)) and an objective method (measuring plasma levels of AEDs coupled with the application of population pharmacokinetic models to predict AED concentrations in the children). The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) was used to examine the association beliefs about medicines with nonadherence in the participating patients. RESULTS: Measuring AEDs in plasma samples captured the highest percentage of nonadherence (36.2%). No significant agreement was found between the AED plasma level method and both the MARS (parent) and MARS (child). The overall nonadherence (combined methods) to AED therapy in children with epilepsy was 44.4%. Logistic regression analysis indicated that children with longer duration of disease were more likely (odds ratio [OR]: 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-2.04) to be classified as nonadherent as were children whose parents have lower AED Necessity scores (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.53-0.87) and higher AED Concerns (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.26-2.04) as measured by the BMQ. CONCLUSION: The use of a multimethod approach for assessing adherence increases sensitivity for detection of nonadherence to AEDs. Disease duration and parental necessity beliefs and concerns assessed by the BMQ-specific questionnaire were significant predictors of nonadherence to the AED therapy. The need for the development and implementation of interventions that can be employed to improve adherence within this pediatric population has been highlighted by the high levels of nonadherence identified.

Factors associated with intentional and unintentional non-adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy following breast cancer.

Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) following breast cancer is known to be suboptimal despite its known efficacy in reducing recurrence and mortality. This study aims to investigate factors associated with non-adherence and inform the development of interventions to support women and promote adherence. A questionnaire survey to measure level of adherence, side effects experienced, beliefs about medicine, support received and socio-demographic details was sent to 292 women 2-4 years post breast cancer diagnosis. Differences between non-adherers and adherers to AET were explored, and factors associated with intentional and unintentional non-adherence are reported. Approximately one quarter of respondents, 46 (22%), were non-adherers, comprising 29 (14%) intentional non-adherers and 17 (8%) unintentional non-adherers. Factors significantly associated with intentional non-adherence were the presence of side effects (p < .03), greater concerns about AET (p < .001) and a lower perceived necessity to take AET (p < .001). Half of the sample (105/211) reported that side effects had a moderate or high impact on their quality of life. Factors associated with unintentional non-adherence were younger age (<65) (p < .001), post-secondary education (p = .046) and paid employment (p = .031). There are distinct differences between intentional non-adherence and unintentional non-adherence. Differentiation between the two types of non-adherence may help tailor support and advice interventions.

Belief in medication and adherence to antiepileptic drugs in people with epilepsy: a cross-sectional study from rural India.

AIM OF THE STUDY: This study was aimed to assess belief in medication and non-adherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in people with epilepsy (PWE) from rural India. And furthermore to study the demographic and seizure attributes influencing the adherence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Present cross-sectional study included 230 adult PWE. Adherence level was assessed by using validated Morisky-Green test and patient's beliefs towards usage of AEDs by utilizing Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ). RESULTS: On the Morisky-Green scale, 57% patients were reported non-adherent to treatment: 49.6% had moderate and 7.4% had low adherence levels. Non-adherence was considerably associated with lower socioeconomical status (p<.001), severity of seizures (p<.001), and duration of epilepsy (p<.041). The connection between seizures recurrence and non-adherence was measurably noteworthy (p<.001). Non-adherent patients had more concern about the potential adverse effects of AEDs (p<.0013). CONCLUSIONS: Beliefs about medicines are a contributing factor to adherence towards AEDs and more concern was common among non-adherent patients. The reinforcement of epilepsy services in rural and underserved areas can be done by providing a regular, uninterrupted, and free supply of AEDs on monthly basis in the government hospitals. There is a need for awareness and educational programs by healthcare professionals at different levels, to support and encourage positive beliefs, and discourage myths against AEDs in order to increase patient's adherence.

Patients' perspectives on antiepileptic medication: relationships between beliefs about medicines and adherence among patients with epilepsy in UK primary care.

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can result in suboptimal outcomes for patients. AIM: This study aimed to assess the utility of a theory-based approach to understanding patient perspectives on AEDs and adherence. METHOD: Patients with epilepsy, identified by a GP case note review, were mailed validated questionnaires assessing their perceptions of AEDs and their adherence to them. RESULTS: Most (84.9%) of the 398 AED-treated respondents accepted the necessity of AEDs, but over half expressed doubts, with 55% disagreeing or uncertain about the statement 'I would prefer to take epilepsy medication than risk a seizure'. Over a third (36.4%) expressed strong concerns about the potential negative effects of AEDs. We used self-report and medication possession ratio to classify 36.4% of patients as nonadherent. Nonadherence was related to beliefs about medicines and implicit attitudes toward AEDs (p<0.05). Adherence-related attitudes toward AEDs were correlated with general beliefs about pharmaceuticals (BMQ General: General Harm, General Overuse, and General Benefit scales) and perceptions of personal sensitivity to medicines (PSM scale). CONCLUSION: We identified salient, adherence-related beliefs about AEDs. Patient-centered interventions to support medicine optimization for people with epilepsy should take account of these beliefs.

Medication Adherence to Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Extent and Impact of Side Effects.

Purpose: Arterial and venous thromboembolism are a leading cause of mortality. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are highly effective in both stroke prevention and prevention of venous thrombotic events. Medication adherence is a prerequisite for optimal protection against thromboembolic complications. Recent studies have shown that good adherence cannot be taken for granted by DOACs. In this cross-sectional study adherence among DOAC users was investigated and associations between beliefs about medication, perceived side effects and adherence were explored. Patients and Methods: We included 100 randomly selected adult DOAC users visiting one of the two participating Dutch community pharmacies in the summer of 2020. The self-reported adherence (primary outcome) was assessed with the Medication Adherence Rating Scale-5 (MARS-5) using three different cut-off scores. Beliefs about DOACs were assessed with the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire Specific (BMQ-S), while side effects and side effect burden were assessed with a self-developed questionnaire based on the Lareb Intensive Monitoring (LIM) system. Results: Of the participants, 9% reported non-adherence on the primary MARS-5 cut-off score <24. For the MARS-5 scores <23 and <25 non-adherence percentages of, respectively, 3 and 33% were calculated. Associations were found between adherence and both side effects and side effect burden, regardless of the MARS-5 cut-off score. Bruising and minor bleeds were the most reported side effects (both 20%). For all patients, the necessity beliefs outweighed the concern beliefs. No associations were found between adherence and either gender, indication, DOAC or dosage. Conclusion: This study confirms that adherence in patients on DOACs cannot be taken for granted. High necessity beliefs do not guarantee good adherence, as side effects impair adherence even in patients having high necessity beliefs. Therefore, we recommend that both physicians and pharmacists evaluate both adherence and side effects with these patients on a regular base.

The issue Thrombosis affects many people. Complications like stroke and lung embolism are a major cause of health damage, disability and even death. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are highly effective drugs at preventing these complications. However, patients need to take their medication properly to get the best protection. Recent studies showed that not all patients consistently take their DOACs. What's new? In this study, we discovered that patients experiencing bothersome side effect were less likely to stick to their medication schedule. The most common side effects reported were bruising and minor bleeding, by 20% each. There were no differences in how well patients took their medication based on gender, medical condition, type of DOAC or prescribed dosage. Most patients believed their medication was necessary for their health. Why is this important? This study shows that side effects hinder patients taking their medication correctly even when they believe their medication is necessary for their health. This means that patients on DOAC therapy who experience side effects may be less protected against stroke and lung embolism. Therefore, we recommend that doctors and pharmacists regularly check in with patients about any side effects they experience and how consistently they take their DOACs. What's next? This study highlights the importance of developing, testing, and implementing practical tools to find and help patients who do not take their DOACs correctly, to ensure they are better protected against blood clots.

Beliefs of Moroccan patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases regarding medication: related factors and correlation with therapeutic adherence.

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence is one of the key elements of the management of patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRDs), adherence/medication regimes are prone to being influenced by beliefs about medicines; such beliefs can influence the management and quality of life of patients. Several factors may be associated with these beliefs, including demographic and clinical factors, as well as socio-psychological factors. The aim of this study is to assess beliefs regarding medications among Moroccan patients with CIRDs, the factors associated with these beliefs, and the correlation of these factors with medication adherence. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This cross-sectional study included patients with CIRDs. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, and information about CIRDs (type, disease duration, pain evaluation, disease activity and treatments) were collected. Beliefs regarding medication were assessed by the Belief about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ). Therapeutic adherence was assessed using the Arabic version of the Compliance Questionnaire in Rheumatology (CQR). Sociopsychological factors, such as catastrophism and trust in physicians, were assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and the Trust in Physicians Scale (TPS), respectively. RESULT: Our sample included 189 patients. The average age was 47.49 ± 13.7; 52.4% had comorbidities; and 49.2% had a low level of education. Of the patients, 49.7% were on glucocorticoids, 61.9% on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 6.3% on biologics. The median necessity-concern differential was 6 [1-12]. Of the patients, 67.4% strongly believed that medication was essential to maintain their health. The long-term side effects were the main concerns about medicines (51.3%). In a multivariate analysis, there was a statistically significant association between low level of education, catastrophizing, methotrexate use, and trust in the physician as independent factors and the BMQ necessity-concern differential as the dependent factor. There was also a significant correlation between CQR and the BMQ necessity score. CONCLUSION: Moroccan patients with CIRDs have a rather positive perception of their medication. This perception seems to influence their adherence to treatment. Low levels of education, catastrophizing, methotrexate use, and trust in physicians are the most important factors associated with patients' beliefs regarding medication.

Translation and Psychometric Validation of Belief about Medication Questionnaire in Parents of Children with Difficult-to-Treat Nephrotic Syndrome.

Belief about Medications Questionnaire (BMQ) is a validated tool to assess the beliefs of patients about their medications. The objective was to translate the BMQ in Hindi, and to perform reliability and validity testing of Hindi version in Indian children (aged ≤ 12 y) with difficult-to-treat nephrotic syndrome (DTNS). The BMQ was first translated using the standard translation and back-translation procedure. The BMQ-Hindi was then applied to 110 children with DTNS. The Principal component analysis was performed, and Cronbach alpha (CA) was calculated. Construct validity was tested by assessing the correlation (Pearson r) between BMQ-Hindi scores and Reported Adherence to Medication (RAM-Hindi) scale. The BMQHindi displayed two-factorial (five-item each) structure similar to BMQ-English. The CA was 0.79 and 0.63 for 'necessity' and 'concerns' subscale, respectively and was comparable to BMQ-English. BMQ-Hindi is a valid and reliable tool for Indian children with DTNS to assess parental beliefs about their child's medications.

Lifetime Cannabis Use Is Not Associated With Negative Beliefs About Medication in Patients With First Treatment Psychosis.

Objective: Cannabis use is common among patients with psychosis, and along with negative beliefs about medication, it has been found to predict poor adherence to antipsychotic drug treatment. Such lack of adherence to antipsychotic drug treatment increases the risk of poor clinical outcomes and relapse in patients with first treatment for psychosis (FTP). However, to date, it is unclear whether cannabis use may be related to negative perceptions about antipsychotic drug treatment. Methods: A cross-sectional sample of 265 FTP patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder underwent extensive clinical assessments. Three measures of cannabis use were obtained: lifetime, current and meeting diagnostic criteria for abuse or addiction. For the primary analyses we focused on lifetime cannabis use. The Beliefs about Medication Questionnaire (BMQ) was employed to assess the patients' specific concerns and perceptions of antipsychotic medications, as well as general beliefs about pharmacotherapy. The relationship between lifetime cannabis use and BMQ scores was investigated with general linear model (GLM) analyses, controlling for age and sex. Results: Patients with lifetime use of cannabis ≥10 times were more likely to be male, younger at the age of onset of psychosis and with higher levels of alcohol use and daily tobacco smoking, as compared to the non-users (p < 0.05). Neither lifetime use of cannabis, current use nor a cannabis abuse diagnosis was associated with negative beliefs about medicines as measured by the BMQ questionnaire. Conclusion: Use of cannabis is not linked to negative perceptions about antipsychotic medicines in patients with FTP. Other reasons for poor compliance to antipsychotic drug treatment in cannabis users need to be further investigated.

Relationship between Patient Preferences, Attitudes to Treatment, Adherence, and Quality of Life in New Users of Teriflunomide.

Background: A poor patient adherence often limits the real-world effectiveness of an oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS). In the present study, we aimed to map patient preferences, attitudes toward treatment, and quality of life to identify the predictors of non-adherence to teriflunomide. Methods: This was a single-arm, non-interventional, multicenter study (Czech Act 378/2007 Coll.) consisting of three visits: the first at treatment initiation (teriflunomide 14 mg), and then after 3 and 9 months of therapy. We enrolled both DMT-naïve and patients who had undergone a DMT diagnosed with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The functional status and MS activity were estimated using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and annualized relapse rate (ARR); the quality of life via the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29); the medication adherence with the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8); the confidence in the ability to take medications by the Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Score (SEAMS); and the attitude to the therapy via the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). After nine months of therapy, we predicted the adherence to teriflunomide (MMAS-8) by fitting a multivariate ordinal logistic model with EDSS changes, gender, previous DMT, MSIS-29, BMQ, and SEAMS as the explanatory variables. Results: Between 2018 and 2019, 114 patients were enrolled at 10 sites in the Czech Republic. The mean age was 41.2 years, 64.8% were diagnosed with a CIS, 52.4% were DMT-naïve, and 98.1% of patients preferred an oral administration at the baseline. The mean EDSS baseline was 1.97 and remained constant during the 9 months of therapy. The ARR baseline was 0.72 and dropped to 0.19 and 0.15 after 3 and 9 months, respectively. Despite a more than 4-fold higher ARR baseline, the treatment-naïve patients achieved an ARR at 9 months comparable with those previously treated. There were ten non-serious adverse reactions. After nine months of teriflunomide therapy, 63.3%, 21.2%, and 15.4% of patients had a high, medium, and low adherence, respectively, as per the MMAS-8; 100% of patients preferred an oral administration. The SEAMS score (odds ratio (OR) = 0.91; p = 0.013) and previous DMT (OR = 4.28; p = 0.005) were the only significant predictors of non-adherence. The disability, the quality of life, and beliefs about medicines had no measurable effect on adherence. Conclusion: After nine months of teriflunomide therapy, both the disability and quality of life remained stable; the relapse rate significantly decreased, 63.3% of patients had a high adherence, and 100% of patients preferred an oral administration. A low adherence was associated with previous DMT experiences and a low self-efficacy for the appropriate medication (i.e., the confidence in one's ability to take medication correctly).

Strengthening the Link between Vaccine Predispositions and Vaccine Advocacy through Certainty.

BACKGROUND: Instruments designed to assess individual differences in predispositions towards vaccination are useful in predicting vaccination-related outcomes. Despite their importance, there is relatively little evidence regarding the conditions under which these instruments are more predictive. The current research was designed to improve the ability of these kinds of instruments to predict vaccination advocacy by considering the certainty associated with the responses to vaccination scales. METHOD: Across two studies, participants completed the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire BMQ scale (Study 1) or the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale (Study 2). The certainty participants had in their responses to each scale was either measured (Study 1) or manipulated (Study 2). Intentions to advocate in favor of vaccination served as the criterion measure in both studies. RESULTS: As expected, the scales significantly predicted vaccination advocacy, contributing to enhancing the predictive validity of the instruments used in the studies. Most relevant, certainty moderated the extent to which these scales predicted vaccination advocacy, with greater consistency between the initial scores and the subsequent advocacy willingness obtained for those with higher certainty. CONCLUSIONS: Certainty can be useful to predict when the relationship between vaccination-related cognitions (i.e., beliefs or attitudes) and advocacy willingness is likely to be stronger.

Implementation and evaluation of a psychoeducation program in an outpatient mental health center.

BACKGROUND: Psychoeducation has been shown to improve patient attitudes toward medication. PROBLEM: A rural mental health agency did not provide a medication psychoeducation group. Medication nonadherence can lead to early psychiatric readmission. METHODS: An 8-week program of group psychoeducation was delivered to clients with severe and persistent mental illness. The Beliefs about Medications Questionnaire measured changes in patient attitudes toward medication. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction was high, even though results showed no significant change in attitudes toward medication. IMPLICATIONS: Future programs might consider different outcome measures, including rates of post-group medication adherence and/or measures of the quality of the therapeutic relationship, which is the most robust indicator of treatment success.

Baseline beliefs about medication are associated with outcomes of antidepressants in inpatients with first-diagnosed depression under supervised therapeutic compliance.

The aim of the present study was to explore the effect of baseline beliefs about medication on therapeutic outcomes of antidepressants in inpatients with first-diagnosed depression under supervised therapeutic compliance. Ninety-seven inpatients with first-diagnosed depression were included to collect their baseline demographic data to evaluate the Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD) scores and the beliefs about medicine questionnaire-specific (BMQ-S) scores at baseline and the end of the eight-week treatment. Additionally, we explored the relationship between inpatients' medication beliefs and therapeutic effect of antidepressants. The inpatients were divided into remitted depression and unremitted depression groups according to outcomes at the end of the eight-week treatment. There was no significant difference in the baseline HAMD between the two groups (P > 0.050). The scores on the BMQ-S of the unremitted group were significantly lower than those of the remitted group (P < 0.001). The HAMD scores were significantly reduced in both groups after the eight-week treatment (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the BMQ-S scores before and after the treatment (P > 0.050). The medication beliefs of the unremitted inpatients after the treatment were still lower than those of the remitted inpatients (P < 0.001). Logistic-regression analysis showed that low BMQ-S scores at the baseline were an independent risk factor for antidepressant efficacy. Beliefs about medication at baseline may be correlated with the therapeutic efficacy in inpatients with first-diagnosed depression under supervised therapeutic compliance.

Pregnancy-Related Beliefs and Concerns of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Modified After Accessing e-Health Portal.

OBJECTIVE: Poor inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-specific reproductive knowledge is associated with concerns and medication noncompliance. Having shown an educational portal can improve knowledge, we evaluated its effectiveness for addressing IBD patients' reproductive and medication concerns. METHODS: Adult IBD participants (aged 18 to 45 years) were invited to access an e-health portal providing information on heritability, fertility, surgery, pregnancy outcomes, delivery, postpartum, and breastfeeding in the context of IBD and IBD medications. At pre-, post-, and 6+-month postintervention, participants completed a questionnaire on IBD-specific pregnancy concerns, medication concerns from the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), and medication adherence via the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare median differences between scores (95% confidence). RESULTS: Demographics for 78 (70.3%) participants completing postintervention questionnaires: median age 29.3 (interquartile range: 25.6 to 32.9) years; 54 (69.2%) Crohn's disease; 21 (26.9%) ulcerative colitis; 63 (80.3%) females, 5 (7.9%) pregnant; and 19 (30.2%) previously pregnant. Postintervention, the median number of reproductive concerns decreased from 3 to 1, and remained stable 6+ months later (P < 0.001*). The median BMQ score decreased from 28 to 25, and remained stable 6+ months later (P = 0.032*). Participants adherent to medications increased from 82.4% to 87.8% postintervention (P = 0.099). CONCLUSION: Using an e-health portal may potentially reduce IBD-specific reproductive and medications concerns. An e-health portal is feasible as one component of managing IBD patient's reproductive and medication concerns during preconception and pregnancy.

Effect of patients beliefs about medications on adherence to drugs in diabetic patients attending family medicine outpatient clinic in Ismailia, Egypt.

BACKGROUND: Adherence affected by many factors in the patient or in the treatment. One of these factors is beliefs about medicine, which is modifiable. This study aimed to assess the effect of beliefs about medicines on adherence to medications in diabetic patients. METHODS: It is a cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study, conducted between March 2019 and June 2019, in Family medicine outpatient clinic, Suez Canal University, Egypt. A consecutive sample of diabetic patients presented to the clinic in the period of study was included until fulfilling sample size (82 patients). They filled validated questionnaires of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, Beliefs about Medicine, and socio-demographic characteristics. RESULTS: About half of the patients were non-adherent (54.9%). The necessity beliefs mean was 18.6, while the median was 20, concerns beliefs mean was 14.2, while the median was 14, overuse beliefs mean was 12.2, while the median was 13, finally mean and median of harm score was 11.0. There was a statistically significant relationship between age, education, concern, and harm score with adherence (p = 0.04, 0.02, < 0.001, and 0.03). Age was a positive predictor of adherence; and concern beliefs score was a negative predictor of adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should inquire about their patient medication beliefs and its effect on patient adherence to discover and solve concerns of diabetic patients to improve non-adherence.