Optimized Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Anti-PEG Antibody Detection in Healthy Donors and Patients Treated with PEGylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.

There is considerable interest in quantifying anti-PEG antibodies, given their potential involvement in accelerated clearance, complement activation, neutralization, and acute reactions associated with drug delivery systems. Published and commercially available anti-PEG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) differ significantly in terms of reagents and conditions, which could be confusing to users who want to perform in-house measurements. Here, we optimize the ELISA protocol for specific detection of anti-PEG IgG and IgM in sera from healthy donors and in plasma from cancer patients administered with PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin. The criterion of specificity is the ability of free PEG or PEGylated liposomes to inhibit the ELISA signals. We found that coating high-binding plates with monoamine methoxy-PEG5000, as opposed to bovine serum albumin-PEG20000, and blocking with 1% milk, as opposed to albumin or lysozyme, significantly improve the specificity, with over 95% of the signal being blocked by competition. Despite inherent between-assay variability, setting the cutoff value of the optical density at the 80th percentile consistently identified the same subjects. Using the optimized assay, we longitudinally measured levels of anti-PEG IgG/IgM in cancer patients before and after the PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy cycle (1 month apart, three cycles total). Antibody titers did not show any increase but rather a decrease between treatment cycles, and up to 90% of antibodies was bound to the infused drug. This report is a step toward harmonizing anti-PEG assays in human subjects, emphasizing the cost-effectiveness and optimized specificity.

Effect of Composition and Size on Surface Properties of Anti-Cancer Nanoparticles.

Liposomal formulations offer significant advantages as anticancer drug carriers for targeted drug delivery; however, due to their complexity, clinical translation has been challenging. In addition, liposomal product manufacturing has been interrupted in the past, as was the case for Doxil® (doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome injection). Here, interfacial tension (IFT) measurements were investigated as a potential physicochemical characterization tool to aid in liposomal product characterization during development and manufacturing. A pendant drop method using an optical tensiometer was used to measure the interfacial tension of various analogues of Doxil® liposomal suspensions in air and in dodecane. The effect of liposome concentration, formulation (PEG and cholesterol content), presence of encapsulated drug, as well as average particle size was analyzed. It was observed that Doxil® analog liposomes demonstrate surfactant-like behavior with a sigmoidal-shape interfacial tension vs. concentration curve. This behavior was heavily dependent on PEG content, with a complete loss of surfactant-like behavior when PEG was removed from the formulation. In addition to interfacial tension, three data analyses were identified as able to distinguish between formulations with variations in PEG, cholesterol, and particle size: (i) polar and non-polar contribution to interfacial tension, (ii) liposomal concentration at which the polar and non-polar components were equal, and (iii) rate of interfacial tension decay after droplet formation, which is indicative of how quickly liposomes migrate from the bulk of the solution to the surface. We demonstrate for the first time that interfacial tension can be used to detect certain liposomal formulation changes, such as PEG content, encapsulated drug presence, and size variability, and may make a useful addition to physicochemical characterization during development and manufacturing of liposomal products.

Differences in Physico-Chemical Properties and Immunological Response in Nanosimilar Complex Drugs: The Case of Liposomal Doxorubicin.

This study aims to highlight the impact of physicochemical properties on the behaviour of nanopharmaceuticals and how much carrier structure and physiochemical characteristics weigh on the effects of a formulation. For this purpose, two commercially available nanosimilar formulations of Doxil and their respective carriers were compared as a case study. Although the two formulations were "similar", we detected different toxicological effects (profiles) in terms of in vitro toxicity and immunological responses at the level of cytokines release and complement activation (iC3b fragment), that could be correlated with the differences in the physicochemical properties of the formulations. Shedding light on nanosimilar key quality attributes of liposome-based materials and the need for an accurate characterization, including investigation of the immunological effects, is of fundamental importance considering their great potential as delivery system for drugs, genes, or vaccines and the growing market demand.

Anticancer Nanotherapeutics in Clinical Trials: The Work behind Clinical Translation of Nanomedicine.

The ultimate goal of nanomedicine has always been the generation of translational technologies that can ameliorate current therapies. Cancer disease represented the primary target of nanotechnology applied to medicine, since its clinical management is characterized by very toxic therapeutics. In this effort, nanomedicine showed the potential to improve the targeting of different drugs by improving their pharmacokinetics properties and to provide the means to generate new concept of treatments based on physical treatments and biologics. In this review, we considered different platforms that reached the clinical trial investigation, providing an objective analysis about their physical and chemical properties and the working mechanism at the basis of their tumoritr opic properties. With this review, we aim to help other scientists in the field in conceiving their delivering platforms for clinical translation by providing solid examples of technologies that eventually were tested and sometimes approved for human therapy.

Doxil chemotherapy plus liposomal P5 immunotherapy decreased myeloid-derived suppressor cells in murine model of breast cancer.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) play a pivotal role in cancer. To overcome the problem of the MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment in this study, a combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy was used. For this purpose, a liposomal formulation of P5 peptide and PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil®) was utilized to treat mice bearing HER2+ tumor model. The results revealed that Doxil® administration before immunotherapy had not only reduced the population and functions of the MDSCs in the spleen (P < 0.001) and the tumor microenvironment (P < 0.05) but had also supported further immunotherapy including enhanced CD4+ (P < 0.01) and CD8+ lymphocyte (P < 0.001) population and IFN-γ production (P < 0.001). This effect was also more pronounced with a liposomal P5 and Doxil® compared with free peptide and doxorubicin. In conclusion, the results demonstrated that Doxil® plus liposomal P5 could have a decreasing effect on MDSCs and tumor growth, and it could be beneficial in breast cancer treatment.

Assessing Advantages and Drawbacks of Rapidly Generated Ultra-Large 3D Breast Cancer Spheroids: Studies with Chemotherapeutics and Nanoparticles.

Traditionally, two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cell culture models have been used to study in vitro conditions for their ease of use, simplicity and low cost. However, recently, three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models have been heavily investigated as they provide better physiological relevance for studying various disease behaviors, cellular activity and pharmaceutical interactions. Typically, small-sized tumor spheroid models (100-500 µm) are used to study various biological and physicochemical activities. Larger, millimetric spheroid models are becoming more desirable for simulating native tumor microenvironments (TMEs). Here, we assess the use of ultra-large spheroid models (~2000 µm) generated from scaffolds made from a nozzle-free, ultra-high resolution printer; these models are explored for assessing chemotherapeutic responses with molecular doxorubicin (DOX) and two analogues of DoxilⓇ (Dox-NPⓇ, DoxovesTM) on MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. To provide a comparative baseline, small spheroid models (~500 µm) were developed using a self-aggregation method of MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines, and underwent similar drug treatments. Analysis of both large and small MCF-7 spheroids revealed that Dox-NP tends to have the highest level of inhibition, followed by molecular doxorubicin and then Doxoves. The experimental advantages and drawbacks of using these types of ultra-large spheroids for cancer research are discussed.

Optimization of post-insertion method to conjugate Doxil with anti-CD133 monoclonal antibodies: Investigating the specific binding and cytotoxicity to colorectal cancer cells in vitro.

In this paper, Doxil coupled with anti-CD133 monoclonal antibodies made by either routine or optimized post-insertion technique, were compared with respect to their size, drug leakage, release pattern and the number of antibodies conjugated per single liposome. The results demonstrated that the number of antibodies conjugated per liposome in the optimized post-insertion technique was almost two times more than those in the routine post-insertion method. However, the drug release and leakage pattern was almost similar between the two methods. Furthermore, anti-tumor activity and therapeutic efficacy of the preferred CD133-targeted Doxil with Doxil was compared in terms of their in vitro binding, uptake, internalization and cytotoxicity against HT-29 (CD133+) and CHO (CD133-) cells. Flow cytometry analyses and confocal laser scanning microscopy results exhibited a significantly higher cellular uptake, binding and internalization of CD133-targeted Doxil in CD+133 cells relative to Doxil. Cytotoxicity results revealed a lower in vitro inhibitory concentration for CD133-targeted Doxil compared to Doxil. However, CHO (CD133-) cells displayed a similar uptake and in vitro cytotoxicity for both CD133-Doxil and non-targeted Doxil. Therefore, the results of this study can exhibit that specific recognition and binding of antibodies with CD133 receptors on HT-29 cells can result in enhanced cellular uptake, internalization and cytotoxicity. The research suggests further investigation for in vivo studies and may offer proof-of-principle for an active targeting concept.

Dog-specific hemorrhagic changes induced by liposomal formulations, in the liver and the gallbladder.

Although several liposomal drugs, including liposomal doxorubicin, have been approved, the etiology of the pathological responses caused by their physicochemical properties remains unknown. Herein, we investigated the pathological changes in the liver and the gallbladder of dogs following a single injection of liposomal doxorubicin (1 or 2.5 mg/kg) or an empty liposomal formulation (i.e., liposomal formulation without doxorubicin, ca. 21 mg/kg as lipid content). Injection of liposomal doxorubicin or the empty liposomal formulation induced hemorrhagic changes in the liver and the gallbladder. These changes were accompanied by minimal cellular infiltration with no obvious changes in the blood vessels. As there were no differences in the incidence and severity of hemorrhage between the groups administered comparable amounts of total lipid, the physicochemical properties of the liposomal formulation rather than an active pharmacological ingredient, doxorubicin, were associated with the hemorrhagic changes. Furthermore, decreased cytoplasmic granules with low electron density in mast cells beneath the endothelium of the hepatic vein were observed in the liver of dogs treated with liposomal doxorubicin or empty liposomal formulation. Injection of compound 48/80, a histamine releaser induced comparable hemorrhage in dogs, implying that hemorrhage caused by injection of liposomal doxorubicin or the empty liposomal formulation could be attributed to the histamine released from mast cells. The absence of similar hemorrhagic lesions in other species commonly used in toxicology studies (i.e., rats and monkeys), as well as humans, is due to the lack of mast cells beneath the endothelium of the hepatic vein in these species.

Simulation of Stimuli-Responsive and Stoichiometrically Controlled Release Rate of Doxorubicin from Liposomes in Tumor Interstitial Fluid.

PURPOSE: To simulate the stimuli-responsive and stoichiometrically controlled doxorubicin (DOX) release from liposomes in in vivo tumor interstitial fluid (TIF), the effect of ammonia concentration and pH on the DOX release from liposomes in human plasma at 37°C was quantitatively evaluated in vitro and the release rate was calculated as a function of ammonia concentration and pH. METHODS: Human plasma samples spiked with DOX-loaded PEGylated liposomes (PLD) or Doxil®, containing ammonia (0.3-50 mM) at different pH values, were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After incubation, the concentration of encapsulated DOX in the samples was determined by validated solid-phase extraction (SPE)-SPE-high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Accelerated DOX release (%) from liposomes was observed as the increase of ammonia concentration and pH of the matrix, and the decrease of encapsulated DOX concentration. The release rate was expressed as a function of the ammonia concentration and pH by using Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. CONCLUSIONS: The DOX release from PLD in TIF was expressed as a function ammonia concentration and pH at various DOX concentrations. Further, it was found that the DOX release from liposomes in a simulated TIF was more than 15 times higher than in normal plasma.

Rapid Analysis of DOXIL Stability and Drug Release from DOXIL by HPLC Using a Glycidyl Methacrylate-Coated Monolithic Column.

In recent years, nanomedicines have received growing attention in a range of medical applications, including selective drug delivery technology. In this context, the analysis of liposome stability and drug release from liposomes is of particular importance, as the efficacy of a nanomedicine is determined by the release of the encapsulated drug. We investigated the influence of the surrounding environment on the stability and release of the encapsulated drug (i.e., doxorubicin) from DOXIL. Thus, for the purpose of this study, we selected the liposomal anticancer drug, DOXIL, as a typical nanomedicine, and investigated the influence of the surrounding environment on release of doxorubicin from DOXIL. We found that two pathways existed for doxorubicin release, namely the collapse of DOXIL, and an increase in the permeability of the lipid bilayer. DOXIL collapse occurred upon the addition of high concentrations (>60%) of a methanol solution, while an increase in permeability occurred at temperatures above the phase transition temperature of the DOXIL lipid bilayer, under basic conditions, and in the presence of membrane-permeable bases (e.g., Tris). As DOXIL is particularly stable and limited collapse of DOXIL occurred under physiological conditions, it is expected that doxorubicin release within the body took place through permeability changes in the lipid bilayer of the DOXIL structure.

Radiolabeled liposome imaging determines an indication for liposomal anticancer agent in ovarian cancer mouse xenograft models.

Liposomal anticancer agents can effectively deliver drugs to tumor lesions, but their therapeutic effects are enhanced in only limited number of patients. Appropriate biomarkers to identify responder patients to these liposomal agents will improve their treatment efficacies. We carried out pharmacological and histopathological analyses of mouse xenograft models bearing human ovarian cancers (Caov-3, SK-OV-3, KURAMOCHI, and TOV-112D) to correlate the therapeutic effects of doxorubicin-encapsulated liposome (Doxil(®) ) and histological characteristics linked to the enhanced permeability and retention effect. We next generated (111) In-encapsulated liposomes to examine their capacities to determine indications for Doxil(®) treatment by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT imaging. Antitumor activities of Doxil(®) were drastically enhanced in Caov-3, moderately in SK-OV-3, and minimally in KURAMOCHI and TOV-112D when compared to doxorubicin. Microvessel density and vascular perfusion were high in Caov-3 and SK-OV-3, indicating a close relation with the enhanced antitumor effects. Next, (111) In-encapsulated liposomes were given i.v. to the animals. Their tumor accumulation and area under the curve values over 72 h were high in Caov-3, relatively high in SK-OV-3, and low in two other tumors. Importantly, as both Doxil(®) effects and liposomal accumulation varied in the SK-OV-3 group, we individually obtained SPECT/CT images of SK-OV-3-bearing mouse (n = 11) before Doxil(®) treatment. Clear correlation between liposomal tumor accumulation and effects of Doxil(®) was confirmed (R(2) = 0.73). Taken together, our experiments definitely verified that enhanced therapeutic effects through liposomal formulations of anticancer agents depend on tumor accumulation of liposomes. Tumor accumulation of the radiolabeled liposomes evaluated by SPECT/CT imaging is applicable to appropriately determine indications for liposomal antitumor agents.

Intracellular PK/PD Relationships of Free and Liposomal Doxorubicin: Quantitative Analyses and PK/PD Modeling.

Nanomedicines are widely studied for intracellular delivery of cancer drugs. However, the relationship between intracellular drug concentrations and drug responses are poorly understood. In this study, cellular and nuclear concentrations of doxorubicin were quantified with LC/MS after cell exposure with free and liposomal doxorubicin (pH-sensitive and pegylated liposomes). Cellular uptake of pegylated liposomes was low (∼3-fold extracellular concentrations) compared with doxorubicin in free form and pH-sensitive liposomes (up to 280-fold extracellular concentrations) in rat glioma (BT4C) and renal clear cell carcinoma (Caki-2) cells. However, after the cell exposure with pegylated liposomes, intracellular doxorubicin was distributed into the nuclear compartment in both cell types. Despite high drug concentrations in the nuclei, Caki-2 cells showed strong resistance toward doxorubicin. A model was successfully built to describe PK/PD relationship between drug concentrations in nucleus and cytotoxic responses in BT4C cells. This model is the first step to link target site concentration of doxorubicin into its effect and can be a useful part of more comprehensive future in vivo PK/PD models.

Equivalency challenge: Evaluation of Lipodox® as the generic equivalent for Doxil® in a human ovarian cancer orthotropic mouse model.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo growth inhibition activity and tumor distribution of Doxil® compared to Lipodox® as its generic (GLD) in human ovarian cancer orthotopic mouse model. METHODS: In the efficacy study 50 mice were randomized to: vehicle, Doxil® 5mg/kg or 10mg/kg, or GLD 5mg/kg or 10mg/kg for a total of three cycles with monitoring for response and toxicity with 10 mice in each arm. In the microdialysis(MD) study, 60 mice were randomized to: Doxil® 5mg/kg or 10mg/kg, or GLD 5mg/kg or 10mg/kg single dose (n=15 mice/arm). MD sample time points included total of 29 samples from baseline through 100h and were evaluated with a validated PaperSpray LC/MS assay. RESULTS: There was 15.7% decrease (p<0.0001) in efficacy of GLD the 5mg/kg and 21.3% decrease (p<0.0001) in efficacy of the 10mg/kg dose of GLD when compared to equivalent doses of Doxil®. The intratumoral concentration for the GLD ranged from 1.0 to 25.5ng/mL (5mg/kg) and 2.9-35.6ng/mL (10mg/kg) compared to 2.7-42.2ng/mL (p<0.04, 5mg/kg) and 2.0-76ng/mL (p<0.02, 10mg/kg) for the Doxil®, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in preclinical efficacy were observed between Doxil® and GLD. These may be due to significant pharmacodynamic effects of drug distribution and decrease uptake of GLD in tumor tissue. A prospective clinical comparison of these two products is warranted to determine equivalency.

Is it equivalent? Evaluation of the clinical activity of single agent Lipodox® compared to single agent Doxil® in ovarian cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: In response to the critical shortage of liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil®) in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved temporary importation of doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome (Lipodox®). The objective was to compare toxicity and clinical activity of Lipodox® with Doxil®. METHODS: Recurrent ovarian cancer patients who received Lipodox® were compared 3:1 to matched control Doxil® patients who had received Doxil®. Patients were matched based on age, stage, dose, platinum sensitivity, and prior treatments from an existing de-identified database. Patients receiving combination regimens were excluded. RESULTS: The data from 40 Lipodox® patients was compared to 120 matched control Doxil® patients. In this study, 17 (42.5%) of the Lipodox® patients were switched to Doxil®. The overall response rate Lipodox® was 4.3% (1/23) compared to 18% (20/111) in matched control Doxil® patients. In the platinum-sensitive patients, 100% progressed in the Lipodox® group compared to 78.4% in matched control Doxil® patients. The mean time to progression was 4.1 ± 2.8 months for Lipodox® and 6.2 ± 7.2 months in control Doxil®s (p = 0·25). Toxicity was similar in the Lipodox® group and control Doxil® group. CONCLUSION: Lipodox® for treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer did not appear to have equivalent efficacy compared to Doxil®. A prospective clinical study is warranted before Lipodox® can be deemed equivalent substitution for Doxil®.

Effects of Doxorubicin Delivery Systems and Mild Hyperthermia on Tissue Penetration in 3D Cell Culture Models of Ovarian Cancer Residual Disease.

Current chemotherapy strategies for second-line treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer are unable to effectively treat residual disease post-cytoreduction. The findings presented herein suggest that tissue penetration of drug is not only an issue for large, unresectable tumors, but also for invisible, microscopic lesions. The present study sought to investigate the potential of a block copolymer micelle (BCM) formulation, which may reduce toxicities of doxorubicin (DOX) in a similar way to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, Doxil/Caelyx), while enhancing penetration into tumor tissue and improving intratumoral availability of drug. To achieve this goal, 50 nm-sized BCMs capable of high DOX encapsulation (BCM-DOX) at drug levels ranging from 2 to 7.6 mg/mL were formulated using an ultrafiltration technique. BCM-DOX was evaluated in 2D and 3D cell culture of the human ovarian cancer cell lines HEYA8, OV-90, and SKOV3. Additionally, the current study examines the impact of mild hyperthermia (MHT) on the cytotoxicity of DOX. The BCM-DOX formulation fulfilled the goal of controlling drug release while providing up to 9-fold greater cell monolayer cytotoxicity in comparison to PLD. In 3D cell culture, using multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTS) as a model of residual disease postsurgery, BCM-DOX achieved the benefits of an extended release formulation of DOX and resulted in improvements in drug accumulation over PLD, while yielding drug levels approaching that achievable by exposure to DOX alone. In comparison to PLD, this translated into superior MCTS growth inhibition in the short term and comparable inhibition in the long term. Overall, although MHT appeared to enhance drug accumulation in HEYA8 MCTS treated with BCM-DOX and DOX alone in the short term, improved growth inhibition of MCTS by MHT was not observed after 48 h of drug treatment. Evaluation of BCM-DOX in comparison to PLD as well as the effects of MHT is warranted in vivo.

Ibrutinib disrupts blood-tumor barrier integrity and prolongs survival in rodent glioma model.

In malignant glioma, cytotoxic drugs are often inhibited from accessing the tumor site due to the blood-tumor barrier (BTB). Ibrutinib, FDA-approved lymphoma agent, inhibits Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and has previously been shown to independently impair aortic endothelial adhesion and increase rodent glioma model survival in combination with cytotoxic therapy. Yet additional research is required to understand ibrutinib's effect on BTB function. In this study, we detail baseline BTK expression in glioma cells and its surrounding vasculature, then measure endothelial junctional expression/function changes with varied ibrutinib doses in vitro. Rat glioma cells and rodent glioma models were treated with ibrutinib alone (1-10 µM and 25 mg/kg) and in combination with doxil (10-100 µM and 3 mg/kg) to assess additive effects on viability, drug concentrations, tumor volume, endothelial junctional expression and survival. We found that ibrutinib, in a dose-dependent manner, decreased brain endothelial cell-cell adhesion over 24 h, without affecting endothelial cell viability (p < 0.005). Expression of tight junction gene and protein expression was decreased maximally 4 h after administration, along with inhibition of efflux transporter, ABCB1, activity. We demonstrated an additive effect of ibrutinib with doxil on rat glioma cells, as seen by a significant reduction in cell viability (p < 0.001) and increased CNS doxil concentration in the brain (56 ng/mL doxil alone vs. 74.6 ng/mL combination, p < 0.05). Finally, Ibrutinib, combined with doxil, prolonged median survival in rodent glioma models (27 vs. 16 days, p < 0.0001) with brain imaging showing a - 53% versus - 75% volume change with doxil alone versus combination therapy (p < 0.05). These findings indicate ibrutinib's ability to increase brain endothelial permeability via junctional disruption and efflux inhibition, to increase BTB drug entry and prolong rodent glioma model survival. Our results motivate the need to identify other BTB modifiers, all with the intent of improving survival and reducing systemic toxicities.

The supramolecular processing of liposomal doxorubicin hinders its therapeutic efficacy in cells.

The successful trajectory of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (e.g., Doxil, which has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration) as an anticancer nanodrug in clinical applications is contradicted by in vitro cell viability data that highlight its reduced efficacy in promoting cell death compared with non-encapsulated doxorubicin. No reports to date have provided a mechanistic explanation for this apparently discordant evidence. Taking advantage of doxorubicin intrinsic fluorescence and time-resolved optical microscopy, we analyze the uptake and intracellular processing of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (L-DOX) in several in vitro cellular models. Cell entry of L-DOX was found to lead to a rapid (seconds to minutes), energy- and temperature-independent release of crystallized doxorubicin nanorods into the cell cytoplasm, which then disassemble into a pool of fibril-shaped derivatives capable of crossing the cellular membrane while simultaneously releasing active drug monomers. Thus, a steady state is rapidly established in which the continuous supply of crystal nanorods from incoming liposomes is counteracted by a concentration-guided efflux in the extracellular medium of fibril-shaped derivatives and active drug monomers. These results demonstrate that liposome-mediated delivery is constitutively less efficient than isolated drug in establishing favorable conditions for drug retention in the cell. In addition to explaining previous contradictory evidence, present results impose careful rethinking of the synthetic identity of encapsulated anticancer drugs.

Liposomal Doxorubicin In vitro and In vivo Assays in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal Doxorubicin (Doxil®) was one of the first nanoformulations approved for the treatment of solid tumors. Although there is already extensive experience in its use for different tumors, there is currently no grouped evidence of its therapeutic benefits in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A systematic review of the literature was performed on the therapeutic effectiveness and benefits of Liposomal Doxil® in NSCLC. METHODS: A total of 1022 articles were identified in publications up to 2020 (MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus). After applying inclusion criteria, the number was restricted to 114, of which 48 assays, including in vitro (n=20) and in vivo (animals, n=35 and humans, n=6) studies, were selected. RESULTS: The maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50), tumor growth inhibition rate, response and survival rates were the main indices for evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of Liposomal DOX. These have shown clear benefits both in vitro and in vivo, improving the IC50 of free DOX or untargeted liposomes, depending on their size, administration, or targeting. CONCLUSION: Doxil® significantly reduced cellular proliferation in vitro and improved survival in vivo in both experimental animals and NSCLC patients, demonstrating optimal safety and pharmacokinetic behavior indices. Although our systematic review supports its benefits for the treatment of NSCLC, additional clinical trials with larger sample sizes are necessary to obtain more precise clinical data on its activity and effects in humans.

Clinical risk factors of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin induced palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia in recurrent ovarian cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown that body composition, age, gender, changes in monocyte count and repeated dosing alter pharmacokinetic properties of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). However, limited information exists regarding the clinical risk factors of ovarian cancer patients who develop palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) while receiving PLD for cancer recurrence. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients with recurrent ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer who were treated with PLD from 2005 to 2009. Clinical and pathologic data were abstracted from electronic medical records. Statistical analyses were performed using univariate and bivariate analyses, logistic regression, and log rank-tests. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent (31/133) of patients developed PPE. Age, body mass index (BMI), race, stage, and histology did not significantly differ between PPE and non-PPE patients. There was a possible trend for decreasing PPE with increasing body mass index (BMI) (24.5% of normal weight, 27.5% of overweight; 23.8% of obese class I; 13.3% of obese class II; and 0% of obese class III), though not statistically significant. The number of chemotherapy regimens prior to PLD, and the mean cycles of PLD received did not differ between patients with and without PPE. 77.4% of PPE cases occurred within the first 3 infusion cycles. PPE was not associated with time to progression. CONCLUSION: Nearly one-quarter of ovarian cancer patients receiving PLD will develop PPE. Further investigation of factors such as BMI associated with PPE may aid in patient selection for PLD, and future development of other nanoparticle and liposomal agents.

Delineating the tumour microenvironment response to a lipid nanoparticle formulation.

Nanoparticles can reduce cytotoxicity, increase circulation time and increase accumulation in tumours compared to free drug. However, the value of using nanoparticles for carrying small molecules to treat tumours at the cellular level has been poorly established. Here we conducted a cytodistribution analysis on Doxorubicin-treated and Doxil-treated tumours to delineate the differences between the small molecule therapeutic Doxorubicin and its packaged liposomal formulation Doxil. We found that Doxil kills more cancer cells, macrophages and neutrophils in the 4T1 breast cancer tumour model, but there is delayed killing compared to its small molecule counterpart Doxorubicin. The cellular interaction with Doxil has slower uptake kinetics and the particles must be degraded to release the drug and kill the cells. We also found that macrophages and neutrophils in Doxil-treated tumours repopulated faster than cancer cells during the relapse phase. While researchers conventionally use tumour volume and animal survival to determine a therapeutic effect, our results show diverse cell killing and a greater amount of cell death in vivo after Doxil liposomes are administered. We conclude that the fate and behaviour of the nanocarrier influences its effectiveness as a cancer therapy. Further investigations on the interactions between different nanoparticle designs and the tumour microenvironment components will lead to more precise engineering of nanocarriers to selectively kill tumour cells and prolong the therapeutic effect.