Avoiding Psychological Pitfalls in Aesthetic Medical Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) in an aesthetic surgery setting in the region of Southwest China, and to ascertain the differences in terms of body images between patients in the aesthetic setting and general Chinese population. This study tracked patient satisfaction with their body image changes while undergoing aesthetic medical procedures to identify whether the condition of patients who were presenting with BDD symptoms or their psychological symptoms could be improved by enhancing their appearance. Additionally, this study explored whether there was improvement in quality of life (QoL) and self-esteem after aesthetic medical procedures. METHODS: A total of 106 female patients who were undergoing aesthetic medical procedures for the first time (plastic surgery, n = 26; minimally invasive aesthetic treatment, n = 42; and aesthetic dermatological treatment, n = 38) were classified as having body dysmorphic disorder symptoms or not having body dysmorphic disorder symptoms, based on the body dysmorphic disorder examination (BDDE), which was administered preoperatively. These patients were followed up for 1 month after the aesthetic procedures. The multidimensional body self-relations questionnaire-appearance scales (MBSRQ-AS) and rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE-S) were used to assess patients' preoccupation with appearance and self-esteem pre-procedure and 1 month post-procedure. Additionally, 100 female healthy control participants were recruited as a comparative group into this study and they were also assessed using BDDE, MBSRQ-AS, and RSE-S. RESULTS: A total of 14.2 % of 106 aesthetic patients and 1 % of 100 healthy controls were diagnosed with BDD to varying extents. BDDE scores were 72.83 (SD ± 30.7) and 68.18 (SD ± 31.82), respectively, before and after the procedure for the aesthetic patient group and 43.44 (SD ± 15.65) for the healthy control group (F = 34.28; p < 0.001). There was a significant difference between the groups in subscales of MBSRQ-AS, i.e. appearance evaluation (F = 31.31; p < 0.001), appearance orientation (F = 31.65; p < 0.001), body areas satisfaction (F = 27.40; p < 0.001), and RSE-S scores (F = 20.81; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference, however, in subscales of MBSRQ-AS, i.e. overweight preoccupation (F = 1.685; p = 0.187), self-classified weight (F = 0.908; p = 0.404) between groups. All the subscales of MBSRQ-AS showed significant differences between the aesthetic patients (pre-procedure) and female adult norms from Dr. Cash's result given in Table 4 (p < 0.001). The study also showed that there were no significant differences in the scores of BDDE, MBSRQ-AS, and RSE-S of those fifteen aesthetic patients diagnosed with BDD after aesthetic procedures lasting one month. CONCLUSION: There was a high prevalence rate (14.2 %) of body dysmorphic disorder in aesthetic procedure seekers, and it seemed that those patients suffering from BDD were more likely to be dissatisfied with the results of the aesthetic medical procedures. However, general aesthetic patients showed improvement in most assessments which indicated that aesthetic medical procedures could not only enhance patient appearance, but also patient low self-esteem and QoL. Self-satisfaction could also be promoted. A screening procedure for BDD including suitable screening questionnaires might be considered for routine use in aesthetic clinical settings to minimize dissatisfaction and complaints. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that the authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors. www.springer.com/00266 .

A Comprehensive Review of Minimally Invasive Dermatosurgical Procedures.

Minimally invasive dermatosurgical procedures have revolutionized the field of dermatology, offering patients effective treatment options with reduced risks and downtime. This review provides a comprehensive overview of these procedures, beginning with their definition and historical context. We classify minimally invasive techniques, including both surgical and nonsurgical approaches, and explore their wide-ranging applications in cosmetic and therapeutic dermatology. Patient selection, preoperative assessment, techniques, clinical outcomes, and comparisons with traditional surgical methods are thoroughly examined. The implications for clinical practice are discussed, emphasizing the importance of integrating minimally invasive techniques into dermatologic care to enhance patient outcomes. Furthermore, areas for future research are identified, highlighting the need for ongoing studies to optimize techniques, evaluate long-term outcomes, and explore emerging technologies. Overall, this review underscores the significance of minimally invasive dermatosurgical procedures in advancing dermatologic practice and improving patient care.

Aesthetic Procedures and Psychological Wellbeing in Saudi College Students: An In-Depth Exploration.

Purpose: Minimally invasive aesthetic procedures are widely popular among the youth. Despite their prevalence, there is a significant gap in the research concerning the relationship between these procedures and psychological wellbeing, as well as an insufficient exploration of the barriers and motivators influencing their adoption, this study aims to address these gaps. Methods: This cross-sectional study has utilized a secure online survey directed at Saudi university students as the target population. The survey was consisting of 18-item electronic questionnaire including of 4 parts (demographical data, history of psychological illness and screening of current psychological wellbeing using WHO-5 well-being tool, history of doing cosmetic procedure, or willingness to do in the future, barriers and motivators to do cosmetic procedures), and it was distributed across multiple social media platforms. Results: A total of 8443 college students completed the study questionnaire. Exactly 1096 (13%) of the students underwent a cosmetic procedure. The most reported procedures were laser hair removal (9.1%), filler (5.3%), skin boosters (2.8%), and Botulinum toxin A injections (Botox) (2.6%). The most ranked motivators were being painless, with no side effects (8.8 out of 10), followed by being free (8.0 out of 10) and enhancing self-confidence (7.4 out of 10). Conclusion: No significant difference recorded at the overall psychological well-being score between who underwent cosmetic procedures and who did not.

Utilization and Cost of Inpatient Dermatologic Procedures: A Cross-sectional Analysis.

Knowledge surrounding inpatient dermatologic procedure costs is limited; therefore to learn more, we performed a cross-sectional analysis of dermatologic procedures contained in a publicly available Washington State Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System database from 2014. Dermatologic procedure utilization and cost were evaluated based on several parameters including demographics, length of hospital stay, payments, and payers. SAS 9.4 was used for the analysis. A total of 14,768 patients underwent dermatologic procedures in 2014 and 81.0% were white. The average age was 53 years (SD = 0.17), and the average payment for all patients who underwent dermatologic procedures was $85,059.48 (SD = $1,284.34). The average hospital length of stay was 8.91 days (SD = 0.07). The most common admission type was elective (66.2%), the most common admit source was a non-healthcare facility point of origin (78.2%), the most common primary payer was Medicare (36.2%), and the most common procedure was incision and drainage of skin and subcutaneous tissue (26.5%), followed by closure of skin and subcutaneous tissue of other sites (20%). This analysis demonstrated that inpatient dermatologic procedures are a significant driver of inpatient health care costs, and it is critical to determine factors that increase inpatient costs related to dermatologic procedures in order to develop strategies for reducing healthcare costs.

Common Dermatologic Procedures.

Dermatologists perform a wide variety of procedures on a daily basis. The skin biopsy is a fundamental technique that can be performed by all physicians who manage cutaneous conditions. Specimens should always be sent for pathologic evaluation, regardless of whether the sampled lesion appears benign. Postoperative care and education are critical for minimizing complications.

Long-term efficacy, safety and durability of Juvéderm® XC.

Over the last decade, there has been increasing interest in minimally invasive cosmetic treatments, especially for facial rejuvenation. Next to botulinum toxin injection, the injection of soft tissue fillers is the second most frequent minimally invasive procedure performed in the USA. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is the most commonly used dermal filler. One of patients' main concerns about filler injections pertains to pain and discomfort. Topical anesthetics, nerve blocks, and/or the incorporation of lidocaine to the filler have been applied in order to reduce distress and pain. Despite nerve blocks being an effective form of anesthesia, they may distort the area to be treated, as well as lengthen and complicate the procedure. Studies have shown that the incorporation of lidocaine to HA fillers significantly reduces pain and discomfort. Yet, one of the dilemmas about the addition of lidocaine solution to HA fillers is the possible alteration of the physical characteristics of the product by negatively impacting the efficacy and/or duration of the filler. The concern is that the addition of lidocaine could dilute the product, creating less correction per mL, changing the product's viscosity and consequently the "lifting" ability. Also, this dilution could reduce the product's duration. There may be a difference between a physician adding an aqueous solution into a lidocaine-free version of HA and the pre-incorporated lidocaine version of HA. An aqueous solution might dilute the product, while the pre-incorporated powder lidocaine appears to avoid this problem. Juvéderm® XC is manufactured with powder lidocaine 0.3%; it is associated with significantly less injection pain than Juvéderm® and other lidocaine-free versions of HA. Studies have shown that lidocaine enhances treatment comfort and optimizes the injection experience while maintaining a similar safety and effectiveness profile. Regarding the longevity, further study is necessary to determine if there is any difference in durability.

Procedimientos en dermatología pediátrica: anestesia y sedoanalgesia / Pediatric dermatologic procedures: anesthesia, sedoanalgesia

La dermatología pediátrica continúa desarrollándose y junto con ella aumentan el número y complejidad de procedimientos realizados en esta población. Los niños poseen un menor umbral del dolor y mayor ansiedad al someterse a estos. Por ello, sólo deben realizarse las intervenciones realmente necesarias y evaluar las características de cada paciente para definir el momento óptimo, la técnica más adecuada y estrategias de manejo de dolor y ansiedad. Los dermatólogos debemos estar familiarizados con las técnicas no farmacológicas, sedantes, analgésicos perioperatorios y anestésicos que son actualmente de uso rutinario en procedimientos pediátricos, ya que tenemos la obligación clínica, ética y moral de minimizar el dolor y sufrimiento de los niños.

Pediatric dermatology continues to evolve and with it increases the number and complexity of procedures performed in this population. Children have a lower pain threshold and increased anxiety to undergo these procedures. Therefore only really necessary interventions must be performed and assess the characteristics of each patient to define the optimal time, the most appropriate technique and management strategies of pain and anxiety. Dermatologists should be familiar with non-pharmacological techniques, sedatives, perioperative analgesics and anesthetics that are currently in routine use in pediatric procedures, because we have clinical, ethical and moral obligation to minimize the pain and suffering of children.