Suction drainage fluid culture during septic orthopaedic surgery, a retrospective study.

We evaluated the usefulness of suction drainage fluid culture after septic orthopaedic surgery to predict early surgical reintervention. We conducted a retrospective observational study, at the Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph between 2014 and 2019. All the patients undergoing septic orthopaedic surgery, with perioperative samples and a postoperative suction drainage device, were enrolled. We compared the group with positive or negative postoperative drainage fluid cultures, respectively, on surgical outcome. We included 246 patients. The drainage fluid culture was positive in 42.3% of the cases. Early surgical reintervention concerned 14.6% of the cases (n = 36), including 61.1% of patients with positive drainage fluid culture (n = 22/36). The risk factors associated with positive drainage fluid cultures were the debridement of the infected site (without orthopaedic device removal), an infection located at the spine, perioperative positive cultures to Staphylococcus aureus. The complete change of the orthopaedic device, and coagulase-negative staphylococci on the preoperative samples, was associated with negative drainage fluid cultures. Positive drainage fluid culture was predictive of early surgical reintervention, and coagulase-negative staphylococci in the preoperative samples and knee infection were predictive of surgical success. Postoperative drainage fluid cultures were predictive of early surgical reintervention. Randomized multicentric studies should be further conducted.

[Challenge of limb care after violence and war with a special focus on imaging procedures]. / Herausforderung der Extremitätenversorgung nach Gewalt und Krieg mit besonderer Betrachtung bildgebender Verfahren.

BACKGROUND: Injury patterns in the area of the extremities following violence and war harbor many special features and require special attention. Destructive and complex defect injuries are often present, which necessitate elaborate and special reconstruction approaches, predominantly as part of a staged and multistaged procedure. RESEARCH QUESTION: In this context, special attention must be paid to the diagnostic options as an essential aspect, as a clear diagnosis means that targeted treatment steps can be planned and implemented. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors' experience in this field from military operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, the Republic of Mali, Kosovo and Georgia, as well as the core content of the Terror and Disaster Surgical Care (TDSC®) course on this topic, have been contextualized and incorporated. In addition, aspects of interdisciplinary cooperation with radiological and, in particular, nuclear medicine disciplines are taken into account in the daily routine. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Extremity injuries in the context of violence and war are accompanied by complex bone and surrounding soft tissue defects due to the high energy impact. The principles of reconstruction familiar from everyday life can only be transferred one-to-one to a limited extent. The treatment pathways are often very long and complex and the questions of infection and tissue vitality must be answered again and again in stages. Interdisciplinary collaboration with the disciplines specialized in imaging procedures, particularly in the field of nuclear medicine, is one of the key building blocks for a successful treatment pathway.

Safety of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Two-Stage Revision of Septic Hip Arthroplasties.

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) during reimplantation in the two-stage revision of septic hip arthroplasties. (2) Methods: As part of an internal quality control study, blood cultures were taken from the processed ICS blood during reimplantation and examined for possible bacterial load (study group). Due to a high rate of bacterial detection with uncertain clinical significance, consecutive ICS samples were also examined from patients undergoing aseptic revision hip arthroplasty (control group). Microbiological samples, patient and surgical characteristics and the follow-up data were analyzed retrospectively. (3) Results: 9 out of 12 (75%) patients in the study group and 5 out of 8 (63%) patients in the control group had positive ICS blood cultures. There was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.642). The initial pathogens causing the periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were not detected, but the bacterial spectrum resembled skin flora, with a high proportion of coagulase-negative staphylococci. No complications due to possible bloodstream-associated infections were observed. In summary, the detected pathogens were interpreted as contamination without clinical significance. (4) Conclusions: ICS in the context of reimplantation was considered a safe and recommendable procedure to optimize patient blood management.

Pulsatile lavage systems and their potential to penetrate soft tissue.

BACKGROUND: In orthopedic and trauma surgery, pulsatile lavage systems are used to clean soft tissue. This may be necessary in septic surgeries or in case of contaminated wounds after trauma. Positive features such as reduction of bacterial contamination and removal of foreign particles are counterbalanced by negative aspects such as bacterial seeding in deeper tissue layers, damage to various tissues and even cases of air embolism. PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective experimental in vitro study was to compare impact pressure and flow rate in three different pulsatile lavage systems and to determine, whether these parameters alter their ability to reach deeper soft tissue layers. METHODS: To test the penetration of soft tissue, the muscle tissue was flushed with contrast medium instead of saline fluid and afterwards scanned by computed tomography. RESULTS: Impact pressure and flow rate showed significant differences between the different systems. There were no significant differences between the three devices in terms of total penetration volume, but there were significant differences in penetration depth. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that higher impact pressure leads to deeper penetration and therefore bacteria are likely to be transferred to deeper tissue layers.

The Use of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Two-Stage Revision of Septic Hip Arthroplasties: A Double-Center Retrospective Study.

(1) Background: intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) devices can provide a valuable contribution to patient blood management. An infection of the surgical site presents a formal contraindication to the use of ICS. To date, there is no recommendation for the use of ICS in the context of reimplantation in two-stage septic exchange arthroplasty. (2) Methods: at two hospitals of maximum endoprosthetic care, a retrospective evaluation of patients who had received ICS blood during reimplantation of hip arthroplasties was performed. Patients' and surgical characteristics, intraoperative cultures, and the occurrence of septic complications in the short- and long-term follow-up were recorded. (3) Results: 144 patients were included. Detection of positive cultures during reimplantation occurred in 13 cases. A total of 127 patients showed no complication, 8 patients showed a non-specific septic complication, 6 patients a local persistence of infection, and 3 patients a possible bloodstream-associated infection. No significant correlation was found between the occurrence of complications and the detection of positive intraoperative cultures. (4) Conclusions: no clustering of septic complications due to the use of ICS during reimplantation was found. In the risk-benefit analysis, we considered the use of ICS during reimplantation to be indicated in terms of patient blood management, while the safety of the procedure during septic first-stage resection arthroplasty or septic one-stage exchange arthroplasty was not investigated. Given the paucity of comparative literature, further studies are needed on ideal patient blood management in the setting of septic revision arthroplasty.

Impact and Modification of the New PJI-TNM Classification for Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

The comprehensive "PJI-TNM classification" for the description of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) was introduced in 2020. Its structure is based on the well-known oncological TNM classification to appreciate the complexity, severity, and diversity of PJIs. The main goal of this study is to implement the new PJI-TNM classification into the clinical setting to determine its therapeutic and prognostic value and suggest modifications to further improve the classification for clinical routine use. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at our institution between 2017 and 2020. A total of 80 consecutive patients treated with a two-stage revision for periprosthetic knee joint infection were included. We retrospectively assessed correlations between patients' preoperative PJI-TNM classification and their therapy and outcome and identified several statistically significant correlations for both classifications, the original and our modified version. We have demonstrated that both classifications provide reliable predictions already at the time of diagnosis regarding the invasiveness of surgery (duration of surgery, blood and bone loss during surgery), likelihood of reimplantation, and patient mortality during the first 12 months after diagnosis. Orthopedic surgeons can use the classification system preoperatively as an objective and comprehensive tool for therapeutic decisions and patient information (informed consent). In the future, comparisons between different treatment options for truly similar preoperative baseline situations can be obtained for the first time. Clinicians and researchers should be familiar with the new PJI-TNM classification and start implementing it into their routine practice. Our adjusted and simplified version ("PJI-pTNM") might be a more convenient alternative for the clinical setting.

[Complication management of infected osteosynthesis: Therapy algorithm for peri-implant infections]. / Komplikationsmanagement bei infizierter Osteosynthese : Therapiealgorithmus bei periimplantären Infektionen.

BACKGROUND: Peri-implant infections (PII) are one of the most frequent postoperative complications and require an individualized combined surgical and antibiotic management. In this review article we provide up to date scientific knowledge regarding the pathogenesis, classification, diagnosis and therapy of PII. The aim of this article is to explain the rational background and evidence of individual treatment options in order to elaborate concrete management recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The relevant scientific publications were critically reviewed for diagnostics, therapy and prevention of PII. Based on these data we present a combined surgical and antibiotic treatment algorithm for PII. RESULTS: With a consistent interdisciplinary action high healing rates with eradication of PII can be achieved. In acute PII (< 6 weeks) the implant can normally be retained but this is dependent on the soft tissue conditions, while in chronic PII (> 6 weeks) the implant generally has to be removed in a one or two step exchange, depending on the soft tissue, bone defects and pathogen. CONCLUSION: Scientific knowledge and clinical data have led to new treatment algorithms for PII with improved outcome, decreased morbidity and shortened hospitalization. Systemic individualized antimicrobial therapy, radical septic and plastic surgery are the cornerstones for successful treatment of acute and chronic PII. The local use of antibiotics and application of bone substitute materials are other techniques for treatment but the exact importance must still be determined.

Functional separation of septic and aseptic surgical procedures.

Current evidence does not favour constructional over functional separation of septic and aseptic surgical procedures in terms of overall hygiene maintenance and incidence of skin and soft tissue infections. In both laminar and turbulent flow air operating theatres, air is not a relevant source of pathogens if surface disinfection is carried out properly.Final cleaning after a septic procedure includes a thorough wipe-disinfection of all potentially contaminated near and distant surfaces, including maintaining the necessary and effective exposure time of the chosen surface disinfectant. Cleaning utensils and clothes of all team members must be disposed of before leaving the theatre, and a complete change of gowns is mandatory before re-entering the operating room area. Strict adherence to this code of behaviour will allow for efficient functional separation of clean and contaminated surgical procedures without compromising patient safety.