Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ?

BACKGROUND: While outcomes after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SP-DP) have been widely reported, impacts on splenic parenchyma have not been well studied. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes, particularly spleen-related outcomes, by assessing splenic imaging after SP-DP with or without splenic vessels removal. METHODS: Data for all patients who underwent SP-DP with splenic vessels removal (Warshaw technique, WDP) or preservation (Kimura technique, KDP) between 2010 and 2022 in two tertiary centres were retrospectively analysed. Splenic ischemia and volume at early/late imaging and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included, 51 in the WDP and 36 in the KDP groups. Median Charlson's Comorbidity Index was significantly higher in the WDP group compared with the KDP group. Postoperative morbidity was similar between groups. There was more splenic ischemia at early imaging in the WDP group compared to the KDP group (55% vs. 14%, p = 0.018), especially severe ischemia (23% vs. 0%). Partial splenic atrophy was observed in 29% and 0% in the WDP and KDP groups, respectively (p = 0.002); no complete splenic atrophy was observed. Platelet levels at POD 1, 2 and 6 were significantly higher in the WDP group compared to KDP group. At univariate analysis, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, platelet levels at POD 6, and early splenic infarction were prognostic factors for development of splenic atrophy. No episodes of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection or secondary splenectomy were recorded after a median follow-up of 9 and 11 months in the WDP and KDP groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Splenic ischemia appeared in one-half of patients undergoing SP-DP with splenic vessels removal at early imaging, and partial splenic atrophy in almost 30% at late imaging, without clinical impact or complete splenic atrophy. Age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, platelet levels at POD 6, and early splenic infarction could help to predict the occurrence of splenic atrophy.

Learning curve of robotic-assisted splenic vessel-preserving spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by one single surgeon: a retrospective cohort study.

AIM: Splenic vessel-preserving spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SVP-SPDP) has a lower risk of splenic infarction than the splenicvessel-sacrificing SPDP, but it is more technically demanding. Learning curve of robotic-assisted SVP-SPDP (RSVP-SPDP) remains unreported. This study sought to analyze the perioperative outcomes and learning curve of RSVP-SPDP by one single surgeon. METHODS: Seventy-four patients who were intended to receive RSVP-SPDP at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between May 2015 and January 2023 were included. The learning curve were retrospectively analyzed by using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients underwent RSVP-SPDP (spleen preservation rate: 83.8%). According to CUSUM curve, the operation time (median, 318 vs. 220 min; P < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (median, 50 vs. 50 mL; P = 0.012) was improved significantly after 16 cases. Blood transfusion rate (12.5% vs. 3.4%; P = 0.202), postoperative major morbidity rate (6.3% vs. 3.4%; P = 0.524), and postoperative length-of-stay (median, 10 vs. 8 days; P = 0.120) improved after 16 cases but did not reach statistical difference. None of the patients had splenic infarction or abscess postoperatively. CONCLUSION: RSVP-SPDP was a safe and feasible approach for selected patients after learning curve. The improvement of operation time and intraoperative blood loss was achieved after 16 cases.

Short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open spleen-saving distal pancreatectomies.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (MI-SPDP) versus open surgery SPDP (O-SPDP). It also aimed to determine the long-term vascular patency after spleen-saving vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomies (SSVDPs). METHODS: A retrospective review of 74 patients who underwent successful SPDP and met the study criteria was performed. Of these, 67 (90.5%) patients underwent SSVDP, of which 38 patients (21 open, 17 MIS) had adequate long-term post-operative follow-up imaging to determine vascular patency. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent open SPDP, whereas 23 patients underwent minimally invasive SPDP, out of which 10 (43.5%) were laparoscopic and 13 (56.5%) were robotic. Patients who underwent MI-SPDP had significantly longer operative time (307.5 vs. 162.5 min, P = 0.001) but shorter hospital stay (5 vs. 7 days, P = 0.021) and lower median blood loss (100 vs. 200 cc, P = 0.046) compared to that of O-SPDP. Minimally-invasive spleen-saving vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy (MI-SSVDP) was associated with poorer long-term splenic vein patency rates compared to O-SSVDP (P = 0.048). This was particularly with respect to partial occlusion of the splenic vein, and there was no significant difference between the complete splenic vein occlusion rates between the MIS group and open group (29.4% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.954). The operative time was statistically significantly longer in patients who underwent robotic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery (330 vs. 173 min, P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Adoption of MI-spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) is safe and feasible. MI-SPDP is associated with a shorter hospital stay, lower blood loss but longer operation time compared to O-SPDP. In the present study, MI-SSVDP was associated with poorer long-term splenic vein patency rates compared to O-SSVDP.

A systematic review of splenic artery variants based on cadaveric studies.

PURPOSE: The splenic artery (SA) is the largest and most tortuous branch of the celiac trunk with a wide spectrum of variants, particularly in its terminal branches. METHODS: The current study presents a systematic review of the English literature on the SA variations, with emphasis on its terminal branching patterns. RESULTS: Thirty cadaveric studies (3132 specimens) were included in the analysis. The SA originated from the celiac trunk in 97.2%, from the abdominal aorta in 2.1% and from the superior mesenteric or the common hepatic artery in 0.7% of cases. A suprapancreatic course was observed in 77.4%, retropancreatic course in 17.8%, anteropancreatic course in 3.4% and intrapancreatic course in 1.3%. In the majority of cases, the SA bifurcated into superior and inferior lobar arteries (83.4%), with trifurcation and quadrifurcation in 11.3% and 2.7%, respectively. Five or more lobar branches (1.4%) and a single lobar artery (1.2%) were rarely identified. The distributed branching pattern was found in 72.7%, whereas the magistral pattern in 26.9%. The inferior and superior polar arteries (IPA and SPA) were found in 47.7% and 41.7% of cases, respectively, while polar artery agenesis was recorded in 28.2%. The SPA usually originated from the SA main trunk (53.6%) or from the superior lobar artery (33.1%). The IPA emanated mainly from the left gastroepiploic artery (53%), from the SA (23.5%) or the inferior lobar artery (21.9%). Intersegmental anastomoses between adjacent arterial segments were identified in 14.2%. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the SA aberrations is important for surgeons and radiologists involved in angiographic interventions.

Laparoscopic ligation of splenic vessels for the treatment of hereditary spherocytosis in children.

BACKGROUND: Total splenectomy is the most effective surgical treatment for hereditary spherocytosis (HS). Nevertheless, post-splenectomy sepsis and hypoimmunity can pose a great risk to children. Some alternative treatments have been proposed to avoid the post-splenectomy complications. In this study, we propose such a procedure (laparoscopic ligation of splenic vessels, L-LSV) for the treatment of HS in children and investigate its effectiveness and feasibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 17 children with HS who underwent the L-LSV at our hospital between May 2015 and Apr 2018 were enrolled in the current study. All patients were followed-up for 3-38 months (mean 19.8 months). The volume of spleen was preoperatively and postoperatively measured using the AW VolumeShare5. The size of functional spleen and the condition of splenic infarction were evaluated using ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) after surgery. The routine blood, biochemistry and coagulation tests were carried out after surgery. RESULTS: The L-LSV was successfully performed in all patients. The average operative time was 115 min (range 60-180 min). No patients underwent blood transfusion during surgery, and the length of hospital stay varied 5-9 days after surgery (mean 7 days). Postoperatively, the red blood cells, platelet and hemoglobin were significantly increased (P < 0.05). The postoperative volume of functional spleen was significantly smaller than preoperative volume of spleen (307.393 ± 177.634 cm3 vs. 581.242 ± 270.260 cm3, P = 0.000). The recent volume of functional spleen was significantly bigger than the postoperative 1 month volume of functional spleen in ten children who were followed-up for more than 1 year (P = 0.004). The index of splenic infarction (the proportion of the postoperative 1-month volume of splenic infarction in the preoperative volume of spleen) was 0.31-0.99 (mean 0.53). There were no patients undergoing the blood transfusion after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The L-LSV is an effective treatment for HS in children; however, future studies should re-evaluate the long-term prognosis.

Laparoscopic splenic vessels and spleen-preserving extended distal pancreatectomy for single metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Laparoscopic splenic vessels and spleen-preserving (SVSP) distal pancreatectomy has been recommended to reduce long-term risk of developing infectious complications. Due to its technical challenge, most cases relate to <50% of the pancreatic gland being excised. We present our first case of a patient incidentally found to have a solitary pancreatic metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), following left nephrectomy for kidney cancer 15 years ago. He underwent laparoscopic SVSP-extended distal pancreatectomy (EDP). Final histopathology confirmed the diagnosis and margins were clear. He made a good recovery and despite loosing >70% of his pancreas, hasn't developed new-onset diabetes. No adjuvant chemotherapy was necessary, but he will require long-term follow-up. This case suggests that even when the pancreatic lesion is located more proximally, near or at the pancreatic neck, laparoscopic SVSP-EDP may still be considered a safe and preferable option despite its greater complexity, increased intraoperative bleeding risk and longer operative time.

Tips and tricks of splenic vessel preservation during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: While a laparoscopic approach can minimize postoperative morbidity in splenic vessel preserving (SVP) distal pancreatectomy (DP), this procedure can be technically challenging. A systematic approach to SVP minimizes the chances of vascular injury and maximizes the chances of successful splenic preservation. This video demonstrates a laparoscopic DP with SVP, highlighting technical tips and tricks that optimize the chances for SVP. PATIENT: The patient is a 14-year-old male with an incidentally discovered pancreatic tail mass. CT imaging demonstrates a 4.5 cm well-circumscribed tumor with the typical solid and cystic components of a solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPPT). Since SPPT is a rare pancreatic tumor associated with excellent prognosis following surgery, upfront minimally invasive DP with SPV was considered the optimal approach in this young patient. Following successful surgery, the postoperative course was uneventful. Pathology confirmed the diagnosis of a pT3N0. SPPT with negative margins. TECHNIQUE: Here we demonstrate a systematic approach to maximize the changes of SVP in DP. This approach, as demonstrated in the video, includes optimal patient and port positioning, dissection to optimize exposure of the distal splenic vessels, techniques to minimize vascular trauma especially splenic venous trauma, as well as supplemental measures to ensure postoperative patency of splenic vessels following completion of the case. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic approach may maximize the changes of successful SVP, while avoiding postoperative complications such as splenic infarct, left-sided portal hypertension or overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis.

The Straightened Splenic Vessels Method Improves Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), isolating the splenic artery and vein requires advanced techniques. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel method termed the 'straightened splenic vessels' (SSV) method for isolating the splenic vessels in LDP. METHODS: In SSV, to adjust the instrument axis, the splenic artery was straightened by grasping 2 points of its nerve sheath. Then, the layer between the splenic artery's nerve sheath and the pancreatic parenchyma was dissected. Next, the pancreas was mobilized from body to tail, and the splenic vein was straightened by 3-point retraction before isolation. To evaluate this method's efficacy, we investigated 51 patients who underwent LDP. RESULTS: In 39 patients who underwent LDP with splenectomy, the mean operating time was significantly shorter in the SSV group than in the conventional group (p = 0.004). In 12 patients who underwent LDP with preserving the splenic vessels, the mean intraoperative blood loss in the SSV group was 27.6 ml, which was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: This method may be applied as a standard procedure with little blood loss and short operation time for LDP. Larger prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the feasibility.

Laparoscopic splenic vessels ligation as a treatment of hypersplenism and thrombocytopenia in children.

BACKGROUND: Splenectomy and partial splenic embolization as the surgical approach in the treatment of hypersplenism and thrombocytopenia have been reported. However, there are still some disadvantages in the application of these techniques. In this article, we propose a new technique for the treatment of hypersplenism and thrombocytopenia in children and report our preliminary experience. METHODS: From Aug 2014 to Dec 2014, four children with hypersplenism and three children with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura were treated in our hospital. Laparoscopic splenic vessels ligation was performed in all patients. The gastric wall was suspended to expose the pancreatic tail and spleen, and the splenic artery was ligated at the superior border of the pancreas. The splenic venous branches were dissected and ligated at the splenic hilum using the Hem-o-lok. RESULTS: The laparoscopic splenic vessels ligation was successfully performed in all patients. The average operative time was 126 min (range 120-150 min). No patient required transfusion, and the length of hospital stay varied from 4 to 11 days (mean 6.6 days). The patients were followed up for 6-10 months (mean 8.5 months). The complete blood counts were within normal range. The size of spleen decreased postoperatively. The partial splenic infarction and the reduction in splenic blood flow were confirmed in all patients by postoperative ultrasound and CT. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic splenic vessels ligation is a feasible option for treating hypersplenism and thrombocytopenia in children.

Short- and long-term outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with radiologic infiltration of splenic vessels for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The effect of radiologic splenic vessels involvement (RSVI) on the survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) located in the body and tail of the pancreas is controversial, and its influence on postoperative morbidity after distal pancreatectomy (DP) is unknown. This study aimed to determine the influence of RSVI on postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients undergoing DP for PAC. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study of DP was conducted at 7 hepatopancreatobiliary units between January 2008 and December 2018. Patients were classified according to the presence of RSVI. A Clavien-Dindo grade of >II was considered to represent a major complication. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were included in the analysis. Moreover, 47 patients had vascular infiltration: 4 had arterial involvement, 10 had venous involvement, and 33 had both arterial and venous involvements. The rates of major complications were 20.8% in patients without RSVI, 40.0% in those with venous RSVI, 25.0% in those with arterial RSVI, and 30.3% in those with both arterial and venous RSVIs (P = .024). The DFS rates at 3 years were 56% in the group without RSVI, 50% in the group with arterial RSVI, and 16% in the group with both arterial and venous RSVIs (P = .003). The OS rates at 3 years were 66% in the group without RSVI, 50% in the group with arterial RSVI, and 29% in the group with both arterial and venous RSVIs (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: RSVI increased the major complication rates after DP and reduced the OS and DFS. Therefore, it may be a useful prognostic marker in patients with PAC scheduled to undergo DP and may help to select patients likely to benefit from neoadjuvant treatment.

Splenic vessels preserving versus Warshaw technique in spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy is widely used to remove benign or low-grade malignant neoplasms located in the pancreatic body and tail. Both splenic vessels preserving (SVP-DP) and splenic vessels ligating (Warshaw technique [WT]) distal pancreatectomy are safe and effective methods but which technique is superior remains controversial. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent both methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Major databases, including PubMed, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and The Cochrane Library, were searched for studies comparing SVP-DP and the WT for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy up to December 2021. The perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the SVP-DP and WT groups. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models. RESULTS: Twenty retrospective studies with 2173 patients were analyzed. A total of 1467 (67.5%) patients underwent SVP-DP, while 706 (32.5%) patients underwent WT. Patients in the SVP-DP group had a significantly lower rate of splenic infarction (OR: 0.17; 95% CI, 0.11-0.25; P < 0.00001) and incidence of gastric varices (OR: 0.19; 95% CI, 0.11-0.32; P < 0.00001) compared to the patients in the WT group; furthermore, they had a shorter length of hospital stay (WMD: 0.71; 95% CI, -1.13 to -0.29; P = 0.0008). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of major complication, postoperative pancreatic fistula (B/C), reoperation, blood loss, or operation time. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to WT, SVP-DP should be preferred to reduce splenic infarction and gastric varices, and WT may be more suitable for large tumors. Moreover, considering the shortcomings of retrospective study, a multicenter randomized controlled study with a large sample size should be conducted to verify our results.

The use of selective splenic vascular control in laparoscopic splenic vessels and spleen preservation distal pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: In the process of laparoscopic splenic vessels and spleen preservation distal pancreatectomy (LsvSPDP), because the splenic blood vessels have many small branches, how to safely separate the splenic blood vessels from the pancreas has always been the focus and difficulty of this operation. Many cases were switched to laparotomy, or the Warshaw method due to the inability to control bleeding during the separation of the splenic blood vessels. Therefore, we tried to use the selective splenic vascular control method when separating the splenic blood vessels to observe its effect on the conditions of the surgical patients during and after the operation. METHODS: We retrospectively collected 35 cases of LsvSPDP conducted in our center from September 2015 to December 2020, including 5 males and 30 females. Considering the influence of the surgical learning curve, the cases were divided into three groups. Finally, through statistics of its intraoperative and postoperative conditions, the effectiveness of selective splenic vascular control method can be judged. RESULTS: Patients in Group 2 and 3 showed significantly less blood loss (172.5 and 134.44 mL, respectively) compared to patients in Group 1 (541.43 mL; P=0.01). However, the amount of blood loss was not significantly different between Group 2 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of bleeding was significantly reduced by splenic blood vessel control technology. And it can improve the success rate of spleen preservation, preserve the success rate of splenic blood vessels, and reduce intraoperative bleeding.

Study on laparoscopic spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy procedures comparing splenic vessel preservation and non-preservation.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether two types of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Lap-SPDP) techniques are being implemented safely. The study compares the clinical outcomes from laparoscopic Warshaw operation (Lap-W) with those from laparoscopic splenic vessels preserving SPDP (Lap-SPDP-VP) and considers the role of those operations. METHODS: On August 2013, the Warshaw technique was introduced to our institution and 17 patients with a lesion in the distal pancreas who underwent Lap-SPDP by December 2015 were enrolled. Six patients who underwent a Lap-W and 11 patients who underwent a Lap-SPDP-VP were investigated retrospectively. RESULTS: In the Lap-W and Lap-SPDP-VP patients, the sizes of the tumors were 46.5±31.2 and 25.7±14.9 mm [Probability (P) value =0.0913)]; the operative times were 287 min (range, 225-369 min) and 280 min (range, 200-496 min); the blood loss was 95 mL (range, 50-200 mL) and 60 mL (range, 0-650 mL); the length of the postoperative hospital stay was 12 days (range, 8-43 days) and 11 days (range, 7-28 days); median follow-up was 19 months (range, 13-28 months) and 23 months (range, 6-28 months), respectively. There was no case of symptomatic spleen infarction in either group. However, partial infarctions of the spleen without symptoms were observed by computed tomography in three out of six cases (50%) in the Lap-W. No patient required reoperation and the postoperative mortality was zero in both groups. All patients were alive and recurrence-free at the end of the follow-up period. Collateral veins around the spleen developed in 83.3% (five out of six patients) in the Lap-W and developed in 12.5% (one out of eight patients) in the Lap-SPDP-VP. A significant difference was observed between groups (P=0.0256). Gastric varices developed in 33.3% (two out of six patients) in the Lap-W. However, no case of rupture of varices, or other late phase complications was observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Both the Lap-W and Lap-SPDP-VP were found to be safe and effective, and in cases in which the detachment work of the splenic vessels from the tumor or the pancreatic parenchyma is difficult, performing Lap-W, rather than Lap-SPDP-VP, is considered appropriate. While Lap-SPDP is recommended for patients with benign or low grade malignant diseases, long-term follow-up to monitor hemodynamic changes in splenogastric circulation is considered needed.

Toward a standard technique for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy? Synthesis of the 2013 ACHBT Spring workshop.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is currently a commonly performed procedure. Twenty-five retrospective studies comparing laparotomy and laparoscopy have dealt with the feasibility of this approach for localized benign and malignant tumors. However, these studies report several different techniques. The aim of this review was to determine if a standardized procedure could be proposed. Based on the literature and the experience of surgeons in the French Association of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation (ACBHT-Association française de chirurgie hépato-biliaire et de transplantation hépatique), we recommend primary control of the splenic artery, use of linear staplers for pancreatic transection, splenic vein control either at its end or its origin, and, depending on local conditions, preservation of the splenic vessels when splenic preservation is envisioned. Current data do not allow establishment of any definitive recommendations as to the ideal site of pancreatic transection, operative patient position, or the direction of dissection, which mainly depends on local practices. Control of the splenic vein remains the critical point of this procedure, and impacts the intra-operative strategy.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen and splenic vessels for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A laparoscopic surgery can be beneficial in a spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. AIMS: This report shows a 60-year-old woman who presented with persistent upper abdominal and bilateral lumbodorsal distending pain for one year. A computed tomography scan demonstrated a 4cm×5cm×5cm solid space-occupying mass in the distal pancreas. The patient was referred to minimally invasive surgery service for resection of the pancreatic lesion. METHODS: A laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy was performed. RESULTS: The mass was completely excised, the pathological examination revealed grade II pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The postoperative advantages of this approach were the early return of bowel function, minimal complications, and early resumption of normal activities. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates that minimally invasive surgery in the performance of a spleen-and-splenic-vessel preserving distal pancreatectomy is a feasible procedure without compromising the splenic function. (Wang WJ, Li JG, Li ZT, Fang Q, Zheng YG. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen and splenic vessels for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.