Laparoscopic Heller-Dor myotomy in elderly achalasia patients: a single center experience with PSM analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder of unknown etiology. With the ageing of the general population, treatment in elderly patients has become increasingly common; however, the gold standard treatment in this population remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic Heller-Dor myotomy (LHM) in geriatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, consecutive achalasia patients undergoing LHM at the University Hospital 'Federico II' of Naples from November 2018 to November 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on their age at intervention: elderly (≥70 years) and younger (<70 years). The two study groups were compared by minimizing the different distribution of covariates through a propensity score matching analysis (PSM). RESULTS: In both populations, there was a significant improvement in terms of manometric parameters and symptoms after surgery. After applying one-on-one PSM, we obtained a total population of 48 achalasia patients divided into two groups (24 patients each). No significant differences were found in terms of demographic characteristics as well as preoperative and intraoperative variables between two groups. At 12 months from surgery, integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) was significantly lower in patients ≥ 70 years (p = 0.032), while younger patients scored significantly less at the post-operative Eckardt score (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic Heller-Dor myotomy is a safe and effective treatment even in elderly patients with rapid post-operative recovery, improvement of symptoms and manometric parameters.

Laparoscopic Heller-Dor is an effective long-term treatment for end-stage achalasia.

BACKGROUND: The end-stage achalasia is a difficult condition to treat, for the esophageal diameter and conformation of the gullet, that may progress to a sigmoid shape. The aim of this study was to examine the outcome of Laparoscopic Heller-Dor in patients with end-stage achalasia, comparing them with patients who had mega-esophagus without a sigmoid shape. METHODS: From 1992 to 2020, patients with a diagnosis of sigmoid esophagus, or radiological stage IV achalasia (the SE group), and patients with a straight esophagus larger than 6 cm in diameter, or radiological stage III achalasia (the NSE group), were all treated with LHD. The two groups were compared in terms of patients' symptoms, based on the Eckardt score, and on barium swallow, endoscopy and manometry performed before and after the treatment. The failure of the treatment was defined as an Eckardt score > 3, or the need for further treatment. RESULTS: The study involved 164 patients: 73 in the SE group and 91 in the NSE group. No intra- or postoperative mortality was recorded. The median follow-up was 51 months (IQR 25-107). The outcome was satisfactory in 71.2% of patients in the SE group, and in 89% of those in the NSE group (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: SE is certainly the worst condition of the disease and the final outcome of LHD, in term of symptom control, is inferior compared to NSE. Despite this, almost 3/4 of the SE patients experienced a significant relieve in symptoms after LHD, which may therefore still be the first surgical option to offer to these patients, before considering esophagectomy.

When is POEM truly equivalent to LHM? A comparison of complication rates during the learning curve.

INTRODUCTION: Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is an effective treatment for Esophageal Achalasia Cardia (EAC) but the endoscopic technique required is complex. As competency is crucial for patient safety, we believe that its' competency can be demonstrated when the complication rate equals that of an established procedure such as Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy with Fundoplication (LHM + F). METHODS: A multicentre, ambi-directional, non-randomized comparison of intra-procedural complications during the learning curve of POEM was performed against a historical cohort of LHM + F. Demographic, clinicopathological, procedural data and complications were collected. A direct head-to-head comparison was performed, followed by a population pyramid of complication frequency. Case sequence was then divided into blocks of 5, and the complication rates during each block was compared to the historical cohort. RESULTS: From January 2010 to April 2021, 60 patients underwent LHM + F and 63 underwent POEM. Mean age was lower for the POEM group (41.7 years vs 48.1 years, p = 0.03), but there was no difference in gender nor type of Achalasia. The POEM group recorded a shorter overall procedural time (125.9 min vs 144.1 min, p = 0.023) and longer myotomies (10.1 cm vs 6.2 cm, p = 0.023). The overall complication rate of POEM was 20.6%, whereas the historical cohort of LHM + F had a rate of 10.0%. On visual inspection of the population pyramid, complications were more frequent in the earlier procedures. On block sequencing, complication frequency could be seen tapering off dramatically after the 25th case, and subsequently equalled that of LHM + F. CONCLUSION: POEM is challenging even for experienced endoscopists. From our data, complication rates between POEM and LHM + F equalize after approximately 25 POEMs.

Is an objective evaluation essential for determining the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic surgery among patients with esophageal achalasia?

BACKGROUND: Despite a high degree of satisfaction with laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) for esophageal achalasia, some cases show no improvement in postoperative esophageal clearance. We investigated whether an objective evaluation is essential for determining the therapeutic effect of LHD. METHODS: We investigated the difference in symptoms, regarding esophageal clearance, using timed barium esophagogram (TBE), in 306 esophageal achalasia patients with high postoperative satisfaction who underwent LHD. Furthermore, these patients were divided into two groups, in accordance with the difference in postoperative esophageal clearance, in order to compare the preoperative pathophysiology, symptoms, and surgical results. RESULTS: Although the poor postoperative esophageal clearance group (117 cases, 38%) was mostly male and the ratio of Sigmoid type was high compared to the good postoperative esophageal clearance group (p = 0.046, p = 0.001, respectively); in patients with high surgical satisfaction, there was no difference in terms of preoperative symptom scores and surgical results. However, although the satisfaction level was high in the poor esophageal clearance group, the scores in terms of the postoperative dysphagia and vomiting were high (p = 0.0018 and p = 0.004, respectively). The AUC was 0.9842 upon ROC analysis regarding the presence or absence of clearance at 2 min following postoperative TBE and the postoperative feeling of difficulty swallowing score, with a cut-off value of 2 points (sensitivity: 88%, specificity: 100%) in cases with a high degree of surgical satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The esophageal clearance ability can be predicted by subjective evaluation, based on the postoperative symptom scores; so, an objective evaluation is not essential in cases with high surgical satisfaction.

Redo laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication versus rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia after failed Heller myotomy: a single-institution experience.

PURPOSE: To compare the surgical outcomes of redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure and rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with failed Heller myotomy. METHODS: We identified patients who had undergone redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure or rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy from August 1996 to September 2019 and assessed the patients' characteristics, timed barium swallow results, symptom scores before/after surgery, surgical outcomes, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure, and 14 underwent rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy. Blood loss (p = 0.001) and intraoperative complications rate (p = 0.003) were lower and the operative time (p > 0.001) and observation period (p = 0.009) shorter in patients who underwent rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy than in patients who underwent redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure. Patients who underwent rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy had a higher rate of postoperative reflux esophagitis (p = 0.033) than those who underwent redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure. After the interventions, the dysphagia symptoms were improved for both groups. Furthermore, both groups expressed satisfaction with their respective procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy was associated with better surgical outcomes than redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor for patients with failed Heller myotomy. However, rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy had higher rates of postoperative reflux esophagitis.

Needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure for achalasia: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the treatment results of needlescopic surgery with those of the conventional method for achalasia, using propensity score-matching. METHODS: Propensity score-matching was performed based on five factors: age, gender, body mass index, extended form, and maximum expansion diameter, to extract 28 cases each for a needlescopic group and a conventional group. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the needlescopic group and the conventional group, in operative time (165 min vs. 170 min, p = 0.682), estimated blood loss (both ≒ 0 ml, p = 0.426), or post-operative hospital stay (4 vs. 4 days, p = 0.248). Although the follow-up period was significantly longer in the conventional group (6 vs. 105 months, respectively; p < 0.001), there was no difference in the post-operative symptom scores for difficulty in swallowing and chest pain or the degree of satisfaction (p = 0.563, p = 0.142, p = 0.342, respectively). Furthermore, there was no difference in the post-operative clearance rate, with both groups found to be favorable (p = 0.758, p = 0.790, p = 1.000, p = 1.000, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The short-term results of needlescopic surgery for achalasia were good and equivalent to those of the conventional method.

Validation of new Japanese classification system for esophageal achalasia.

BACKGROUND: The fourth edition of New Japanese classification system for esophageal achalasia was revised after a long interval of 30 years in 2012. In this new system, achalasia is morphologically classified into 3 types, based on its X-ray findings. However, the system has been limitedly used in Japan and has not been fully validated in terms of its predictive capability of postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to clarify the validity of new Japanese classification system for esophageal achalasia, as an index of patient characteristics and as a predictor of operative and mid/long-term postoperative outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine cases of achalasia underwent laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery between 2005 and 2018. We evaluated retrospectively patient characteristics, intraoperative findings, esophageal manometry, 24-h pH monitoring and postoperative course. RESULTS: There were 34 St and 25 Sg/aSg cases. Age of St group was lower than Sg group. Preoperative duration of disease of St group was shorter than Sg. There were no differences in the results of surgical outcomes and prognoses. CONCLUSION: The new Japanese classification system may give additional insight and information in understanding epidemiology of esophageal achalasia; however, our study failed to demonstrate "inter-disease type" differences in surgical outcomes and prognoses.

Effects of laparoscopic myotomy on the esophageal motility pattern of esophageal achalasia as measured by high-resolution manometry.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal achalasia can be classified on the grounds of three distinct manometric patterns that correlate well with final outcome after laparoscopic Heller-Dor myotomy (LHM). No analytical data are available, however, on the postoperative picture and its possible correlation with final outcome. The aims of this study were: (a) to investigate whether manometric patterns change after LHM for achalasia; (b) to ascertain whether postoperative patterns and/or changes can predict final outcome; and (c) to test the hypothesis that the three known patterns represent different stages in the evolution of the disease. METHODS: During the study period, we prospectively enlisted 206 consecutive achalasia patients who were assessed using high-resolution manometry (HRM) before undergoing LHM. Symptoms were scored using a detailed questionnaire. Barium swallow, endoscopy and HRM were performed, before and again 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Preoperative HRM revealed the three known patterns with statistically different esophageal diameters (pattern I having the largest), and patients with pattern I had the highest symptom scores. The surgical treatment failed in 10 cases (4.9%). The only predictor of final outcome was the preoperative manometric pattern (p = 0.01). All patients with pattern I preoperatively had the same pattern afterward, whereas nearly 50% of patients with pattern III before LHM had patterns I or II after surgery. There were no cases showing the opposite trend. CONCLUSIONS: Neither a change of manometric pattern after surgery nor a patient's postoperative pattern was a predictor of final outcome, whereas preoperative pattern confirmed its prognostic significance. The three manometric patterns distinguishable in achalasia may represent different stages in the disease's evolution, pattern III and pattern I coinciding with the early and final stages of the disease, respectively.

Training model for laparoscopic Heller and Dor fundoplication: a tool for laparoscopic skills training and assessment-construct validity using the GOALS score.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic training demands practice. The transfer of laparoscopic skills from training models to real surgical procedures has been proven. The global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS) score is a 5-item global rating scale developed to evaluate laparoscopic skills by direct observation. This scale has been used to demonstrate construct validity of several laparoscopic training models. Here, we present a low-cost model of laparoscopic Heller-Dor for advanced laparoscopic training. The aim of this study was to determine the capability of a training model for laparoscopic Heller-Dor to discriminate between different levels of laparoscopic expertise. METHODS: The performance of two groups with different levels of expertise, novices (<30 laparoscopic procedures PGY1-2) and experts (>300 laparoscopic procedures PGY4-5) was assessed. All participants were instructed to perform two tasks (esophageal myotomy and fundoplication). All the performances were recorded in a digital format. A laparoscopic expert who was blinded to subject's identity evaluated the recordings using the GOALS score. Autonomy, one of the five items of GOALS, was removed since the evaluator and the trainee did not have interaction. The time required to finish each task was also recorded. Performance was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05 was significant). RESULTS: Twenty subjects were evaluated: ten in each group, using the GOALS score. The mean total GOALS score for novices was 7.5 points (SD: 1.64) and 13.9 points (SD: 1.66) for experts (p < 0.05).The expert group was superior in each domain of the GOALS score compared to novices: depth perception (mean: 3.3 vs 2 p < 0.05), bimanual dexterity (mean 3.4 vs 2.1 p < 0.05), efficiency (mean 3.4 vs 1.7 p < 0.05) and tissue handling (mean 3.6 vs 1.7 p < 0.05). With regard to time, experts were superior in task 1 (mean 9.7 vs 14.9 min p < 0.05) and task 2 (mean 24 vs 47.1 min p < 0.05) compared to novices. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic Heller-Dor training model has construct validity. The model may be used as a tool for training of the surgical resident.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first over 100 patients with short-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: POEM is a recently developed achalasia treatment method, which combines the efficacy of surgical myotomy with the benefits of endoscopic procedures. Very few studies have focussed on the efficacy and usefulness of POEM in over 100 cases. METHODS: The first 100 adult patients treated according to standard POEM technique in a single center and followed up for 3 months were identified and included in this study (men 42; women 58; mean age 48.2 ± 18.8; range 9-91 years) The pre- and postoperative assessments included Eckardt scores, manometry, endoscopy, and monitoring pH. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 150.8 ± 49.3 min (75-370 min). Adverse events over Grade IIIb by the Clavien-Dindo classification were not encountered. The mean preoperative and postoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressures were 43.6 ± 26.2 and 20.9 ± 12.7 mmHg, respectively, indicating a statistically significant decrease after POEM (P < 0.05). The mean preoperative and postoperative integrated relaxation pressure values were 33.5 ± 15.2 and 15.3 ± 6.5 mmHg (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the Eckardt score significantly decreased from 5.9 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 0.8 ± 0.9 postoperatively (P < 0.05). Clinical success was documented in 99 % of the patients. Short-term outcomes after POEM were extremely good and independent of the age, type of achalasia, and previous treatment method. The percent of monitoring time with a pH < 4 was 25.6 % (22/86) in patients not on proton-pump inhibitors. Nine patients were diagnosed with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); patients with reflux esophagitis and symptomatic GERD improved with PPI treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the efficacy of POEM in a large patient series and support POEM as one of the first-line achalasia therapies in the near future.

Shorter myotomy on the gastric site (≤2.5 cm) provides adequate relief of dysphagia in achalasia patients.

The right length of the myotomy on the gastric side for esophageal achalasia is still a debated issue. We aimed to investigate the final outcome after classic myotomy (CM) as compared with a longer myotomy on the gastric side (LM) in two cohorts of achalasia patients. Forty-four achalasia patients who underwent laparoscopic Heller-Dor were considered; patients with a sigmoid-shaped esophagus were excluded. Symptoms were scored using a detailed questionnaire for dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain. Barium swallow, endoscopy, and esophageal manometry were performed before and 6 months after the surgical treatment; 24-hour pH-monitoring was also performed 6 months after the procedure. CM was defined as a gastric myotomy length in the range of 1.5-2.0 cm, while LM was 2.5-3 cm in length. The surgical treatment (CM or LM) was adopted in two consecutive cohorts. Treatment failure was defined as a postoperative symptom score >10th percentile of the preoperative score (i.e. >8). Of the 44 patients representing the study population, 20 had CM and 24 had LM. The patients' demographic and clinical parameters (age, sex, symptom score, duration of symptoms, esophageal diameter, and manometric pattern) were similar in the two groups. The median follow up was 24 months (interquartile range 12-39). One patient in each group was classified as a treatment failure. After the treatment, there was a significant decrease in both groups' symptom score, and resting and residual pressure (P < 0.01), with no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative symptom score, resting and residual pressure, or total and abdominal lower esophageal sphincter length and esophageal diameter. Extending the length of the myotomy on the gastric side does not seem to change the final outcome of the laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure.

The esophageal pull-down technique improves the outcome of laparoscopic Heller-Dor myotomy in end-stage achalasia.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients with end-stage achalasia with a sigmoid-shaped esophagus is particularly challenging. A modified technique (pull-down technique) has been developed to straighten the esophageal axis, but only a limited number of studies on this topic are available in the literature. This study aimed to compare the outcome of patients who underwent the pull-down technique with that of patients who had a classical laparoscopic Heller-Dor (CLHD) myotomy. METHODS: All patients with a radiologic diagnosis of end-stage achalasia who underwent an LHD myotomy between 1995 and 2022 were considered eligible for the study. All patients underwent symptom score, barium swallow, endoscopy, and manometry tests before and after the procedure was performed. Treatment failure was defined as the persistence or reoccurrence of an Eckardt score (ES) of >3 or the need for retreatment. RESULTS: Of the 94 patients who were diagnosed with end-stage achalasia (male-to-female ratio of 52:42), 60 were treated with CLHD myotomy, and 34 were treated with the pull-down technique. Of note, 2 patients (2.1%), both belonging to the CLHD myotomy group, developed a squamous cell carcinoma during the follow-up. The overall success of LHD myotomy was seen in 76 of 92 patients (82.6%). All patients in both groups achieved a lower ES after surgery. The failure rates were 27.6% (16/58) in the CLHD myotomy group and 5.9% (2/34) in the pull-down technique group (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that LHD myotomy is an effective treatment of end-stage achalasia and that the pull-down technique further improves the outcome in patients with end-stage achalasia who are difficult to treat.

A case report of end-stage achalasia: Conservative option as the new surgical standard.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: End-stage achalasia is a rare disease, consisting of a functional impairment of the esophagus which becomes dilated with a sigmoid shape. While esophagectomy was considered for a long time as the principal surgical procedure in end-stage achalasia, recent literature results demonstrate that laparoscopic Heller Dor (LHD) could be an advocated alternative with acceptable functional results. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of an eighty-three-year-old male, an elderly patient, who had been complaining for one year of dysphagia and general status loss. Endoscopy, manometry then a barium X-ray confirmed end-stage achalasia. The patient had LHD with an improvement of symptomatology post-operatively. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Achalasia is a rare disease affecting oesophagal motility. The diagnosis is suggested clinically and confirmed by a wide range of tests notably esophagogastroduodenoscopy, barium swallow and manometry. The diagnosis of achalasia is classically made by demonstrating impaired relaxation of the lower oesophagal sphincter and absent peristalsis in the oesophagal manometry. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is made mainly to eliminate the diagnosis of oesophagal cancer. Barium swallow, however, is done to appreciate the impact of achalasia on the rest of the esophagus. CONCLUSION: Our case highlights the satisfying results after an LHD which is an alternative to esophagectomy especially in elderlies with high risk.

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication following an unsuccessful peroral endoscopic myotomy.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder that presents as dysphagia and severely affects quality of life. An esophageal myotomy has been the golden standard for treatment. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) as a first-line therapy has an acceptable outcome. However, after the clinical failure of POEM, appropriate second-line therapy is rather controversial. Here, we present the first published case in English of a patient who was successfully treated using laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with Dor fundoplication following an unsuccessful POEM. CASE PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old man with type 1 achalasia who had been previously treated with POEM visited our hospital for further treatment. After undergoing LHM with Dor fundoplication, his Eckardt score improved from 3 to 0 points. On a timed barium esophagogram (TBE), the barium height improved from 119 mm/119 mm (1 min/5 min) to 50 mm/45 mm. No significant complications have occurred postoperatively for 1 year. CONCLUSION: Treating refractory achalasia is challenging, and treatment options are controversial. LHM with Dor fundoplication after POEM could be a safe and efficient option for the treatment of refractory achalasia.

[Robotic-assisted laparoscopic Heller-Dor's cardiomyotomy and fundoplication for achalasia]. / Achalasia miatt végzett robotasszisztált laparoszkópos cardiomyotomia és fundoplicatio (Heller­Dor-mutét).

INTRODUCTION: The outcomes of surgical interventions for achalasia treatment improved with the advent of minimally invasive surgery. Robotic-assisted Heller-Dor's (RAHD) procedure established over the last years, provides important advantages to surgeons, such as binocular three-dimensional vision and improvement of fine motor control. METHOD: Between October and December of 2022, first in Hungary, 3 patients (37-year-old man, 55- and 72-year-old women) underwent RAHD procedure for achalasia at the Clinical Centre of the University of Pécs using the da Vinci Xi system. RESULTS: RAHD procedure was feasible without any particular problems and the postoperative course of all three patients was uneventful. The operation times were 198, 204 and 238 minutes, including 23, 19 and 14 minutes for the setup time of the robot. By the last patient, due to an accompanying hiatal hernia, an additional hiatal reconstruction was also performed. In the first 2 cases, the patients were discharged on the 4th postoperative day, while in the last case, with the additional hiatal reconstruction, the patient was emitted on the 6th postoperative day. DISCUSSION: There are several published studies about RAHD cardiomyotomy. The general conclusion is that, in experienced hands, RAHD procedure is easy to perform, ensures a meticulous esophageal and gastric myotomy, allowing to visualize and divide each muscle fiber with a significantly lower rate of mucosal perforations. However, by RAHD procedure, the overall costs are higher, including a longer operation time during the learning curve. At the same time, the avoidance of mucosal lacerations and their possible consequences has to be weighed against the higher overall costs. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cardiomyotomy is the first standard upper-gastrointestinal operation where a clear advantage of the use of a surgical robot has been proven. Thus, wherever this equipment is available, it should be preferred for this procedure. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(14): 542-547.

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and anterior Dor fundoplication for achalasia cardia in Malaysia: Clinical outcomes and satisfaction from four tertiary centers.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and satisfaction of patients following laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia cardia in four tertiary centers. METHODS: Fifty-five patients with achalasia cardia who underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy between 2010 and 2019 were enrolled. The adverse events and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Overall patient satisfaction was also reviewed. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 144.1 ± 38.33 min with no conversions to open surgery in this series. Intraoperative adverse events occurred in 7 (12.7%) patients including oesophageal mucosal perforation (n = 4), superficial liver injury (n = 1), minor bleeding from gastro-oesophageal fat pad (n = 1) & aspiration during induction requiring bronchoscopy (n = 1). Mean time to normal diet intake was 3.2 ± 2.20 days. Mean postoperative stay was 4.9 ± 4.30 days and majority of patients (n = 46; 83.6%) returned to normal daily activities within 2 weeks after surgery. The mean follow-up duration was 18.8 ± 13.56 months. Overall, clinical success (Eckardt ≤ 3) was achieved in all 55 (100%) patients, with significant improvements observed in all elements of the Eckardt score. Thirty-seven (67.3%) patients had complete resolution of dysphagia while the remaining 18 (32.7%) patients had some occasional dysphagia that was tolerable and did not require re-intervention. Nevertheless, all patients reported either very satisfied or satisfied and would recommend the procedure to another person. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and anterior Dor is both safe and effective as a definitive treatment for treating achalasia cardia. It does have a low rate of oesophageal perforation but overall has a high degree of patient satisfaction with minimal complications.

Laparoscopic Heller-Dor Is an Effective Treatment for Esophageal-Gastric Junction Outflow Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) currently mirrors that of achalasia, but this is based on only a few studies on small case series. The aim of this prospective, controlled study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic Heller-Dor (LHD) in patients with EGJOO, as compared with patients with esophageal achalasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2016 and 2019, patients with manometric diagnosis of idiopathic EGJOO and patients with radiological stage I achalasia, both treated with LHD, were compared. The achalasia group was further analyzed by subgrouping the patients based on the manometric pattern. Treatment failure was defined as the persistence or reoccurrence of an Eckardt score > 3 or the need for retreatment. RESULTS: During the study period, 150 patients were enrolled: 25 patients had EGJOO and 125 had radiological stage I achalasia (25 pattern I, 74 pattern II, and 26 pattern III). The median follow-up was 24 months (IQR: 34-16). Treatment was successful in 96% of patients in the EGJOO group and in 96% of achalasia patients with pattern I, 98.7% in those with pattern II, and 96.2% of those with pattern III (p=0.50). High-resolution manometry showed a reduction in the LES resting pressure and integrated relaxation pressure for all patients in all 4 groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first comparative study based on prospective data collection to assess the outcome of LHD in patients with EGJOO. LHD emerged as an effective treatment for EGJOO, with an excellent success rate, comparable with the procedure's efficacy in treating early-stage achalasia.

Robotic Heller-Dor for Idiopathic Achalasia: the Pisa experience.

Achalasia is a rare motility disorder of the esophagus. According to the Chicago Classification criteria, there are three clinical types of Achalasia and the treatment is patient-tailored. Laparoscopic Heller-Dor is the gold-standard treatment for the most frequent types of Achalasia. However, robotic surgery is able to combine the clinical advantages of minimally invasive surgery with a powerful dexterity on complex anatomic structures. The aim of this study is to report the institutional experience developed in a referral center of esophageal surgery in the treatment of Achalasia by Robotic Heller-Dor. We retrospectively analyzed data of patients that consecutively underwent Robotic Heller-Dor at our institution between January 2012 and January 2020 using the Da Vinci® Surgical System. Sixty-nine patients underwent Robotic Heller-Dor. Among the patients, 35 (51%) were classified as type I, 29 (42%) as type II, and 5 (7%) as type III. The Da Vinci® SI HD Surgical System and the Da Vinci® XI HD Surgical System were used in 56 (81%) and 13 (19%) patients, respectively. No mucosal perforation was observed and post-operative mortality was absent. The mean follow-up was 23.3 months (6-84). Ten patients (14.5%) reported post-operative complaints. In our opinion, Robotic Heller-Dor is an effective tool in the treatment of Achalasia. Robotic Heller-Dor may be a suitable procedure for learning and teaching robotic surgery in the perspective of pursing more complex esophago-gastric surgical procedures.

Extending Myotomy Both Downward and Upward Improves the Final Outcome in Manometric Pattern III Achalasia Patients.

Background: Achalasia is currently classified in three manometric patterns. Pattern III is the least common pattern, and reportedly correlated with the worst outcome after all available treatments. We aimed to investigate the final outcome in pattern III achalasia patients after classic laparoscopic myotomy (CLM) as compared with a myotomy lengthened both downward and upward (long laparoscopic myotomy [LLM]). Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 61 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of pattern III achalasia who underwent laparoscopic myotomy between 1997 and 2017. In CLM the total length of the myotomy was ≤9 cm, whereas myotomies extending both downward and upward to a length >9 cm were defined as LLM. Results: Of the 61 patients considered, 24 had CLM and 37 had LLM. The postoperative improvement in symptom score differed between the two groups: it dropped from 22 (17-26) to 4 (0-8) in the CLM group and from 20 (17-24) to 3 (0-6) in the LLM group (P < .001). There were 8 of 24 failures (33.3%) in the former group and 4 of 37 (10.8%) in the latter group (P < .05). An abnormal acid exposure was detected after the treatment of CLM in 4 patients and after the treatment of LLM in 3 patients (P = n.s.). Conclusions: Although with the intrinsic limitations of this study (retrospective, different time windows of the two procedures, and different lengths of follow-up), the results indicate that extending the myotomy both downward and upward improves the final outcome of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery in pattern III achalasia patients. A longer myotomy does not affect any onset of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux.

Poem Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy in the Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia: A Case-Control Study from Two High Volume Centers Using the Propensity Score.

BACKGROUND: POEM has recently had a widespread diffusion, aiming at being the treatment of choice for esophageal achalasia. The results of ongoing RCTs against laparoscopic myotomy are not available, yet. We, therefore, designed this propensity score (PS) case-control study with the aim of evaluating how POEM compares to the long-standing laparoscopic Heller myotomy + Dor fundoplication (LHD) and verifying if it may really replace the latter as the first-line treatment for achalasia. METHODS: Two groups of consecutive patients undergoing treatment for primary achalasia from January 2014 to November 2017 were recruited in two high-volume centers, one with extensive experience with POEM and one with LHD. Patients with previous endoscopic treatment were included, whereas patients with previous LHD or POEM were excluded. A total of 140 patients in both centers were thus matched. LHD and POEM were performed following established techniques. The patients were followed with clinical (Eckardt score), endoscopic, and pH-manometry evaluations. RESULTS: The procedure was successfully completed in all the patients. POEM required a shorter operation time and postoperative stay compared to LHD (p < 0.001). No mortality was recorded in either group. Seven complications were recorded in the POEM group (five mucosal perforations) and 3 in the LHD group (3 mucosal perforations)(p = 0.33). Two patients in the POEM group and one in the LHD were lost to follow-up. One patient in both groups died during the follow-up for unrelated causes. At a median follow-up of 24 months [15-30] for POEM and 31 months [15-41] for LHD (p < 0.05), 99.3% of the POEM patients and 97.7% of the LHD patients showed an Eckardt score ≤ 3 (p < 0.12). Four years after the treatment, the probability to have symptoms adequately controlled was > 90% for both groups (p = 0.2, Log-rank test). HR-Manometry showed a similar reduction in the LES pressure and 4sIRP; 24-h pH-monitoring showed however an abnormal exposure to acid in 38.4% of POEM patients, as compared to 17.1% of LHD patients (p < 0.01) and esophagitis was found in 37.4% of the POEM and 15.2% of LHD patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: POEM provides the same midterm results as LHD. This study confirms, however, a higher incidence of postoperative GERD with the former, even if its real significance needs to be further evaluated.