Time trends and regional variation in utilization of antidiabetic medicines in China, 2015-2022.

AIM: To assess the use of non-insulin antidiabetic medicines in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed the national procurement data for 29 non-insulin antidiabetic medicines from nine subgroups in China from 2015 to 2022. We estimated the number of defined daily doses (DDDs) procured per year in seven regions of China for nine subgroups and adjusted the data by the number of patients with diabetes. For each subgroup, the regional ratio was calculated by comparing the procurement per patient in each region with the procurement nationwide. The regional disparity was the difference between the highest and lowest regional ratios. We compared the medication patterns across regions. RESULTS: Nationally, between 2015 and 2022, the number of DDDs per patient increased from 14.45 to 47.37. The two most commonly used categories were sulphonylurea and biguanides, which increased from 7.04 to 15.39 (119%) and 3.28 to 11.11 (239%) DDDs per patient, respectively. The procurement of new drugs (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) increased quickly and had >5000% relative changes. Particularly for sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors, it increased from 0.08 to 5.03 DDDs (6662%). The southwest region had the highest relative change (319%), while the southern region had the lowest (118%). Biguanide and thiazolidinediones had the lowest (1.19) and highest level (2.21) of regional disparity in 2022, respectively. CONCLUSION: The procurement of non-insulin antidiabetic medicines in China has increased a lot from 2015 to 2022. In terms of DDDs per patient, sulphonylurea ranked first, followed by metformin. The procurement of new drugs increased greatly. A large regional disparity existed in medicine usage and patterns.

Patterns of initial and first-intensifying antidiabetic drug utilization among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Scotland, 2010-2020: A retrospective population-based cohort study.

AIM: To evaluate the utilization and prescribing patterns of antidiabetic drugs (ADDs) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at treatment initiation and first intensification. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using linked routinely collected data of patients with T2DM who received ADDs between January 2010 and December 2020 in Scotland. The prescribing patterns were quantified using frequency/percentages, absolute/relative change, and trend tests. RESULTS: Overall, 145 909 new ADD users were identified, with approximately 91% (N = 132 382) of patients receiving a single ADD at first treatment initiation. Metformin was the most often prescribed monotherapy (N = 118 737, 89.69%). A total of 50 731 patients (39.40%) who were started on metformin (N = 46 730/118 737, 39.36%) or sulphonylurea (SU; N = 4001/10 029, 39.89%) monotherapy had their treatment intensified with one or more additional ADD. Most initial-metformin (45 963/46 730; 98.36%) and initial-SU users (3894/4001; 97.33%) who added further drugs were intensified with single ADDs. SUs (22 197/45 963; 48.29%) were the most common first-intensifying monotherapy after initial metformin use, but these were replaced by sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in 2019 (SGLT2 inhibitors: 2039/6065, 33.62% vs. SUs: 1924/6065, 31.72%). Metformin was the most frequently added monotherapy to initial SU use (2924/3894, 75.09%). Although the majority of patients received a single ADD, the use of combination therapy significantly increased over time. Nevertheless, there was a significant increasing trend towards prescribing the newer ADD classes (SGLT2 inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors) as monotherapy or in combination compared with the older ones (SUs, insulin, thiazolidinediones) at both drug initiation and first intensification. CONCLUSIONS: An overall increasing trend in prescribing the newer ADD classes compared to older ADDs was observed. However, metformin remained the most commonly prescribed first-line ADD, while SGLT2 inhibitors replaced SUs as the most common add-on therapy to initial metformin use in 2019.

Hypertension medication from guidelines to practice: A cohort study in western Iran.

PURPOSE: Hypertension (HTN) is one of the most common risk factors for non-communicable chronic diseases. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the prescribing patterns of antihypertensive medications in Kermanshah Province, west of Iran. METHODS: The Ravansar Non-Communicable Diseases (RaNCD) cohort study is the first Kurdish community-based study; subjects' age ranged from 35 to 65 years. In order to examine the use of medications to control blood pressure, participants were asked to bring all prescribed medications to the study center. Treatments were compared with 2013 European Society of Hypertension (ESH)/European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines for the management of arterial HTN. RESULTS: From a total of 10 040 participants in RaNCD cohort, 1575 (15.7%) individuals were hypertensive, of whom, 1271 (80.7%) people were aware of their condition. From 1153 (73.20%) people under treatment, 840 (72.8%) had their HTN properly controlled. The most common medications used to treat HTN were losartan (27.5%), metoprolol (14.3%), and captopril (11.9%). Regardless of type of treatment, 49.3% of all patients have received the medication for l 6 ≥ years. The most commonly used drugs were ß-blockers and angiotension receptor blockers as 620 (31.0%) and 612 (30.6%), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that female gender, those receive ≥3 antihypertensive agents, and using preferred combinations were associated with a better blood pressure control. In addition, the probability of hypertension control was less likely with increasing duration of treatment (i.e >6 years) and in obese patients with ≥35 kg/m2 . CONCLUSIONS: Even though adherence to the international guidelines was acceptable, improvements can be made for better control of HTN. Therefore, it is imperative to educate healthcare professionals on improving their selection of antihypertensive medications and combination therapy for hypertensive patients.

Outpatient opioid prescribing by Alzheimer's diagnosis among older adults with pain in United States.

OBJECTIVE: To examine opioid prescribing practices for pain in older adults with and without Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). METHODS: This cross-sectional study used National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data (2014-2016, and 2018). Adults aged ≥ 50 years with pain were analyzed. Prescribing of opioid and concomitant sedative prescriptions (including benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, and barbiturates) were identified by the Multum lexicon code. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the risk of opioid prescribing or co-prescribing of opioid and sedative associated with ADRD in older adults with pain. RESULTS: There were 13,299 office visits in older adults with pain, representing 451.75 million visits. Opioid prescribing occurred in 27.19%; 30% involved co-prescribing of opioids and sedatives. ADRD was not associated with opioid prescribing or co-prescribing of opioid and sedative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid and sedatives are commonly prescribed in older adults with pain. Longitudinal studies need to understand the etiology and chronicity of opioid use in older patients, specifically with ADRD.

Academic detailing as a method to improve general practitioners' drug prescribing in type 2 diabetes: evaluation of changes in prescribing.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of an academic detailing intervention on the utilisation of type 2 diabetes medication among general practitioners. DESIGN: We developed an academic detailing campaign based on the revised national treatment guideline for diabetes and the best available evidence. General practitioners were offered a 20-minute one-to-one visit by a trained academic detailer. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A total of 371 general practitioners received a visit and represented the intervention group. The control group consisted of 1282 general practitioners not receiving a visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in prescribing from 12 months before to 12 months after the intervention. The primary endpoint was a change in metformin. Secondary endpoints were changes in other groups of Type 2 diabetes medication and of these drugs in total. RESULTS: Prescribing of metformin increased by 7.4% in the intervention group and 5.2% in the control group (p = .043). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors increased by 27.6% in the intervention group and 33.8% in the control group (p = .019). For sulfonylureas there was a decrease of 3.6% in the intervention group vs. 8.9% in the control group (p = .026). The total amount of prescribed medications for type 2 diabetes increased by 9.1% in the intervention group and 7.3% in the control group (p = .08). CONCLUSION: Academic detailing initiated a small but statistically significant increase in the prescription of metformin. For a complex subject like type 2 diabetes, we recommend reserving more time in the visit than the 20 min our campaign aimed for.

Academic detailing is a validated method for facilitating changes in prescribing, via interactive one-to-one meetings with a trained academic detailer.General practitioners who received a 20-minute visit on the treatment of type 2 diabetes prescribed more metformin, compared to the control group.For a complex interventions like the present, we recommend setting aside more than 20 minutes, to ensure sufficient time for discussion and reflection.Academic detailing can impact prescribing, even for a complex subject like the treatment of Type 2 Diabetes.

Removal of pregnancy categories and likelihood of prescribing: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the degree to which removal of FDA' Pregnancy Categories (PC) of medications (A, B, C, and D) from labeling, affects the likelihood that providers will prescribe those medications. METHODS: Over a one-year period a convenience sample of providers was recruited into a randomized, survey-based, study. Two versions of the survey were randomly distributed; version 1 presented clinical vignettes, drug information, and PC, while version 2, presented the identical information without the PC. Respondents were asked to estimate their likelihood of prescribing the drug. A mixed linear model was constructed, with likelihood of prescription as the dependent variable, treated as interval-scaled. RESULTS: Out of 169 surveys given out, 162 (96%) were returned. Simple effects analysis showed that the presence of PC letter significantly affected the decision to prescribe category B (p<0.001) and C drugs (p=0.008) but not the A or D. Participants were significantly less likely to prescribe class B and C drugs when the letters were not available for review. These findings remained significant even when controlling for covariates (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When a PC letter is absent on labeling, physicians were less likely to use category B and C drugs, the most common medications prescribed in pregnancy.

Persistence and adherence to second-generation antipsychotic long-acting injectable medications for schizophrenia: A comparative study in the Australian context.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient characteristics, persistence and adherence to treatment associated with use of second-generation antipsychotic long-acting injectable (SGA LAI) medications in the Australian real-world setting. METHOD: Five SGA LAIs were compared using a retrospective 10% sample of prescriptions in Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data: paliperidone palmitate 1-monthly (PP1M), paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly (PP3M), aripiprazole monohydrate (ARI), risperidone (RLAI) and olanzapine pamoate (OLAI). RESULTS: Patients in the PP3M cohort were more persistent with treatment (p < 0.001). Median months of persistence: PP3M (36 months); ARI (18 months); PP1M (11 months); OLAI (8 months); RLAI (4 months). Patients in the PP3M cohort were more adherent to treatment (p < 0.001): PP3M (78%); ARI (51%); PP1M (46%); OLAI (35%); RLAI (33%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on PP3M treatment showed comparatively longer persistence and better adherence. Treatments for schizophrenia with longer dosing intervals may provide patients with symptomatic stability that could allow for reduced hospitalisations/relapse and increased focus on functional recovery.

Antihypertensive prescribing pattern, prescriber adherence to ISH 2020 guidelines, and implication of outpatient drug price on blood pressure control at selected hospitals in Southern Ethiopia.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of drug prescribing pattern, outpatient drug price of medicines, and level of adherence to evidence-based international guidelines on blood pressure (BP) control at selected hospitals in Southern Ethiopia. METHODS: Hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted. The data entry and analysis were done by using SPSS version 21.0. RESULTS: A mean age of participants was 55.87 ± 11.02 years. The rate of BP control was 17.5% based on International Society of Hypertension (ISH) guidelines 2020. In about two-thirds of patients, 270 (66.5%) were taking combination therapy. Mean annual cost of drugs for hypertension was 11.39 ± 3.98 US dollar (USD). Treatment was affordable for only 91 (22.4%) of patients. There was considerable variation on prescriber's adherence to evidence-based guidelines. Body mass index (BMI) of 18-24.9 kg/m2, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.63 (95% confidence interval (C.I), 1.169-11.251, p = 0.026), physically activity, AOR = 12.69 (95% C.I, 1.424-113.17, p = 0.023), presence of no comorbidity, AOR = 12.82 (95% C.I, 4.128-39.816, p = 0.000), and taking affordable antihypertensive regimen, AOR = 3.493 (95% C.I, 1.4242-9.826, p = 0.018), were positively associated BP control. CONCLUSION: The level of BP control, affordability of drugs for the management of hypertension and related comorbidities, and the prescriber's adherence to evidence-based guidelines were inadequate. Therefore, addressing factors associated with good BP control including affordability and clinician adherence to evidence-based guidelines by responsible stakeholders could improve BP control and reduce associated complications.

Variability in discharge opioid prescribing practices for children: a historical cohort study.

PURPOSE: Legitimate opioid prescriptions can increase the risk of misuse, addiction, and overdose of opioids in children and adolescents. This study aimed to describe the prescribing patterns of discharge opioid analgesics following inpatient visits and to determine patient and prescriber characteristics that are associated with prolonged opioid prescription. METHODS: In a historical cohort study, we identified patients discharged from hospital with an opioid analgesic prescription in a tertiary pediatric hospital from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2017. The primary outcome was the duration of opioid prescription in number of days. We assessed the association between patient and prescriber characteristics and an opioid prescription duration > five days using a generalized estimating equation to account for clustering due to repeated admissions of the same patient. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, 15.4% of all admitted patients (3,787/24,571) were given a total of 3,870 opioid prescriptions at discharge. The median [interquartile range] prescribed duration of outpatient opioid therapy was 3.75 [3.00-5.00] days. Seventy-seven percent of the opioid prescriptions were for five days or less. Generalized estimating equation analysis revealed that hospital stay > four days, oxycodone prescription, and prescription by clinical fellows and the orthopedics service were all independently associated with a discharge opioid prescription of > five days. CONCLUSIONS: Most discharge opioids for children were prescribed for less than five days, consistent with current guidelines for adults. Nevertheless, the dosage and duration of opioids prescribed at discharge varied widely.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les ordonnances légales d'opioïdes peuvent augmenter le risque d'abus, de dépendance et de surdose d'opioïdes chez les enfants et les adolescents. Cette étude avait pour objectif de décrire les schémas de prescription d'analgésiques opioïdes au congé des séjours hospitaliers et à déterminer les caractéristiques des patients et des prescripteurs qui sont associées à la prescription prolongée d'opioïdes. MéTHODE: Dans une étude de cohorte historique, nous avons identifié les patients ayant reçu leur congé de l'hôpital avec une ordonnance d'analgésiques opioïdes dans un hôpital pédiatrique de soins tertiaires entre le 1er janvier 2016 et le 30 juin 2017. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la durée de la prescription d'opioïdes en nombre de jours. Nous avons évalué l'association entre les caractéristiques des patients et des prescripteurs et la durée d'une ordonnance d'opioïdes > cinq jours à l'aide d'une équation d'estimation généralisée pour tenir compte du regroupement dû aux admissions répétées d'un même patient. RéSULTATS: Au cours de la période d'étude de 18 mois, 15,4 % de tous les patients admis (3787/24 571) ont reçu un total de 3870 ordonnances d'opioïdes à leur congé. La durée de prescription médiane [écart interquartile] du traitement d'opioïdes hors hôpital était de 3,75 [3,00-5,00] jours. Soixante-dix-sept pour cent des ordonnances d'opioïdes étaient de cinq jours ou moins. L'analyse de l'équation d'estimation généralisée a révélé qu'un séjour à l'hôpital > quatre jours, une prescription d'oxycodone et la prescription par des fellows cliniques et le service d'orthopédie ont tous été indépendamment associés à une ordonnance d'opioïdes au congé > cinq jours. CONCLUSION: La plupart des opioïdes prescrits au congé pour les enfants ont été prescrits pour moins de cinq jours, conformément aux lignes directrices actuelles pour les adultes. Néanmoins, la posologie et la durée des opioïdes prescrits au congé variaient considérablement.

Pattern of utilization, disease presentation, and medication prescribing and dispensing at 51 primary healthcare centers during the Hajj mass gathering.

BACKGROUND: The majority of pilgrims seeking healthcare during Hajj are seen at primary healthcare centers (PHCCs). Data on the utilization of these facilities during Hajj can aid in directing optimal health services delivery and allocation of resources during the pilgrimage. METHOD: We investigated the pattern of disease presentation, caseload, and medication prescribing and dispensing at 51 PHCCs during the 2019 Hajj. Data on patients' demographics, diagnoses, and prescribed medications were retrieved from each PHCC's electronic records and analyzed. Data were also used to calculate six of the World Health Organization (WHO) indicators for drug use at these facilities. RESULTS: Data were captured for 99,367 patients who were mostly Hajj pilgrims (95.4%), male (69.1%) from the Eastern Mediterranean (60.8%) and had a mean age of 46.6 years (SD = 14.9). Most patients (85.2%) were seen in Mina and towards the end of Hajj. The majority of patients (96.0%) had a single diagnosis; most commonly, respiratory (45.0%), musculoskeletal (17.2%), and skin (10.5%) diseases. Patients were prescribed 223,964 medications, mostly analgesics (25.1%), antibacterials for systemic use (16.5%), anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products (16.4%), and cough and cold preparations (11.9%). On average, 2.25 (SD = 0.94) medications were prescribed per consultation, with low (1.3%) prevalence of polypharmacy. An antibiotic and an injectable were prescribed in 43.6 and 2.67% of patient encounters, respectively. Most (92.7%) of the prescribed drugs were actually dispensed, in an average time of 8.06 min (SD = 41.4). All PHCCs had a copy of the essential drugs list available, on which all the prescribed drugs appeared. CONCLUSION: Respiratory illnesses are the main reason for PHCCs visits during Hajj, and analgesics and antibiotics are the most common medications prescribed to pilgrims. Our results, including the calculated WHO drug use indicators, contribute to evidence-based optimization of primary healthcare services during Hajj.

Prescribing patterns of antidiabetics in type 2 diabetes and factors affecting them.

Introduction: There are limited studies that address the use of newer antidiabetics by prescribers in Saudi Arabia and their adoption of the newer diabetes guidelines. The primary aim of our study was to explore the prescribing patterns of first- and second-line agents for the management of type 2 diabetes and the factors affecting them. Methods: A cross-sectional self-administered survey was designed to collect responses from the prescribers in the Makkah Region of Saudi Arabia from 16 February through 16 June 2021. The questionnaire was developed in the English language, piloted, and tested for validity. Participants were recruited on a convenience sampling basis, and the data were collected by visiting them in-person. Results: A total of 103 prescribers responded to the survey. The majority of the respondents were male (69%), Saudi nationals (54%), practicing in Makkah city (62%), working in the government sector (62%), and had the prescribing experience of 1-5 years (37%). Metformin (95%) was the respondents' most preferred first-line drug of choice, followed by sulfonylureas (5%). When the first-line was contraindicated, sulfonylureas (30%) were considered the most preferred drug of choice, followed by DPP4 inhibitors (25%) and SGLT2 inhibitors (16%), respectively. When the first-line was not sufficient to control diabetes, sulfonylureas (32%) and DPP4 inhibitors (31%) were considered the most preferred drugs of choice as an add-on therapy. SGLT2 inhibitors (31%) and metformin (24%) were considered the preferred first-line choices if the patient had an established cardiovascular disease. Conclusion: Sulfonylureas were found to be the most considered choice as second-line therapy. There is a need to provide targeted education to the prescribers related to the newer diabetes guidelines in order to promote the use of more evidence-based and safer antidiabetics.

Opioid Prescribing Among Outpatients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine the outpatient opioid prescribing practices and the factors associated with opioid prescriptions in patient visits with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DESIGN: This cross-sectional study used the 2011-2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Descriptive weighted analyses were used to examine the trends in opioid prescribing practices for RA. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the factors associated with opioid prescriptions among RA visits. SUBJECTS: Adult patients (>18 years of age) with a primary diagnosis of RA based on the International Classification of Diseases. RESULTS: According to the national surveys, an average of 4.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.30-6.60) million office visits were made annually for RA. Approximately 24.28% of these visits involved opioid prescriptions. The RA visits involving opioid prescriptions increased from 1.43 million in 2011-2012 to 3.69 million in 2015-2016 (P < .0001). Being in the age group of 50-64 years (odds ratio [OR] = 3.40; 95% CI, 1.29-9.00), being Hispanic or Latino (OR = 2.92, 95% CI, 1.10-7.74), visiting primary physician (OR = 4.67; 95% CI, 1.86-11.75), prescribing of muscle relaxants (OR = 64.32; 95% CI, 9.71-426.09), acetaminophen (OR = 93.40; 95% CI, 26.19-333.04), antidepressants (OR = 6.10; 95% CI, 2.63-14.14), and glucocorticoids (OR = 3.20; 95% CI, 1.61-6.38), were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving opioid prescriptions in RA. CONCLUSIONS: One in four adult RA visits resulted in opioid prescriptions, and the opioid visits more than doubled during the study period. Several patient and provider factors were associated with the opioid prescribing among RA visits. Understanding these prescribing practices can help to devise strategies for safe opioid prescribing practices in RA.

Aspirin prescribing pattern and guidelines-adherence evaluation for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases at a teaching hospital.

The present study investigates the aspirin prescribing pattern and guidelines-adherence evaluation for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases at a teaching hospital. A total of 816 patients were included in the study, the patients who received aspirin aged 60-69 (29.65%), followed by patients aged 50-59 years old (29.53%) and 70-79 years old (22.91%). Demographic information shown that the majority of the patients were males (58.55%). The BMI revealed that 85.78% of patients were obese. The majority of the patients have diabetes 78.67%, hypertension 74.38%, and dyslipidemia 65.68%. The mean systolic blood pressure was 136 ± 7.4 and diastolic blood pressure was 74.9 ± 5.2. After applying aspirin candidacy calculation, only 6% patients were highly recommended to be on aspirin, 49% patients had reasonable recommendation of aspirin, 27% patients use aspirin based on "may be considered" recommendation, and 23% patients were on aspirin with no indication or recommendation. The study highlights the importance of following the international recommendations in aspirin prescribing, and flags the inappropriate use and prescribing by our healthcare providers. The current study encourages further investigation to be carried out which should include patient and clinician education, to well understand and alleviate the inequalities in aspirin use and adherence. Further studies are also warranted to understand of the prescribing pattern and to provide solutions to avoid aspirin associated complications.

Medication utilization pattern among outpatients during the Hajj mass gathering.

BACKGROUND: The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) provides free healthcare, including medications, for the over 2 million Muslim pilgrims who attend Hajj every year. Information on drug utilization patterns at the Hajj is important to strengthen the supply chain for medicines, avert stock-outs, identify inappropriate use, and support public health planning for the event. METHOD: We investigated drug utilization pattern among outpatients in eight seasonal Holy sites hospitals in Makkah, KSA, during the 2018 Hajj. Data on medication prescribed and dispensed were retrieved from the hospitals' electronic records. Data were also used to calculate six of the WHO indicators for drug use at these facilities. RESULTS: A total of 99,117 medications were prescribed for 37,367 outpatients during 37,933 encounters. Outpatients were mainly older males and originated from 134 countries. Twenty medications accounted for 72.8% of the 323 different medications prescribed. These were mainly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics and antipyretics, and antibacterial medicines for systemic use. Outpatients were prescribed an average of 2.6 (SD = 1.2) drugs per consultation and polypharmacy (≥5 medications) was observed in 4.8% of the encounters. Antibiotics and an injection were prescribed in 46.9% and 6.5% of encounters, respectively. Nearly 90% of the prescribed drugs were actually dispensed. On average, medications were dispensed 16.4 (SD = 119.8) minutes from the time they were prescribed for the patient. All hospitals had a copy of the essential drugs list available and all of the prescribed drugs appeared on that list. CONCLUSION: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics and antibiotics are the most common medications prescribed to outpatient during Hajj. Our results, including the calculated WHO drug use indicators, can form a basis for further investigations into appropriate drug use at the Hajj and for planning purposes. These results could also guide the development of reference values for medications prescribing and use indicators at mass gatherings.

Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing among Elderly Patients at a Primary Care Clinic in Oman.

Drug prescribing to the elderly increases the risk of potential adverse drug reactions as well as potentially inappropriate medications. The goal of this study was to describe drug prescribing patterns in elderly patients and to measure the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications using updated Beers' criteria and the STOPP criteria. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study for all patients aged ≥65 years who attended regularly a primary care clinic at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital in Oman. Data of 377 patients were analyzed using the software Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23.0 (SPSS™, Chicago, IL, USA). Using Beers criteria, the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications was 12.7% as 48 patients had at least one potentially inappropriate medication. Beers criteria revealed a statistical association between the occurrence of potentially inappropriate medications with polypharmacy (p < 0.001), with female gender (p = 0.002) and with asthma as a comorbidity (p = 0.020). STOPP criteria showed that the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications was 17.2% as 65 patients had at least one potentially inappropriate medication. STOPP criteria revealed a statistical association between the occurrence of potentially inappropriate medications and osteoarthritis as a comorbidity (p = 0.032). The study revealed moderate prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications prescribing in elderly patients which was mainly associated with polypharmacy and female gender. Safe prescribing practices in the elderly requires increasing the awareness of healthcare providers and efficiently reporting drug-related problems.

Prescribing patterns of coronary artery aneurysm in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) is a rare disease, and there are limited data on prescribing patterns for CAA. The aim of our study was to investigate prescribing patterns for CAA in Taiwan via the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). METHODS: We included all CAA patients in Taiwan from 2005 to 2011. Data from 1 year before and after the CAA diagnosis were used to analyze examinations, comorbidities and prescribing patterns. RESULTS: A total of 1397 patients diagnosed with CAA were enrolled in our study. Most pediatric patients with CAA were diagnosed with Kawasaki disease (95.7%). In pediatric CAA patients, the utilization rates of aspirin and gamma globulins were 82.9 and 53.6%, respectively, after CAA diagnosis. Among the antithrombotic agents, aspirin was used most commonly, followed by dipyridamole (16.9%), heparin (5.8%) and warfarin (4.6%). In adult CAA patients, common comorbidities included hypertension (63.4%), hyperlipidemia (39.6%), and diabetes mellitus (26.1%). Coronary atherosclerosis was identified in 72.5% of adult patients after CAA diagnosis. Antithrombotic agents, particularly aspirin, clopidogrel and heparin, were prescribed more frequently after CAA diagnosis. Among the prescribed medications, aspirin (75.8%), ß-blockers (48.3%), statins (47.6%), metformin (14.4%), sulfonylureas (14.4%) and isosorbide mononitrate (32.9%) were frequently observed in each category. CONCLUSIONS: Kawasaki disease was the main cause of CAA in pediatric patients, and coronary artery disease was the most common comorbidity in adult CAA patients. The most commonly used antithrombic agent after CAA diagnosis was aspirin in both adult and pediatric patients.

Sex differences in antihypertensive drug use and blood pressure control.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is the most important modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Epidemiological studies have shown the benefits of lowering blood pressure (BP), but BP control is a major challenge. Furthermore, there are significant sex differences in antihypertensive drug use and BP control. This study examined sex differences in antihypertensive drug use and BP control, with the aim of reducing the complications of hypertension and improving quality of life. METHODS: The study was performed in our outpatient hypertension clinic, and included 1529 patients without secondary hypertension or comorbidities. The study, investigated BP control rates and patterns of antihypertensive drug use in male and female. All data were collected using structured questionnaires and patient measurements. RESULTS: The study included 713 males and 816 females in this study. Fewer females had hypertension in the younger age group (16.2% vs 11.6%; p>0.05), but this difference disappeared in middle-aged (47.8% vs 49.9 %; p<0.05) and elderly age groups (36.0% vs 38.5%; p<0.05). BP control rates differed between males and females (35.6% in male, 31.9% in female, p<0.01). There was an overall difference in BP control rates between males and females (35.6% in males, 31.9% in females, p<0.01). In this aged 18-44 years, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) showed the best control rate in males, while calcium channel blockers (CCBs) were least effective (61.5% with ACEIs, 28.6% with CCBs; p<0.05). In this aged 45-64 years, diuretics (DUs) showed the best control rate in females, while CCBs were least effective (47.5% with DUs, 28.3% with CCBs; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sex plays an important role in BP control. In those aged 18-44 years, males using ACEIs showed best control rates. In those aged 45-64 years, females using DUs showed best control rates. Our study provides a basis with the selection of antihypertensive drugs according to sex and age.

Assessing the effect of oral activated vitamin D on overall survival in hemodialysis patients: a landmark analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end stage renal disease have a high all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D deficiency are considered part of the mechanism for the excess mortality observed. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between vitamin D use and all-cause mortality. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included all incident patients who started hemodialysis in Taiwan between 2001 and 2009. Patients were followed from landmark time, i.e., the 360th day from hemodialysis initiation, through the end of 2010 or death. We evaluated the association between activated vitamin D use or not before landmark time and all-cause mortality using conditional landmark analysis with Cox regression. We used group-based trajectory model to categorize high-dose versus average-dose users to evaluate dose-response relationships. RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 1019 days from landmark time, vitamin D users had a lower crude mortality rate than non-users (8.98 versus 12.93 per 100 person-years). Compared with non-users, vitamin D users was associated with a lower risk of death in multivariate Cox model (HR 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.95]) and after propensity score matching (HR 0.94 [95% CI, 0.90-0.98]). High-dose vitamin D users had a lower risk of death than conventional-dose users, HR 0.75 [95% CI, 0.63-0.89]. The association of vitamin D treatment with reduced mortality did not alter when we re-defined landmark time as the 180th day or repeated analyses in patients who underwent hemodialysis in the hospital setting. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings supported the survival benefits of activated vitamin D among incident hemodialysis patients.

Potentially Inappropriate Antidepressant Prescriptions Among Older Adults in Office-Based Outpatient Settings: National Trends from 2002 to 2012.

Using data from 2002 to 2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, we estimated that the prevalence of overall antidepressant prescriptions increased almost twofold from 5.2% in 2002 to 10.1% in 2012 in office-based outpatient visits made by older adults. In addition, older adults were exposed to the risk of potentially avoidable adverse drug events in approximately one in ten antidepressant-related visits, or 2.2 million visits annually. Amitriptyline and doxepin were the two most frequent disease-independent potentially inappropriate antidepressants. Racial/ethnic minorities, and Medicaid beneficiaries had higher odds of potentially inappropriate antidepressant prescriptions (P < 0.05). Efforts to minimize potentially inappropriate antidepressant prescriptions are needed.

Has cost inhibited the uptake of more potent statins in England?

BACKGROUND: The use of statins has increased substantially over the last 2 decades in England and represents a significant cost burden to the National Health Service. Therefore, it is important to understand what influences prescribers' choice. OBJECTIVES: This study examines the changes in use pattern of all statins in England (1998-2015). The study focuses on the use of simvastatin and atorvastatin before and after their patent expiry and rosuvastatin, to investigate the impact of the reduced acquisition costs on prescribing. METHODS: Interrupted time series analysis of primary care use data from the health and social care information centre database from 1998 to 2015. RESULTS: Primary care expenditure on statins increased by 125% during the period 1998 to 2004 driven by branded simvastatin and atorvastatin. Before 2003, the rate of use of more potent branded atorvastatin exceeds branded simvastatin. Between 2004 and 2011, the less potent but less expensive agent generic simvastatin has the higher utilisation rate (66%). Since 2012, the more potent agent but less expensive generic atorvastatin has the higher utilisation rate (50%). The more potent branded rosuvastatin failed to make a significant impact on the English statins market. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of generic statins has reduced overall expenditure significantly. When there is a significant price difference, acquisition cost appears to be the main influencing factor in prescribing statins, but, when costs are similar, potency is a key factor. This suggests that English prescribers are cost sensitive and appear to be prepared to trade marginal benefit for savings.