Mendelian randomization analysis implicates bidirectional associations between brain imaging-derived phenotypes and ischemic stroke.

Brian imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs) have been suggested to be associated with ischemic stroke, but the causality between them remains unclear. In this bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study, we explored the potential causal relationship between 461 imaging-derived phenotypes (n = 33,224, UK Biobank) and ischemic stroke (n = 34,217 cases/406,111 controls, Multiancestry Genome-Wide Association Study of Stroke). Forward MR analyses identified five IDPs associated with ischemic stroke, including mean diffusivity (MD) in the right superior fronto-occipital fasciculus (1.22 [95% CI, 1.11-1.34]), MD in the left superior fronto-occipital fasciculus (1.30 [1.17-1.44]), MD in the anterior limb of the right internal capsule (1.36 [1.22-1.51]), MD in the right anterior thalamic radiation (1.17 [1.09-1.26]), and MD in the right superior thalamic radiation (1.23 [1.11-1.35]). In the reverse MR analyses, ischemic stroke was identified to be associated with three IDPs, including high isotropic or free water volume fraction in the body of corpus callosum (beta, 0.189 [95% confidence interval, 0.107-0.271]), orientation dispersion index in the pontine crossing tract (0.175 [0.093-0.257]), and volume of the third ventricle (0.219 [0.138-0.301]). This bidirectional two-sample MR study suggested five predictors and three diagnostic markers for ischemic stroke at the brain-imaging level. Further studies are warranted to replicate our findings and clarify underlying mechanisms.

Associations Between Temporomandibular Disorders and Brain Imaging-Derived Phenotypes.

OBJECTIVE: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) affect the temporomandibular joint and associated structures. Despite its prevalence and impact on quality of life, the underlying mechanisms of TMD remain unclear. Magnetic resonance imaging studies suggest brain abnormalities in patients with TMD. However, these lines of evidence are essentially observational and cannot infer a causal relationship. This study employs Mendelian randomisation (MR) to probe causal relationships between TMD and brain changes. METHODS: Genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics for TMD were collected, along with brain imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs). Instrumental variables were selected from the GWAS summary statistics and used in bidirectional 2-sample MR analyses. The inverse-variance weighted analysis was chosen as the primary method. In addition, false discovery rate (FDR) correction of P value was used. RESULTS: Eleven IDPs related to brain imaging alterations showed significant causal associations with TMD (P-FDR < .05), validated through sensitivity analysis. In forward MR, the mean thickness of left caudal middle frontal gyrus (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67-0.87; P-FDR = 1.15 × 10-2) and the volume of right superior frontal gyrus (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.10-1.39; P-FDR = 2.26 × 10-2) exerted significant causal effects on TMD. In the reverse MR analysis, TMD exerted a significant causal effect on 9 IDPs, including the mean thickness of the left medial orbitofrontal cortex (ß = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.08; P-FDR = 2.06 × 10-11), the volume of the left magnocellular nucleus (ß = -0.15; 95% CI, -0.22 to -0.09; P-FDR = 3.26 × 10-4), the mean intensity of the right inferior-lateral ventricle (ß = -0.09; 95% CI, -0.14 to -0.04; P-FDR = 2.23 × 10-2), the volume of grey matter in the anterior division of the left superior temporal gyrus (ß = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.04-0.14; P-FDR = 1.69 × 10-2), and so forth. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides genetic evidence supporting the bidirectional causal associations between TMD and brain IDPs, shedding light on potential neurobiological mechanisms underlying TMD development and its relationship with brain structure.