Radar-Guided Localization and Resection for Metastatic Nodal and Soft Tissue Melanoma: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Radar-guided localization (RGL) offers a wire-free, nonradioactive surgical guidance method consisting of a small percutaneously-placed radar reflector and handheld probe. This study investigates the feasibility, timing, and outcomes of RGL for melanoma metastasectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients at our cancer center who underwent RGL resection of metastatic melanoma between December 2020-June 2023. Data pertaining to patients' melanoma history, management, reflector placement and retrieval, and follow-up was extracted from patient charts and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Twenty-three RGL cases were performed in patients with stage III-IV locoregional or oligometastatic disease, 10 of whom had reflectors placed prior to neoadjuvant therapy. Procedures included soft tissue nodule removals (8), index lymph node removals (13), and therapeutic lymph node dissections (2). Reflectors were located and retrieved intraoperatively in 96% of cases from a range of 2 to 282 days after placement; the last reflector was not able to be located during surgery via probe or intraoperative ultrasound. One retrieved reflector had migrated from the index lesion, thus overall success rate of reflector and associated index lesion removal was 21 of 23 (91%). All RGL-localized and retrieved index lesions that contained viable tumor (10) had microscopically negative margins. There were no complications attributable to reflector insertion and no unexpected complications of RGL surgery. CONCLUSION: In our practice, RGL is a safe and effective surgical localization method for soft tissue and nodal melanoma metastases. The inert nature of the reflector enables implantation prior to neoadjuvant therapy with utility in index lymph node removal.

There are a variety of tools available to localize melanoma that had spread to deep layers of the skin or lymph nodes that can guide surgeons to the cancer when the tumor cannot be felt. We evaluated a marker that reflects radar signals that has been studied in breast surgery but not in melanoma. The marker was placed in the tumor before surgery and was located during surgery using a handheld probe, guiding the surgeon to the correct location. An advantage of the radar-reflecting marker we studied is that since it is safe to stay in the body, it can be placed ahead of the use of cancer medications and can keep track of the tumor as it responds to treatment. In a review of 23 surgeries in which the radar-reflecting marker was used, there was one case where the marker migrated away from the tumor and one case where the marker was not able to be located. Monitoring or alternative definitive treatment was provided in each of these cases. Overall, we found the marker to be an effective tumor localization tool for surgeons and safe for patients. Other marker options available are unable or less suitable to be placed a long time in advance of surgery due to either technical or safety reasons, so the radar-reflecting marker is especially useful when it is placed in a tumor ahead of medical treatment leading up to planned surgical treatment.

Successful Use of a Cadaver Model to Teach Ultrasound-Guided Breast Procedures to Surgical Trainees.

INTRODUCTION: In academic breast surgery, ultrasound use tends to be limited to radiology departments, thus formal surgical resident training in breast ultrasound is sparse. Building on residents' ultrasound skills in our general surgery training program, we developed a novel curriculum to teach ultrasound-guided breast procedures (UGBPs), including core needle biopsy (CNB) and wire localization (WL). We hypothesized that learning UGBPs on cadavers would be preferred to learning with a breast phantom model using chicken breasts. METHODS: Residents received a 1-h lecture on breast CNB and WL followed by a 1-h hands-on laboratory session. Olives stuffed with red pimentos were used to replicate breast masses and implanted in chicken breasts and the breasts of lightly embalmed and unembalmed female cadavers. All residents practiced UGBPs with a course instructor on both models. Residents completed anonymous prelaboratory and postlaboratory surveys utilizing five-point Likert scales. RESULTS: A total of 35 trainees participated in the didactics; all completed the prelaboratory survey and 28 completed the postlaboratory survey. Participant clinical year ranged from 1 to 6. Residents' confidence in describing and performing CNBs and WLs increased significantly on postlaboratory surveys, controlling for clinical year (P < 0.001). Eighty-point seven percent preferred learning UGBPs on cadavers over phantoms most commonly citing that the cadaver was more realistic. CONCLUSIONS: Following a novel 2-h UGBP training curriculum using phantom and cadaveric models, resident confidence in describing and performing UGBPs significantly improved. Most favored the cadaveric model and reported that the course prepared them for real-life procedures.

Endoscopic Features of Synchronous Multiple Early Gastric Cancers: Findings from a Nationwide Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the factors associated with synchronous multiple early gastric cancers and determined their localization. METHODS: We analyzed 8,191 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers at 33 hospitals in Japan from November 2013 to October 2016. Background factors were compared between single-lesion (n = 7,221) and synchronous multi-lesion cases (n = 970) using univariate and multivariate analyses. We extracted cases with two synchronous lesions (n = 832) and evaluated their localization. RESULTS: Significant independent risk factors for synchronous multiple early gastric cancer were older age (≥75 years old) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.257), male sex (OR = 1.385), severe mucosal atrophy (OR = 1.400), tumor localization in the middle (OR = 1.362) or lower region (OR = 1.404), and submucosal invasion (OR = 1.528 [SM1], 1.488 [SM2]). Depressed macroscopic type (OR = 0.679) and pure undifferentiated histology OR = 0.334) were more common in single early gastric cancers. When one lesion was in the upper region, the other was more frequently located in the lesser curvature of the middle region. When one lesion was in the middle region, the other was more frequently located in the middle region or the lesser curvature of the lower region. When one lesion was in the lower region, the other was more frequently located in the lesser curvature of the middle region or the lower region. CONCLUSION: Factors associated with synchronous multiple early gastric cancer included older age, male sex, severe mucosal atrophy, tumor localization in the middle or lower region, and tumor submucosal invasion. Our findings provide useful information regarding specific areas that should be examined carefully when one lesion is detected.

Radioactive seed localization is a safe and effective tool for breast cancer surgery: an evaluation of over 25,000 cases.

Radioactive seed localization (RSL) provides a precise and efficient method for removing non-palpable breast lesions. It has proven to be a valuable addition to breast surgery, improving perioperative logistics and patient satisfaction. This retrospective review examines the lessons learned from a high-volume cancer center's RSL program after 10 years of practice and over 25 000 cases. We provide an updated model for assessing the patient's radiation dose from RSL seed implantation and demonstrate the safety of RSL to staff members. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of various aspects of presurgical evaluation, surgical techniques, post-surgical management, and regulatory compliance for a successful RSL program. Notably, the program has reduced radiation exposure for patients and medical staff.

Assessment of Autologous Blood marker localIzation and intraoperative coLonoscopy localIzation in laparoscopic colorecTal cancer surgery (ABILITY): a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been proved to have similar oncological outcomes with open surgery. Due to the lack of tactile perception, surgeons may have misjudgments in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Therefore, the accurate localization of a tumor before surgery is important, especially in the early stages of cancer. Autologous blood was thought a feasible and safe tattooing agent for preoperative endoscopic localization but its benefits remain controversial. We therefore proposed this randomized trial to the accuracy and safety of autogenous blood localization in small, serosa-negative lesion which will be resected by laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: The current study is a single-center, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants would be aged 18-80 years and diagnosed with large lateral spreading tumors that could not be treated endoscopically, malignant polyps treated endoscopically that required additional colorectal resection, and serosa-negative malignant colorectal tumors (≤ cT3). A total of 220 patients would be randomly assigned (1:1) to autologous blood group or intraoperative colonoscopy group. The primary outcome is the localization accuracy. The secondary endpoint is adverse events related to endoscopic tattooing. DISCUSSION: This trial will investigate whether autologous blood marker achieves similar localization accuracy and safety in laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared to intraoperative colonoscopy. If our research hypothesis is statistically proved, the rational introduction of autologous blood tattooing in preoperative colonoscopy can help improve identification of the location of tumors for laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, performing an optimal resection, and minimizing unnecessary resections of normal tissues, thereby improving the patient's quality of life. Our research data will also provide high quality clinical evidence and data support for the conduction of multicenter phase III clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05597384. Registered 28 October 2022.

Pre-diagnostic faecal calprotectin levels in patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Faecal calprotectin (FC) is a potential biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. There is uncertainty if tumor characteristics are associated with FC levels. We investigated how tumor stage and tumor localization influence the extent of FC levels in patients with CRC in clinical practice. METHODS: In two cohorts of patients with CRC, we retrospectively analyzed FC tests (CALPRO®) performed within three months prior to diagnosis. One hundred twenty-four patients with CRC were included (mean age 68 years, 44% women). RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients with CRC (79%) had a FC ≥ 50 µg/g. FC correlated positively with tumor stage (UICC based on WHO TNM classification) (rs 0.24; p = 0.007) and with CRP levels (rs 0.31, p = 001), and a negatively with B-haemoglobin (rs -0.21; p = 0.019). The patients with right-sided CRC had significantly more often a FC ≥ 50 µg/g than patients with left-sided CRC (92% vs 74% p = 0.027). In a binary logistic regression analysis, tumor stage III/IV (adjusted OR 3.47; CI 1.27-9.42) and right-sided tumor localization (adjusted OR 3.80; CI 1.01-14.3) were associated with FC ≥ 50 µg/g. Tumor stage III/IV (adjusted OR 2.30; CI 1.04-5.10) and acetylsalicylic use (adjusted OR 3.54; CI 1.03-12.2) were associated with FC ≥ 100 µg/g. In a cox regression analysis, a FC ≥ 100 µg/g was not associated with survival (Hazard OR 0.61; CI 0.24-1.52). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated pre-diagnostic FC levels were common in patients with CRC in close proximity to diagnosis. Right-sided localization and tumor stage were significantly associated with a rise in FC levels.

An advanced RFID-based system to localize gastric and colon cancers during laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to improve the tumor localization system using radiofrequency identification (RFID) technology used during laparoscopic surgery for gastric and colorectal cancer. To this end, we developed a detection algorithm and designed improvement for the RFID clip. METHODS: To evaluate the proposed system, a swine-based animal study was conducted, followed by experiments on porcine stomachs and colons using the EASIE-R simulator. The success rates of endoscopic clipping, detection time, and detection accuracy, which is the distance between the detection point and RFID tag, were measured. RESULTS: Results of the in vivo swine animal study showed success in all three clippings and detections of the RFID clips. Results of the 60 RFID endoclip attempts using the EASIE-R simulator showed a total clipping success rate of 85.0% (n = 51/60; stomach, 83.3%, n = 25/30; colon, 86.7%, n = 26/30). The median detection times were 29.2 s for the stomach and 25.5 s for the colon. The median detection accuracy was 4.0 mm for the stomach and 4.5 mm for the colon. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that the proposed RFID-based system showed improvements over the system of a previous study. This RFID-based system is effective at localizing gastric and colorectal tumors.

Randomized controlled trial comparing magnetic marker localization (MaMaLoc) with wire-guided localization in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Wire-guided localization (WGL) is the standard of care in the surgical treatment of nonpalpable breast tumors. In this study, we compare the use of a new magnetic marker localization (MaMaLoc) technique to WGL in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients. Open-label, single-center, randomized controlled trial comparing MaMaLoc (intervention) to WGL (control) in women with early-stage breast cancer. Primary outcome was surgical usability measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS, 0-100 score). Secondary outcomes were patient reported, clinical, and pathological outcomes such as retrieval rate, operative time, resected specimen weight, margin status, and reoperation rate. Thirty-two patients were analyzed in the MaMaLoc group and 35 in the WGL group. Patient and tumor characteristics were comparable between groups. No in situ complications occurred. Retrieval rate was 100% in both groups. Surgical usability was higher for MaMaLoc: 70.2 ± 8.9 vs. 58.1 ± 9.1, p < 0.001. Patients reported higher overall satisfaction with MaMaLoc (median score 5/5) versus WGL (score 4/5), p < 0.001. The use of magnetic marker localization (MaMaLoc) for early-stage breast cancer is effective and has higher surgical usability than standard WGL.

[Diagnosis of breast diseases in a certified breast center]. / Senologische Diagnostik in einem zertifizierten Brustzentrum.

The beginning of the 21st century has seen immense improvements in the quality of diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer due to several, simultaneous developments. In particular, the introduction of a certification program from the German Cancer Society based on level III guidelines has enhanced the transparency and quality of treatment of breast diseases for all actors. As a result, patients have benefited from intensified cooperation especially between core disciplines in breast disease, gynecology, pathology, and radiology. The standardized and synoptic reading of multiple diagnostic modalities has enabled precise sampling of histologic specimen, which has improved prognosis and the successful individualization of therapy. In this article the benefits of breast cancer diagnosis and therapy in a certified breast center are illustrated using four case examples.

Diagnostic accuracy of the gastric cancer T-category with respect to tumor localization.

PURPOSE: Diagnosing early gastric cancer (EGC) or advanced gastric cancer (AGC) according to T-category is important for optimal GC treatment; however, the clinical and pathological diagnosis of tumor depths can sometimes vary. This study investigated the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of the tumor depth from the viewpoint of tumor localization and prognosis of patients with GC with discordance between clinical and pathological findings. METHODS: This study enrolled 741 patients with primary GC who underwent curative gastrectomy. Based on the clinical and pathological diagnosis of T-category, the patients were classified into four groups: Early-look EGC, Early-look AGC, Advanced-look EGC, and Advanced-look AGC. Tumor localization was classified longitudinally (the upper [U], middle [M], and lower [L] parts and cross-sectionally (the anterior [Ant] and posterior [Post] walls, and the lesser [Less] and greater [Gre] curvatures). RESULTS: Of the 462 clinical EGC cases, 52 were Early-look AGC cases that exhibited a significant association of tumor localization with the Post and Less in the U and M locations (UM-PL; p = 0.037). An Advanced-look EGC (p = 0.031) and Advanced-look AGC (p = 0.025) were independent prognostic factors for relapse-free survival each in pathological EGC and AGC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with clinically diagnosed EGC but with pathologically diagnosed AGC more frequently presented tumor in the UM-PL than in any other location. Selection of therapeutic strategy according to the clinical diagnosis might be critical; however, it should be also considered that the accuracy of preoperative assessments varies with tumor localization.

Evaluating the distribution of the locations of colorectal cancer after appendectomy and cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUNDS: The number of appendectomies and cholecystectomies performed is gradually increasing worldwide. An increasing incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) after appendectomy and cholecystectomy has been reported, but the location of tumors in certain segments of the colon and rectum after appendectomy and cholecystectomy is still uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the distribution of the locations of colorectal cancer after appendectomy and/or cholecystectomy in patients who underwent CRC surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who had undergone CRC surgery between 2015 and 2017 for the presence of previous appendectomy/cholecystectomy. Data were collected from the Colorectal Data Base of the University of Szeged, Department of Surgery. RESULTS: Surgery for CRC was performed in 640 patients during the study period. Data of 604 patients were analyzed. Appendectomy was performed in 100 patients (16.6%), cholecystectomy in 65 (10.8%), and both interventions in 18 (3%) before the CRC surgery. Out of those patients who underwent appendectomy alone, 92 (92%) had undergone appendectomy more than 10 years before the CRC surgery. Also in these 100 patients, the prevalence of right-sided colon cancer (CC) was 35% (n = 35), in comparison with the prevalence among the 504 other patients (20.4%, n = 103). The prevalence of right-sided CC among patients who underwent cholecystectomy alone was 36.9% (n = 24), in comparison with 21.2% (n = 114) of the 539 other patients. CONCLUSIONS: A significant left to right side shift in CRC was noted among patients who had previously undergone appendectomy/cholecystectomy. Because right-sided CC has a worse prognosis, the role of incidental appendectomy and routine cholecystectomy seems that need re-evaluation.

[Three Dimensional Measurement of the Space Distance Between the Hilum and Clinical Stage T 1 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Its Relationship with Lymph Node Metastasis].

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a novel method to quantitatively define the tumor location of clinical stage T 1 (cT 1) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate its impact on lymph node metastasis in a large cohort group. METHODS: We developed a novel method to transform the datum of 2D CT scans to 3D datum and to quantitatively measure the distance between the tumor and hilum through the Pythagorean theorem. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: A total of 399 patients (166 male and 233 female) with cT 1 NSCLC were enrolled in this study. The mean age was (57.48±10.88) yr., the mean distance between tumor and hilum was (5.44±1.96) cm, and the mean tumor diameter was (1.77±0.65) cm. Patients were divided into lymph node positive group (N + group) and lymph node negative group (N － group). By multiple logistic regression analysis, we identified 4 risk variables associated with lymph node metastasis. Gender (odds ratio ( OR)=2.118， P=0.022), distance between tumor and hilum ( OR=0.843， P=0.040), differentiation (moderate vs. high， OR=15.547， P=0.008；poor vs. high， OR=70.749， P=0.000), and cancer embolus ( OR=24.769， P=0.004) were independent risk variables associated with lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSION: Distance between tumor and hilum was identified as an independent risk factor associated with lymph node metastasis in cT 1 NSCLC.

[Neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach, duodenum and pancreas : Value of (hybrid) radiological diagnostics]. / Neuroendokrine Tumoren von Magen, Duodenum und Pankreas : Stellenwert der (hybriden) radiologischen Diagnostik.

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the stomach, duodenum and pancreas are rare tumors with a low incidence but the exact tumor localization and staging diagnostics are of critical importance for further planning of treatment. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Standard primary diagnostic methods include multimodal imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) but in 20-50% of the cases the localization of the primary tumor cannot be identified. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Modern hybrid imaging procedures combine radiological procedures and functional imaging, e.g. using somatostatin receptor (SSR) positron emission tomography CT (PET)/CT imaging. For the exact diagnostics of the primary tumor and distant metastases morphological and functional aspects can be combined for targeted diagnostics. For primary tumor staging a sensitivity of 80.0% and a specificity of 88.4% are given in the literature. PERFORMANCE: The application of SSR PET/CT led to a change in patient management in 44% of all cases according to a recently published meta-analysis and therefore had a significant influence on the further procedure. ASSESSMENT: The use of SSR PET/CT can provide critical information for further treatment and can lead to a significant change in treatment management in a relevant proportion of patients. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Radiological imaging diagnostics and in particular hybrid functional imaging procedures using PET/CT will become increasingly more relevant for the diagnostics, treatment and follow-up of NET patients.

Preoperative endoscopic clipping for rectal tumor localization in laparoscopic anterior resection.

Background: Increasing the number of rectal tumors undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy or endoscopic resection has increased the importance of accurate tumor localization. This study describes the preoperative endoscopic clipping method for the localization of rectal tumors and evaluated the feasibility of this technique.Material and methods: A total of 109 patients underwent preoperative endoscopic clipping to localize non-palpable rectal adenocarcinomas, which were located within 10 cm from the anal verge. Two endoscopic clips were attached to both lateral sides of the tumor's distal edge. For confirming the distal margin of tumors during surgery, attempts were made to palpate the clips by digital rectal examination.Results: In all 109 cases, endoscopic clips applied to targeted rectal lesions were easily palpable in the operating room. None of the tumors showed involvement at the distal resection margins (median 1.5 cm) in histopathology.Conclusion: Preoperative endoscopic clipping methods can be useful for localizing non-palpable rectal tumors.

[Preliminary application of endoscopic titanium clip localization combined with three-dimensional CT reconstruction in the determination of resection margin of gastric central cancer under laparoscopy].

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic titanium clip localization combined with CT three-dimensional reconstruction for the control of incision margin in early gastric cancer under laparoscopy. Methods: A prospective analysis was made for gastric cancer whose lesions were located in the middle of the stomach and T stage was 1 to 2 from October 2017 to January 2019 at Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital. Totally 25 patients were eventually enrolled in the study. There were 17 males and 8 females aging of (63.6± 7.2) years (range: 48 to 77 years). All cases were treated with titanium clip localization under endoscope combined with CT three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction to construct a virtual panorama of gastric cavity and lesions, and to design surgical margins. Laparoscopic surgical resection was performed according to the surgical margins designed before operation. The distance from the gastric angle to the origin of the minor curvature of the incisional margin, the distance from the gastric angle to the the center of lesion and the distance of the upper incision margin were measured under three-dimensional CT reconstruction and under actual specimen. Paired t test was used to compare the three distances measured by two methods. Results: The measured distances from the gastric angle to the center of the lesion and the proximal incisional margin under 3D reconstruction CT were according to the measured values of actual specimens ((2.67±1.38) cm vs. (2.83±1.56) cm, t=1.51, P=0.14; (5.23±0.60) cm vs. 5 cm, t=1.93, P=0.07); the measured distances from the gastric angle to the origin of the minor curvature of the incisional margin under CT 3D reconstruction were different with the measured values of solid specimens ((5.94±0.94) cm vs. (6.37±0.90) cm, t=3.52, P=0.00). Conclusion: The method of titanium clip localization combined with CT 3D reconstruction can provide a feasible laparoscopic localization method and incision edge solution for T1 to 2 gastric central cancer.

Vulvar cancer: Two pathways with different localization and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Two etiologic pathways for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are described: in a background of lichen sclerosus and/or differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and related to high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) as precursor. The aim was to compare the predilection site and survival of HPV-related to non HPV-related vulvar SCCs. METHODS: Data of patients treated for primary vulvar SCC at the Radboudumc between March 1988 and January 2015 were analyzed. All histological specimens were tested for HPV with the SPF10/DEIA/LiPA25 system assay and p16INK4a staining was performed using CINtec® histology kit. Vulvar SCCs were considered HPV-related in case of either >25% p16INK4a expression and HPV positivity or >25% p16INK4a expression and HSIL next to the tumor without HPV positivity. Tumor localization, disease specific survival (DSS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with HPV-related and non HPV-related vulvar SCC were compared. RESULTS: In total 318 patients were included: 55 (17%) had HPV-related (Group 1) and 263 (83%) had non HPV-related vulvar SCC (Group 2). Tumors in Group 1 were significantly more often located at the perineum compared to Group 2, 30% and 14%, respectively (p=0.001). The DSS, DFS and OS were significantly better in HPV-related than in non HPV-related vulvar SCC patients. CONCLUSION: HPV-related vulvar SCCs are more frequently located at the perineum and have a favorable prognosis compared to non HPV-related vulvar SCCs. Both localization and HPV-relation could explain this favorable prognosis. HPV-related vulvar SCC seems to be a separate entity.

Real-time detection system for tumor localization during minimally invasive surgery for gastric and colon cancer removal: In vivo feasibility study in a swine model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: During minimally invasive surgery (MIS), it is impossible to directly detect marked clips around tumors via palpation. Therefore, we developed a novel method and device using Radio Frequency IDentification (RFID) technology to detect the position of clips during minimally invasive gastrectomy or colectomy. METHODS: The feasibility of the RFID-based detection system was evaluated in an animal experiment consisting of seven swine. The primary outcome was to successfully detect the location of RFID clips in the stomach and colon. The secondary outcome measures were to detect time (time during the intracorporeal detection of the RFID clip), and accuracy (distance between the RFID clip and the detected site). RESULTS: A total of 25 detection attempts (14 in the stomach and 11 in the colon) using the RFID antenna had a 100% success rate. The median detection time was 32.5 s (range, 15-119 s) for the stomach and 28.0 s (range, 8-87 s) for the colon. The median detection distance was 6.5 mm (range, 4-18 mm) for the stomach and 6.0 mm (range, 3-13 mm) for the colon. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated favorable results for a RFID system that detects the position of gastric and colon tumors in real-time during MIS.

Diagnostic utility of staging abdominal computerized tomography and repeat endoscopy in detecting localization errors at initial endoscopy in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy has a reported localization error rate as high as 21% in detecting colorectal neoplasms. Preoperative repeat endoscopy has been shown to be protective against localization errors. There is a paucity of literature assessing the utility of staging computerized tomography (CT) and repeat endoscopy as diagnostic tools for detecting localization errors following initial endoscopy. The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic characteristics of staging CT and repeat endoscopy in correcting localization errors at initial endoscopy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large tertiary academic center between January 2006 and August 2014. All patients undergoing surgical resection for CRC were identified. Group comparisons were conducted between (1) patients that underwent only staging CT (staging CT group), and (2) patients that underwent staging CT and repeat endoscopy (repeat endoscopy group). The primary outcome was localization error correction rate for errors at initial endoscopy. RESULTS: 594 patients were identified, 196 (33.0%) in the repeat endoscopy group, and 398 (77.0%) patients in the staging CT group. Error rates for each modality were as follows: initial endoscopy 8.8% (95% CI 6.5-11.0), staging CT 9.3% (95% CI 6.5-11.0), and repeat endoscopy 2.6% (95% CI 0.3-4.7); p < 0.01. Repeat endoscopy was superior to staging CT in correcting localization errors for left-sided / rectal lesions (81.2% vs. 33.3%; p < 0.01), right-sided lesions (80.0% vs. 54.5%; p = 0.21), and overall lesions (80.8% vs. 42.3%; p < 0.01). Repeat endoscopy compared to staging CT demonstrated relative risk reduction of 66.7% (95% CI 22-86%), absolute risk reduction of 38.5% (95% CI 14.2-62.8%), and odds ratio of 0.18 (95% CI 0.05-0.61) for correcting errors at initial endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat endoscopy in colorectal cancer is superior to staging CT as a diagnostic tool for correcting localization-based errors at initial endoscopy.

Intraoperative ultrasound in breast cancer surgery-from localization of non-palpable tumors to objectively measurable excision.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in breast cancer surgery is a relatively new concept in surgical oncology. Over the last few decades, the field of breast cancer surgery has been striving for a more rational approach, directing its efforts towards removing the tumor entirely yet sparing tissue and structures not infiltrated by tumor cells. Further progress in objectivity and optimization of breast cancer excision is possible if we make the tumor and surrounding tissue visible and measurable in real time, during the course of the operation; IOUS seems to be the optimal solution to this complex requirement. IOUS was introduced into clinical practice as a device for visualization of non-palpable tumors, and compared to wire-guided localization (WGL), IOUS was always at least a viable, or much better alternative, in terms of both precision in identification and resection and for patients' and surgeons' comfort. In recent years, intraoperative ultrasound has been used in the surgery of palpable tumors to optimize resection procedures and overcome the disadvantages of classic palpation guided surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to show the role of IOUS in contemporary breast cancer surgery and its changes over time. METHODS: A PubMed database comprehensive search was conducted to identify all relevant articles according to assigned key words. CONCLUSION: Over time, the use of IOUS has been transformed from being the means of localizing non-palpable lesions to an instrument yielding a reduced number of positive resection margins, with a smaller volume of healthy breast tissue excided around tumor, by making the excision of the tumor optimal and objectively measurable.

Simple and reliable method for tumor localization during totally laparoscopic gastrectomy: intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography combined with tattooing.

We have developed a new method to localize a tumor during totally laparoscopic gastrectomy that uses intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography combined with preoperative clipping and tattooing. One or 2 days before the surgery, endoscopic clipping was performed just proximal to the tumor, followed by tattooing with India ink at the clipping site. Examination by intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography was performed at the tattooed site to detect the clips. The resection line of the stomach was determined with use of the detected clips as a marker of the proximal margin of the tumor. This method was attempted in 14 patients who underwent totally laparoscopic gastrectomy, and the clips were successfully identified in all patients. The clips were visualized as several layers of a hyperechoic bar, which was termed a "ladder sign." The mean time from insertion of the laparoscopic probe to identification of the clips was 2 min. The ladder sign is an important finding in this method.