Report of the 2022 Banff Heart Concurrent: Focus on non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies in rejection and the pathology of "mixed" rejection.

The Banff Heart Concurrent Session, held as part of the 16th Banff Foundation for Allograft Pathology Conference at Banff, Alberta, Canada, on September 21, 2022, focused on 2 major topics: non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and mixed rejection. Each topic was addressed in a multidisciplinary fashion with clinical, immunological, and pathology perspectives and future developments and prospectives. Following the Banff organization model and principles, the collective aim of the speakers on each topic was to • Determine current knowledge gaps in heart transplant pathology • Identify limitations of current pathology classification systems • Discuss next steps in addressing gaps and refining classification system.

Human leukocyte antigen class I antibody-activated endothelium promotes CD206+ M2 macrophage polarization and MMP9 secretion through TLR4 signaling and P-selectin in a model of antibody-mediated rejection and allograft vasculopathy.

HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) elicit alloimmune responses against the graft vasculature, leading to endothelial cell (EC) activation and monocyte infiltration during antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). AMR promotes chronic inflammation and remodeling, leading to thickening of the arterial intima termed transplant vasculopathy or cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in heart transplants. Intragraft-recipient macrophages serve as a diagnostic marker in AMR; however, their polarization and function remain unclear. In this study, we utilized an in vitro Transwell coculture system to explore the mechanisms of monocyte-to-macrophage polarization induced by HLA I DSA-activated ECs. Anti-HLA I (IgG or F(ab')2) antibody-activated ECs induced the polarization of M2 macrophages with increased CD206 expression and MMP9 secretion. However, inhibition of TLR4 signaling or PSGL-1-P-selectin interactions significantly decreased both CD206 and MMP9. Monocyte adherence to Fc-P-selectin coated plates induced M2 macrophages with increased CD206 and MMP9. Moreover, Fc-receptor and IgG interactions synergistically enhanced active-MMP9 in conjunction with P-selectin. Transcriptomic analysis of arteries from DSA+CAV+ rejected cardiac allografts and multiplex-immunofluorescent staining illustrated the expression of CD68+CD206+CD163+MMP9+ M2 macrophages within the neointima of CAV-affected lesions. These findings reveal a novel mechanism linking HLA I antibody-activated endothelium to the generation of M2 macrophages which secrete vascular remodeling proteins contributing to AMR and CAV pathogenesis.

Differentiating patient characteristics between platelet refractory patients with and without antibodies to human leukocyte antigens.

BACKGROUND: Predicting whether a patient's platelet refractoriness (PR) is due to immune or nonimmune causes can be challenging. This study compared the demographics and clinical history of PR patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (HLA-PR) versus PR patients without HLA antibodies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with PR consults at a single institution over a 3-year period was performed. Patient charts were reviewed for all patients with confirmed PR, and demographic information (e.g., sex, race and ethnicity, preferred language) and clinical history (e.g., pregnancy, transfusion, primary diagnosis) were collected. Patient characteristics were compared among the HLA and non-HLA cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 295 patients with confirmed PR were identified, of whom approximately 70% did not have HLA antibodies and 30% did. Approximately 84% of the HLA-PR cohort was female. A history of transfusions was not associated with HLA-PR (p = .1). A history of pregnancy was strongly associated with the occurrence of HLA-PR (p < .001). Splenomegaly was associated with PR in the absence of HLA alloimmunization whereas infection, fever, bleeding, and disseminated intravascular coagulation were not. CONCLUSION: In this single-institution retrospective review, a history of pregnancy was strongly associated with HLA-PR, whereas a history of transfusion was not.

Virtual platelet cross-matching as transfusion management for patients with immune platelet refractoriness.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study describes the use of the Epvix platform for virtual cross-matching (VC) of human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-compatible platelets for patients with immune platelet refractoriness, and demonstrates effectiveness of the selected platelets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort of haematological patients was evaluated from 2018 to 2022. HLA-typed donor bank profile was previously uploaded to the Epvix platform. Each patient's antibody reactivity panel (PRA) was included in the platform. Then, search, selection and VC were performed, and 24-h-corrected count increment (CCI) platelet transfusion was calculated (reference ≥2500). RESULTS: Six patients were included (four female, two male), with mean age of 61 years. HLA antibodies were detected as the cause of immunity for all patients, whereas four patients also had non-immune causes. High percentage of alloimmunization was detected in all studied patients (mean PRA: 85.7%). Thirty different donors were able to schedule and perform platelet donations. The mean 24-h CCI count was 9882. All platelet transfusions achieved a satisfactory CCI count except for two transfusion events. Presence of non-immune causes identified in these two cases could account for the unsatisfactory CCI. CONCLUSION: Epvix is a free application hosted on the Web and uses the HLAMatchmaker algorithm to generate histocompatibility reports. This study demonstrates the efficiency of VC performed by Epvix. However, physical cross-matching will still be necessary in some instances, as the platform does not support human platelet antigen polymorphism.

Does bortezomib influence pre-transplant desensitization therapy or benefit post-heart transplant outcomes for highly sensitized patients?

BACKGROUND: The use of bortezomib which is a proteasome inhibitor has been demonstrated to be efficacious in small number of patients as a desensitization strategy in heart transplant. We reviewed our single center's experience using Bortezomib along with plasmapheresis as desensitization therapy for highly sensitized patients to assess pre- and post-transplant outcomes. METHOD: We assessed 43 highly sensitized patients awaiting HTx (defined as cPRA > 50%) between 2010 and 2021 who underwent desensitization therapy with bortezomib. Only those patients who subsequently underwent HTx were included in this study. Enrolled patients received up to four doses of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 ) over 2 weeks in conjunction with plasmapheresis. The efficacy of PP/BTZ was assessed by comparing the calculated panel reactive antibodies to HLA class I or class II antigens. Post-transplant outcomes including overall survival and incidence of rejection were compared to those of non-sensitized patients (PRA < 10%, n = 649) from the same center. RESULTS: The average cPRA prior to PP/BTZ was 94.5%. Post-PP/BTZ there was no statistically significant decline in mean cPRA, class I cPRA, or class II cPRA, though the average percentage decrease in class I cPRA (8.7 ± 17.0%) was higher than the change in class II cPRA (4.4 ± 13.3%). Resulted were also replicated with C1q-binding antibodies showing more effect on I class compared to class II (15.0 ± 37.4% vs. 6.8 ± 33.6%) as well as with 1:8 dilutional assay (14.0 ± 23.0% vs. 9.1 ± 34.9%). Additionally, PP/BTZ treated patients and the control group of non-sensitized patients had similar overall 1 year survival (95.4 vs. 92.5%) but patients with PP/BTZ had increased incidence of AMR (79.1% vs. 97.1%, p = < .001), any treated rejection (62.8% vs. 86.7%, p = < .001) and de novo DSA development (81.4% vs. 92.5%, p = .007). Major side effects of PP/BTZ included thrombocytopenia (42%), infection requiring antibiotics (28%), and neuropathy (12%). CONCLUSION: The use of bortezomib in highly sensitized patients does not significantly lower circulating antibodies prior to heart transplantation. However, its use may improve the chances of obtaining an immuno-compatible donor heart and contribute to acceptable post-transplant outcomes.

Intravenous Immunoglobulins Alone for the Desensitization of Lung Transplant Recipients with Preformed Donor Specific Antibodies and Negative Flow Cytometry Crossmatch.

BACKGROUND: The lack of evidence regarding optimal desensitization strategies for lung transplant candidates with preformed donor specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs) has led to varying approaches among centers towards this patient group. Our institution's desensitization protocol for recipients with preformed DSAs and negative flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) consists of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as the sole therapy. The study aimed to determine outcomes using this approach. METHODS: This retrospective study included adults who underwent lung-only transplantation for the first time between January 2015 and March 2022 at a single center. We excluded patients with positive or missing FCXM results. Transplant recipients with any DSA ≥ 1000 MFI on latest testing within three months of transplant were considered DSA-positive, while recipients with DSAs <1000 MFI and those without DSAs were assigned to the low-level/negative group. Graft survival (time to death/retransplantation) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free times were compared between groups using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Thirty-six out of 167 eligible patients (22%) were DSA-positive. At least 50% of preformed DSAs had documented clearance (decrease to <1000 MFI) within the first 6 months of transplant. Multivariable Cox regression analyses did not detect a significantly increased risk of graft failure (aHR 1.04 95%CI 0.55-1.97) or chronic lung allograft dysfunction (aHR 0.71 95%CI 0.34-1.52) in DSA-positive patients compared to patients with low-level/negative DSAs. Incidences of antibody-mediated rejection (p = 1.00) and serious thromboembolic events (p = 0.63) did not differ between study groups. CONCLUSION: We describe a single-center experience of administering IVIG alone to lung transplant recipients with preformed DSAs and negative FCXM. Further studies are required to confirm the efficacy of this strategy against other protocols.

Effects of invivo CXCR4 blockade and proteasome inhibition on bone marrow plasma cells in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates.

To date, plasma cell (PC)-targeted therapies have been limited by suboptimal PC depletion and antibody rebound. We hypothesized this is partly because of PC residence in protective bone marrow (BM) microenvironments. The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to examine the effects of the CXCR4 antagonist, plerixafor, on PC BM residence; its safety profile (alone and in combination with a proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib); and the transcriptional effect on BMPCs in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Participants were enrolled into 3 groups: group A (n = 4), plerixafor monotherapy; and groups B (n = 4) and C (n = 4), plerixafor and bortezomib combinations. CD34+ stem cell and PC levels increased in the blood after plerixafor treatment. PC recovery from BM aspirates varied depending on the dose of plerixafor and bortezomib. Single-cell RNA sequencing on BMPCs from 3 group C participants pretreatment and posttreatment revealed multiple populations of PCs, with a posttreatment enrichment of oxidative phosphorylation, proteasome assembly, cytoplasmic translation, and autophagy-related genes. Murine studies demonstrated dually inhibiting the proteasome and autophagy resulted in greater BMPC death than did monotherapies. In conclusion, this pilot study revealed anticipated effects of combined plerixafor and bortezomib on BMPCs, an acceptable safety profile, and suggests the potential for autophagy inhibitors in desensitization regimens.

Luminex Crossmatch in kidney transplantation.

The introduction of the Luminex Crossmatch assay (LumXm) which uses Luminex bead technology, consists of extracting the donor's Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) molecules from their lymphocytes, and binding them to fluorescent beads that are put in contact with recipient's serum. HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are detected using a fluorescent conjugate. The goal of our study is to determine the benefits of using LumXm in a renal transplantation algorithm. We tested 78 recipients' sera using the LumXm, and the results were compared with the Luminex single antigen bead assay (SAB) for all sera, as well as the Flow Cytometry Crossmatch (FCXM) for 46 sera. We compared our results with those of SAB using 3 cutoffs, the first being the manufacturer's criteria where sensitivity and specificity were at 62.5% and 91.3% respectively for HLA class 1, and 88.5% and 50.0% respectively for HLA class 2. When using the third cutoff criteria (≥2 Adjusted values + MFI [Mean fluorescence intensity] >500 + Neg MFI < 500), the sensitivity increased to 69.0% for HLA class 1 and decreased to 84.0% for HLA class 2, while the specificity increased for HLA class 1 and 2. When comparing with FCXM, the 3 assays agreed in 55.8% of results for class 1 and 2 alike. However, major discrepancies were found for two groups in HLA class 1 and one in HLA class 2. The LumXm when used with other techniques to overcome its' weak points, can provide an interesting insight into the patient's HLA-DSA profile.

Adverse effect of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies directed at HLA-DP/-DQ on engraftment in cord blood transplantation.

BACKGROUND AIMS: While donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) in the recipient before transplantation are associated with graft failure in cord-blood transplantation (CBT), effects of DSAs other than against HLA-A, -B or -DRB1 on transplantation outcomes remained poorly understood. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 567 single-unit CBT recipients to evaluate impact of DSAs against HLA-DP and -DQ on CBT outcomes. RESULTS: Among 143 recipients (25.2%) who had anti-HLA antibodies, nine harbored DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ. DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ were associated with a significantly lower neutrophil engraftment rate (55.6% versus 91.8%, P = 0.032) and with a marginally lower platelet engraftment rate (46.7% versus 75.3%, P = 0.128) at day 100 after transplantation, compared with patients without anti-HLA antibodies. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in patients with DSAs for HLA-DP or -DQ was significantly longer than that in patients without anti-HLA antibodies (median, 25 versus 21 days, P = 0.002 in neutrophil; median 61 versus 46 days, P = 0.014 in platelet). Cumulative incidence of bacterial infection at day 100 was significantly greater (88.9% versus 57.1%, P = 0.024), and re-transplant-free survival was marginally lower (55.6% versus 76.8%, P = 0.132) in patients with DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ, compared with those without anti-HLA antibodies. These findings suggest that DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ lead to unfavorable engraftment, which may increase risk of bacterial infection, and reduce survival soon after CBT. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the importance of evaluating DSAs against HLA-DP and -DQ in recipients before selecting CB units.

The Clinical Utility of Post-Transplant Monitoring of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients: A Consensus Report With Guideline Statements for Clinical Practice.

Solid phase immunoassays improved the detection and determination of the antigen-specificity of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The widespread use of SPI in kidney transplantation also introduced new clinical dilemmas, such as whether patients should be monitored for DSA pre- or post-transplantation. Pretransplant screening through SPI has become standard practice and DSA are readily determined in case of suspected rejection. However, DSA monitoring in recipients with stable graft function has not been universally established as standard of care. This may be related to uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of DSA monitoring as a screening tool. This consensus report aims to appraise the clinical utility of DSA monitoring in recipients without overt signs of graft dysfunction, using the Wilson & Junger criteria for assessing the validity of a screening practice. To assess the evidence on DSA monitoring, the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated workgroup, comprised of experts in transplantation nephrology and immunology, to review relevant literature. Guidelines and statements were developed during a consensus conference by Delphi methodology that took place in person in November 2022 in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the workgroup on subclinical DSA monitoring are presented in this article.

Additional Benefits of Rituximab and Plasma Exchange on Top of Standard Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients With a Negative CDC Crossmatch but High Preformed Donor Specific Antibody Titer.

Optimal induction strategy in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is still a matter of debate. The place of therapies, such as plasma exchange and rituximab, with potential side effects and high cost, is not clearly established. We compared two induction strategies with (intensive) or without (standard) rituximab and plasma exchange in KTRs with high levels of preformed DSA transplanted between 2012 and 2019. Sixty KTRs with a mean age of 52.2 ± 12.2 years were included, 36 receiving standard and 24 intensive induction. Mean fluorescence intensity of immunodominant DSA in the cohort was 8,903 ± 5,469 pre-transplantation and similar in both groups. DSA level decrease was similar at 3 and 12 months after transplantation in the two groups. An intensive induction strategy was not associated with better graft or patient survival, nor more infectious complications. The proportion of patients with rejection during the first year was similar (33% in each group), but rejection occurred later in the intensive group (211 ± 188 days, vs. 79 ± 158 days in the standard group, p < 0.01). Our study suggests that an intensive induction therapy including rituximab and plasma exchanges in highly sensitized kidney recipients is not associated with better graft survival but may delay biopsy-proven rejection.

Low incidence of de novo HLA antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination: A cohort study of patients awaiting kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Antibodies against human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA Abs) are associated with an increased risk of allograft loss. Herein, we report the prospective follow-up for anti-HLA Abs formation in 103 patients with end-stage kidney disease on the waiting list for transplantation who underwent COVID-19 vaccination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sera were tested before and after vaccination using Luminex technology. The cohort comprised of 62 males and 41 females with a mean age of 56 ± 14 years. The patients received BNT162b2 (80.4%), mRNA-1273 (18.5%), AZD1222 (0.40%), or ChAdOx1-S (0.80%) vaccine. Patients were tested before and within 119 ± 50, 95 ± 46 and 25 ± 26 days after the first, second, and third dose of the vaccine, respectively. RESULTS: No significant change in calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) after vaccination was seen. Although 98.1% of patients had no change in anti-HLA Abs profile or cPRA after vaccination, two patients (1.9%) developed de novo anti-HLA Abs against class I or II HLA antigens. In those two patients, the cPRA changed from 0% and 63% at baseline to 9% and 90% after vaccination, respectively. Both patients received the BNT162b2 mRNA-based vaccine. The earliest detected anti-HLA Abs was 18 days after the first dose. CONCLUSION: In rare cases, new anti-HLA antibodies were observed after COVID-19 vaccination, with potential implications for transplantation. The low incidence of this phenomenon is outweighed by the clinical benefits of vaccination.

DETERMINATION OF THE PRA POSITIVITY PERCENTAGE IN MALE PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE BY USING FLOW CYTOMETRY TECHNIQUE.

The antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules, which play a crucial role in allograft histocompatibility, are called anti-HLA antibodies. Anti-HLA antibodies against foreign HLA molecules may be present in patients with chronic kidney disease even before transplantation. The panel reactive antibody (PRA) test is used to measure the renal transplant candidate's immune sensitivity to HLA molecules other than their own HLA molecules by assessing the diversity of anti-HLA antibodies in the blood of these patients. This study aimed to determine the PRA values and the percentage of PRA positivity of Turkish male patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), who had not been sensitized by the major known causes (those with no history of organ or tissue transplantation, those with no history of blood transfusion), who had not been diagnosed with any autoimmune diseases, and who had not been under immunosuppressive treatment. The study included 60 male patients aged over 18 years. All of the patients were followed up with a diagnosis of CKD at the Nephrology Clinic, Internal Medicine Department, Akdeniz University Medical Faculty Hospital. None of the patients included in the study was sensitized by a known mechanism previously (they did not have blood transfusion or organ transplantation). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) levels of all patients were below the level of 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patient data including their age information, etiology of CKD, accompanying diseases, and information about dialysis modalities were recorded. HLA antibody percentage was determined by the flow cytometry technique. Statistical data analysis was performed by using SPSS 22.0 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Version 22.0). The values of p less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Twenty patients were receiving dialysis treatment due to end-stage renal disease. Of the 60 patients included in the study, 25% showed PRA positivity; 28.3% of all study patients were found to be positive for anti-HLA class I antibodies and 26.7% of all study patients were found to be positive for anti-HLA class II antibodies on separate analysis for anti-HLA class I and anti-HLA class II antibody positivity. When the patients were categorized as PRA negative and PRA positive in two groups, there were no differences between the groups according to mean age, percentage of hemodialysis patients, percentage of peritoneal dialysis patients and presence of accompanying chronic diseases (such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, nephrolithiasis, coronary artery disease). In addition to this, evaluation of the GFR levels showed that the PRA positive group contained a significantly higher percentage of end-stage renal disease patients (GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2) as compared with the PRA negative group. Detailed analysis of the percentages of PRA levels in the PRA positive patients, which was carried out to determine the degree of sensitization, showed that the PRA values were over 80% in 11.77% of the patients positive for anti-HLA class I antibodies. On the other hand, PRA values were within the range of 15%-80% in 88.23% of the patients who had anti-HLA class II antibodies. The PRA values were below 80% in all of the patients positive for anti-HLA class II antibodies and those positive for both anti-HLA class I and class II antibodies. In conclusion, PRA levels of the candidates for kidney transplantation should always be measured to assess their state of sensitization before transplantation, even though they have no risk factors known to cause anti-HLA antibody development.

Non-HLA antibodies targeting angiotensin II Type 1 receptor and endothelin-1 Type A receptors induce endothelial injury via ß2-arrestin link to mTOR pathway.

Functional non-HLA antibodies (antibodies to non-human leukocyte antigens) targeting the G protein-coupled receptors angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and endothelin-1 type A receptor (ETAR) are implicated in the pathogenesis of transplant vasculopathy. While ERK signaling (a regulator of cell growth) may represent a general cellular response to agonist stimulation, the molecular link between receptor stimulation and development of vascular obliteration has not been fully established. Here we hypothesize involvement of the versatile adaptor proteins, ß-arrestins, and the major regulator of cell growth, PI3K/mTOR signaling, in impaired endothelial repair. To test this, human microvascular endothelial cells were treated with AT1R/ETAR antibodies isolated from patients with kidney transplant vasculopathy. These antibodies activated both mTOR complexes via AT1R and ETAR in a PI3K-dependent and ERK-independent manner. The mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin, completely abolished activation of mTORC1 and mTORC2 after long-term treatment with receptor antibodies. Imaging studies revealed that ß2- but not ß1-arrestin was recruited to ETAR in response to ET-1 and patient antibodies but not with antibodies isolated from healthy individuals. Silencing of ß2-arrestin by siRNA transfection significantly reduced ERK1/2 and mTORC2 activation. Non-HLA antibodies impaired endothelial repair by AT1R- and ETAR-induced mTORC2 signaling. Thus, we provide evidence that functional AT1R/ETAR antibodies induce ERK1/2 and mTOR signaling involving ß2-arrestin in human microvascular endothelium. Hence, our data may provide a translational rationale for mTOR inhibitors in combination with receptor blockers in patients with non-HLA receptor recognizing antibodies.

Association of Predicted HLA T-Cell Epitope Targets and T-Cell-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The relationship between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecular mismatches and T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is unknown. We investigated the associations between the different donor HLA-derived T-cell targets and the occurrence of TCMR and borderline histologic changes suggestive of TCMR after kidney transplantation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: All kidney transplant recipients at a single center between 2004 and 2013 with available biopsy data and a DNA sample for high-resolution HLA donor/recipient typing (N = 893). EXPOSURE: Scores calculated by the HLA matching algorithm PIRCHE-II and HLA eplet mismatches. OUTCOME: TCMR, borderline changes suggestive of TCMR, and allograft failure. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Multivariable cause-specific hazards models were fit to characterize the association between HLA epitopes targets and study outcomes. RESULTS: We found 277 patients developed TCMR, and 134 developed only borderline changes suggestive of TCMR on at least 1 biopsy. In multivariable analyses, only the PIRCHE-II scores for HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 were independently associated with the occurrence of TCMR and with allograft failure; this was not the case for HLA class I molecules. If restricted to rejection episodes within the first 3 months after transplantation, only the T-cell epitope targets originating from the donor's HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1, but not class I molecules, were associated with the early acute TCMR. Also, the median PIRCHE-II score for HLA class II was statistically different between the patients with TCMR compared to the patients without TCMR (129 [IQR, 60-240] vs 201 [IQR, 96-298], respectively; P < 0.0001). These differences were not observed for class I PIRCHE-II scores. LIMITATIONS: Observational clinical data and residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of HLA-DSA, HLA class II but not class I mismatches are associated with early episodes of acute TCMR and allograft failure. This suggests that current immunosuppressive therapies are largely able to abort the most deleterious HLA class I-directed alloimmune processes; however, alloresponses against HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 molecular mismatches remain insufficiently suppressed. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Genetic differences in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex between kidney transplant donors and recipients play a central role in T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), which can lead to failure of the transplanted kidney. Evaluating this genetic disparity (mismatch) in the HLA complex at the molecular (epitope) level could contribute to better prediction of the immune response to the donor organ posttransplantation. We investigated the associations of the different donor HLA-derived T-cell epitope targets and scores obtained from virtual crossmatch algorithms with the occurrence of TCMR, borderline TCMR, and graft failure after kidney transplantation after taking into account the influence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. This study illustrates the greater importance of the molecular mismatches in class II molecules compared to class I HLA molecules.

Successful desensitization of high level donor-specific anti-HLA antibody in patients with hematological diseases receiving haploidentical allografts.

Donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (DSA) is associated with a higher incidence of graft failure and mortality in HLA-mismatched allograft settings. However, the optimal protocol of desensitization for patients with positive DSA remains uncertain. We investigated the effectiveness of a desensitization protocol, including rituximab, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and a single session of plasma exchange (PE), for haploidentical allograft recipients with a high mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) level of DSA (≥ 5,000). Eleven patients with hematological disease who had positive DSA (median, 11,676, range 5387-20,435) were desensitized by the protocol. All of the patients achieved hematopoietic recovery. The median times for neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 13 (range, 11-26) days and 19 (range, 11-90) days, respectively. Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was seen in one patient and was controlled completely. Chronic cutaneous GVHD was seen in eight patients. Nine patients are alive with good performance so far. One patient suffered extramedullary relapse, and one patient died of transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. The 1-year probability of overall survival was 81.8%. These results suggest that successful desensitization could be obtained by a combination of rituximab, high-dose IVIG, and PE for haploidentical allograft recipients with high MFI levels of DSA.

Effect of anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies on the outcomes of kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) have been recognized as non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies associated with allograft rejection and poor allograft outcomes after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess the risk anti-AT1R-Abs pose for rejection and graft loss among kidney transplant (KT) populations. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles published from inception until June 2021 to identify all studies concerning the role AT1R-Abs play in the clinical outcome after kidney transplantation. Two reviewers independently identified studies, abstracted outcome data and assessed the quality of the studies. The meta-analysis was summarized using fixed-effects or random-effects models, according to heterogeneity. The major outcomes included delayed graft function, acute rejection, graft loss or patient death after transplantation. RESULTS: Twenty-one eligible studies involving a total of 4023 KT recipients were included in the evaluation. Meta-analysis results showed that the AT1R-Ab-positive KT group had a greater incidence of antibody-mediated rejection {relative risk [RR] 1.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-2.33]; P < 0.00001} and graft loss [RR 2.37 (95% CI 1.50-3.75); P = 0.0002] than did the AT1R-Abs-negative KT group. There was no significant statistical difference in delayed graft function rate, T-cell-mediated rejection, mixed rejection, acute cellular rejection, acute rejection and patient death rate between the AT1R-Ab-positive KT and AT1R-Ab-negative KT groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the presence of anti-AT1R-Abs was associated with a significantly higher risk of antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss in kidney transplantation. Future studies are still needed to evaluate the importance of routine anti-AT1R monitoring and therapeutic targeting. These results show that assessment of anti-AT1R-Abs would be helpful in determining immunologic risk and susceptibility to immunologic events for recipients.

SARS-COV-2 Triggers the Development of Class I and Class II HLA Antibodies in Recovered Convalescent Plasma Donors.

Various studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 is a highly immunogenic virus. It is known that different types of immunogenic viral pathogens could trigger the formation of HLA antibodies. Therefore, there is a concern that the SARS-CoV-2 could also induce the development of HLA antibodies in volunteers, who donate convalescent plasma after their recovery from COVID-19. HLA antibodies have been identified as the main cause for transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), a well-documented life-threatening complication of transfusions. The TRALI risk could be high in COVID-19 patients who need convalescent plasma, as such patients usually have already an impaired respiratory system affected by the SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this study, we screened 34 convalescent plasma donors on the presence of antibodies against HLA class I and II antigens. All included donors have no any history of sensitization events such as blood transfusions, pregnancy, or previous transplants. We found a high rate of HLA antibody formation in convalescent plasma donors. The frequency of positivity for HLA antibodies for class I, class II, class I and II, and the overall reactivity was 23%, 31%, 46%, and 76%, respectively. The presented data suggest a closed correlation between SARS-CoV-2 virus infection and the development of HLA antibodies in recovered convalescent plasma donors. This finding might have the potential to reduce the risk of TRALI and mortality rate in COVID-19 patients by implementing HLA diagnostic strategies before the administration of convalescent plasma.

European Guideline for the Management of Kidney Transplant Patients With HLA Antibodies: By the European Society for Organ Transplantation Working Group.

This guideline, from a European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) working group, concerns the management of kidney transplant patients with HLA antibodies. Sensitization should be defined using a virtual parameter such as calculated Reaction Frequency (cRF), which assesses HLA antibodies derived from the actual organ donor population. Highly sensitized patients should be prioritized in kidney allocation schemes and linking allocation schemes may increase opportunities. The use of the ENGAGE 5 ((Bestard et al., Transpl Int, 2021, 34: 1005-1018) system and online calculators for assessing risk is recommended. The Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch program should be extended. If strategies for finding a compatible kidney are very unlikely to yield a transplant, desensitization may be considered and should be performed with plasma exchange or immunoadsorption, supplemented with IViG and/or anti-CD20 antibody. Newer therapies, such as imlifidase, may offer alternatives. Few studies compare HLA incompatible transplantation with remaining on the waiting list, and comparisons of morbidity or quality of life do not exist. Kidney paired exchange programs (KEP) should be more widely used and should include unspecified and deceased donors, as well as compatible living donor pairs. The use of a KEP is preferred to desensitization, but highly sensitized patients should not be left on a KEP list indefinitely if the option of a direct incompatible transplant exists.

Frequency, reactivity and evolution of human leukocyte antigen and human platelet antigen antibodies in the setting of hematopoietic cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Antibodies (Ab) against HLA and HPA antigens play an important role in HCT. In this prospective study we evaluated prevalence and kinetics of HLA- and HPA-Ab after HCT, including a possible donor-recipient transfer and their clinical relevance in respect to platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were consecutively recruited. Ab were determined by microbead assay technique and a mean fluorescence intensity cut-off of 1,000. RESULTS: At baseline, 21 donors (42 %) and 27 patients (54 %) had HLA-Ab with a mean panel reactivity (cPRA) of 34.9 ± 29.4 % and 46.1 ± 36.5 %, respectively. We observed a significant higher number of HLA-Ab specificities in female donors and patients and a predominance of HLA-class I Ab. At day 0 we detected an increase of HLA-Ab (from 526 to 673) and cPRA (55.2 ± 31.9 %). Thirty-six patients (72 %) developed new HLA-Ab, mainly 3 weeks after HCT. In 7 patients an HLA-Ab with the same specificity as detected in the corresponding donor emerged, suggesting a possible transfer from the donor to the recipient. Overall, MFI showed a high variation. Type and number of transfusions were not associated with number and intensity of HLA-Ab (ρ: -0.05 - 0.02). Number of HLA-Ab, cPRA and intensity were not associated with PTR, which occurred in 9 patients (18 %) and none had bleeding WHO > 2. CONCLUSIONS: Although a considerable number of patients have and develop HLA-Ab before and early after HCT, we found no association with PTR and bleeding and management should be individualized.