Transarterial chemoembolization in a patient with the replaced right hepatic and left gastric arteries arising from the abdominal aorta: a new anatomical variation.

PURPOSE: Knowing the anatomical variation of the coeliac trunk (CT) and its detailed interpretation in the preoperative period is important for the prevention of iatrogenic injury during liver surgery or endovascular intervention on the coeliac trunk and its branches. METHODS: A diagnostic abdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed in a 61-year-old male patient, who was investigated for a liver cancer and chemoembolization was planned. RESULTS: CTA reveals that right hepatic artery (RHA) arises directly from the abdominal aorta, at the level of CT. This vessel coursing to the right hepatic lobe, functioning therefore as a replaced right hepatic artery (RRHA). Also, the left gastric artery (LGA) arises directly from the abdominal aorta. This patient successfully underwent chemoembolization from RRHA. CONCLUSION: We presented a case of new anatomical variation involving the origination of RRHA and LGA from the abdominal aorta.

A rare case with multiple arterial variations of the liver complicated laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic arterial variations were fully elaborated in anatomical monographs. Here, we aimed to present a rare case with multiple arterial variations of the liver complicated laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 67-year-old woman with a periampullary tumor underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Intraoperatively, the aberrant right hepatic artery derived from the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) was observed and had accidentally sacrificed due to untimely ligature of GDA. Three-dimensional reconstruction based on preoperative contrast-enhanced CT performed to better study the anatomy. It demonstrated a replaced right hepatic artery branched from the GDA and supplied right liver lobe. Meanwhile, the middle hepatic artery derived from the common hepatic artery and supplied hepatic segment IV. Additionally, the replaced left hepatic artery emerged from the left gastric artery and fed into left liver lobe. CONCLUSIONS: The origination and course of hepatic arterial anatomy should be thoroughly assessed in planning and performing hepatopancreatobiliary surgeries. Reconstruction images of contrast-enhanced CT are helpful to visualize the vascular variations and its spatial relation with adjacent structures.

Replaced right hepatic artery arising from the distal renal artery, a new variation.

PURPOSE: Arterial irrigation of the liver is highly variable and widely studied due to its importance in the correct planification of the surgical or endovascular treatment of the hepatobilary area. Various classifications have been published of the common and uncommon anatomic variations of the hepatic arterial distribution. While the classic anatomic pattern of the proper hepatic artery-when it originates from the celiac trunk dividing into left and right branches-represents 50-83% of the described patterns, there are numerous uncommon distributions based on the presence of replaced or accessory hepatic arteries. In this article, we present a case of a replaced right hepatic artery originating from the right distal renal artery. METHODS: Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) examination was performed on a 67 years-old male patient with compensated alcoholic cirrhosis as part of the disease monitoring. RESULTS: The replaced right hepatic artery of the patient arises from the right distal renal artery and-after its cranial course-enters the porta hepatis posterior to the main portal vein. After giving off the cystic artery, it irrigates the right hepatic lobe. The left hepatic artery does not show any variation. CONCLUSION: We present CT angiography images of an extremely rare anatomic variation of the hepatic arterial irrigation in a cirrhotic patient.

Rare anastomosis between a replaced right hepatic artery and left branch of the proper hepatic artery.

Appreciation of the potential anatomical variation of the hepatic arterial supply and branches of the abdominal aorta is of paramount importance in pancreatic and hepatobiliary surgery. Here we describe a hitherto un-reported coelio-mesenteric anastomotic connection between a replaced right hepatic artery, originating from the superior mesenteric artery, and the left hepatic branch of the proper hepatic artery. The embryological origins of the variant anatomy as well as its potential surgical implications are discussed with a view to encourage thorough pre-operative interrogation of available imaging by radiologists and surgeons to successfully identify such variants and take advantage of their potentially useful functionality.

Outcome of concomitant resection of the replaced right hepatic artery in pancreaticoduodenectomy without reconstruction.

PURPOSE: It has been reported that preoperative embolization or intraoperative reconstruction of the replaced right hepatic artery (rRHA) in order to secure the arterial blood flow to the liver and biliary tract are useful for patients who have undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with concomitant rRHA resection. In this study, the feasibility of concomitant resection of rRHA in PD without preoperative embolization or intraoperative reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated with a particular focus on postoperative complications. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 323 consecutive patients who underwent PD. RESULTS: In 51 patients (15.8%), an rRHA was detected. Nine of 51 patients underwent combined rRHA resection during PD. Eight patients showed tumor abutment, and one patient had accidental intraoperative damage of the rRHA. Although there were no cases of bilioenteric anastomotic failure, a hepatic abscess occurred in one patient. This patient was treated with percutaneous transhepatic abscess drainage and was cured immediately without suffering sepsis. Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ IIIa were found in three patients, and R0 resection was achieved in six. Surgical outcomes showed no significant differences between the rRHA-resected and non-resected groups. Moreover, there were no significant differences in laboratory data related to liver functions between the rRHA-resected and non-resected groups before surgery and on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7. CONCLUSIONS: Simple resection of the rRHA following an unintended or accidental injury during PD is not associated with severe morbidity and should be considered as an alternative to a technically difficult reconstruction.

Clinically relevant anatomical parameters of the replaced right hepatic artery (RRHA).

PURPOSE: Vascular anatomy of the liver is subjected to many variations. The most common hepatic artery (HA) replacement is the right hepatic artery (RRHA). Variations of the HA are particularly important consideration when choosing the best surgical procedure or if radiological abdominal intervention is required. In this study, we evaluated the anatomical details of the RRHA origin. METHODS: Retrospective investigation of clinical data from 1569 patients who underwent an abdominal MDCT was performed. The anatomy of RRHA origin was described based on four parameters measured: D--the distance between SMA origin and the RRHA origin, L--the lumen at the place of origin, AH--the origin angle from the SMA in horizontal plane, and AV--the origin angle from the SMA in vertical plane. RESULTS: RRHA arising from SMA was detected in 10.13 % of cases (159/1569) and its anatomy was subjected to variations. Mean (±SD) of parameters D, L, AH and AV was 27.34 mm ± 6.83, 3.29 mm ± 1.17, 97.27º ± 26.69 and 89.73º ± 20.81, respectively. Values of parameters D and L were significantly higher in males compared to females. CONCLUSION: Although radiologists are not always aware of the clinical significance of the RRHA origin, the evaluation of its anatomy is thought to help reduce the risk of inadvertent vascular injury, especially in pancreatoduodenectomy. Detection and evaluation of the RRHA does not necessarily require angio-CT examination. Our study demonstrated that the MDCT, the standard imaging modality for diagnosing the abdominal symptoms, is sufficient to provide the knowledge of the HA abnormalities.

Long-term impact of replaced right hepatic artery resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

The clinical impact of replaced right hepatic artery (rRHA) resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has not been thoroughly investigated. We therefore assessed the short- and long-term effects of rRHA resection during PD, with special reference to alterations in the volumetric profile of the liver. Patients with rRHA were divided into two groups based on the presence (R group) or absence (nR group) of resection. The nR group included cases of rRHA resection and reconstruction. We compared the postoperative short-term complications and detailed liver volume profile by CT volumetry in the long term between the R and nR groups. Forty-seven patients were eligible for the analyses of short-term outcomes (R: n = 7, nR: n = 40), and no marked difference was observed in the incidence of short-term postoperative complications. The patient cohort for the long-term investigations included 34 cases (R: n = 6, nR: n = 28), excluding patients with early recurrence. There was no significant difference in the preoperative liver volume profiles between the two groups. At 12 postoperative months, although the whole liver (WL) volume did not significantly change in either group, the ratio of the volume of the anterior/posterior sections significantly increased in the R group (R: pre- vs. 12 months, 1.01 vs. 1.28, p < 0.05; nR: pre- vs. 12 months, 1.40 vs. 1.33, p = 0.99). Long-term rRHA resection did not significantly affect the WL volume with alteration of the liver volumetric profile of each section.

Preoperative embolization strategy for the combined resection of replaced right hepatic artery in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a small case series.

BACKGROUND: Replaced right hepatic artery (rRHA) is a common vascular variation, and combined resection of this vessel is sometimes needed for the curative resection of pancreatic head malignancy. Safe surgical management has not been established, and there is a small number of reported cases. Here, we reported five cases, wherein preoperative embolization of rRHA was performed for combined resection. CASE PRESENTATION: All patients had pancreatic head malignancies that were in contact with rRHA. We performed a preoperative embolization of the rRHA before the scheduled pancreaticoduodenectomy for the combined resection. Arterial embolization was safely accomplished, and the communicating arcade from the left hepatic artery via the hilar plate was clearly revealed in all cases. Four patients underwent the operative procedure, except for one patient who had liver metastasis at laparotomy. No patient suffered from a severe abnormal liver function during the management; however, one patient had multiple liver infarctions during the postoperative course. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative embolization for the combined resection of rRHA in pancreaticoduodenectomy can be a management option for the precise evaluation of hemodynamics after sacrificing rRHA. In our cases, arterial flow to the right liver lobe was supplied by the left hepatic artery via the bypass route, including the communicating arcade of the hilar plate.

Anatomical variations of the hepatic artery: a closer view of rare unclassified variants.

BACKGROUND: Defining the hepatic artery anatomy is of great importance for both surgeons and radiologists. Michel classification was designed to classify hepatic artery variations. Nevertheless, there are variations that do not fit into this classification. In this study, we aim to define the incidence of all variations in a healthy liver donor by reviewing their computed tomography (CT) scan with special emphasis on variations that do not fit in any of the Michel classes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of CT scan of donors and potential liver donors who were evaluated by triphasic CT scan. The CT scans were reviewed independently by a radiologist and two transplant surgeons. Cases that did not fit in any of the Michel classes were classified as class 0. RESULTS: Out of 241 donors, 210 were classified within the Michel classification, of which 60.9% were class I and 9.1% class II. Thirty-one (12.9%) donors classified as class 0. Of which, nine, three, two and three had replaced right hepatic artery from pancreaticoduodenal artery, gastroduodenal artery, aorta and coeliac artery, respectively. Two and six donors had accessory right hepatic artery from pancreaticoduodenal artery and gastroduodenal artery, respectively. Segment 4 artery originated from left and right hepatic artery in 56.8% and 31.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A great caution should be taken when evaluating the hepatic artery anatomy, clinicians should anticipate and be familiar with the rare unclassified variations of the hepatic artery.

Unusual arterial supply of the segment IV with interlobar bridge and right replaced hepatic artery: a case report.

A replaced right hepatic artery (RHA) arising from the superior mesenteric artery and an interlobar parenchymal bridge over the sagittal fissure have been observed on a 64-year-old formalin-fixed male cadaver in the anatomy laboratory. As we had followed a detailed segmental anatomy, we encountered an arterial distribution of segment IV featuring a different pattern from the literature so far. According to our observations, the segment I is supplied by both left (LHA) and middle (MHA) hepatic arteries; the segments II and III are supplied by the LHA while the segment IV is supplied by both the MHA and replaced RHA. The segments V-VIII are supplied only by the replaced RHA. The case emphasizes the importance of arterial variations of liver in terms of the surgical procedures during the liver transplantation, hepatic resections, hepatic tumours, and etc. Our discussion focuses to the arterial supply of the segment IV and possible complications it may cause during/after the liver operations.

Aberrant Inferior Pancreaticoduodenal Artery During Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed Embolization.

Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is a well-validated treatment for patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding who have failed endoscopic techniques. We present a case of a patient with duodenal ulcer bleeding that persisted despite endoscopic intervention. A gastroduodenal artery (GDA) embolization was performed; however, recurrence of bleeding warranted further embolization of inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA). The IPDA - anterior and posterior branches - had two different origins from the middle colic artery and a replaced right hepatic artery respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first report of this IPDA branching pattern. Knowledge of common and uncommon anatomical variants of mesenteric arteries is paramount to proper interventional management of GI bleeding.

Successful radical resection of pancreatic head carcinoma in a patient with replaced right hepatic artery originating from posterior inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery: a case report.

Anatomical variations of hepatic arteries may be problematic in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We experienced pancreatic head cancer in a patient with rare variation of hepatic artery and performed PD successfully with the resection of this artery. A 75-year-old woman showed pancreatic head tumor on CT. Preoperative CT detected rare variation of hepatic artery; posterior segmental branch of right hepatic artery (RHA-PB) originating from posterior inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery. The image also demonstrated that there was a junction between RHA-PB and anterior branch of right hepatic artery (RHA-AB). We performed PD for suspected pancreatic head cancer. We divided RHA-PB for complete resection of cancer because we preoperatively knew that there was the junction between RHA-PB and RHA-AB. She was discharged uneventfully, and there was no evidence of local recurrence throughout the whole course. Careful preoperative assessment of hepatic blood supply is the key to perform successful PD even in this troublesome situation.

Aberrant right hepatic arterial anatomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy: recognition, prevalence and management.

BACKGROUND: Aberrant arterial anatomy is a common finding during foregut surgery. Anomalies to the right hepatic lobe are especially relevant during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and their recognition serves to protect the blood supply to the liver and bile ducts. We report our experience with aberrant right hepatic arterial anatomy (ARHAA) found during PD. METHODS: All patients who underwent PD between February 2003 and June 2007 were retrospectively reviewed and those with ARHAA were identified. Preoperative imaging studies were assessed by one radiologist, graded according to the presence of ARHAA and compared with the original interpretations. RESULTS: We found ARHAA in 31 of 191 patients (16.2%). Operative management included dissection and preservation in 24, transection and reconstruction in four, and transection and primary anastomosis in three patients. Reconstruction of ARHAA was carried out through interposition grafts in two patients and implantation into the gastroduodenal stump in two patients. No cases of arterial thrombosis, liver infarction, abscess formation or biliary fistula were demonstrated in the immediate postoperative period. Review of preoperative imaging interpretations found that only nine of 23 reports indicated the presence of ARHAA; however, the retrospective review of the images found that ARHAA was readily apparent in 24 patients. DISCUSSION: Recognition of aberrant vasculature to the liver before PD is important. Preoperative imaging studies will often be adequate to identify these anomalies, but interpreting radiologists may not be aware of its clinical significance. Surgeons performing PD must be adept at managing ARHAA safely.