The Complex Genetic Basis and Multilayered Regulatory Control of Yeast Pseudohyphal Growth.

Eukaryotic cells are exquisitely responsive to external and internal cues, achieving precise control of seemingly diverse growth processes through a complex interplay of regulatory mechanisms. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae provides a fascinating model of cell growth in its stress-responsive transition from planktonic single cells to a filamentous pseudohyphal growth form. During pseudohyphal growth, yeast cells undergo changes in morphology, polarity, and adhesion to form extended and invasive multicellular filaments. This pseudohyphal transition has been studied extensively as a model of conserved signaling pathways regulating cell growth and for its relevance in understanding the pathogenicity of the related opportunistic fungus Candida albicans, wherein filamentous growth is required for virulence. This review highlights the broad gene set enabling yeast pseudohyphal growth, signaling pathways that regulate this process, the role and regulation of proteins conferring cell adhesion, and interesting regulatory mechanisms enabling the pseudohyphal transition.

Pseudohyphal differentiation in Komagataella phaffii: investigating the FLO gene family.

Many yeasts differentiate into multicellular phenotypes in adverse environmental conditions. Here, we investigate pseudohyphal growth in Komagataella phaffii and the involvement of the flocculin (FLO) gene family in its regulation. The K. phaffii FLO family consists of 13 members, and the conditions inducing pseudohyphal growth are different from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. So far, this phenotype was only observed when K. phaffii was cultivated at slow growth rates in glucose-limited chemostats, but not upon nitrogen starvation or the presence of fusel alcohols. Transcriptional analysis identified that FLO11, FLO400 and FLO5-1 are involved in the phenotype, all being controlled by the transcriptional regulator Flo8. The three genes exhibit a complex mechanism of expression and repression during transition from yeast to pseudohyphal form. Unlike in S. cerevisiae, deletion of FLO11 does not completely prevent the phenotype. In contrast, deletion of FLO400 or FLO5-1 prevents pseudohyphae formation, and hampers FLO11 expression. FAIRE-Seq data shows that the expression and repression of FLO400 and FLO5-1 are correlated to open or closed chromatin regions upstream of these genes, respectively. Our findings indicate that K. phaffii Flo400 and/or Flo5-1 act as upstream signals that lead to the induction of FLO11 upon glucose limitation in chemostats at slow growth and chromatin modulation is involved in the regulation of their expression.

Characterization of specialized flocculent yeasts to improve sparkling wine fermentation.

AIMS: Flocculent wine yeasts were characterized for the expression of FLO1, FLO5, FLO8, AMN1 and RGA1 genes, growth kinetics and physicochemical properties of the cell surface during a 6-month sparkling wine fermentation period. METHODS AND RESULTS: The expression of FLO1, FLO5, FLO8, AMN1 and RGA1 genes was determined by RT-qPCR. The physicochemical characterization of yeast surface properties was evaluated by the microbial adhesion to solvents method. FLO5 gene was the most expressed one and a linear correlation with the flocculent degree was found. Flocculent strains were more hydrophobic than the commercial wine strain EC1118. CONCLUSIONS: Gene expressions and the ability to face secondary wine fermentation conditions were strain dependent. The importance of FLO5 gene in developing the high flocculent characteristic of wine yeasts was highlighted. Cell surface properties depended on the time of fermentation. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Better knowledge about the expression of some genes encoding the flocculent phenotype which could be useful to select suitable starter cultures to improve sparkling wine technology was achieved. A step forward in understanding the complexity and strain-specific nature of flocculation phenotype was done.

Genetic basis for probiotic yeast phenotypes revealed by nanopore sequencing.

Probiotic yeasts are emerging as preventative and therapeutic solutions for disease. Often ingested via cultured foods and beverages, they can survive the harsh conditions of the gastrointestinal tract and adhere to it, where they provide nutrients and inhibit pathogens like Candida albicans. Yet, little is known of the genomic determinants of these beneficial traits. To this end, we have sequenced 2 food-derived probiotic yeast isolates that mitigate fungal infections. We find that the first strain, KTP, is a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae within a small clade that lacks any apparent ancestry from common European/wine S. cerevisiae strains. Significantly, we show that S. cerevisiae KTP genes involved in general stress, pH tolerance, and adherence are markedly different from S. cerevisiae S288C but are similar to the commercial probiotic yeast species S. boulardii. This suggests that even though S. cerevisiae KTP and S. boulardii are from different clades, they may achieve probiotic effect through similar genetic mechanisms. We find that the second strain, ApC, is a strain of Issatchenkia occidentalis, one of the few of this family of yeasts to be sequenced. Because of the dissimilarity of its genome structure and gene organization, we infer that I. occidentalis ApC likely achieves a probiotic effect through a different mechanism than the Saccharomyces strains. Therefore, this work establishes a strong genetic link among probiotic Saccharomycetes, advances the genomics of Issatchenkia yeasts, and indicates that probiotic activity is not monophyletic and complimentary mixtures of probiotics could enhance health benefits beyond a single species.

Karyotype engineering reveals spatio-temporal control of replication firing and gene contacts.

Eukaryotic genomes vary in terms of size, chromosome number, and genetic complexity. Their temporal organization is complex, reflecting coordination between DNA folding and function. Here, we used fused karyotypes of budding yeast to characterize the effects of chromosome length on nuclear architecture. We found that size-matched megachromosomes expand to occupy a larger fraction of the enlarged nucleus. Hi-C maps reveal changes in the three-dimensional structure corresponding to inactivated centromeres and telomeres. De-clustering of inactive centromeres results in their loss of early replication, highlighting a functional correlation between genome organization and replication timing. Repositioning of former telomere-proximal regions on chromosome arms exposed a subset of contacts between flocculin genes. Chromatin reorganization of megachromosomes during cell division remained unperturbed, and it revealed that centromere-rDNA contacts in anaphase, extending over 0.3 Mb on wild-type chromosome, cannot exceed ∼1.7 Mb. Our results highlight the relevance of engineered karyotypes to unveiling relationships between genome organization and function.

Chromosome-level genome assembly and structural variant analysis of two laboratory yeast strains from the Peterhof Genetic Collection lineage.

Thousands of yeast genomes have been sequenced with both traditional and long-read technologies, and multiple observations about modes of genome evolution for both wild and laboratory strains have been drawn from these sequences. In our study, we applied Oxford Nanopore and Illumina technologies to assemble complete genomes of two widely used members of a distinct laboratory yeast lineage, the Peterhof Genetic Collection (PGC), and investigate the structural features of these genomes including transposable element content, copy number alterations, and structural rearrangements. We identified numerous notable structural differences between genomes of PGC strains and the reference S288C strain. We discovered a substantial enrichment of mid-length insertions and deletions within repetitive coding sequences, such as in the SCH9 gene or the NUP100 gene, with possible impact of these variants on protein amyloidogenicity. High contiguity of the final assemblies allowed us to trace back the history of reciprocal unbalanced translocations between chromosomes I, VIII, IX, XI, and XVI of the PGC strains. We show that formation of hybrid alleles of the FLO genes during such chromosomal rearrangements is likely responsible for the lack of invasive growth of yeast strains. Taken together, our results highlight important features of laboratory yeast strain evolution using the power of long-read sequencing.

Yeast Flocculin: Methods for Quantitative Analysis of Flocculation in Yeast Cells.

Flocculation, the clump forming property of yeast, has long been appreciated in breweries and utilized as an off-cost method to enable the reuse of yeast cells. Members of the flocculin protein family were identified as the adherent proteins on the cell surface responsible for flocculation, and their properties have been investigated. Crystal structures of the adhesion domain of flocculins revealed their unique mode of ligand binding where a calcium ion is located in the middle of the interface between flocculin and the interacting sugar. Here we describe the most commonly used flocculation assay. The method is simple and easy, yet it is the most direct and reliable assay to evaluate the flocculation cellular phenotype.

Histone chaperones and the Rrm3p helicase regulate flocculation in S. cerevisiae.

BACKGROUND: Biofilm formation or flocculation is a major phenotype in wild type budding yeasts but rarely seen in laboratory yeast strains. Here, we analysed flocculation phenotypes and the expression of FLO genes in laboratory strains with various genetic backgrounds. RESULTS: We show that mutations in histone chaperones, the helicase RRM3 and the Histone Deacetylase HDA1 de-repress the FLO genes and partially reconstitute flocculation. We demonstrate that the loss of repression correlates to elevated expression of several FLO genes, to increased acetylation of histones at the promoter of FLO1 and to variegated expression of FLO11. We show that these effects are related to the activity of CAF-1 at the replication forks. We also demonstrate that nitrogen starvation or inhibition of histone deacetylases do not produce flocculation in W303 and BY4742 strains but do so in strains compromised for chromatin maintenance. Finally, we correlate the de-repression of FLO genes to the loss of silencing at the subtelomeric and mating type gene loci. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the deregulation of chromatin maintenance and transmission is sufficient to reconstitute flocculation in laboratory yeast strains. Consequently, we propose that a gain in epigenetic silencing is a major contributing factor for the loss of flocculation phenotypes in these strains. We suggest that flocculation in yeasts provides an excellent model for addressing the challenging issue of how epigenetic mechanisms contribute to evolution.

Genetic diversity of FLO1 and FLO5 genes in wine flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Twenty-eight flocculent wine strains were tested for adhesion and flocculation phenotypic variability. Moreover, the expression patterns of the main genes involved in flocculation (FLO1, FLO5 and FLO8) were studied both in synthetic medium and in presence of ethanol stress. Molecular identification and typing were achieved by PCR-RFLP of the 5.8S ITS rRNA region and microsatellite PCR fingerprinting, respectively. All isolates belong to Saccharomyces cerevisiae species. The analysis of microsatellites highlighted the intraspecific genetic diversity of flocculent wine S. cerevisiae strains allowing obtaining strain-specific profiles. Moreover, strains were characterized on the basis of adhesive properties. A wide biodiversity was observed even if none of the tested strains were able to form biofilms (or 'mats'), or to adhere to polystyrene. Moreover, genetic diversity of FLO1 and FLO5 flocculating genes was determined by PCR. Genetic diversity was detected for both genes, but a relationship with the flocculation degree was not found. So, the expression patterns of FLO1, FLO5 and FLO8 genes was investigated in a synthetic medium and a relationship between the expression of FLO5 gene and the flocculation capacity was established. To study the expression of FLO1, FLO5 and FLO8 genes in floc formation and ethanol stress resistance qRT-PCR was carried out and also in this case strains with flocculent capacity showed higher levels of FLO5 gene expression. This study confirmed the diversity of flocculation phenotype and genotype in wine yeasts. Moreover, the importance of FLO5 gene in development of high flocculent characteristic of wine yeasts was highlighted. The obtained collection of S. cerevisiae flocculent wine strains could be useful to study the relationship between the genetic variation and flocculation phenotype in wine yeasts.