Understanding the side effects of chronic silodosin administration via untargeted metabolomics approach.

BACKGROUND: Precision medicine, which looks for high efficacy and low toxicity in therapies, has increased in popularity with omics technology. This work aims to discover novel and low-toxicity therapy options by examining the complex relationship between silodosin-induced side effects and the metabolomic profiles associated with its administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The plasma samples of the control group and silodosin-treated rats were analyzed by LC-Q-TOF-MS/MS. Employing XCMS and MetaboAnalyst software, MS/MS data processed to detect compounds and investigate metabolic pathways. MATLAB 2019b was used for data categorization and multivariate analysis. A thorough comparison of METLIN and HMDB databases revealed 41m/z values with significant differences between the drug-treated and control groups (p <0.01 and fold analysis≥1.5). RESULTS: According to multivariate data analysis, 17-ß-estradiol, taurocholic acid, L-kynurenine, N-formylkynurenine, D-glutamine, L-arginine, prostaglandin H2, prostaglandine G2, 15-keto-prostaglandin E2, calcidiol, thromboxane A2, 5'-methylthioadenosine, L-methionine and S-adenosylmethionine levels changed significantly compared to the control group. Differences in the metabolisms of glycerophospholipid, tyrosine, phenylalanine, arachidonic acid, cysteine and methionine, and biosynthesis of phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan, and aminoacyl-tRNA have been successfully demonstrated by metabolic pathway analysis. According to this study, vitamin D, D-glutamine, and L-arginine supplements can be recommended to prevent side effects such as fatigue, intraoperative floppy iris syndrome, blurred vision, and dizziness in the treatment of silodosin. Silodosin treatment negatively affected the immune system by affecting the kynurenine and tryptophan metabolism pathways. CONCLUSIONS: The study is a guide for silodosin treatments that offer low side effects and high therapeutic effect within the scope of precision medicine.

[Women's experience following prophylactic low molecular weight heparin treatment post-cesarean section]. / Ressenti des femmes après traitement prophylactique par héparine de bas poids moléculaire après une césarienne.

OBJECTIVE: To assess women's experiences with skin-related side effects following subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) injections after a cesarean section, and to analyze their impact on treatment adherence. METHOD: A questionnaire was developed in collaboration with Cesarine, a patients' association, to explore various aspects of LMWH administration, including prevention methods, cutaneous side effects, treatment compliance, perceived constraints, apprehension, and understanding of treatment benefits. Additionally, women's opinions on an alternative oral administration approach were solicited, taking into consideration breastfeeding contraindication. The questionnaire was on the Facebook® page and blog of the association. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-four women participated in the survey. Among them, 139 women (84.8%) reported bruising, while 117 (71.3%) reported pruritus, erythema, or nodules at the injection site. Treatment discontinuation was observed in 36 cases (22%), decided mostly by the women themselves (77.8%). The main reasons cited for discontinuation were discomfort during injection (71.4%), skin reactions (31.4%), and a perceived lack of effectiveness (54.3%). Furthermore, 88 women (53.7%) wanted to quit the treatment prematurely, citing similar reasons. Thirty-three women (20.1%) reported oversights. For most women, the treatment was perceived as burdensome and caused apprehension. An alternative oral administration method was of interest to 131 women (79.9%). However, only 28 (17.8%) would have accepted if the medication was incompatible with breastfeeding. CONCLUSION: Cutaneous side effects of LMWH injections, as well as injection process itself, have a negative impact on adherence in the postpartum period following a c-section. These findings highlight the need to explore alternative to improve women's compliance and comfort.

[Low-dose methotrexate: Indications and side effects, particularly in cases of diffuse interstitial pneumonia]. / Méthotrexate à faible dose : indications et effets secondaires, en particulier en cas de pneumopathie interstitielle diffuse.

INTRODUCTION: Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate antagonist used as an immunosuppressant in a number of conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Low-dose MTX (MTX-LD) is associated with a risk of haematological, hepatic, gastrointestinal and pulmonary toxicity, which may up until now have limited its use. STATE OF THE ART: In RA, data from retrospective cohorts have reported a possible excess risk of methotrexate toxicity in cases of underlying interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, recent prospective and retrospective multicentre studies have found no such increased risk, and have reassuringly concluded that MTX-LD can be prescribed in cases of RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD). PERSPECTIVES AND CONCLUSIONS: Current recommendations are not to delay the introduction of MTX in patients with RA at risk of developing ILD or in the presence of RA-ILD with mild to moderate respiratory impairment.