Case Studies in Neuroscience: Lack of inhibitory synaptic plasticity in the substantia nigra pars reticulata of a patient with lithium-induced tremor.

Tremor is a well-known side effect from many psychiatric medications, including lithium and dopamine antagonists. In patients whose psychiatric symptoms are stabilized and only respond to certain medications, deep brain stimulation may offer relief of the consequent motor complications. We report the case of an elderly male with disabling tremor related to lithium therapy for bipolar affective disorder, who was subsequently treated with deep brain stimulation. In this patient, we obtained recordings from the substantia nigra pars reticulata and performed a high-frequency stimulation protocol that robustly elicits long-term potentiation (LTP)-like changes in patients with Parkinson's disease. We hypothesized that in this patient, who did not have Parkinson's disease, the levels of inhibitory plasticity would be much greater. However, we found an unanticipated lack of plasticity in the patient with lithium-induced tremor, compared with two de novo control patients with Parkinson's disease. This patient was successfully treated with deep brain stimulation in the vicinity of the ventral oral posterior nucleus, an area of the thalamus that receives inputs from the basal ganglia. We postulate that the lithium-induced blockade of LTP may bring about motor complications such as tremor while simultaneously contributing to the therapeutic mechanism for treating the symptoms of psychiatric disorders such as bipolar affective disorder.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Use of a dual-microelectrode technique enabled us to compare long-term potentiation (LTP)-like changes in a patient with lithium-induced tremor to that of patients with Parkinson's disease. This study corroborated the findings in rodent brain slices that chronic lithium treatment may block LTP. Whereas a deficit in LTP may underlie the therapeutic mechanism for treating psychiatric disorders such as bipolar affective disorder, it may simultaneously contribute to consequent appearance of tremor.

Distinguishing features between valproate-induced tremor and essential tremor.

BACKGROUND: Tremor frequently occurs in patients taking valproate and may resemble that observed in patients with essential tremor (ET). We aimed to compare the distribution, severity, and functional impact of both types of tremor. METHODS: Among 118 consecutive individuals taking valproate, we identified 28 patients with valproate-induced tremor severe enough to require pharmacological treatment; through evaluations using the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST), they were compared with 29 consecutive patients with ET. RESULTS: Patients with valproate-induced tremor were significantly younger than those with ET: 35.6 ± 15.4 vs 58.8 ± 20.5 years (P < .001), with a shorter evolution time of tremor (P < .001). Total CRST scores did not differ between groups (P = .164), neither in subscores of Parts A (P = .321), B (P = .094), and C (P = .386). Patients with valproate-induced tremor had a higher proportion of postural tongue tremor compared with ET patients: 22 (79%) vs 15 (52%) (P = .034). A frank tremor axis in the Archimedes spirals was observed in a higher proportion of patients with ET compared to valproate-induced tremor: 31% vs 3.6% (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with valproate-induced tremor requiring pharmacological treatment have similar distribution, CRST scores, and functional impact than those with ET.

Evaluation and Management of Tremor.

Tremor is a commonly encountered condition in the primary care setting and can manifest at rest, with action, or both. Common causes include Parkinson disease, essential tremor, and drug-induced tremor. In this article, the authors discuss how to examine a patient with tremor and which features of the history and examination can help clue the provider in to the appropriate diagnosis. They also review treatments for varying types of tremor and when referral to a neurologist may be necessary.

Phenomenology and Physiology of Tacrolimus Induced Tremor.

Background: Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressant drug commonly used after solid organ transplant surgery. The use of this drug is frequently associated with the emergence of tremors. There is little information on the clinical and physiological characteristics of tacrolimus-induced tremors. Characterizing these tremors is essential as they can promote the development of specific therapies. Methods: We describe four patients placed on tacrolimus immunosuppressant therapy following kidney transplant surgery and who developed tremors impacting their daily functional activities. We describe the clinical and physiological characteristics of the tremor and the response generated after a limb cooling test. Results: A postural and kinetic tremor mainly involving the distal hands was observed in our cohort. In the accelerometer-based assessment, the tremor amplitude was noted to be mild to moderate, and the frequency was 5-6 Hz. Cooling the forearm and the hand led to a temporary albeit significant reduction of tremor amplitude (p = 0.03). Limb cooling lowered the tremor frequency by 1 Hz in two patients with no change in the other two patients, and the statistical comparison was not significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Limb cooling may be pursued as a therapeutic option for addressing tacrolimus-induced tremor, as the patients in our cohort benefitted from temporary tremor suppression.

Drug-induced tremor, clinical features, diagnostic approach and management.

Tremor is the most common movement disorder and there are numerous causes of tremor. In many individuals, tremor can be due to drugs. The most common drugs associated with tremor include amiodarone, selective serotonin (and norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs/SNRIs), amitriptyline, lithium, valproate, ß-adrenoceptor agonists, dopamine receptor antagonists, VMAT2 inhibitors, or drugs of abuse: ethanol, cocaine, etc. Drug-induced tremor usually resembles essential or parkinsonian tremor, depending on the offending drug; however, features such as unilateral, task-specific, position-dependent tremor or sudden onset, distractibility, entrainment and arrest with contralateral movements suggest etiologies such as dystonic or functional (psychogenic) tremor. Risk factors for drug-induced tremor include polypharmacy, male gender, older age, high doses and immediate-release preparations or reaching toxic levels of the offending drugs. Drug-induced tremor usually resolves once the offending medication is discontinued, however, persistent tremor may be observed in some cases (tardive tremor). In this manuscript, we discuss the most common causes of drug-induced tremor. This article is part of the Special Issue "Tremor" edited by Daniel D. Truong, Mark Hallett, and Aasef Shaikh.

Valproate-induced rest tremor and parkinsonism.

Tremor and parkinsonism are recognized side effects of valproate; however, the relationship between rest tremor and other signs of parkinsonism has not been addressed in patients taking valproate. We studied a cohort of 125 consecutive patients treated with valproate due to epilepsy or migraine, evaluated with the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS). A total of 14 (11.2%) patients had rest tremor (bilateral n = 10, unilateral n = 4). Patients with rest tremor had significant higher scores in the FTM-TRS (P < 0.001), but only one was diagnosed with parkinsonism. Patients may have valproate-induced parkinsonism or exacerbated motor features of Parkinson's disease by valproate. The frequency of parkinsonism was 1.6% in this cohort and of 3% in the pooled data of 717 patients from previous reports. Rest tremor is observed in 11.2% of patients treated with valproate and is related to the burden of valproate-induced tremor, rather than the presence of parkinsonism.

Tremor induced by Calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression: a single-centre observational study in kidney transplanted patients.

INTRODUCTION: Tremor is the most frequent and disabling neurological side effect under Calcineurin inhibitor-induced immunosuppression, but no studies have defined its phenomenology, severity, distribution, the impact on quality of life, as well as of other neurological symptoms associated. METHODS: 126 consecutive kidney-transplanted patients, under treatment with Cyclosporin A, Tacrolimus and non-Calcineurin inhibitors, within therapeutic range, were enrolled. Participants underwent a deep neurological examination by two blinded to the treatment raters, and a blood sampling to assess plasmatic immunosuppressant level and nephrological function tests. Tremor and cerebellar signs were scored according to the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin and the SARA scale. Parkinsonism was excluded applying the UPDRS (part III). RESULTS: Tremor was more common and severe in the Tacrolimus group, similar to impairment in ADL. Regardless of treatment, tremor involved both upper and lower limbs and was activated by action, but in about 50% of cases presented in action and rest condition. Plasmatic level of Tacrolimus was higher in patients with tremor than in those without, while cholesterol was significantly lower. Cerebellar and neuropathic signs were overall mild and were not significantly different across the three groups comparing patients with and without tremor. CONCLUSIONS: Non-Calcineurin inhibitors such as Sirolimus have the lowest propensity to induce tremor and with a milder severity, while Calcineurin inhibitors, especially Tacrolimus, the highest, and regardless of the formulation. Plasmatic concentration of Tacrolimus was higher in tremulous patients; further research needs to validate the role of cholesterol plasmatic concentration in predicting the occurrence of tremor in patients on Tacrolimus.

The clinical features and functional impact of valproate-induced tremor.

BACKGROUND: Tremor is a known side-effect of anticonvulsants, particularly of valproate. However, there is a dearth of information regarding detailed clinical features and functional impact of valproate-induced tremor. METHODS: We studied a cohort of patients treated with anticonvulsants for neurological disorders, through blinded evaluations using the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST); we compared the frequency, severity and functional impact of drug-induced tremor between patients treated with valproate and those treated with other anticonvulsants. RESULTS: From a cohort of 218 consecutive patients, 171 were fully evaluated; 118 patients were taking valproate alone or combined with other anticonvulsants and 53 patients were taking other anticonvulsants. Mean age (±SD) at evaluation of the cohort was 32 ± 13 years, females represented 55.6% of cases. Tremor was more frequently observed in patients taking valproate particularly postural upper limb tremor: 49% vs. 15% (right-side) (P < 0.001) and 48.3% vs. 13.2% (left-side), (P < 0.001); had a higher total CRST score: 12.14 vs. 3.06 (P < 0.001), and required more frequently treatment for drug-induced tremor: 23.7% vs. 5.6% (P=0.005) compared with patients taking other anticonvulsants. Among 118 patients taking valproate, women had a higher total CRST score compared with men: 14.54 ± 14.9 vs. 9.56 ± 9.55 (P=0.034). A weak correlation between the total CRST score, dose per Kg of valproate and serum levels of valproate were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Tremor is frequently observed in patients taking valproate and is severe enough to require treatment in about 24% of cases.

Insights into Pathophysiology from Medication-induced Tremor.

Background: Medication-induced tremor (MIT) is common in clinical practice and there are many medications/drugs that can cause or exacerbate tremors. MIT typically occurs by enhancement of physiological tremor (EPT), but not all drugs cause tremor in this way. In this manuscript, we review how some common examples of MIT have informed us about the pathophysiology of tremor. Methods: We performed a PubMed literature search for published articles dealing with MIT and attempted to identify articles that especially dealt with the medication's mechanism of inducing tremor. Results: There is a paucity of literature that deals with the mechanisms of MIT, with most manuscripts only describing the frequency and clinical settings where MIT is observed. That being said, MIT emanates from multiple mechanisms depending on the drug and it often takes an individualized approach to manage MIT in a given patient. Discussion: MIT has provided some insight into the mechanisms of tremors we see in clinical practice. The exact mechanism of MIT is unknown for most medications that cause tremor, but it is assumed that in most cases physiological tremor is influenced by these medications. Some medications (epinephrine) that cause EPT likely lead to tremor by peripheral mechanisms in the muscle (ß-adrenergic agonists), but others may influence the central component (amitriptyline). Other drugs can cause tremor, presumably by blockade of dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia (dopamine-blocking agents), by secondary effects such as causing hyperthyroidism (amiodarone), or by other mechanisms. We will attempt to discuss what is known and unknown about the pathophysiology of the most common MITs.