Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 21(12): 1819-1830, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36178008

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Two vaccine formulations are available to prevent diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and poliomyelitis: the pediatric full-dose (DTaP-IPV) and the reduced dose formulation (dTap-IPV). Different immunization schedules are internationally recommended for the pre-school booster dose. AREAS COVERED: International and Italian recommendations, scientific evidence on immunogenicity and safety of DTaP/dTap vaccines to support the full dose as a pre-school booster and Italian vaccination coverage (VC) up to adolescence. EXPERT OPINION: The WHO recommends a '3+1' schedule with DTaP vaccine for primary immunization, followed by a pre-school booster with DTaP or dTap vaccine. In Italy, a '2+1' schedule, with no booster in the second year, and a pre-school booster dose are recommended with DTPa-IPV vaccines. Studies showed a non-inferior immunogenicity in dTap vaccinees in pre-school age; nevertheless, the antibody titers were usually greater in children vaccinated with DTaP, while lower frequencies of adverse events were recorded in children receiving dTap. Italian VCs for pre-school and adolescent boosters have not been satisfactory, which further reduced during the COVID-19 period. In Italy, the pre-school booster offers the last chance to receive a full dose of DTaP vaccine, thus, representing the most suitable intervention to provide lasting protection in children.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular , Vacunas contra Haemophilus , Adolescente , Preescolar , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados , Inmunización Secundaria , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina , Vacunación , Vacunas Combinadas
2.
Vaccine ; 35(4): 619-625, 2017 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28017441

RESUMEN

Extensive limb swelling (ESL) after a booster dose of acellular pertussis (aP) containing vaccine can cause concern and has the potential to be confused with cellulitis. In the United Kingdom aP-containing vaccine was introduced for primary immunisation at 2, 3 and 4months of age in 2004, with the first cohorts eligible to receive a fourth dose in 2007 at school entry. We assessed the frequency of ESL (here defined as swelling >100mms diameter) in 973 children receiving a fourth dose of one of four aP vaccines given combined with inactivated polio, tetanus and either low dose diphtheria (TdaP/IPV) or high dose diphtheria (DTaP/IPV) vaccine; 2 of the 3 DTaP/IPV vaccines also contained Haemophilus influenza b conjugate vaccine (Hib). Post-vaccination symptoms and local reactions were recorded in 7-day diaries or by a telephone follow up if no diary was returned. Local swellings >50mm diameter were reported by 2.2% TdaP/IPV recipients compared with 6.6-11.1% of DTaP/IPV recipients; the corresponding proportions for redness >50mms was 7.0% for TdaP/IPV and 13.3-17.7% for DTaP/IPV recipients. Among the latter, the addition of Hib did not affect the frequency or size of local reactions. Pain at the injection site and systemic symptoms did not differ between the four vaccine groups. A history of atopy was not associated with development of local swelling or redness. A total of 13 children (1.3%) experienced an ESL, three after TdaP/IPV. ESLs resolved without systemic upset within a few days and were usually painless; medical advice was only sought for two children. Parents should be informed about the possible occurrence of an ESL with the pre-school aP-containing booster vaccine but can be reassured that it is a benign and transient condition.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/efectos adversos , Edema/epidemiología , Extremidades/patología , Inmunización Secundaria/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Diarrea/epidemiología , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Edema/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Letargia/epidemiología , Masculino , Dolor/epidemiología , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/efectos adversos , Reino Unido
3.
Vaccine ; 33(36): 4579-85, 2015 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26165918

RESUMEN

This serological follow up study assessed the kinetics of antibody response in children who previously participated in a single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial of low-dose compared to standard-dose diphtheria booster preschool vaccinations in the United Kingdom (UK). Children had previously been randomised to receive one of three combination vaccines: either a combined adsorbed tetanus, low-dose diphtheria, 5-component acellular pertussis and inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) (Tdap-IPV, Repevax(®); Sanofi Pasteur MSD); a combined adsorbed tetanus, low-dose diphtheria and 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap, Covaxis(®); Sanofi Pasteur MSD) given concomitantly with oral polio vaccine (OPV); or a combined adsorbed standard-dose diphtheria, tetanus, 2-component acellular pertussis and IPV (DTap-IPV, Tetravac(®); Sanofi Pasteur MSD). Blood samples for the follow-up study were taken at 1, 3 and 5 years after participation in the original trial (median, 5.07 years of age at year 1), and antibody persistence to each vaccine antigen measured against defined serological thresholds of protection. All participants had evidence of immunity to diphtheria with antitoxin concentrations greater than 0.01IU/mL five years after booster vaccination and 75%, 67% and 79% of children who received Tdap-IPV, Tdap+OPV and DTap-IPV, respectively, had protective antitoxin levels greater than 0.1IU/mL. Long lasting protective immune responses to tetanus and polio antigens were also observed in all groups, though polio responses were lower in the sera of those who received OPV. Low-dose diphtheria vaccines provided comparable protection to the standard-dose vaccine and are suitable for use for pre-school booster vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/inmunología , Esquemas de Inmunización , Inmunización Secundaria , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Niño , Preescolar , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Instituciones Académicas , Estudiantes , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido , Vacunas Combinadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Combinadas/inmunología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA