Comparison of outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing haploidentical stem cell transplantation in first and second complete remission.

There was no consensus on whether prognostic advantages existed when transplant conducted at first complete remission (CR1) stage than at second complete remission (CR2) stage for patients with AML who received haploidentical hematological stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). In 768 consecutive AML patients who received haplo-HSCT from January 2014 to December 2017, a 1:2 ratio matched-pair analysis was performed, 69 patients who in CR2 group and 138 CR1 patients were enrolled. Hematopoietic recovery, graft versus host disease (GVHD), relapse, transplant related mortality (TRM), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in two groups, and further evaluated in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk subgroups. The cumulative incidences of 30-day myeloid recovery and 90-day platelet recovery were comparable in CR1 and CR2 groups. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV aGVHD were not significantly different. The cumulative incidences of relapse at 3-year and 5-year in these two groups were 12.4% versus 11.6% (P = 0.880) and 12.4% versus 17.5% (P = 0.322). The cumulative incidences of TRM at 3-year and 5-year were both 10.9% versus 23.2% (P = 0.019). The probability of DFS at 3-year and 5-year were 76.7% versus 65.2% (P = 0.029) and 76.7% versus 59.3% (P = 0.009). The probability of OS at 3-year and 5-year were 81.8% versus 68.1% (P = 0.026) and 76.7% versus 59.3% (P = 0.026). In the intermediate-risk group, TRM was lower in CR1 group, DFS and OS of CR1 group were superior to CR2 group. In conclusion, haplo-HSCT at CR1 stage was of better prognosis for intermediate-risk AML patients than at CR2 stage.

Conditioning Intensity for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Poor-Prognosis Cytogenetics in First Complete Remission.

The optimal intensity of conditioning regimen may be dependent on not only age and comorbidities but also disease characteristics and risk of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We, therefore, analyzed the transplant outcomes of 840 adult patients with cytogenetically poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) who received first allogeneic HCT with either myeloablative conditioning (MAC; n = 652) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC; n = 188) between 2006 and 2017. The median age at HCT was 50.5 years (range: 16 to 77 years). The multivariate analysis showed that patients receiving MAC had a significantly higher overall survival and lower leukemia-related mortality than those receiving RIC (P = .011 and P = .025, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, these results applied to patients aged 16 to 59 years, with HCT-comorbidity index scores ≥3, and with cytogenetic remission. Among MAC regimens, there was a trend for worse survival and nonrelapse mortality with the busulfan/fludarabine-based regimen compared with the total body irradiation (TBI) ≥8 Gy-based regimen (P = .082 and P = .062, respectively), whereas the busulfan/cyclophosphamide-based regimen and the fludarabine/melphalan-based regimen had similar outcomes with the TBI-based regimen. These data suggest that MAC is preferable to RIC for patients with cytogenetically poor-risk AML undergoing allogeneic HCT in CR1.

The role of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas in first complete remission: Report from COMPLETE, a prospective, multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the first complete remission (CR1) of peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) is not well defined. This study analyzed the impact of ASCT on the clinical outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed PTCL in CR1. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, aggressive PTCL were prospectively enrolled into the Comprehensive Oncology Measures for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Treatment (COMPLETE) study, and those in CR1 were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred thirteen patients with PTCL achieved CR1, and 119 patients with nodal PTCL, defined as anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), or PTCL not otherwise specified, were identified. Eighty-three patients did not undergo ASCT, whereas 36 underwent consolidative ASCT in CR1. At the median follow-up of 2.8 years, the median overall survival was not reached for the entire cohort of patients who underwent ASCT, whereas it was 57.6 months for those not receiving ASCT (P = .06). ASCT was associated with superior survival for patients with advanced-stage disease or intermediate-to-high International Prognostic Index scores. ASCT significantly improved overall and progression-free survival for patients with AITL but not for patients with other PTCL subtypes. In a multivariable analysis, ASCT was independently associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large prospective cohort study directly comparing the survival outcomes of patients with nodal PTCL in CR1 with or without consolidative ASCT. ASCT may provide a benefit in specific clinical scenarios, but the broader applicability of this strategy should be determined in prospective, randomized trials. These results provide a platform for designing future studies of previously untreated PTCL.

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for adult acute myeloid leukaemia in second remission: a retrospective study of the Adult Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Working Group of the Japan Society for Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation (JSHCT).

To evaluate the outcomes and prognostic factors following allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in second complete remission (CR2), we retrospectively analysed the Japanese registration data of 1080 adult AML patients in CR2 who had received allogeneic HCT. The probability of overall survival and the cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 66% and 19%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, older age, poor cytogenetics and shorter duration of first complete remission were significantly associated with a higher overall mortality. Our data demonstrated the significant efficacy of allogeneic HCT for adult AML in CR2.

Haploidentical transplantation compared with matched sibling and unrelated donor transplantation for adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission.

We retrospectively investigated outcomes of haploidentical donor (HID) transplant for adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1) compared with human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) and HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants. A total of 348 adult patients were enrolled, including 127 HID, 144 MSD and 77 MUD recipients. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was 39·5%, 24·0% and 40·3% for HID, MSD and MUD, respectively (P = 0·020). However, there was no difference in grade III-IV aGVHD (11·4%, 7·7%, 13·5%, respectively, P = 0·468). The 5-year cumulative transplant-related mortality was 16·4%, 11·6% and 19·6% (P = 0·162), the 5-year relapse rate post-transplantation was 14·8%, 21·1% and 16·7% (P = 0·231), the 5-year overall survival was 70·1%, 73·7% and 69·8% (P = 0·525), and the 5-year disease-free survival was 68·7%, 67·3% and 63·7%, respectively (P = 0·606). Furthermore, the 3-year GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was not different (50·8%, 54·9% and 52·2%, respectively, P = 0·847). Our results indicate that the outcomes of HID transplants are equivalent to those of MSD and MUD, and that HID transplantation is a valid alternative for standard-risk adults with ALL in CR1 who lack matched donors.

Unrelated bone marrow transplantation or immediate umbilical cord blood transplantation for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.

BACKGROUND: While unrelated bone marrow transplantation (UBMT) has been widely used as alternative donor transplantation, the use of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) is increasing recently. METHODS: We conducted a decision analysis to address which transplantation procedure should be prioritized for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring high- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics in first complete remission (CR1), when they lack a matched related donor but have immediate access to a suitable umbilical cord blood unit. Main sources for our analysis comprised the data from three phase III trials for a chemotherapy cohort (n = 907) and the registry data for a transplantation cohort (n = 752). RESULTS: The baseline analysis showed that when the 8/8 match was considered for UBMT, the expected 5-year survival rate was higher for UBMT than for UCBT (58.1% vs. 51.8%). This ranking did not change even when the 7/8 match was considered for UBMT. Sensitivity analysis showed consistent superiority of UBMT over UCBT when the time elapsed between CR1 and UBMT was varied within a plausible range of 3-9 months. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that 8/8 or 7/8 UBMT is a better transplantation option than UCBT even after allowing time required for donor coordination.

Benefit of allogeneic transplantation in patients age ≥ 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia is limited to those in first complete remission at time of transplant.

We evaluated the impact of age and remission status on 242 consecutive patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in our program between 1999 and 2011. Median age of all patients was 48 years (range, 18 to 71). Based on age and remission status, patients were divided into 4 groups: first complete remission (CR1) age <60 years (n = 116), second complete remission (CR2) age <60 years (n = 78), CR1 age ≥60 years (n = 32), and CR2 age ≥60 years (n = 16). Donors were matched related (n = 155, 64%) or matched unrelated (n = 87, 36%). Median follow-up of survivors was 65 months (range, 12 to 145). In a univariate analysis, 3-year overall survival rates of the 4 groups were 57%, 43%, 39%, and 16% (P = .003), respectively. In a multivariable analysis, hazard ratios of nonrelapse mortality and survival were 2.08 (P = .06) and 1.52 (P = .23), respectively, in patients ≥60 years in CR2 compared with ≥ 60 years in CR1. Although a plateau in survival was observed for patients ≥60 years in CR1 similar to those <60 years in CR1 and CR2, no long-term survivors were seen in patients ≥60 years in CR2. Our data suggest disappointing outcomes in AML patients ≥60 years of age transplanted in CR2. Therefore, if a transplant is indicated, early referral is recommended in patients ≥60 years with AML.

Limited utility of routine surveillance imaging for classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients in first complete remission.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) who achieved complete remission with frontline therapy and then underwent either clinical surveillance or routine surveillance imaging. METHODS: In total, 241 patients who were newly diagnosed with cHL between January 2000 and December 2010 at 3 participating tertiary care centers and achieved complete remission after first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, there were 174 patients in the routine surveillance imaging group and 67 patients in the clinical surveillance group, based on the intended mode of surveillance. In the routine surveillance imaging group, the intended plan of surveillance included computed tomography and/or positron emission tomography scans; whereas, in the clinical surveillance group, the intended plan of surveillance was clinical examination and laboratory studies, and scans were obtained only to evaluate concerning signs or symptoms. Baseline patient characteristics, prognostic features, treatment records, and outcomes were collected. The primary objective was to compare overall survival for patients in both groups. For secondary objectives, we compared the success of second-line therapy and estimated the costs of imaging for each group. RESULTS: After 5 years of follow-up, the overall survival rate was 97% (95% confidence interval, 92%-99%) in the routine surveillance imaging group and 96% (95% confidence interval, 87%-99%) in the clinical surveillance group (P = .41). There were few relapses in each group, and all patients who relapsed in both groups achieved complete remission with second-line therapy. The charges associated with routine surveillance imaging were significantly higher than those for the clinical surveillance strategy, with no apparent clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical surveillance was not inferior to routine surveillance imaging in patients with cHL who achieved complete remission with frontline therapy. Routine surveillance imaging was associated with significantly increased estimated imaging charges.

Management of High-Risk Neuroblastoma with Soft-Tissue-Only Disease in the Era of Anti-GD2 Immunotherapy.

Neuroblastoma presents with two patterns of disease: locoregional or systemic. The poor prognostic risk factors of locoregional neuroblastoma (LR-NB) include age, MYCN or MDM2-CDK4 amplification, 11q, histology, diploidy with ALK or TERT mutations, and ATRX aberrations. Anti-GD2 immunotherapy has significantly improved the outcome of high-risk (HR) NB and is mostly effective against osteomedullary minimal residual disease (MRD), but less so against soft tissue disease. The question is whether adding anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) benefits patients with HR-NB compounded by only soft tissue. We reviewed 31 patients treated at SJD for HR-NB with no osteomedullary involvement at diagnosis. All tumors had molecular genetic features of HR-NB. The outcome after first-line treatment showed 25 (80.6%) patients achieving CR. Thirteen patients remain in continued CR, median follow-up 3.9 years. We analyzed whether adding anti-GD2 immunotherapy to first-line treatment had any prognostic significance. The EFS analysis using Cox models showed a HR of 0.20, p = 0.0054, and an 80% decrease in the risk of relapse in patients treated with anti-GD2 immunotherapy in the first line. Neither EFS nor OS were significantly different by CR status after first-line treatment. In conclusion, adding treatment with anti-GD2 mAbs at the stage of MRD helps prevent relapse that unequivocally portends poor survival.

HLA-mismatched micro-transplantation as post-remission treatment compared to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or consolidation with single agent cytarabine for favorable-or intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

OBJECTIVES: Optimal post-remission treatment for individual favorable and intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients has not yet been established. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched stem cell microtransplantation (MST), may improve outcomes and avoid graft-versus-host disease in patients with first complete remission of AML. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy, safety, and survival of 63 patients with favorable- or intermediate-risk AML who received MST, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), or cytarabine single agent (CSA) as post-remission treatment from January 2014 to August 2021. RESULTS: The neutrophil recovery time was shorter in the MST group than in the CSA group. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse in the MST, ASCT, and CSA groups were 27.27%, 29.41%, and 41.67%, respectively. During follow-up, 21 patients (33.30%) died of relapse, including six (9.52%), five (7.94%), and 10 (15.84%) in the MST, ASCT, and CSA groups, respectively. The estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 62.20% vs. 50.00% (P = 0.101) and 57.10% vs. 50.00% (P = 0.136), in the >60 years MST and CSA groups (P = 0.101). The estimated 2-year OS was 100%, 66.20%, and 69.10% in the MST, ASCT, and CSA groups (MST vs CSA, P = 0.044), meanwhile, the estimated 2-year RFS was 100%, 65.40%, and 59.80% in patients ≤60 years. CONCLUSION: MST, ASCT, and CSA are acceptable post-remission treatments for patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk AML and may not only improve the prognosis of the elderly but also prolong the OS and RFS of favorable- or intermediate-risk patients ≤60 years.

Comparable outcomes in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Pretransplant minimal residual disease-negative complete remission following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy versus chemotherapy.

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) therapy followed by haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) markedly improves the long-term survival of patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Methods: We performed a parallel comparison of transplant outcomes in 168 B-ALL patients undergoing haplo-HSCT after achieving minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR) from CAR-T therapy (n = 28) or chemotherapy (n = 140) between January 2016 and August 2021. We further divided the chemotherapy group into the first CR group (chemo+CR1, n = 118) and a second or more CR group (chemo+≥CR2, n = 22). Results: With a median follow-up period of 31.0 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse rates in the CAR-T and chemotherapy groups did not differ significantly (OS, 87.9% vs. 71.5 %; LFS, 72.0% vs. 66.8%; NRM, 3.9% vs. 13.7%; relapse, 24.1% vs. 19.4%). Multivariate analysis confirmed that ≥CR2 at transplantation following chemotherapy was an independent risk factor associated with poor OS (hazard ratio (HR) 4.22 [95% CI, 1.34-13.293], p = 0.014) and LFS (HR 2.57 [95% CI, 1.041-6.343], p = 0.041). The probabilities of OS and LFS at 2 years in the CAR-T group were comparable to those in the chemo+CR1 group but significantly higher than those in the chemo+≥CR2 group (OS, 87.9% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.007; LFS, 72.0% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.043). No significant differences in the incidences of NRM were noted among the three groups. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that patients with R/R B-ALL receiving haplo-HSCT after CAR-T therapy achieved comparable outcomes to patients transplanted post-chemotherapy-based MRD-negative CR1, without increased risk of transplant-related mortality and toxicity.

Pretransplant Consolidation Therapies Improve the Outcome of Myeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation in Adults with Ph-negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

BACKROUND AND AIM: The benefit of pre-transplant consolidation in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who achieved first complete remission (CR1) has not yet been clearly demonstrated. Here, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the treatments received before transplantation and transplant outcome in Ph-ALL patients who underwent myeloablative allo-HSCT in CR1. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 55, 32 (58.2%) men and 23 (41.8%) women, who underwent allo-HSCT with the diagnosis of Ph-ALL were evaluated retrospectively. All patients underwent to allo-HSCT with myeloablative conditioning regimen in the 1st CR from the available donor. RESULTS: In patients who received >2 consolidation, the 2-year and 3-year OS was 69% and 65%, respectively, while the 2-year and 3-year OS was 39% and 26%, respectively, in those who received < 2 consolidation (P =.03). RFS was similar in both groups (P = .8). One year- NRM was found 28% in patients who received ≥ 2 consolidations, and 37% in patients who received <2 consolidation (P =.06). L-asparaginase, high dose methotrexate, and cranial treatments given before transplantation had no effect on transplant outcomes (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Contrary to the belief that pre-transplant consolidation is not beneficial in ALL patients who proceed with allo-HCST in CR1, our results showed that consolidation treatments reduce NRM and improve the survival.

High-dose cytarabine chemotherapy (≥4 g/m2/day) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for non-core-binding-factor AML in the first complete remission.

Benefit of high-dose cytarabine (HD-AraC) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains unknown. We retrospectively analyzed data from 79 non-core-binding-factor AML patients who underwent allo-HSCT in their first complete remission (CR1). In univariate analysis, HD-AraC (≥4 g/m2/day) before allo-HSCT improved disease-free survival (DFS) (p = .018), overall survival (OS) (p = .029), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (p = .033). Four-year DFS, OS, and CIR of patients receiving and not receiving HD-AraC were 79% vs. 49%, 82% vs. 56%, and 18% vs. 42%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, HD-AraC was a positive prognostic factor for DFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14-0.88), OS (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-0.99), and CIR (HR = 0.38, 95% CI; 0.14-1.0). Our study demonstrates that HD-AraC before allo-HSCT at a dose ≥4 g/m2/day is effective for treating AML patients in CR1.

Measurement of minimal residual disease before and after myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia.

Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) can identify leukemia-associated immunophenotypes in more than 90% of cases of acute leukemia with detection limits of 10(-3)-10(-4). In order to better understand the potential utility of MFC to measure minimal residual disease (MRD) in the setting of myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), we studied cohorts of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in complete remission (CR) both pre- and post-HCT. Among 253 patients with AML, the 3-year estimates of overall survival were 73% (CR1) and 73% (CR2) for those who were MRD(neg) and 32% (CR1) and 44% (CR2) for those who were MRD(pos), with relapse rates being more than doubled in those who were MRD(pos) pre-HCT (21% vs 58% for CR1 patients and 19% vs 68% for CR2 patients). The presence of MRD anytime during the first 100 days post-HCT predicted a 6-fold higher risk of subsequent relapse. In 157 patients with ALL, the 3-year overall survivals were 68% for the MRD(neg) cohort vs 40% for those who were MRD(pos) pre-HCT, with probabilities of relapse of 16% in those who were MRD(neg) vs 33% in the MRD(pos) group. As in AML, the presence of MRD in the post-transplant setting indicated that the risk of subsequent relapse was high, but not inevitable.