Outpatient versus inpatient management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: To compare neonatal, obstetrical, and maternal outcomes associated with outpatient versus inpatient management of pregnancies with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database and Central Register from January 1, 1990 to July 31, 2023 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing outpatient with inpatient management for pregnant persons diagnosed with PPROM before 37 weeks' gestation. No language restriction was applied. We applied a random effects model for meta-analysis. Trustworthiness was assessed using recently published guidance and Risk of bias using the RoB 2.0 tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for cohort studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence (COE). Outcomes of interest included perinatal mortality, neonatal morbidities, latency and gestational age at delivery, and maternal morbidities. RCTs and cohort studies were analyzed separately. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviewsr: CRD42022295275. RESULTS: From 2825 records, two RCTs and 10 cohort studies involving 1876 patients were included in the review and meta-analysis. Outpatient management protocols varied but generally included brief initial hospitalization, strict eligibility criteria, and surveillance with laboratory and ultrasound investigations. Outpatient management showed lower rates of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (cohort: RR 0.63 [0.52-0.77, very low COE]), longer latency to delivery (RCT: MD 7.43 days [1.14-13.72 days, moderate COE], cohort: MD 8.78 days [2.29-15.26 days, low COE]), higher gestational age at birth (cohort: MD 7.70 days [2.02-13.38 days, low COE]), lower rates of Apgar scores <7 at 5 min of life (cohort: RR 0.66 [0.50-0.89, very low COE]), and lower rates of histological chorioamnionitis (cohort: RR 0.74 [0.62-0.89, low COE]) without increased risks of adverse neonatal, obstetrical, or maternal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of data from RCTs and cohort studies with very low-to-moderate certainty of evidence indicates that further high-quality research is needed to evaluate the safety and potential benefits of outpatient management for selected PPROM cases, given the moderate-to-high risk of bias in the included studies.

Impact of electrophysiologists at daily multidisciplinary report in a paediatric cardiac care unit.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric cardiac electrophysiologists are essential in CHD inpatient care, but their involvement is typically limited to consultation with individual patients. In our integrated heart centre, an electrophysiologist reviews all cardiac inpatient telemetry over the preceding 24 hours and participates in daily multidisciplinary morning report. This study investigates the impact of the strategy of consistent, formalised electrophysiologist presence at multidisciplinary morning report. METHODS: This is a single-centre, prospective, observational study of electrophysiologist participation in patient encounters during heart centre multidisciplinary morning report from 10/20/2021 to 10/31/2022. Multidisciplinary morning report includes discussion of all intensive care and non-intensive care cardiac patients. An encounter was defined as reporting on one patient for one day. Electrophysiologists were initially blinded to observations. RESULTS: Two electrophysiologists were observed over 215 days encompassing 6413 patient encounters. Electrophysiologists made comments on 581(9.1%) encounters in 234 unique patients with diverse diagnoses, equating to a median of 3[interquartile range:1-4] encounters per day. These included identifications of arrhythmias and describing electrocardiographic findings. Recommendation to change management occurred in 282(48.5%) encounters, most commonly regarding medications (n = 142, 24.4%) or pacemaker management (n = 48, 8.3%). Of the 581 encounters, there were 61(10.5%) in which they corrected another physician's interpretation of rhythm or electrocardiogram. CONCLUSION: Routine electrophysiologist involvement in multidisciplinary morning report provides significant, frequent, and timely input in patient management by identifying precise rhythm-related diagnoses and allowing nuanced, patient-specific medication and pacemaker management of all cardiac patients, not just those consulted. Electrophysiologist presence at multidisciplinary morning report is a vital resource and this practice should be considered at integrated paediatric cardiac centres.

Efficacy and safety of degludec U100 versus glargine U300 for the early postoperative management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A non-inferiority randomized trial.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of degludec U100 versus glargine U300 for the early postoperative management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. METHODS: A total of 239 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a basal-bolus regimen in the early postoperative period using degludec U100 (n = 122) or glargine U300 (n = 117) as basal and glulisine before meals. The primary outcome was mean differences between groups in their daily BG concentrations. The major safety outcome was the occurrence of hypoglycemia. RESULTS: There were no differences in mean daily BG concentrations (157 vs. 162 mg/dl), mean percentage of readings within target BG of 70-180 mg/dl (74% vs. 73%), daily basal insulin dose (19 vs. 21 units/day), length of stay (median [IQR]: 9 vs. 9 days), or hospital complications (21.3% vs. 21.4%) between treatment groups. There were no differences in the proportion of patients with BG <70 mg/dl (15.6% vs. 23.1%) or <54 mg/dl (1.6% vs. 4.3%) between degludec-100 and glargine-300 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with degludec U100 is as effective and safe as glargine U300 for the early postoperative hospital management of patients with T2D undergoing CABG.

The Length of Hospital Stay of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan.

Background and Objectives: Venous thromboembolism is one of the leading causes of mortality and disability worldwide. Treatment with anticoagulation therapy is essential and requires a delicate approach to select the most appropriate option to improve patient outcomes, including the length of hospital stay (LOS). The aim of this study was to determine the LOS among patients with acute onset of VTE in several public hospitals in Jordan. Materials and Methods: In this study, we recruited hospitalized patients with a confirmed diagnosis of VTE. We reviewed the electronic medical records and charts of VTE admitted patients in addition to a detailed survey to collect the patients' self-reported data. Hospital LOS was categorized into three levels: 1-3 days, 4-6 days, and ≥7 days. An ordered logistic regression model was used to study the significant predictors of LOS. Results: A total of 317 VTE patients were recruited, with 52.4% of them were male and 35.3% aged between 50 and 69 years. Most patients had a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) diagnosis (84.2%), and most of the VTE cases were admitted for the first-time (64.6%). The majority of the patients were smokers (57.2%), overweight/obese (66.3%), and hypertensive (59%). Most of the VTE patients received Warfarin overlapped with low molecular weight heparins as their treatment regimen (>70%). Almost half of the admitted VTE patients (45%) were hospitalized for at least 7 days. Longer LOS was significantly associated with hypertension. Conclusions: We recommend using therapies that have been proven to reduce hospital LOS, such as non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or direct oral anticoagulants, to treat VTE patients in Jordan. Additionally, preventing and controlling comorbidities such as hypertension is essential.

Degludec hospital trial: A randomized controlled trial comparing insulin degludec U100 and glargine U100 for the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: Limited data exist about the use of insulin degludec in the hospital. This multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label, prospective randomized trial compared the safety and efficacy of insulin degludec-U100 and glargine-U100 for the management of hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In total, 180 general medical and surgical patients with an admission blood glucose (BG) between 7.8 and 22.2 mmol/L, treated with oral agents or insulin before hospitalization were randomly allocated (1:1) to a basal-bolus regimen using degludec (n = 92) or glargine (n = 88), as basal and aspart before meals. Insulin dose was adjusted daily to a target BG between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L. The primary endpoint was the difference in mean hospital daily BG between groups. RESULTS: Overall, the randomization BG was 12.2 ± 2.9 mmol/L and glycated haemoglobin 84 mmol/mol (9.8% ± 2.0%). There were no differences in mean daily BG (10.0 ± 2.1 vs. 10.0 ± 2.5 mmol/L, p = .9), proportion of BG in target range (54·5% ± 29% vs. 55·3% ± 28%, p = .85), basal insulin (29.6 ± 13 vs. 30.4 ± 18 units/day, p = .85), length of stay [median (IQR): 6.7 (4.7-10.5) vs. 7.5 (4.7-11.6) days, p = .61], hospital complications (23% vs. 23%, p = .95) between treatment groups. There were no differences in the proportion of patients with BG <3.9 mmol/L (17% vs. 19%, p = .75) or <3.0 mmol/L (3.7% vs. 1.3%, p = .62) between degludec and glargine. CONCLUSION: Hospital treatment with degludec-U100 or glargine-U100 is equally safe and effective for the management of hyperglycaemia in general medical and surgical patients with type 2 diabetes.

Caring for Hospitalized Patients with Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperglycemia, and COVID-19: Bridging the Remaining Knowledge Gaps.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses the interplay between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection), diabetes mellitus, and hyperglycemia in the hospital setting. There are data emerging about diabetes and hyperglycemia, their prevalence, and potential risks in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19. RECENT FINDINGS: It is known that viral infections exert effects on beta cell function and insulin resistance. Therefore, much can be learned about SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 from examining these known relationships. Such pathophysiological underpinnings may unlock greater understanding as we navigate atypical cases of hyperglycemia, severe insulin resistance, and diabetic ketoacidosis amidst COVID-19. Glycemic outcomes likely have beneficial effects on morbidity and mortality, but this needs to be studied. Changes in diabetes-related protocols and new technology can be deployed in the inpatient setting to potentially improve healthcare worker and patient safety; however, one must weigh the risks and benefits of implementation during a pandemic. Ultimately, knowledge and research must be shared at record speed to combat this global crisis.

Efficacy of basal-bolus insulin regimens in the inpatient management of non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hyperglycemia during hospitalization is associated with increased rates of complications and longer hospital stays. Various insulin regimens are used in the inpatient diabetes management of non-critically ill patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of basal-bolus insulin therapy (BBI) by summarizing evidence from studies of BBI versus sliding scale insulin therapy (SSI) in the management of hospitalized non-critically ill type 2 diabetes patients. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies comparing BBI therapy with SSI therapy in hospitalized non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes. Primary outcome was mean daily blood glucose (BG) during admission. Secondary outcomes were incidence of hypoglycemia and length of hospital stay. Results of included randomized controlled trials (RCT) were pooled and meta-analysed to provide estimates of the efficacy of BBI therapy. Five RCTs and seven observational studies were included in the review. Meta-analysis of RCTs showed significantly lower mean daily BG with BBI than SSI. Mean difference in daily BG between the two regimens ranged from 14 to 29 mg/dl. BBI therapy was associated with increased risk of mild hypoglycemia (BG ≤ 70 mg/dl, RR 5.75; 95% CI 2.79-11.83), (BG ≤ 60 mg/dl, RR 4.21; 95% CI 1.61-11.02) compared with SSI therapy. There was no difference in risk of severe hypoglycemia (BG ≤ 40 mg/dl) and no difference in mean length of stay. In conclusion, basal-bolus insulin in the inpatient diabetes management results in significantly lower mean daily BG than sliding scale insulin but is associated with increased risk of mild hypoglycemia.

Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Comparison of Inpatient and Outpatient Care.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the safety of outpatient management of pregnancy complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with PPROM and a latency period of at least one week in one provincial health region between January 2007 and December 2012. We evaluated pregnancy outcomes for 133 women whose cases were managed using specialized community care and compared these with outcomes of a similar group of 122 women whose cases were managed entirely in the hospital. The primary outcome measured was the difference in the latency period between the two groups. For categorical variable outcomes, data were analyzed using chi-square tests, and continuous variable outcomes were compared using t tests. RESULTS: The median latency period for inpatients was 11 days compared with 18 days for patients in the community (P < 0.001). The most common reason for delivery was spontaneous labour (57% of inpatients and 50% of outpatients). Rates of stillbirth and neonatal mortality were similar between the two groups (3% in the inpatient group and 4% in the outpatient group). Precipitous vaginal delivery of a preterm breech infant was associated with mortality. Umbilical cord pH was < 7.10 in 5% of the inpatient group and 3% of the outpatient group. Median Apgar scores were slightly higher among the outpatient group. CONCLUSION: The safety of outpatient management of appropriately selected patients with PPROM is comparable with the safety of in-hospital management. Patients with PPROM and a fetus in breech presentation may not be appropriate for outpatient management, especially prior to 28 weeks' gestation. The decision to manage a patient with PPROM on an outpatient basis must be made after careful evaluation, with a thorough discussion of the risks and benefits and with serial reassessment of patient suitability.

Dapagliflozin for inpatient hyperglycemia in cardiac surgery patients with type 2 diabetes: randomised controlled trial (Dapa-Hospital trial).

AIMS: To examine the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in the treatment of hyperglycemia in cardiac surgery patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Cardiac surgery patients with T2D (n = 250) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive dapagliflozin plus basal-bolus insulin (DAPA group) or basal-bolus insulin alone (INSULIN group) in the early postoperative period. The primary outcome was mean difference in daily blood glucose (BG) concentrations between groups. The major safety outcomes were the occurrence of severe ketonemia/diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hypoglycemia. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 61 years (range, 55-61), and 219 (87.6%) were men. Overall, the randomization blood glucose was 165 mg/dL (SD, 37) and glycated hemoglobin was 7.7% (SD, 1.4). There were no differences in mean daily BG concentrations (149 vs. 150 mg/dL), mean percentage of readings within target BG of 70-180 mg/dL (82.7% vs. 82.5%), total daily insulin dose (mean, 39 vs. 40 units/day), number of daily insulin injections (median, 3.9 vs. 4), length of hospital stay (median, 10 vs. 10 days), or hospital complications (21.6% vs. 24.8%) between the DAPA and INSULIN groups. The mean plasma ketone levels were significantly higher in the DAPA group than in the INSULIN group at day 3 (0.71 vs. 0.30 mmol/L) and day 5 (0.42 vs. 0.19 mmol/L) of randomization. Six patients in the DAPA group developed severe ketonemia, but no patient developed DKA. There were no differences in the proportion of patients with BG < 70 mg/dL (9.6% vs. 7.2%) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin complementary to basal-bolus insulin does not improve glycemia further over and above the basal-bolus insulin alone in hospitalized cardiac surgery patients. Dapagliflozin significantly increases plasma ketones levels. Safety of dapagliflozin in hospitalized patients needs further investigation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05457933.

The Use of Liquid Sinemet in Routine Clinical Practice of Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Comparison of Available Options.

BACKGROUND: Tablet formulations of Parkinson's disease (PD) medications may become ineffective at managing motor fluctuations in advanced PD. The liquid formulation, levodopa carbidopa ascorbic acid solution, or LCAS, is an effective and inexpensive treatment for motor fluctuations however it remains underutilized. OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy of LCAS with tablet formulations and Duodopa jejunal infusion through routine inpatient management using hourly functional status measures, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). The TUG differentiates between 'off' and 'on' states and quantifies motor fluctuations. METHODS: Experienced nurses used the TUG times and functional observations recorded hourly throughout the waking day to optimize the LCAS hourly dose and the Duodopa flow rate over several days. When patients were stabilized on each of the interventions, the TUG measures were then recorded to compare the outcomes of the interventions. RESULTS: Twenty-six participants had TUG times recorded while on one or more of the formulations: 19 had TUG times recorded on tablets, 23 on LCAS and 10 on Duodopa. TUG times on LCAS and Duodopa were significantly faster compared to tablets (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001 respectively). Severity of dyskinesia was not significantly different between formulations (p = 0.35). Daily dose for the three formulations and the hourly doses for LCAS and Duodopa did not differ significantly (p = 0.37, p = 0.19 respectively). CONCLUSION: This report demonstrated the efficacy of LCAS for improving motor complications and its equivalency with Duodopa jejunal infusion.

Factors related to the length of stay for major depressive disorder patients in China: A real-world retrospective study.

Background: As numerous patients with depression have to be hospitalized because of various reasons, the demand far exceeds the limited bed count in the psychiatry department. Controlling the length of stay (LOS) of the patient is gradually being considered an effective method to alleviate this problem. Given the lack of statistical evidence of the LOS of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in China and the strain on the limited psychiatric resources, the purpose of our study was to investigate the LOS of patients with MDD among in-patient samples and to analyze related factors of the LOS in China by building a regression model. Method: The data were exported from the electronic medical record system. A total of three categories of independent variables were enrolled in our study, namely, demographic, clinical, and biochemical. Univariate analysis and binominal regression analysis were applied comprehensively to find the factors related to the LOS among MDD samples. The discrimination accuracy of the model was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. ROC analysis indicated that the discrimination accuracy of our model was acceptable (AUC = 0.790, 95% CI = 0.714-0.865, P < 0.001). Result: A total of 254 patients were finally brought into analysis after filtering. Regression analysis indicated that abnormal LDL was the only risk factor of long LOS (OR = 3.352, 95% CI = 1.087-10.337, P = 0.035) among all the kinds of variables. Notably, in the statistically irrelevant factors of the LOS, the category of anti-depressant drugs [serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)] prescribed to patients with MDD was not associated statistically with the LOS, which was against our initial hypothesis that the LOS of patients with MDD treated with SNRI would vary from that of the patients treated with SSRI. Conclusion: Up to our knowledge, our research is the first study to show the potential factors related to the LOS from various domains, especially biochemical indexes, and the effect of drugs, among clinical patients with MDD in China. Our results could provide a theoretical reference for efficient psychiatry hospitalization management and prioritization of allocating medical resources. Future studies are required for updating independent variables which are potentially related to the LOS and verifying existing results in a larger sample.

Effectiveness and safety of new oral and injectable agents for in-hospital management of type 2 diabetes in general wards: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend insulin alone for in-hospital management of diabetes, but growing information suggests that new oral or injectable agents may be as effective and safe. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis with evidence from randomized (RCT) and non-randomized (NRS) studies in PubMed, EMBASE and LILACS databases up to February 10, 2022, for studies including hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients, comparing dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1Ra) with insulin alone for glycemic control and safety outcomes. FINDINGS: 7 RCT and 3 NRTs were included. There were no differences in mean blood glucose, measurements within range or rate of hypoglycemia between DPP4i and insulin. We found a lower mean glucose for GLP1Ra plus insulin subgroup (-16.36 mg/dL, 95 % CI -27.31, -5.41; I2 = 0 %) with lower incidence of hypoglycemia < 70 mg/dL with GLP1Ra (RR 0.31, CI 95 % 0.14-0.70, I2 = 0 %). SGLT2i data was limited. Adverse events rates were similar between treatments. CONCLUSION: Our review suggests that inpatient management in the general ward with DPP4i and GLP1Ra is as effective and safe as management with insulin. More randomized studies are required to support these findings before they could be recommended as usual practice.

Use and Accuracy of Inpatient CGM During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study of General Medicine and ICU Patients.

BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is widely used in the outpatient setting for people with diabetes and has been limited to investigational use only for the inpatient population. In April 2020, the US FDA exercised enforcement discretion for the temporary use of inpatient CGM during the pandemic, thus hospitals were presented the opportunity to implement this technology. METHODS: We sought to investigate the accuracy of CGM in hospitalized patients on general care floors and the intensive care unit (ICU) in attempts to decrease healthcare professional exposure to COVID-19 and ultimately improve glycemic management of patients affected by COVID-19. Point of care (POC) and laboratory (Lab) glucose values were matched with simultaneous CGM glucose values and measures of accuracy were performed to evaluate the safety and usability of CGM in this population. Our data are presented drawing a distinction between POC and Lab as reference glucose sources. RESULTS: In 808 paired samples obtained from 28 patients (10 ICU, 18 general floor), overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) for all patients using either POC or Lab as reference was 13.2%. When using POC as the reference glucose MARD was 13.9% and using Lab glucose as reference 10.9%. Using both POC and Lab reference glucose pairs the overall MARD for critical care patients was 12.1% and for general floor patients 14%. CONCLUSION: We determined, with proper protocols and safeguards in place, use of CGM in the hospitalized patient is a reasonable alternative to standard of care to achieve the goal of reducing healthcare professional exposure. Further study is necessary to validate safety, accuracy, and efficacy of this technology. Investigation and analysis are necessary for the development of protocols to utilize CGM trend arrows, alerts, and alarms.

Real-time location and inpatient care systems based on passive RFID.

RFID technology meets identification and tracking requirements in healthcare environments with potential to speed up and increase reliability of involved processes. Due to this, high expectations for this integration have emerged, but hospital and medical centers interested in adoption of RFID technology require prior knowledge on how to squeeze RFID capabilities, real expectations and current challenges. In this paper, we show our lab tested solutions in two specific healthcare scenarios. On the one hand, we analyze the case of a medical equipment tracking system for healthcare facilities enabling both real-time location and theft prevention. Worth-noting aspects such as possible EMI interferences, technology selection and management of RFID data from hospital information system are analyzed. Lab testing of system reliability based on passive UHF RFID is provided for this case. On the other hand, we analyze and provide a solution for care and control of patients in a hospital based on passive HF RFID with the result of a fully functional demonstrator. Our prototype squeezes RFID features in order to provide a backup data source from patient's wristband. It also provides an offline working mode aiming to increase application reliability under network fail down and therefore, improving patient's safety. Considerations regarding lessons learned and challenges faced are exposed.

Building a hospital-based addiction medicine consultation service in Vancouver, Canada: the path taken and lessons learned.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To improve evidence-based addiction care in acute care settings, many hospitals across North America are developing an inpatient addiction medicine consultation service (AMCS). St Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada houses a large interdisciplinary AMCS. This study aimed to: (1) describe the current model of clinical care and its evolution over time; (2) evaluate requests for an AMCS consultation over time; (3) highlight the established clinical training opportunities and educational curriculum and (4) provide some lessons learned. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective observational analysis in an urban, academic hospital in Vancouver, Canada with a large interdisciplinary AMCS, studied from 2013 to 2018, among individuals who presented to hospital and had a substance use disorder. MEASUREMENTS: Data were collected using the hospital's electronic medical records. The primary outcome was number of AMCS consultations over time. FINDINGS: In 2014 the hospital's AMCS was restructured into an academic, interdisciplinary consultation service. A 228% increase in the number of consultations was observed between 2013 (1 year prior to restructuring) and 2018 (1373 versus 4507, respectively; P = 0.027). More than half of AMCS consultations originated from the emergency department, with this number increasing over time (55% in 2013 versus 74% in 2018). Referred patients were predominantly male (> 60% in all 5 years) between the ages of 45 and 65 years. Reasons for consultation remained consistent and included: opioids (33%), stimulants (30%), alcohol (23%) and cannabis use (8%). CONCLUSIONS: After St Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada was restructured in 2014 to a large, interdisciplinary addiction medicine consultation service (AMCS), the AMCS saw a 228% increase in the number of consultation requests with more than half of requests originating from the emergency department. Approximately two-thirds of consultation requests were for opioid or stimulant use.

Hospital Management of Parkinson Disease Patients.

Management of patients with Parkinson disease (PD) during inpatient hospital stays is complex and poses unique challenges for physicians and ancillary staff. Patients with PD have a high risk of complications, encephalopathy, and prolonged hospital stay. Early recognition of complications and implementation of rehabilitation strategies along with appropriate management of medications are critical to improve outcomes. Patients with PD can exhibit worsening mobility and balance, insomnia, orthostatic hypotension, multiple neuropsychiatric symptoms, and gastrointestinal dysfunction while hospitalized. This review summarizes the specific in-hospital concerns observed in patients with PD and discusses potential treatment approaches.

Diagnosis and Management of Opioid Use Disorder in Hospitalized Patients.

The diagnosis of opioid use disorder (OUD) is often overlooked or inadequately managed during the inpatient admission. When recognized, a common strategy is opioid detoxification, an approach that is often ineffective and can be potentially dangerous because of loss of tolerance and subsequent risk for overdose. Medication for addiction treatment (MAT), including methadone and buprenorphine, is effective and can be dispensed in the hospital for both opioid withdrawal and initiation of maintenance treatment. Hospitalists should be knowledgeable about diagnosing and managing patients with OUD, including how to manage acute pain or MAT during the perioperative setting.

Advances in the Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.

Patients hospitalized for heart failure pose a considerable clinical and financial burden on the health care system. Early recognition and deep phenotyping of heart failure for reduced and preserved ejection fraction syndromes facilitate the introduction of appropriate guideline-directed therapy and decongestion strategies to help improve heart failure morbidity and mortality. Robust and safe transitions of care programs are needed to deliver adequate care and improve overall survival.

Safety and efficacy of sphenopalatine artery ligation in recalcitrant pediatric epistaxis.

BACKGROUND: Epistaxis is a common cause for emergency department visits for both children and adults. In particular, posterior bleeds can be difficult to identify and treat. In adults, endoscopic sphenopalatine artery (SPA) ligation has been shown to be safe, cost-effective, and curative. Conversely, very few studies have delved into the safety and efficacy of SPA ligation in children. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of SPA ligation for treatment of recalcitrant epistaxis in children. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of outcomes in pediatric patients who underwent SPA ligation at a tertiary academic center was performed. Patients with coagulopathies or other underlying conditions were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Data obtained from 5 patients demonstrated 60% of the population were female, with ages ranging from 2 to 13 years. 7 SPA ligations were performed among the 5 patients, with 3 undergoing unilateral SPA ligation only. The remaining 4 underwent contralateral SPA ligation subsequently. No postoperative complications were observed, and all patients experienced resolution of significant epistaxis. CONCLUSION: Although additional studies are necessary to further support our findings, SPA ligation in the pediatric population appears to be a safe and effective treatment to control persistent posterior bleeds.

Inpatient Management of Migraine.

Migraine is a frequently disabling neurologic condition which can be complicated by medication overuse headache and comorbid medical disorders, including obesity, anxiety and depression. Although most migraine management takes place in outpatient clinics, inpatient treatment is indicated for migraine refractory to multiple outpatient treatments, with intractable nausea or vomiting, need for detoxification from medication overuse (such as opioids and barbiturates), and significant medical and psychiatric disease. The goals of inpatient treatment include breaking the current cycle of headache pain, reducing the frequency and/or severity of future attacks, monitored detoxification of overused medications, and reducing disability and improving quality of life.