Comparison of Postoperative Axial Rotation of the Toric Intraocular Lens in Cataract Surgery Combined with Vitrectomy versus Cataract Surgery Alone.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the postoperative axial rotation of the toric intraocular lens (T-IOL) after cataract surgery combined with vitrectomy versus cataract surgery alone. METHODS: This retrospective, non-randomized, observational study enrolled patients who underwent cataract surgery combined with vitrectomy in one eye and cataract surgery alone in the contralateral eye. AcrySof Toric IOLs (Alcon Laboratories) were implanted in both eyes of the same patient. The axial rotation of the T-IOL was analyzed 3 months postoperatively using photographs obtained during and after surgery. In the combined group, T-IOL axial alignment was performed before vitrectomy. Preoperative corneal astigmatism and postoperative residual astigmatism were also compared in both groups. RESULTS: This study examined 36 eyes of 18 patients (74.7 ± 6.8 years). The axial rotation was 2.94 ± 1.70° in the cataract group versus 3.06 ± 2.34° in the combined group 3 months postoperatively, and the difference lacked significance (p = 0.98). In the combined group, the mean axial rotation during surgery was 2.17 ± 1.80°. Axial rotation within 5° was observed in 17 of 18 eyes (94.4%) in the cataract group and 16 of 18 eyes (88.9%) in the combined group, with no significant difference (p = 0.54). The comparison of postoperative residual astigmatism with preoperative corneal astigmatism revealed a significant improvement from 1.49 ± 0.40 D to 0.39 ± 0.47 D in the cataract group (p < 0.0001) and from 1.61 ± 0.40 D to 0.42 ± 0.43 D in the combined group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative axial rotation of the T-IOL in eyes that underwent cataract surgery combined with vitrectomy was stable and comparable to that of eyes that underwent cataract surgery alone.

Custom-Made Artificial Iris and Toric-Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Flange Fixation: A Case Report.

Different techniques for artificial iris implantation with or without an intraocular lens, depending on lens status, are described in the literature. We describe a surgical technique for a custom-made artificial iris and toric-intraocular lens intrascleral flange fixation. We modified the "Backpack" artificial iris implantation surgical technique to facilitate an accurate alignment of the toric-intraocular lens in a patient with aphakia, aniridia, and high asymmetric astigmatism secondary to blunt trauma. Two months after the surgery, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/30, corrected to 20/25 with a refraction of -2.00 in the diopter sphere with no residual astigmatism. The artificial iris implant and toric-intraocular lens were well-centered. The patient was satisfied with the visual and cosmetic outcomes. This procedure, however, is not complication-free as our patient developed uveitis and increased intraocular pressure during the postoperative period, which was treated successfully.

[On the issue of diagnostic accuracy of methods for analyzing the parameters of regular astigmatism]. / K voprosu o diagnosticheskoi tochnosti metodov indikatsii pokazatelei regulyarnogo astigmatizma.

Accurate measurement of astigmatism parameters is the basis for prescribing modern means of optical correction. In recent years, another direction for correcting astigmatism has emerged - implantation of toric intraocular lenses (TIOL). PURPOSE: This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of various methods for measuring the parameters of regular astigmatism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 83 patients (122 eyes) with regular astigmatism exceeding 1.0 D. Three groups were formed depending on the type of astigmatism. Spherical and cylindrical (power and axis) components of refraction were determined using automatic refractometry. The results were refined with subjective tests: power and axis tests with a cross-cylinder. The criterion for diagnostic accuracy was the level of corrected visual acuity. To assess the impact of cylinder position on visual acuity, discrete deviations of the axis of trial astigmatic lenses from the correct position (determined based on subjective tests) were modeled at 5, 10, and 15 degrees in both clockwise and counterclockwise directions. RESULTS: In the overall sample of observations, coincidence of results was found only in one-third of cases, with a tendency for discrepancies in data between the two methods in nearly 70% of cases. Statistical processing revealed significant differences only in the magnitude of the cylinder in the group with against-the-rule astigmatism (p<0.0005). An increase in maximum visual acuity corrected based on subjective test data was noted. With a deviation of the cylinder axis from the correct position by 10-15 degrees, regardless of the type of astigmatism, a significant tendency for a decrease in visual acuity was identified. At the same time, with a deviation of the cylinder axis within 5 degrees, a significant decrease in visual acuity was noted only in with-the-rule astigmatism and counterclockwise deviation. CONCLUSION: To achieve maximum visual acuity in the correction of regular astigmatism, objective method data must be refined with subjective tests. The results of modeling the deviation of the axis of the corrective lens from the proper position can be considered when evaluating the functional outcomes of TIOL implantation.

Propensity-matched comparison of postoperative stability and visual outcomes of toric intraocular lens with or without a capsular tension ring and updated meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the contribution of capsular tension ring (CTR) to postoperative stability and visual outcomes of a plate-haptic toric intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: This prospective cohort study was performed among patients underwent toric IOL (AT TORBI 709 M) implantation with or without CTR at the Eye and ENT hospital between April 2020 and November 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline factors. Postoperatively, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA) and residual astigmatism, as well as IOLs' rotation, tilt, and decentration, were analyzed. Grouped multiple linear regression analysis was used to model predictive factors of rotation in each group. Additionally, a meta-analysis of data from 4 publications (284 eyes) and current study was performed to evaluate the effect of CTR co-implantation on toric IOL rotation. RESULTS: After PSM, 126 eyes from each group were included for further analysis. Postoperatively, UDVA was 0.31 ± 0.38 logMAR and 0.27 ± 0.36 logMAR in the CTR and NCTR groups, respectively (P = 0.441), and residual astigmatism was 0.75 ± 0.52 D and 0.86 ± 0.65 D, respectively (P = 0.139). The rotation of toric IOL was significantly smaller in the CTR group than in the NCTR group (4.63 ± 6.27 vs. 10.93 ± 16.05 degrees, P < 0.001). The regression models of the two groups and the coefficients of LT were significantly different (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the meta-analysis confirmed that CTR co-implantation reduced toric IOL rotation (MD, - 1.59; 95% CI, - 3.10 to - 0.09; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: CTR enhances rotational stability of toric IOL by reducing the impact of LT, and CTR co-implantation is recommended in patients with lens thickness (LT) ≥ 4.5 mm, white-to-white (WTW) ≥ 11.6 mm, or high preexisting astigmatism.

Visual performance and rotational stability of a multifocal toric intraocular lens in myopic eyes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the visual performance and rotational stability of the multifocal toric intraocular lens in myopes. METHODS: This prospective, observational study included patients with an axial length of ≥24.5 mm and regular corneal astigmatism of >1 diopter who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery and implantation of a multifocal toric intraocular lens (AT LISA toric 909M). The visual acuity, defocus curves, residual astigmatism, rotational stability, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), modulation transfer function (MTF), spectacle dependence and patient satisfaction were evaluated 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Forty-three eyes from 30 patients were enrolled in this study. Postoperatively, uncorrected distance and near visual acuities (logMAR) were 0.09 ± 0.08 (standard deviation, SD) and 0.14 ± 0.08, respectively. The defocus curve analysis provided a bimodal curve showing two peaks of maximum vision at 0.0 D and at -3.0 D defocus level. The multifocal toric intraocular lens showed excellent rotational stability; the mean rotation was 4.02 ± 2.49 (SD) degrees at 3 months postoperatively. Refractive predictability was excellent with a mean spherical equivalent of 0.19 ± 0.37 (SD) diopters (D) and a mean refractive cylinder of -0.34 ± 0.39 (SD) D. CONCLUSIONS: The diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens, AT LISA toric 909M, provided effective distance and near visual acuities in myopic eyes. It was a predictable and effective device with good rotational stability for the correction of preexisting astigmatism during cataract surgery. In this study, more than 80% of patients achieved spectacle independence.

Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy versus toric intraocular lens implantation on correction of astigmatism in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy (FSAK) combined with non-toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation versus Toric IOL (TIOL) implantation in correcting corneal astigmatism in cataract patients. METHODS: Relevant literature was searched in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and SinoMed. Data from the included studies were extracted. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the correction performance of FSAK combined with non-toric IOL implantation and TIOL implantation using postoperative refractive astigmatism, correction index, and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) outcomes. Publication bias assessment and sensitivity analysis were also performed. RESULTS: Five comparative studies were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The TIOL group had smaller postoperative refractive astigmatism and a greater correction index compared to the FSAK group. The mean differences in postoperative refractive astigmatism and correction index between the two groups were - 0.19D (95% CI = 0.12 to 0.26, P < 0.01, I2 = 7%) and - 0.09 (95% CI = - 0.18 to 0.00, P = 0.04, I2 = 0%), respectively. We found no statistically significant difference in UDVA between the two groups (95% CI = - 0.01 to 0.11, P = 0.09, I2 = 70%). CONCLUSIONS: FSAK combined with non-toric IOL implantation was found to be less effective than TIOL implantation in correcting preoperative corneal astigmatism in cataract patients. The difference in the effectiveness of astigmatism correction between the two surgical methods seems to diminish, as the degree of preoperative corneal astigmatism decreases.

Effect of two different preoperative calculation schemes on visual outcomes of patients after toric intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative visual outcomes of two different preoperative corneal incision schemes in TECNIS toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. METHODS: In this randomized controlled study, patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism greater than 1.0 diopter (D) were included. These patients were grouped according to the different preoperative schemes: steep-axis group and minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group. The outcome measurements were the residual refractive astigmatism, visual acuity, changes of corneal astigmatism, and high-order aberration at 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: This study consisted of 90 eyes (45 eyes steep-axis group, 45 eyes minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group). 1 month after surgery, the refractive astigmatism was statistically lower in the minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group compared with the steep-axis group (0.58 ± 0.40D vs 0.38 ± 0.37D, P = 0.021). The minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group had a smaller difference vector (0.56 ± 0.38D vs 0.36 ± 0.35D; P = 0.047) and a smaller prediction error (0.60 ± 0.44D vs 0.37 ± 0.35D; P = 0.004). In the steep-axis group, corneal astigmatism significantly decreased compared with preoperative value (1.65 ± 0.57D vs 1.17 ± 0.64D; P < 0.001). In the minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group, the changes of corneal astigmatism before and after surgery were not significant. Moreover, total aberration and second astigmatism in ocular aberration were lower in the minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group compared with the steep-axis group (1.86 ± 1.09 vs 1.37 ± 0.95; P = 0.035 and 0.47 ± 0.28 vs 0.31 ± 0.19; P = 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSION: Minimum-residual refractive astigmatism incision had better astigmatism correction and more accurate prediction. The corneal astigmatism was stable 1 month after surgery. It might lead to better visual quality in the early postoperative stage. Trial registration number for prospectively registered trials: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04006912, 07/02/2019.

Long-term changes in the refractive effect of a toric intraocular lens on astigmatism correction.

PURPOSE: To examine the long-term changes in the astigmatism-correcting effect of a toric intraocular lens (IOL) after stabilization of surgically induced astigmatic changes due to cataract surgery. METHODS: Unilateral eyes of 120 patients that received a toric IOL for against-the-rule (ATR) or with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism were enrolled. Manifest refractive and anterior corneal astigmatism, and ocular residual astigmatism which is mainly derived from internal optics were examined preoperatively, at approximately 2 months postoperatively (baseline) and at 5 ~ 10 years postbaseline. The astigmatism was decomposed to vertical/horizontal (Rx) and oblique components (Ry), which was compared between baseline and 5 ~ 10 years postbaseline. RESULTS: In the eyes having ATR astigmatism, the mean Rx and Ry of the manifest refractive and corneal astigmatism significantly changed toward ATR astigmatism between the baseline and 5 ~ 10 years postbaseline (p ≤ 0.0304), but those of ocular residual astigmatism did not change significantly between the 2 time points. In the eyes having WTR astigmatism, the Rx and Ry of refractive, corneal, and ocular residual astigmatism did not change significantly between the 2 time points. Double-angle plots revealed an ATR shift in refractive and corneal astigmatism and no marked change in the ocular residual astigmatism in the eyes with ATR astigmatism, and there is no change in this astigmatism in the eyes with WTR astigmatism. CONCLUSION: The long-term changes with age in the effect of a toric IOL significantly deteriorated due to an ATR shift of corneal astigmatism in the eyes having ATR astigmatism, while it was maintained in eyes having WTR astigmatism, suggesting that ATR astigmatism should be overcorrected.

Correction of pre-existing astigmatism with phacoemulsification using toric intraocular lens versus spherical intraocular lens and wave front guided surface ablation.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate toric intraocular lens to correct of pre-existing astigmatism at the time of phacoemulsification compared to using of spherical intraocular lens followed by wavefront guided surface ablation. RESULTS: The patients were classified into three groups: Group A with 20 eyes of 19 patients having phacoemulsification with spherical intraocular lens only as a control group, group B with 20 eyes of 14 patients had phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lens and group C with 20 eyes of 16 patients had phacoemulsification with spherical intraocular lens and wavefront guided PRK three months later. Comparison pre-operative data for all groups showed no statistically significant difference regarding UCVA, BCVA, MRSE, and refractive astigmatism (P>0.05). Post operatively, there was a statistically significant difference for UCVA, BCVA, MRSE, and refractive astigmatism for group A compared to group B (P<0.05) and group A compared to group C but there was no statistically significant difference for group B compared to C regarding all these parameters (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, we found similar effects for both techniques in astigmatism corrected groups while both differed from the control group that was not corrected. Correcting preexisting astigmatism during cataract surgery should be in mind in every case to improve visual outcomes. Longer period of follow up are required to evaluate stability of these techniques and possibility of regression.

Rotational stability and clinical outcomes of a new one piece toric intraocular lens with anchor-wing haptics.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new toric intraocular lens (IOL) with anchor-wing haptics. METHODS: The new toric IOL with anchor-wing haptics (NS60YT, NIDEK Co., Ltd.) was implanted in eligible patients with age-related cataracts with preoperative corneal astigmatism of 1.0 D or greater at a university hospital and two private hospitals in Japan. The following IOL cylinder powers were evaluated: 1.50 D (NS60YT3), 2.25 D (NS60YT4), 3.00 D (NS60YT5) and 4.50 D (NS60YT7). All patients were assessed out to 12 months postoperatively. The primary endpoint was visual acuity (VA) with spherical addition at 6 months postoperatively, and the primary analysis calculated the proportion of eyes with VA with spherical addition of 0.1 logMAR or better. The magnitude of rotation was compared to the intended axis of IOL implantation at each postoperative examination. Adverse events were evaluated for the safety analysis. RESULTS: This study enrolled 64 eyes of 53 patients. At 6 months postoperatively, for all IOL powers, VA with spherical addition of 0.1 logMAR or better was achieved in 90% [95% confidence interval (CI): 80-96] of eyes. The mean IOL rotation was 5.3 ± 4.3° at 12 months postoperatively. The mean magnitude of rotation ranged from 1.9° to 2.5° between each postoperative examination from 1 day to 12 months. There were no vision-threatening intraoperative or postoperative complications for the duration of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The NS60YT IOL remained stable after implantation and was efficacious for treating 1.00 D or greater astigmatism in patients with senile cataracts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03242486 ) on August 8, 2017 - Retrospectively registered.

Refractive outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with arcuate keratotomy and standard phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: Femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy (FS-AK) and toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation are effective for the correction of eyes with corneal astigmatism. In this study, the postoperative refractive outcomes of patients receiving femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with FS-AK and patients receiving standard phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation were evaluated. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing FLACS with FS-AK (the FS-AK group) and patients undergoing standard phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation (the toric IOL group). The main outcome measures were uncorrected and corrected visual acuities, keratometric and refractive astigmatism, and vector analysis. RESULTS: The FS-AK group included 41 eyes with preoperative keratometric astigmatism of - 1.64 ± 0.42 diopters (D), and the toric IOL group included 53 eyes with preoperative keratometric astigmatism of - 2.29 ± 0.91 D (P < 0.001). Postoperative refractive astigmatism was comparable between the two groups. Compared with the FS-AK group, postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was significantly better (P = 0.005) and corrected visual acuity was marginally better in the toric IOL group (P = 0.051). The absolute angles of error were 9.95° ± 9.57° and 5.08° ± 4.94° (P = 0.02) in the FS-AK and the toric IOL groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both FLACS with FS-AK and standard phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation are safe and effective methods for astigmatism correction during cataract surgery. Standard phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation achieves better visual acuity than FLACS with FS-AK at the 6-month follow-up.

Refractive outcomes of toric intraocular lens in combined trabecular micro bypass stent implantation and cataract surgery in glaucomatous eyes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of trabecular micro bypass stents (iStent Inject) on refractive outcomes with toric intraocular lens (IOL) in glaucomatous eyes. METHODS: We identified glaucomatous eyes receiving a toric IOL between October 2017 and December 2020. Eyes with iStent implantation were included in the study group and eyes undergoing isolated phacoemulsification served as controls. Corrected and uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), and number of hypotensive drugs three months after surgery were evaluated. RESULTS: 26 eyes comprised the study group and 41 eyes the control group. Mean postoperative refractive cylinder was 0.26D in the control and 0.11D in the iStent group, with 63% and 85% of eyes with a cylinder of 0 and 85% and 92% of eyes with a cylinder ≤ 0.5D respectively. The mean absolute difference between target and outcome spherical equivalent was 0.26D in the control and 0.22D in the iStent group, with all eyes within 0.75D of target. LogMar uncorrected postoperative vision in eyes targeted for emmetropia was 0.04 in the control and 0.03 in the iStent group. There was a statistically significant reduction in IOP and number of hypotensive drugs in both groups, with a mean decrease in IOP of 8.6% in the control and 15.7% in the iStent group. The number of hypotensive drugs dropped from 1.63 ± 0.80 to 1.34 ± 0.91 in the control group and from 2.12 ± 0.65 to 0.44 ± 0.71 in the iStent group. CONCLUSION: Toric IOLs provide predictable refractive outcomes in glaucomatous eyes undergoing combined phacoemulsification with iStent implantation, reducing postoperative spectacle dependence.

[The impact of the position of toric intraocular lenses on the functional outcomes of phaco surgery]. / Vliyanie polozheniya toricheskikh intraokulyarnykh linz na funktsional'nye rezul'taty fakokhirurgii.

The article reviews data on the impact of the position (orientation) of toric intraocular lenses on the functional outcomes of cataract phacoemulsification surgery, discusses the algorithm of astigmatism correction with intraocular lenses including preoperative determination of the size and position of main meridians, calculation of lens parameters, marking of corneal meridians, intraoperative positioning, as well as rotation and/or repositioning of the lens when necessary.

Prediction of postoperative refractive astigmatism before toric intraocular lens implantation.

BACKGROUND: To determine the preoperative factors influencing refractive astigmatism after cataract surgery for astigmatism correction by toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and to evaluate the prediction model using these factors. METHODS: Prospective, observational case series. The right eyes of forty consecutive patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism of the total cornea of 1.5 diopters (D) or more in magnitude and scheduled for implantation of a non-toric IOL during cataract surgery with a 2.4-mm temporal clear corneal incision were examined prospectively. The vertical/horizontal astigmatism component (J0) and oblique astigmatism component (J45) of refractive and corneal astigmatism were converted using power vector analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was performed with refractive astigmatism at three months postoperatively as the dependent variable, and preoperative parameters including age, sex, refractive astigmatism, corneal astigmatism, sphere, spherical equivalent, intraocular pressure, corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, lens positions (tilt and decentration), axial length, and corneal higher order aberrations as independent variables. The root mean square (RMS) errors were calculated to express the regression model fit. RESULTS: The regression model for the J0 component was [Formula: see text] (R2 = 0.96, P < 0.001). The model for the J45 component was [Formula: see text] (R2 = 0.72, P < 0.001). The mean RMS errors for preoperative corneal astigmatism alone and the multivariate model were 0.58 D and 0.46 D, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between them (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Refractive astigmatism after implantation of a toric IOL can be predicted by the regression model more accurately than by corneal astigmatism alone. However, the prediction of oblique astigmatism remains a challenge.

Astigmatic correction of simultaneous femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with intrastromal arcuate keratotomy (ISAK) versus Toric intraocular Lens Impantation with conventional phacoemulsification.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacies in astigmatic correction of simultaneous femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with intrastromal arcuate keratotomy (ISAK) versus toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with conventional phacoemulsification in moderate astigmatism. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who had undergone cataract surgery by one surgeon. We identified patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism from + 0.75 to + 2.00 diopters (D) who had undergone astigmatic correction with FLACS with ISAK or toric IOL implantation with conventional phacoemulsification. We measured the visual acuity, intraocular pressure, automated keratometer, manifest refraction, and topography preoperatively and 1-day, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month postoperatively. The vector analysis of refractive astigmatism was performed. RESULTS: Of a total of 48 eyes of 48 patients, 27 eyes of 27 patients had FLACS with ISAK (AK group), and 21 eyes of 21 patients had conventional cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation (toric IOL group). Refractive astigmatism was significantly decreased in both groups. The mean preoperative and 6-month postoperative refractive astigmatism were 1.85 ± 1.07 and 0.99 ± 0.51 D, respectively, in the AK group (P = 0.028), and 1.84 ± 0.81 and 0.68 ± 0.21 D, respectively, in the toric IOL group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in refractive astigmatism between the two groups at 6-month postoperatively (0.99 ± 0.51 vs 0.68 ± 0.21 D, P = 0.057). At 6-month postoperatively, parameters for vector analysis of refractive astigmatism showed no statistical difference between the two groups. Corneal astigmatism was significantly decreased in the AK group. Corneal astigmatism from topography and the automated keratometer were significantly lower in the AK group 6-month postoperatively compared to toric IOL group (0.94 ± 0.40 vs. 1.53 ± 0.46 D, P = 0.018 for topography; and 0.98 ± 0.69 vs. 1.37 ± 0.41 D, P = 0.032 for the automated keratometer). CONCLUSIONS: FLACS with ISAK could be an effective procedure for reducing astigmatism as well as toric IOL implantation in cataract surgery.

Clinical differences between toric intraocular lens (IOL) and monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation when myopia is determined as target refraction.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the clinical results of toric intraocular lens (IOL) and monofocal IOL implantation when the target refraction value is -3 diopter (D) in cataract patients with corneal astigmatism > 1.5 diopters (D). METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review for patients with corneal astigmatism > 1.5D who underwent cataract surgery and their target refraction is -3D. 100 eyes (100 patients; monofocal IOL, 60; toric IOL, 40) were enrolled in the current study. Near and distant uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corrected VA, spherical equivalent and refractive, corneal astigmatism were evaluated before and after surgery. RESULTS: The near UCVA of the toric IOL group (0.26 ± 0.33) after cataract surgery was significantly better than that of the monofocal IOL group (0.48 ± 0.32) (p = 0.030). The distant UCVA of the toric IOL group (0.38 ± 0.14) was also significantly better than that of the monofocal IOL group (0.55 ± 0.22) (p = 0.026). Best-corrected visual acuity (p = 0.710) and mean spherical equivalent (p = 0.465) did not show significant differences between the toric IOL group and the monofocal IOL group. In the toric IOL group, postoperative refractive astigmatism was - 0.80 ± 0.46D and postoperative corneal astigmatism was - 1.50 ± 0.62D, whereas the corresponding values in the monofocal IOL group were - 1.65 ± 0.77D and - 1.45 ± 0.64D; residual refractive astigmatism was significantly lower with toric IOL implantation compared with monofocal IOL implantation (p = 0.001). There were no postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: When myopic refraction such as -3D was determined as the target power in patients with corneal astigmatism, toric IOL implantation led to excellent improvement in both near and distant UCVA.

Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes of diffractive bifocal toric and trifocal toric intraocular lenses 12 months after implantation in patients with moderate to high myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of bifocal toric and trifocal toric intraocular lenses (IOL) in patients with moderate to high myopia at 12 months after implantation. METHOD: This is a prospective and comparative study. In 120 eyes with moderate to high myopia and astigmatism, bifocal toric IOLs (n = 60 eyes) or trifocal toric IOLs (n = 60 eyes) were implanted. Eyes with axial lengths from 24.0 to 26.5 mm were included. Postoperative examinations measured near, intermediate, and distance visual acuity (VA), along with refractive measurements, binocular defocus curves, and patient satisfaction with the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. RESULTS: For uncorrected- and corrected distance intermediate VA, the trifocal group showed significantly better VA at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months than the bifocal group. Driving subscale scores from the questionnaire were significantly better in the trifocal than the bifocal group. Concerning the binocular defocus curve, uncorrected distance VA was significantly higher in the trifocal than bifocal group at test distances of -1.5 D. CONCLUSIONS: Both trifocal and bifocal toric IOLs effectively corrected the near, intermediate, and distance vision in patients with moderate to high myopia and astigmatism. However, intermediate vision was significantly better in eyes with trifocal than bifocal toric IOLs.

Assessment of posture-induced cyclotorsion during cataract surgery using the Verion image-guided system.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective observational study is to analyse posture-induced cyclotorsion in eyes undergoing conventional phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and femtolaser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using the Verion image-guided system. METHODS: Cyclotorsion was assessed in patients who underwent conventional phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation and FLACS between June 2017 and November 2017 with registration of iris architecture, limbal and bulbar conjunctival blood vessels acquired preoperatively using the Verion Reference Unit (the patient in sitting position) and intraoperatively under the microscope using the digital marker of the Verion image-guided system with the patient in supine position. RESULTS: Forty-four eyes of 30 patients (21 men and 9 women) were included with the mean age of 56.5 ± 17.1 (range, 19-89; median, 62) years. The mean cyclotorsion induced by change in posture from sitting to supine position was 5.84 ± 3.25° (range, 1-17; median, 5). Overall, clockwise (CW) rotation (59.1%) was noted to be more common than counter clockwise (CCW) rotation (40.9%). Furthermore, CW rotation was more common in men than in women, and CCW rotation was significantly more common in women. Patients who underwent bilateral sequential cataract surgery show similar cyclorotation (CW or CCW) in both eyes more often than mixed rotation (85.7% vs 14.3%). CONCLUSION: Significant cyclotorsion can occur in supine position during cataract surgery. Accurate assessment of the amount and direction of cyclotorsion aids in appropriate alignment of the toric IOL for optimal visual outcomes.

[Corneal astigmatism in patients with various ophthalmic pathologies]. / Rogovichnyi astigmatizm pri razlichnoi oftal'mopatologii.

PURPOSE: To analyze the prevalence, magnitude of corneal astigmatism, anatomical parameters of the eye and age of patients with the condition, as well as to assess the prospects of its correction with intraocular lenses (IOLs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved a retrospective analysis of initial biometric data of 128 379 patients (256 630 eyes) referred to the S.N. Fedorov NMRC «MNTK «EYE MICROSURGERY¼ research center in the years 2013 to 2018. The patients previously operated for cataract were examined 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: In 5 years, corneal astigmatism of over 1.0 D was diagnosed in 66 610 (25.96%) eyes. Among them, low astigmatism was observed in 86.30% of cases, with-the-rule - in 56.10%, compound - in 78.72%, and astigmatism combined with myopic refraction - in 61.48%. More severe astigmatism is characterized by thinner cornea and lens (p<0.05). Cataract surgery with implantation of toric IOLs was performed only on 2.56% of eyes. The average age of the operated patients was 68.42±13.3. Patients with implanted toric IOLs had 23% better uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and 15% better corrected visual acuity compared with outcomes of spherical IOL implantation. CONCLUSION: Corneal astigmatism of more than 1.0 D was observed in 25.96% of examined subjects. Patients with corneal astigmatism apply for cataract surgery 10 years earlier, when they are still in the working age, due to inability to engage in professional activities; in most cases, those patients are female. Astigmatism of up to 0.75 D is more common on the right dominant eye, of 2.0 D and higher - on the left. The correlation coefficients determined for study data indicate a barely noticeable relationship between biometric parameters and the degree of astigmatism. The use of toric intraocular lenses provides a 2-fold increase in uncorrected visual acuity compared to spherical IOLs.

Clinical evaluation of toric intraocular lens implantation based on iTrace wavefront keratometric astigmatism.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no standard technique for determining corneal astigmatism. The iTrace wavefront aberrometry of cornea calculated steep power and axis based on the best Zernike mathematical fit from all topo data within 4 mm circle. It was supposed to be more accurate than iTrace simulated keratometry which was calculated based on only 4 points on the circle of 3 mm. This aim of this study was to evaluate visual outcomes and rotational stability after toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using the wavefront aberrometry of the cornea with iTrace. SETTING: Single site in China, Shanxi Eye Hospital, Shanxi, China. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: The study included 85 eyes of 63 patients undergoing phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation. The IOL power and cylinders were chosen with the help of the iTrace toric planning program using wavefront keratometric astigmatism. Astigmatic changes were assessed using Alpins vector method over a 3-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Preoperative mean corneal topographic astigmatism was 1.91 diopters (D) ± 0.69 (standard deviation). Postoperative mean refractive astigmatism decreased significantly to 0.48 D ± 0.34. Surgical induced astigmatism was 1.73 D ± 0.77 and the mean correction index was 0.89 ± 0.22, showing a slight undercorrection. The proportion of astigmatism ≤0.50 D increased from 0 to 71.8% postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study on evaluation of clinical outcomes of toric IOL implantation in corneal astigmatism patients using iTrace wavefront keratometric readings. The findings show that use of iTrace built-in toric calculator is safe and effective for planning toric IOL surgery for wavefront keratometric astigmatism. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN94956424 , Retrospectively registered (Date of registration: 05 February 2020).